• 検索結果がありません。

quiz2 solution Recent site activity Vu, Tuan Khai's personal website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "quiz2 solution Recent site activity Vu, Tuan Khai's personal website"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

1 ICU winter 2011, Principles of Macroeconomics February 11, 2012

Quiz #2 Solution

Problem 1 (10pts×6) (References: topic 8 and chapter 10) The Keynesian cross model

C = 140 + 0.8(Y – T) (1)

G = 100 (2)

T = 100 (3)

I = 120 (4)

PE = C + I + G (5)

Y = PE (6)

(a) Substitute (1)~(5) into the equilibrium condition (6), arrange terms and solve for the equilibrium level of income as follows:

T from (3) I from (4) G from (2) C from (1)

PE from (5)

Y = [140 + 0.8(Y - 100 )] + 120 + 100

 Y-0.8Y = 140-80+120+100  0.2Y = 280  0.2Y = 280/0.2 or Y= Y1=1400

(b) When the actual level of output (which is also income) happens to be Y=1200, the planned expenditure PE= C + I + G = [140+0.8(Y - T)]+I+G = [140+0.8(1200 - 100)] +120+100 = 1240, while the actual expenditure = the level of output = 1200.

Unplanned investment = actual expenditure - planned expenditure = 1200 - 1240 = -40. Thus in this case the actual level of output falls short of the planned expenditure (which is also the aggregate demand), resulting in a decrease in unplaned inventories of firms (i.e. negative unplanned investment). Put differently, in this case the amount of output that firms expected to sell is smaller than the amount they actually sell, so there must be a fall in their inventories.

Actual investment = planned investment + unplanned inventory investment = 120 + (-40) = 80.

Facing a situation of decreasing inventories like this, the action would firms take is to increase output, and because of this the economy moves toward the equilibrium computed in (a)

(c) When there is a 10% tax cut, the new level of tax revenue Tnew = (1-0.1) T =0.9T = 0.9100 = 90. Use this new level of taxes to solve for the equilibrium level of income similarly as (a):

Y = [140 + 0.8(Y - 90)] + 120 +100  Y-0.8Y = 140-72+120+100

 0.2Y = 288 0.2Y = 288/0.2 or Y=Y1 =1440

(2)

2

Y= Y2 - Y1 = 1440-1400 = 40, and %Y = Y/ Y1 =40/1400 =2.9% Thus the tax cut raises income by 40 units or 2.9%.

(d) Draw a graph to explain briefly the effect in (c).

Problem 2 (10pts×4) (References: topic 8 and chapter 10)

With equation (3) changing to (3’), the new model now becomes C = 140 + 0.8(Y – T) (1)

G = 100 (2)

T =0.05Y (3’)

I = 120 (4)

PE = C + I + G (5)

Y = PE (6)

(a) Solve similarly as (a) in problem 1 to obtain the equilibrium level of income: Y = [140 + 0.8(Y – 0.05Y)] + 120 +100  Y-0.8Y+0.04Y = 140+120+100

 0.24Y = 360  Y = 360/0.24 or Y= Y3=1500

(b) The government budget deficit = government expenditure - government revenue = government expenditure - tax revenue = G - T. According to (3’), T=0.05Y=0.05Y1 government budget deficit = G - 0.05Y1 = 100 - 0.051500 = 25.

(c) When the government raises the tax rate to 10%, (3’) now becomes

T =0.1Y (3’’)

Use this equation (3’’) and the other unchanged equations to solve similarly as (a) for the new equilibrium level of income:

Y = [140 + 0.8(Y – 0.1Y)] + 120 +100  Y-0.8Y+0.08Y = 140+120+100

 0.28Y = 360  Y = 360/0.28 or Y=Y4 = 1285.7

Y= Y4 – Y3 = 1285.7-1500 = -214.3, and %Y = Y/ Y1 =-214.3/1500 =-14.3% Thus the increase in income tax rate reduces income by 214.3 units or 14.3%.

Y E'

E

PE=Y

Explanation:

T disposal income

C ⇒PE and the PE line shifts upward (PE PE’) Y (Y Y’) PE

Y Y’

PE PE’

(3)

3

(d) According to (3’) & (3’’), the tax revenue before and after the increase of the tax rate are T= 0.05Y3 = 0.051500 = 75, and Tnew = 0.1Y4 =0.11285.7 = 128.6  the government deficit before and after the increase of the tax rate are G - T = 100 - 75 = 25, and G - Tnew = 100 - 128.6 = -28.6 (the negative sign means a surplus!). Thus by raising the income tax rate, the government can turn its budget balance from a deficit of 25 to a surplus of 28.6 (a change of -28.6 - 25 = -53.6)

参照

関連したドキュメント

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

The solution is represented in explicit form in terms of the Floquet solution of the particular instance (arising in case of the vanishing of one of the four free constant

Ulrich : Cycloaddition Reactions of Heterocumulenes 1967 Academic Press, New York, 84 J.L.. Prossel,

The dimension d will allow us in the next sections to consider two different solutions of an ordinary differential equation as a function on R 2 with a combined expansion.. The

We present sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to Neu- mann and periodic boundary-value problems for some class of quasilinear ordinary differential equations.. We

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Definition An embeddable tiled surface is a tiled surface which is actually achieved as the graph of singular leaves of some embedded orientable surface with closed braid

Classical Sturm oscillation theory states that the number of oscillations of the fundamental solutions of a regular Sturm-Liouville equation at energy E and over a (possibly