• 検索結果がありません。

Áîãîñëîâñêèå ðàçìûøëåíèÿ #2

ドキュメント内 katalog.p65 (ページ 31-34)

Ôîðìàò

170 X 239 mm

Öåíà

5$

ÆÓÐÍÀË «ÁÎÃÎÑËÎÂÑÊÈÅ ÐÀÇÌÛØËÅÍÈß»

ÑÎÄÅÐÆÀÍÈÅ

Ãåííàäèé Ñåðãèåíêî Öåðêîâíàÿ äèñöèïëèíà â Êîðèíôå (1 Êîð. 5:1-13)

Gennadi Sergienko

A case of church discipline in 1 Corinthians 5

Âèêòîð Êèðüÿíîâ

Ñóùåñòâóåò ëè îäíî, áóêâàëüíîå çíà÷åíèå áèáëåéñêîãî òåêñòà, êîòîðîå ìîæåò îáíàðóæèòü òîëêîâàòåëü?

Viktor Kiryanov

Meaning: is there a single, literal meaning of a biblical text that the interpreter can discover?

Àëåêñàíäð Ïðèëóöêèé Èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêèå ïðåäïîñûëêè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ýêçåãåòè÷åñêîé ïàðàäèãìû Ìàðòèíà Ëþòåðà

Alexander Prilutskii Historical and philosophical

assumptions for the formation of the exegetical paradigm of Martin Luther

Èãîðü Ïåòðîâ

Àêòèâíîå îáó÷åíèå â ðóññêèõ åâàíãåëüñêèõ ó÷åáíûõ çàâåäåíèÿõ

Igor Petrov

Àctive learning for russian

evangelical educational institutions

Ðîìàí Ñîëîâ³é

²ñòîðè÷íî-áîãîñëîâñüêèé êîíòåêñò âèíèêíåííÿ ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöòâà: ðóõ ñâÿòîñò³

Roman Soloviy

The Historical-Theological Context of the Origin of Pentecostalism: The Holiness Movement

Àëåêñàíäð Ëèõîøåðñòîâ Õðèñòèàíñòâî è ãîñóäàðñòâî

Alexander Lykhosherstov ChristIanity and THE state Èíôîðìàöèÿ ïî ïðèîáðåòåíèþ ñì. ñòð. 2

Öåðêîâíàÿ äèñöèïëèíà â Êîðèíôå (1 Êîð. 5:1-13) Ñåðãèåíêî Ãåííàäèé Àíäðååâè÷

Ñëó÷àé àìîðàëüíîãî ïîâåäåíèÿ â öåðêâè â Êîðèíôå ïîñòàâèë ïîä óãðîçó ðåïóòàöèþ âñåé õðèñòèàíñêîé îáùèíû. Ñàìà æå îáùèíà, â ñèëó ðÿäà áîãîñëîâñêèõ è ñ îöèàëüíûõ ôàêòîðîâ, íå âèäåëà îñíîâàíèÿ äëÿ áåñïîêîéñòâà. Âïîëíå âîçìîæíî, ÷òî ïîäîáíîå äåâèàíòíîå ïîâåäåíèå ðàññìàòðèâàëîñü êàê ïðèìåð íîâîé «äóõîâíîé»

ñâîáîäû âåðóþùèõ. Ñèòóàöèÿ ìîãëà áûòü îñëîæíåíà è òåì îáñòîÿòåëüñòâîì, ÷òî ñîãðåøàþùèé áðàò ìîã áûòü îäíèì èç âëèÿòåëüíûõ ïàòðîíîâ îáùèíû. Èñïðàâëÿÿ ñë îæèâøååñÿ ïîëîæåíèå, Ïàâåë óê àçûâàåò íà íåñîâìåñòèìîñòü ãðåõà ñî ñòàòóñîì õðèñòèàíèíà.  îáîñíîâàíèå ñâîåé ïîçèöèè Ïàâåë òâîð÷åñêè ïåðåîñìûñëèâàåò òåêñòû Âåòõîãî Çàâåòà, ïðèìåíÿÿ èõ ê êà÷åñòâåííî íîâîé ñèòóàöèè.  ýòîì îí ïîäàåò ïðèìåð âñåì ñëóæèòåëÿì Ñëîâà íàøèõ äíåé.

A case of church discipline in 1 Corinthians 5 Gennadi Sergienko

A case of immoral behavior at the church in Corinth threatened the reputation of the Christian community. The community itself, however, due to some theological and social factors, did not realize the seriousness of the threat. Most probably such behavior was perceived as an example of the new

“spiritual” freedom of the believers. The situation might have been further complicated if the sinning brother was one of the influential patrons of the church. In trying to correct the situation, Paul points to the incompatibility of sin with the status of the Christian. In arguing his position, Paul creatively reapplies the Old Testament Scriptures to a qualitatively new situation. In so doing, he sets a precedent for ministers of the Word of our day.

