• 検索結果がありません。

Non-Verbal Communication for Better English

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Non-Verbal Communication for Better English"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

How doesateacherfeelwhenhe/sheseesastudentwavinghis/herhandenthusiasti c-ally in responseto a question?Usually it'sa good feeling sincetheteacherviewsitas confirmationastudentisengagedinthelesson.From astudent・sperspective,receivi ngnon-verbalsignsandgesturesalsoisbeneficialsinceitassistsin getting abetterreadon the teacher.Theinstructor・suseofimprovisationalbody languageforconveying meaning can be crucialin the language acquisition process ofstudents.In brief,the following will describetheimportanceofnon-verbalcommunication forEnglish asa Foreign Language students,andafew examplesofthetechniqueinpractice.

Not many people realize the significance of non-verbalcommunication in everyday interaction.Somefeelit・sjustascrucialtogiveofftherightbody languageasitisto communicateclearlyorally.Intheclassroom,andinparticular,theEFL class,thesameis true.AccordingtoSusanGoldin-Meadow inherarticle,・Thefew experimentalstudiesthat havebeen donesuggestthatalesson accompanied by gestureismoreeffectivethan that samelesson notaccompaniedby gesture.・Furthermore,in astudy by CarlL.Garrot,the useofpositivebody languagepromotesstudentreceptivity toward thesubjectmatterby makingtheteacherappearmoreapproachable,warm andcaring.

In addition,facilitating communication and vocabulary building are the results of effectivenon-verbalcues.Someexamplesincludesimplyusingcountingfingersfornumbers, orcuppinganeartogetastudenttospeaklouder,ortwirlingofthearmstogetastudent toexplain morein acompletesentence.In addition,theacquisition ofvocabulary through gesturesallowsforstudentstointernalizemeaning morerapidly.Forexample,agameof classroom charades,in which studentsareplaced in groupstomimicactionscentered on certain topicssuch astravelorsportsorschool,can beboth enjoyableandeducationally valuable.Acting outthemeaning ofwordsmakesthelanguageacquisition processmore comprehensibleaswell.

Using improvisationalbody languageaddsanothervisualcomponentto thelearning process.Thisisabenefittostudentswithstrongvisualintelligence,butteachersneedtobe aware that not all students are strong visual learners. Furthermore, non-verbal communication differs sometimes largely in different cultures.For example,giving the symboltocomecloserinU.S.culturebybendingones・fingerquicklywouldbeconsidered rudeinsomeAsiancultures,whichprefertosignalsuchmeaningwiththepalm down.

― 23― 学苑英語コミュニケーション紀要 No.822 23~24(20094)

Non-VerbalCommuni

cati

onforBetterEngl

i

sh

(2)

Finally,canteachersbemadeawareofeffectivenon-verbalcuesforcommunication,and improve their rate and clarity ofgestures? To answer in simple terms― Why not? If business managers and sales representatives can receive training in non-verbal communication,socanlanguageteachers.

References

Garrott,CarlL.2005.TheRelationshipbetween Nonverbal/VerbalImmediacy,Learning,andCaring by theTeacherin theL2Spanish Classroom.Papersubmitted on-linetoEducationalResources InformationCenter.RetrievedJune17,2006,from

http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERI CExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED490540&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED490540

Goldin-Meadow,Susan.2004.Gesture・sRoleintheLearningProcessinTheoryIntoPractice,Autumn 2004,Volume43,Number4,pp.314321,OhioStateUniversityCollegeofEducation.

JosephMontagnaisoriginallyfrom Massachusetts, USA. He is a graduate of the University of MassachusettsatAmherstand Boston Collegein Boston.Hetaughtfor 4 yearsatKansaiGaidai University in Osakaand1yearatUniversity Del Marin Oaxaca,Mexico.Hehasbeen teaching at ShowaBostonsince2007.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In discrete convex analysis, two convexity concepts, called L-convexity and M- convexity are defined, where “L” stands for “Lattice” and “M” for “Matroid.” L- convex

On Landau–Siegel zeros and heights of singular moduli Submitted

Related to this, we examine the modular theory for positive projections from a von Neumann algebra onto a Jordan image of another von Neumann alge- bra, and use such projections

“rough” kernels. For further details, we refer the reader to [21]. Here we note one particular application.. Here we consider two important results: the multiplier theorems

In my earlier paper [H07] and in my talk at the workshop on “Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry” at RIMS in September 2006, we made explicit a conjec- tural formula of the L -invariant

In Section 6 we derive expressions for the intersection parameters of the coherent configuration R(q) on the non-tangent lines L of the conic O; so in particular we obtain

The configurations of points according to the lattice points method has more symmetry than that of the polar coordinates method, however, the latter generally yields lower values for

Hugh Woodin pointed out to us that the Embedding Theorem can be derived from Theorem 3.4 of [FM], which in turn follows from the Embedding Theorem for higher models of determinacy