• 検索結果がありません。

Chapter I: OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY

V. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

1. Cambodian Students’ Competency

Case of the research question on Cambodian students‟ competency in Chemistry, the data is collected quantitatively from Cambodian students at grade 8 (2nd year of lower secondary school) using the test paper designed by Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), 2011 standard. The data is analyzed by SPSS program (PASW statistics 18, version 18.0.0, July 30, 2009) to run for data deviation in T-test comparing by genders, areas, as well as to regional countries and Japan whom also participated in TIMSS-2011 standard.

2. Development of Teaching and Learning Materials

The development of teaching and learning materials was carried out by following the six steps as shown in Fig. 1-5.

<Determining topics>

The first important starting point was to determine the topics for developing teaching and learning materials. As mentioned in the rational of the study, topics must be strongly linked to student‟s daily life and applicable in the secondary curriculum in Cambodia.

Furthermore, these topics are believed to be feasible and physically possible in typical Cambodian classrooms.

<Developing teaching and learning materials>

After the topics had been selected, the teaching and learning materials namely experimental apparatus to conduct the practical work was developed and then tested by conducting several experimental trials in the laboratory. The development was trying to use most of the apparatus is available and inexpensive. The ways to set up and use the apparatus were designed to be simple and uncomplicated for students. The apparatus was standardized

13

with actual laboratory apparatus and so the experimental results obtained showed good consequence with theory.

Determining Topics

Developing teaching and learning

materials

Developing lesson activities

Conducting lesson in actual class

Evaluating feasibility in classroom

Teaching and learning materials

 Available in Cambodia

 Connect to daily life

 Applicable by students

 Inexpensive

 Simple

 Available in Cambodia

 Standardized by actual lab-apparatus

 Theoretically acceptable

 Unit plans/worksheets

 Lesson plans

 Poster-teaching tools

 Pre-post tests

 Questionnaires

 Japanese High School

 Applicability

 Understandability

 Satisfactory

Comments and Revises

Simulating Lesson  Lab colleagues

 Undergraduate students

Fig. 1-5: Process of developing teaching and learning materials

14

<Developing lesson activities>

The lesson activities were prepared after the experiments and apparatus had been developed and tested to see that they were usable in actual classrooms. Several necessary documents such as lesson summary, student worksheets, lesson plans, posters, pre/post test etc.

were produced for use in the classroom. Student worksheets and lesson plans were prepared using the inquiry based approach format, in which students formulate an experimental hypothesis, make observations, collect data, analyze results and make conclusions.

<Simulating lessons>

Before introducing the lessons to the actual classrooms, some simulation lessons were conducted. The participants were under-graduate and graduate students from the inorganic chemistry laboratory, as well as supervisor. The aim of this step was to collect ideas to improve the teaching and learning materials and the teaching approaches.

<Conducting lesson in actual classroom>

The learning materials were used by students in the classroom through a complete step of lesson instruction. Following the inquiry based approach, the students formulated their hypothesis, use the developed apparatus to investigate the hypothesis and present their results.

<Evaluating feasibility>

The feasibility of the developed teaching and learning materials in the classroom was measured based on the students‟ performance on pre/post tests and the students‟ perception on questionnaires. Before the lessons, the students were asked to complete the pre-test which consisted of multiple choice questions that were related to the lesson contents to be taught. At the end of the activities, students were requested to answer the post-test, consisting of the same questions as the pre-test, and to fill up the questionnaires. The pre/post tests assessed the students‟ understanding and improvement, whereas the questionnaires examined the feasibility and suitability of the developed apparatus and activities.

15 REFERENCES

Bucat, Bl, &Fensham, P. Selected papers in chemistry education research implications for the teaching of chemistry. Delhi: Shatabdi Computers, 1995.

Chantha, C. Examination of science process skills of elementary teacher trainees in PTTCs in Cambodia. Master Thesis, Hiroshima University, Japan, 2013

Gabel, D.L.k&Bunce, D.M. Research on problem solving. In D. Babel (Ed), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, pp. 301-326, 1994

Garnett, P.J., Garnett, P.J., & Hackling, M. W. Students alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in science education.25, pp, 69-95, 1995

Griffiths, A.K. A critical analysis and synthesis of research on students‟ chemistry misconceptions.In H.-J. Schmidt (Ed.), Problem solving and misconceptions in chemistry and physics, Hong Kong:

ICASE, pp.70-99, 1994

Hans-J.S., Annettte. M., & Allan.G.H. Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (2), pp. 258-283, 2007

Johnstone, A. H. Macro-and micro chemistry. School Science Review. 64(227), 377-379, 1982

Johnstone, A. H. New Stars for the Teacher to Steer by? Journal of Chemical Education, 61(10), pp.

847-849, 1984.

Johnstone.A.H. Macro and microchemistry.School Science Review,64, pp. 377-379, 1982

Johnstone.A.H. Thinking about thinking. International Newsletter on Chemical Education, 6, pp. 7-11, 1991

Maeda, M. Cambodian Chemistry Teacher Survey. STEPSAM, Cambodia, 2006.

Maeda, M. Chemistry Practical Work in Classroom. STEPSAM, Cambodia, 2003.

Maeda, M., Pen, S., Set, S., Kita, M., &Sieng, S. The quality of science teachers in Cambodia: From Problem to a Solution. HCMC: IRD-IER-NIESAC, 2006

MoEY, Lower Secondary Science Textbook (Grade 7, 8 & 9), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Cambodia, 2009.

16

MoEY, Primary Science Textbook (Grade 4, 5 & 6), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Cambodia, 2012.

MoEY, Upper Secondary Chemistry Textbook (Grade 10, 11 & 12), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Cambodia, 2011

MoEYS, Policy for curriculum development 2005-2009. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Cambodia, 2004

NIE, Teaching Effectiveness of Newly Upper Secondary School Teacher, National Institute of Education, 2014.

NIE, Teaching Effectiveness of Newly Upper Secondary School Teacher, National Institute of Education, 2012.

Rahayu, S & Kita, M. An analysis of Indonesian and Japanese students‟ understandings of macroscopic and submicroscopic levels of representing matter and its change.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (4), pp. 667-688, 2010

Seng, S. Development and Effectiveness Study of Chemistry Teaching Materials for Upper Secondary Schools in Cambodia: Unit Planning on Detergent and Conductivity. Master Thesis, Okayama University, 2007.

STEPSAM2. Baseline Survey Report.Cambodian Science Teacher Education Project. PADECO CO., LTD & HIROSHIMA University, 2009

Wall, S. V., Uon, V, Cnudde, V., &Keo, M. Strengthening student centered approaches in science teaching in Cambodia. VVOB, Cambodia, 2010

17