Ñóùåñòâóåò ëè îäíî, áóêâàëüíîå çíà÷åíèå áèáëåéñêîãî òåêñòà, êîòîðîå ìîæåò îáíàðóæèòü òîëêîâàòåëü?

Êèðüÿíîâ Âèêòîð Ìèõàéëîâè÷

Öåëüþ äàííîé ðàáîòû ÿâëÿåòñÿ ðàññìîòðåòü êðèòè÷åñêè ñóùåñòâóþùèå ñåãîäíÿ òî÷êè çðåíèÿ ïî ïðîáëåìå çíà÷åíèÿ òåêñòà.  áîãîñëîâñêèõ êðóãàõ ïðîâîäÿòñÿ ïîñòîÿííûå äåáàòû â îòíîøåíèè òîãî, à åñëè â òåêñòå çíà÷åíèå. È åñëè åñòü – êàê åãî îáíàðóæèòü. È åñëè îíî ïðèñóòñòâóåò, òî îäíî ëè çíà÷åíèå ïðèñóòñòâóåò â êàæäîì òåêñòå èëè èõ ìîæåò áûòü íåñêîëüêî.  äàííîé ðàáîòå áóäóò ðàññìîòðåíû òðè îñíîâíûõ ïîäõîäà ê îïðåäåëåíèþ çíà÷åíèÿ òåêñòà: ïîäõîä, íàïðàâëåííûé íà ÷èòàòåëÿ, ïîäõîä, íàïðàâëåííûé íà àâòîðà, è ïîäõîä, íàïðàâëåííûé íà òåêñò.  êàæäîì ïîäõîäå áóäóò ðàññìîòðåíû àðãóìåíòû çà è ïðîòèâ êàæäîãî ïîäõîäà è â êîíöå áóäåò ïðåäëîæåíî ìíåíèå àâòîðà.

Meaning: Is there a single, literal meaning for a Biblical text that the interpreter can discover?

Viktor Kiryanov

The purpose of this article is to look critically at different opinions circulating today concerning the meaning of the text.

There are always debates in theological circles concerning

the subject of meaning. If a meaning exists, how is it found? If a meaning exists, is there just one meaning or many? Three main approaches to defining the meaning of the text are examined: the reader-oriented approach, the writer-oriented approach, and the text-oriented approach. Arguments for and against each approach are given, with the author’s opinion at the end.

Èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêèå ïðåäïîñûëêè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ýêçåãåòè÷åñêîé ïàðàäèãìû Ìàðòèíà Ëþòåðà

Ïðèëóöêèé Àëåêñàíäð Ìèõàéëîâè÷

Ýêçåãåòèêà Ìàðòèíà Ëþòåðà, ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, ÿâëÿåòñÿ

÷àñòüþ ïðîãðàììû ðåôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ñðåäíåâåêîâîé öåðêâè è â ñâÿçè ñ ýòèì âêëþ÷àåòñÿ â îáù óþ âåðîèñïîâåäíóþ ïàðàäèãìó Ðåôîðìàöèè. Ñ äðóãîé ñòîðîíû, íà ñòàíîâëåíèå ýêçåãåòèêè Ì. Ëþòåðà ïîâëèÿë öåëûé ðÿä ôàêòîðîâ èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêîãî õàðàêòåðà, êîòîðûé îáóñë îâëèâàë ðàçâèòèå áîëüøèíñòâà èíòåëëåêòóàëüíûõ äâèæåíèé ïîçäíåãî ñðåäíåâåêîâüÿ.

Î÷åâèäíî, ÷òî ïðàâèëüíîå ïîíèìàíèå Ðåôîðìàöèè êàê òàêîâîé, ðàâíî êàê è îáóñëîâëåííûõ åþ áîëåå ÷àñòíûõ âîïðîñîâ, êàêèì ÿâëÿåòñÿ è ôåíîìåí ýêçåãåòèêè Ì.

Ëþòåðà, íåâîçìîæíî â îòðûâå îò ðàññìîòðåíèÿ èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêîãî êîíòåêñòà ïåðèîäà ïîçäíåãî ñðåäíåâåêîâüÿ, àíàëèçó êîòîðîãî ïîñâÿùåíà íàñòîÿùàÿ ñòàòüÿ.

Historical and philosophical assumptions for the formation of the exegetical paradigm of Martin Luther

Alexander Prilutskii

The exegesis of Martin Luther, on the one hand, is part of the reform program of the medieval church, and for this reason is included in the general confessional paradigm of the Reformation. On the other hand, Luther’s exegesis was influenced by the full range of historical and philosophical factors that determined the development of the majority of medieval intellectual movements. Obviously, one cannot correctly understand the Reformation, which is a phenomenon of the exegesis of Martin Luther, and its questions, without considering the historical and philosophical context of the late medieval period.

