• 検索結果がありません。

Acemoglu Ryo Suzuki ch14

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "Acemoglu Ryo Suzuki ch14"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Advanced Macroeconomics Problem Set 3

Exercise 14.4 First, gis given by

ληβL − (λ − 1)−1g= θg+ ρ

Left hand side of the equation is decreasing in gand right hand side is increasing in g, so g which satisfies above equation is only one. (Of course the condition of

ληβL > ρ > (1 − θ)(λ − 1)ηβL (1) must be hold.)

Therefore

g= ληβL − ρ θ + (λ − 1)−1 is unique.

Next, we will prove the transversality condition is satisfied. The transversality condition is

t→∞lim exp − Zt

0

r(s)ds Z t

0

V(ν, t|q)dν = 0

Recall that (14.17), I mean

V(ν, t|q) =q(ν, t) λη Then we can calculate

Z t 0

V(ν, t|q)dν = 1 λη

Zt 0

q(ν, t)dν

= 1

ληQ(t)

Therefore, from this equation the transvesality condition is given by

1

(2)

t→∞lim exp(−r

t) 1

ληQ(t)

 = lim

t→∞ exp(−r

t) 1

ληexp(g

t)

= 1

ληt→∞limexp −(r

− g)t

So, it is almost the same as the previous exercises

r− g = θg+ ρ − g

= ρ − (1 − θ) ληβL − ρ θ + (λ − 1)−1

= 1 + (λ − 1)−1ρ − (1 − θ)ληβL θ + (λ − 1)−1

= λ

(λ − 1)θ + 1 ρ − (1 − θ)(λ − 1)ηβL > 0

We use condition (1) in last inequality.

After all, as long as r− g> 0 has hold, the transversality condi- tion is satisfied; and this is the proof of the Execercis 14.4.

Exercise 14.17 (a)

ln Y(t) = ln C + n(t) ln λ Therefore

ln Y(t + Δ) − ln Y(t) = n(t + Δ) − n(t) ln λ

g = Eln Y(t + Δ) − ln Y(t) Δ



= En(t + Δ) − n(t)

Δ  ln λ

= 1

ΔE ln λ

= ηL

Rln λ

2

(3)

(Expectation of Poisson Process)

E =

X

=0

(zΔ)

e−zΔ

!

= (zΔ)e−zΔ



1 +(zΔ)

1

1! + (zΔ)2

2! + . . .



= (zΔ)e−zΔe

=

Next, the transversality condition in steady state

t→∞limexp(−r

t)V(q) = 0

V(q) = βq(t)LE r+ z

= β(L − L

R)

ρ+ z q(0) exp(g

t)

t→∞limexp(−r

t)β(L − L

R)

ρ+ z q(0) exp(g

t)

=β(L − L

R)q(0)

ρ+ z t→∞limexp −(ρ − gt)

0 < g< ρ

⇔ 0 < λ(1 − β)ηL − ρ <1 + λ(1 − β)ρ ln λ

⇔ ρ < λ(1 − β)ηL <ln λ + 1 + λ(1 − β)

ln λ ρ

Because

g= ηλ(1 − β)ηL − ρ η 1 + (1 − β)λ ln λ

= λ(1 − β)ηL − ρ 1 + (1 − β)λ ln λ g> 0 ⇔ λ(1 − β)ηL − ρ > 0

3

(4)

g< ρ ⇔λ(1 − β)ηL − ρ

1 + (1 − β)λ ln λ < ρ

(b)

In previous model, we use linear approximation like Q(t + Δ) ≈ zΔλQ(t) + (1 − z(t)Δ)Q(t)

Q(t + Δ) − Q(t)

Δ ≈ z(λ − 1)Q(t) And we obtain

Q(t)˙

Q(t) = (λ − 1)z

However, we does not use such a approximation in this model. This is different point.

As you see

ln λ ≈ λ − 1

4

参照

関連したドキュメント

講義の目標.

Optimal stochastic approximation algorithms for strongly convex stochastic composite optimization I: A generic algorithmic framework.. SIAM Journal on Optimization,

Jones, 村上順, 大槻知忠, 葉廣和夫, (量子力学, 統計学, 物理学など様々な分野との結びつき ながら大きく発展中!!

Dual averaging and proximal gradient descent for online alternating direction multiplier method. Stochastic dual coordinate ascent with alternating direction method

There is a bijection between left cosets of S n in the affine group and certain types of partitions (see Bjorner and Brenti (1996) and Eriksson and Eriksson (1998)).. In B-B,

(The Elliott-Halberstam conjecture does allow one to take B = 2 in (1.39), and therefore leads to small improve- ments in Huxley’s results, which for r ≥ 2 are weaker than the result

“Breuil-M´ezard conjecture and modularity lifting for potentially semistable deformations after

S., Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press, Oxford