• 検索結果がありません。

Final1 09 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

シェア "Final1 09 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Final Exam

Date: June 11, 2009

Subject: Advanced Microeconomics I (ECO600E) Professor: Yosuke YASUDA

1. True or False (15 points)

Answer whether each of the following statements is true (T) or false (F). You do NOT need to explain the reason.

(a) A binary relation % is said to be a preference relation if it is “complete” and

“monotone.”

(b) Hicksian demand of the good is always weakly decreasing in its own price. (c) The vNM (von Neumann-Morgenstern) utility function is de…ned over “lotter-

ies,” not over “prizes.” 2. Consumer Theory (25 points)

A consumer gets utility from 2 sources: drinking (measured in liters x) and time spent on the phone (measured in hours y). Each liter of drink costs $4 and each hour on the phone costs $4. She has a total of $120 available for spending. Her utility function is given by:

u(x; y) = xy (a) Solve the utility maximization problem.

(b) The health authorities are putting up a program to cut down alcohol consump- tion. They propose a quota that allows to consume a maximum of 8 liters. What are the optimal choices under this new scenario?

(c) Suppose the price of alcohol is reduced from $4 to $3. Then, what are her optimal choices if the quota is not imposed?

(d) What are the optimal choices when the price of alcohol is $3 but the quota (of 8 liters) is imposed?

(e) Find the amount of quota q that would make the consumer indi¤erent between the scenario (a) (no quota, price is $4) and (d) (quota of q, price is $3). 3. Producer Theory (20 points)

A …rm’s production function is given by:

f(x1; x2) = pmin(x1; x2)

Let w1; w2 > 0 be the input prices for good x1 and x2 respectively. Then, answer the following questions.

1

(2)

(a) Set up the cost minimization problem.

(b) Solve this cost minimization problem you describe in (a), and derive the cost function, c(w1; w2; y).

(c) Let p be the output price. Set up the pro…t maximization problem using your answer in (b).

(d) Solve the pro…t maximization problem in (c), and derive the pro…t function, (p; w1; w2).

4. Uncertainty (10 points)

Suppose that an individual can either exert e¤ort or not. The cost of e¤ort is c. Her initial wealth is 100. Her probability of facing a loss 75 (that is, her wealth becomes 25) is 13 if she exerts e¤orts and 23 if she does not. Her wealth will not change with the rest of probability in each scenario. Let u(x) be her vNM utility function.

(a) Express her expected utilities in each scenario, i.e., exerting e¤ort or not, by using u(x). You can assume that her expected utility is additively separable between e¤ort cost and (probabilistic) monetary outcome, i.e., E[u(x)] c. (b) Assume u(x) = px. For what values of c will she exert e¤ort?

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

On the Hedging of American Options in Discrete Time Markets with Proportional Transaction Costs. Dual Formulation of the Utility Maximization Problem : the case of

Standard domino tableaux have already been considered by many authors [33], [6], [34], [8], [1], but, to the best of our knowledge, the expression of the

In [1, 2, 17], following the same strategy of [12], the authors showed a direct Carleman estimate for the backward adjoint system of the population model (1.1) and deduced its

Our guiding philosophy will now be to prove refined Kato inequalities for sections lying in the kernels of natural first-order elliptic operators on E, with the constants given in

If in the infinite dimensional case we have a family of holomorphic mappings which satisfies in some sense an approximate semigroup property (see Definition 1), and converges to

If there is a NE path from 0 to (r, θ ) with less than C r/2 bad edges among these C r closed edges, note that each good edge costs at least passage time δ, so the passage time of

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

[Mag3] , Painlev´ e-type differential equations for the recurrence coefficients of semi- classical orthogonal polynomials, J. Zaslavsky , Asymptotic expansions of ratios of