• 検索結果がありません。

HM chapter3 Recent site activity masaruinaba

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "HM chapter3 Recent site activity masaruinaba"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Chapter 3

Contents

I Overview 1

II Solution of Deterministic Models 1

II.1 Finite-Horizon Models . . . 1 II.2 Infinite Horizon Models . . . 3

III Solution of Stochastic Models 4

III.1 An Illustrative Example . . . 4 III.2 The Algorithm in General . . . 5

IV Further Applications 6

IV.1 The Benchmark Model . . . 6 IV.2 A Small Open Economy . . . 7

I Overview

• A solution for the deterministic finite-horizon Ramsey model: a system of non-linear equa- tions.

• A solution for the deterministic infinite-horizon Ramsey model: an infinite number of un- knowns.

• A solution for the stochastic infinite-horizon Ramsey model: “deterministic extended path.”

II Solution of Deterministic Models

II.1 Finite-Horizon Models

The Model. max

{Ct,Kt+1}Tt=0 T

t=0

βtC

1−η t

1 − η

s.t. Kt+1 = Ktα− Ct+ (1 − δ)Kt, K0 : given,

KT = 0,

1

(2)

where β ∈ (0, 1), η > 0, α ∈ (0, 1), and δ ∈ [0, 1]. The F.O.C.s can be written as a system of T non-linear equations in the T unknown capital stocks K1, . . ., KT.

0 = [(1 − δ)Kt+ Ktα− Kt+1]−η− β[(1 − δ)Kt+1+ Kt+1α − Kt+2

]−η

(1 − δ + αKt+1α−1), t= 0, 1, . . . , T − 1,

K0 : given, KT = 0,

Non-Linear Equation Solvers.

• The common structure of the algorithms is the iterative scheme: xs+1 = xs+ µ∆xs

• An initial guess of the solution x0

• A direction of change ∆x

• A step length µ

• Find xs so that f (xs) ≃ 0 or xs+1− xs ≃ 0 Solutions.

(3)

II.2 Infinite Horizon Models

The Model.

{Ct,Kmaxt+1}t=0

t=0

βtC

1−η t

1 − η

s.t. Kt+1 = Ktα− Ct+ (1 − δ)Kt, K0 : given.

Kt is approaching to the steady state level K.

K =[ 1 − β(1 − δ) αβ

]α−11

We cannot use non-linear equation solvers in this case. However, in which T is large enough that KT+1 = K, we can use non-linear equation solvers again. Shooting algorithm can also be applied to solve this problem.

Solutions.

3

(4)

III Solution of Stochastic Models

III.1 An Illustrative Example

{Ct,Kmaxt+1}t=0E0

[

t=0

βtC

1−η t

1 − η ]

s.t. Kt+1 = ZtKtα− Ct+ (1 − δ)Kt, ln Zt= ρ ln Zt−1+ ǫt,

K0 : given,

where ρ ∈ [0, 1) and ǫt∼ N (0, σ2). The F.O.C.s can be written as follows. 0 = [(1 − δ)Kt+ Ktα− Kt+1]−η− βEt

{[(1 − δ)Kt+1+ Kt+1α − Kt+2

]−η

(1 − δ + αKt+1α−1)}, t= 0, 1, . . . ,

K0 : given,

and transversality condition. Under the assumption of the rational expectations, the expected future path of Zt is:

{Z0, Z1, . . .} = {Zt}t=0 ={Z0ρt}

t=0.

Then we can obtain an approximation of this path from the solution of the system of T non-linear equations

0 =[(1 − δ)Kt+ Z0ρtKtα− Kt+1

]−η

− β[(1 − δ)Kt+1+ Z0ρt+1Kt+1α − Kt+2

]−η

(1 − δ + αKt+1α−1), t= 0, 1, . . . , T − 1,

K0 : given, KT+1 = K,

(5)

III.2 The Algorithm in General

Notation.

• The system of stochastic difference equations that governs this model is generally described as

0 = Et[gi(xt, yt, zt, xt+1, yt+1, zt+1)] , zt= Πzt−1+ σΩǫt,

i= 1, 2, . . . , n(x) + n(y), t= 0, 1, . . . ,

where ǫt ∼ N(0n(z), In(z))

• xt ∈ Rn(x): the vector of state variables with x0.

• yt ∈ Rn(y): the vector of control and co-state variables (sometimes these are so called “jump variables”).

• zt∈ Rn(z): the vector of purely exogenous variables which are logarithmic. The Algorithm.

