Keisuke Kawata
ISS, UTokyo
Applications of DMP model
• An important extension of the DMP model is the endogenous productivity distribution ↔ given as y in the original model.
← can study the relationship between market structure and organizational decision- making.
Plan
1. Solving strategy: Market variable 2. Human capital investment.
1. Market variable
• In many cases, the equilibrium can be characterized as follow steps.
1. Given others strategy ( and pass of future strategy), optimal strategy of an agent is characterized.
2. Finding all agents strategies as consistent in step 1.
• Ma y odels ith zero ass orkers, there are arket aria les hi h are;
← ot affe ted y ea h age t’s strategy
← aggregator of other’s strategies
← able to be sufficient to characterize optimal strategy of each agent. E,.g.,) Price of Warlasian market model.
1. DMP model
• Is Wage a market variable in the DMP model? ←
• DMP model has variables which is determined by interactions between a firm and a worker (match level variables) ← Wage is determined by the Nash
bargaining ← Each worker and firm can partially manipulate.
• Market tightness is determined by the wage distribution in a market ←market level variable.
• Outside option (value of unemployed) is determined by market tightness and the wage distribution ←market level variable and sufficient to characterize the match level variable (wage).
2. Human capital investment
• Human capital investment is an important channel to determine the productivity.
• Becker (1962) shows classical argument with the perfect competitive market. General human capital: A firm has no incentives to invest the human capital if the capital can be used in other firm, while worker has an incentive.
Specific human capital: A firm has an incentive to invest human capital if the capital can be used only in the firm, while worker has an incentive.
• Empirical findings show many firms invest even if the general human capital.
←Theoretical challenge (Survey Acemoglu & Pischke 1999)
2. DMP with human capital investment
• General capital model.
• To simplify, all workers are employed in period 0, and human capital investment is occurred in the period 0.
• The investment cost functions of a worker and a firm are � and � .
→ Total productivity after period 0 is given by � + � .
2. Equilibrium conditions
• Market equilibrium is defined over value functions, wage, tightness, and investment levels � and � .
←tightness is market variable, while outside option (U) is not.
2. Value function in period 0
0 = − �� + � �� + � ,
and
�0 = − � + �� �� + � . The first order conditions are
′ �
� = � ′
′ � = ��′
2. On-path after period 0
• The value of an employed worker with wage w is
� + � = � � + � + � � � + �� + − � � + � , the value of an unemployed worker is
� + � = + � � � + � + − � � + � ,
the value of a filled job is
� � + � = � + � − � � + � + � � + − � � � + � , and the value of a vacancy is
= −� + � � � � + � + − � ,
where �0 is an initial productivity (given).
2. After period 0
• Let suppose a deviated worker and a firm hiring the worker.
→� is not affected, while � of the worker is affected by deviation. We need to characterize the value functions given ��.
Wage equation is obtained as
� � + � = � � + �� + − � − � � + �� , And the value of unemployed
− � � + � = − � + �� + � �� � � + ��
− � + �� + � �� �
2. After period 0
• The value of employed is
� + � = � � + �� + [ − � − � + ��] � + ��
− � + �� ,
� � + � = − � � + � − − � � + ��
− � + �� ,
where
− � � + � = − � + �� + � �� � � + ��
− � + �� + � �� �
2. After period 0
• The investment is
′ �
� = � ′, ′ � = ��′
where
′ = � + − � − � + �� ′
− � + �� > ,
�′ = − � − � + ��− − � ′ > ,
where
− � ′ = − � + �� + � �� �� � � �
2. Main result
• The arket stri ture is ru ial for Be ker’s result.
• In the market with search friction, the wage is not elastic over the productivity, firms have then incentive to invest the human capital.
←What’s the effi ie y property?
Reference
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1999). Beyond Becker: training in imperfect labour markets. The Economic Journal, 109(453), 112-142.
Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of political economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9-49.