• 検索結果がありません。

PS3 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

シェア "PS3 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Problem Set 3: Due on May 24

Advanced Microeconomics I (Spring, 1st, 2012)

1. Question 1 (4 points)

A real-valued function f (x) is called homothetic if f (x) = g(h(x)) where g : R → R is a strictly increasing function and h is a real-valued function which is homo- geneous of degree 1. Suppose that preferences can be represented by a homothetic utility function. Then, prove the following statements.

(a) The marginal rate of substitution between any two goods depends only on the ratio of the demands consumed. That is M RSij is identical whenever xi

xj takes the same value.

(b) The cross price derivatives of Marshallian demands are identical, i.e.,

∂xi(p, I)

∂pj =

∂xj(p, I)

∂pi . 2. Question 2 (6 points)

Assume that a consumer has preferences over the single good x and all other goods m represented by the utility function, u(x, m) = ln(x) + m. Let the price of x be p, the price of m be unity (= 1), and let income be ω.

(a) Derive the Marshallian demands for x and m.

(b) Use the Slutsky equation to decompose the effect of an own-price change on the demand for x into an income and substitution effect.

(c) Suppose that the price of x rises from p0 to p1(> p0). Calculate the (change of) consumer surplus, compensating variation, and equivalent variation. 3. Question 3 (6 points)

Consider the following (social welfare) maximization problem where ui is a strictly increasing and continuous function for all i ∈ I and (λ1,· · · , λI) ∈ RI+\ {0}.

max

x

I i=1

λiui(xi)

s.t.

I h=1

xkh ≤ ek for k = 1, ..., n.

(a) Under the above assumptions on ui for all i ∈ I, prove the equivalence between strong Pareto efficiency and weak Pareto efficiency.

(b) Show that any solution of the above maximization problem (you may denote x) must be Pareto efficient.

1

(2)

(c) Find an example of Pareto efficient allocation that cannot be the solution of the maximization problem whichever (λ1,· · · , λI) ∈ RI+\ {0} will be chosen. 4. Question 4 (4 points)

Consider an exchange economy with two goods, x and y. Suppose that individuals have the following symmetric utility functions and symmetric initial endowments:

u(x, y) = x2+ y2x, ωy) = (1, 1)

(a) Assume there are only two individuals in this economy. Then, draw the Edgworth-box and show the contract curve. Find a competitive equilibrium if it exists. If there is no equilibrium, explain the reason.

(b) Now suppose there are n(> 2) individuals. Then, can we find a competitive equilibrium? (How) Does your answer depend on n?

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

The only thing left to observe that (−) ∨ is a functor from the ordinary category of cartesian (respectively, cocartesian) fibrations to the ordinary category of cocartesian

Eskandani, “Stability of a mixed additive and cubic functional equation in quasi- Banach spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.. Eshaghi Gordji, “Stability

An easy-to-use procedure is presented for improving the ε-constraint method for computing the efficient frontier of the portfolio selection problem endowed with additional cardinality

If condition (2) holds then no line intersects all the segments AB, BC, DE, EA (if such line exists then it also intersects the segment CD by condition (2) which is impossible due

Let X be a smooth projective variety defined over an algebraically closed field k of positive characteristic.. By our assumption the image of f contains

2 Combining the lemma 5.4 with the main theorem of [SW1], we immediately obtain the following corollary.. Corollary 5.5 Let l > 3 be

Related to this, we examine the modular theory for positive projections from a von Neumann algebra onto a Jordan image of another von Neumann alge- bra, and use such projections

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A