• 検索結果がありません。

サーチ・審査結果の相互利用について 「特技懇」誌のページ(特許庁技術懇話会 会員サイト)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "サーチ・審査結果の相互利用について 「特技懇」誌のページ(特許庁技術懇話会 会員サイト)"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A

1 "dossier" "file wrapper"

(2)
(3)

3 Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, July 18, 2002 - Oversight hearing on "The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Fee Schedule Adjustment and Agency Reform." http://www.house.gov/judiciary/courts.htm

4 http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/stratplan_03feb2003.pdf

5 http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/action/actionpapers.htm

6 http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/speech2002jun27.htm

7

(4)

8 Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, April 3, 2003 - Legislative hearing on H.R.1561, the "United States Patent and Trademark Fee Modernization Act of 2003." "Patent quality is an elusive concept, but in the view of IPO members, high patent quality is even more important than short patent pendency." "The number of lawsuits and threatened suits against U.S. manufacturers based on invalid patents is rising." http://www.house.gov/judiciary/williamson040303.htm

9 To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy A Report by the Federal Trade Commission, October 2003

II .Questionable Patents Are a Significant Competitive Concern and Can Harm Innovation. A. Questionable Patents Can Deter or Raise the Costs of Innovation. B. In Industries with Incremental Innovation, Questionable Patents Can Increase "Defensive Patenting" and Licensing Complications.

HP http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/10/cpreport.htm

(5)

10 58 12 No.135 3-6 11 AIPPI Vol.32, No.11, p.3-21(1987)

12 No.228 p.16-24(2003)

13 No.216 p.45-51(2001) 14 F 2 No.209 p.58-65(2000) 15 11 2 No.317 15-18

(6)

18 2001 44 39 6 4 1

16

19 EPO EPO EPOQUE No.223 p.66-90(2002)

20 9 2 No.294 5-11 6 7 No.263 5-6 1994 1996

(7)

22 http://www.jpo.go.jp/torikumi_e/kokusai_e/tws/twsindex.htm

No.228 p.25-33(2003) 15 3 4 No.355 19-29

23 Takeshi ISAYAMA, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 2, No. 5(1999), 679-696

(8)

25

2002 9 W 21

http://usembassy.state.gov/tokyo/wwwhjp0192.html 26 15 1 2 No.354 19-24

(9)
(10)

28 1

1

29 PCT PCT

http://www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki/t_tokkyo/kokusai/researching_fee_return.htm PCT PCT

参照

関連したドキュメント

Proof of Theorem 2: The Push-and-Pull algorithm consists of the Initialization phase to generate an initial tableau that contains some basic variables, followed by the Push and

Proof of Theorem 2: The Push-and-Pull algorithm consists of the Initialization phase to generate an initial tableau that contains some basic variables, followed by the Push and

The last sections present two simple applications showing how the EB property may be used in the contexts where it holds: in Section 7 we give an alternative proof of

2.本サービスの会費の支払い時に、JAF

In particular this implies a shorter and much more transparent proof of the combinatorial part of the Mullineux conjecture with additional insights (Section 4). We also note that

Given a marked Catalan tree (T, v), we will let [T, v] denote the equivalence class of all trees isomorphic to (T, v) as a rooted tree, where the isomorphism sends marked vertex

The Borel-Cantelli lemmas play the central role in the proofs of many probabi- lity laws including the law of large numbers and the law of the iterated logarithm.. Let (Ω, F, P) be

(4S) Package ID Vendor ID and packing list number (K) Transit ID Customer's purchase order number (P) Customer Prod ID Customer Part Number. (1P)