Deterministic Extended Path: Simulation of the stochastic DGE model

Step 1. Initialize: Let p denote the number of periods to consider and (x0, z0) the initial state of the model.

Step 1.1 Draw a sequence of shocks {ǫt}pt=0.

Step 1.2 Compute {zt}pt=1 from zt = Πzt−1+ σΩǫt. Step 1.3 Choose large T .

Step 2. For t = 0, 1, . . . , p repeat the following steps to obtain decisions for period t: Step 2.1 Given zt, compute {zt}pt=1 from zt+s= Πszt.

Step 2.2 Solve the system of T (n(x) + n(y)) equations by using non-linear equations solver or shooting method,

0 = Et[gi(xt+s, yt+s, zt+s, xt+s+1, yt+s+1, zt+s+1)] , i= 1, 2, . . . , n(x) + n(y),

s= 0, 1, . . . , T − 1, x = xt+T.

Keep xt+1 and yt.

Step 2.3 Use xt+1 as starting value for next period t + 1.

5

(6)

IV Further Applications

IV.1 The Benchmark Model

{Ct,Nmaxt,Kt+1}t=0E0

[

t=0

βtC

1−η

t (1 − Nt)θ(1−η)

1 − η

]

s.t. Kt+1 = ZtKtα(AtNt)1−α+ Ct+ (1 − δ)Kt, At+1 = aAt, (a ≥ 1)

ln Zt= ρ ln Zt−1+ ǫt, K0 : given.

When we define the detrended variables as ktAKtNtt and ctACtNtt, we obtain the F.O.C.s as follows.

0 =c−ηt (1 − Nt)θ(1−Nt)− λt,

0 =θc1−ηt (1 − Nt)θ(1−η)−1− (1 − α)λtZtNt−αktα, 0 =akt+1− (1 − δ)kt+ ct− ZtNt1−αktα,

0 =λt− βa−ηEtλt+1(1 − δ + αZt+1Nt+11−αkt+1α−1).

• xt ≡ kt

• yt ≡ (ct, Nt, λt)

• T = 150. Therefore, a system contains 600 unknown variables.

However, we can eliminate ct and λt by using ct = 1−αθ (1 − Nt)ZtNt−αktα. Then, we obtain 2T equations as follows.

0 =ZtρsNt+s1−αkt+sα + (1 − δ)kat+skt+s+11 − α

θ (1 − Nt+s)Z

ρs

t Nt+s−αkt+sα ,

0 =

(Ztρs+1Nt+s+11−α kt+s+1α + (1 − δ)kt+s+1− akt+s+2

ZtρsNt+s1−αkt+sα + (1 − δ)kt+s− akt+s+1

)η

( 1 − Nt+s

1 − Nt+s+1

)θ(1−η)

,

− βa−η(1 − δ + αZtρs+1Nt+s+11−α kα−1t+s+1), s =0, . . . , T − 1,

kT =kT+1 = k.

(7)

IV.2 A Small Open Economy

• Since a small open economy model has often many points of steady state, the log-linearized approach in chapter 2 is not suitable to solve the model. The deterministic extended path approach can address this problem. (Omitted)

• To use the log-linearized approach in chapter 2, Schmit-Grohe and Uribe (2003) “Closing small open economy models” shows several approach to stabilize a small open economy model.

http://public.econ.duke.edu/~grohe/research/closing_jie.pdf

7

参照

関連したドキュメント

Therefore, we presuppose that the random walk contains a sufficiently large number of steps, so that there can be an equivalent to finite partial sums of both sums in (2.13)

The aim of this leture is to present a sequence of theorems and results starting with Holladay’s classical results concerning the variational prop- erty of natural cubic splines

The main observation is that each one of the above classes of categories can be obtained as the class of finitely complete categories (or pointed categories) with M-closed

In terms of the i-invariants, the absolute p-adic Grothendieck conjecture is reduced to the following two

In this paper we develop the semifilter approach to the classical Menger and Hurewicz properties and show that the small cardinal g is a lower bound of the additivity number of

Abstract. In Section 1 we introduce Frobenius coordinates in the general setting that includes Hopf subalgebras. In Sections 2 and 3 we review briefly the theories of Frobenius

In the language of category theory, Stone’s representation theorem means that there is a duality between the category of Boolean algebras (with homomorphisms) and the category of

Our goal in this paper is to present a new approach to their basic results that we expect will lead to resolution of some of the remaining open questions in one-dimensional