Àêòèâíîå îáó÷åíèå â ðóññêèõ åâàíãåëüñêèõ ó÷åáíûõ çàâåäåíèÿõ

Ïåòðîâ Èãîðü Âèêòîðîâè÷

Ýòà ñòàòüÿ êðàòêî ïðåäñòàâëÿåò ôàêòîðû, ïîâëèÿâøèå íà ôîðìèðîâàíèå ñâåòñêîé è ðåëèãèîçíîé ïåäàãîãèêè â Ðîññèè. Àâòîð ïðîâîäèò êðàòêèé àíàëèç îñíîâíûõ õàðàêòåðèñòèê îáùåïðèíÿòîãî ïîäõîäà ê ïåäàãîãèêå, êîòîðûé õàðàêòåðèçóåòñÿ ñòðåìëåíèåì ïåðåäàòü çíàíèÿ ó÷àùèìñÿ â ôîðìå çàðàíåå îðãàíèçîâàííîãî è êîíòðîëèðóåìîãî ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ. Àâòîð îòìå÷àåò ñèëüíûå è ñëàáûå ñòîðîíû òàêîãî ïîäõîäà: ëåãêî êîíòðîëèðóåìûé ðåçóëüòàò, ïåðåäà÷à ñêîíöåíòðèðîâàííûõ çíàíèé, ïàññèâíàÿ ôîðìà îáó÷åíèÿ, ïîëó÷åíèå çíàíèé ó÷àùèìèñÿ áåç äîñòàòî÷íîãî óñâîåíèÿ. Äàëåå àâòîð âûíîñèò íà îáñóæäåíèå ÷èòàòåëåé àêòèâíûé ïîäõîä ê îáó÷åíèþ, êîòîðûé ïîäðàçóìåâàåò àêòèâíîå ó÷àñòèå îáó÷àþùèõñÿ â îáðàçîâàòåëüíîì ïðîöåññå, òðàíñôîðìèðîâàíèå ðîëè ïðåïîäàâàòåëÿ â ðîëü âåäóùåãî, ïîçíàíèå Áîãà-Èñòèíû,

ÆÓÐÍÀË «ÁÎÃÎÑËÎÂÑÊÈÅ ÐÀÇÌÛØËÅÍÈß»

à íå ïðîñòî óçíàâàíèå î Íåì, âîçìîæíîñòü ñîõðàíèòü åâàíãåëüñêóþ âåðó â ÷èñòîòå ÷åðåç îòêðûòûé äèàëîã è îáñóæäåíèå, â öåíòðå êîòîðîãî – Áîã è Åãî Ïèñàíèå. Àâòîð òàêæå ïðèâîäèò íåêîòîðûå ïðàêòè÷åñêèå ðåêîìåíäàöèè ïî ïåðåõîäó íà áîëåå àêòèâíûå ôîðìû îáó÷åíèÿ.  áèáëèîãðàôèè ïðèâîäèòñÿ ñïèñîê ïîëåçíîé ëèòåðàòóðû äëÿ óãëóáëåííîãî èçó÷åíèÿ ìåòîäîâ àêòèâíîãî îáó÷åíèÿ.

Active learning for Russian Evangelical educational institutions

Igor Petrov

This article briefly presents the factors that influenced the for-mation of spiritual and secular pedagogy in Russia. The au-thor presents a brief analysis of the basic characteristics of a widely-accepted approach to pedagogy, characterized by the effort to impart knowledge to students in the form of previ-ously organized and highly controlled presentations. The au-thor notes the strengths and weaknesses of this approach, including an easily controlled outcome; the impartation of knowledge in concentrated form; a passive type of learning;

and the acceptance of knowledge by the students without ad-equate absorption. Further, the author discusses an active approach to learning that assumes active participation in the educational process by those being taught; the transforma-tion of the role of the teacher into the role of the facilitator;

direct knowledge of the God of Truth and not simply knowl-edge about Him; and the preservation of pure evangelical faith through open dialogue and discussion centered around God and Scripture. The author also makes several practical recommendations concerning the transition to more active forms of learning. The bibliography includes a list of useful literature for further study of active learning methods.

²ñòîðè÷íî-áîãîñëîâñüêèé êîíòåêñò âèíèêíåííÿ ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöòâà: ðóõ ñâÿòîñòi

Ñîëîâ³é Ðîìàí Ïàâëîâè÷

Ó ñòàòò³ äîñë³äæóºòüñÿ ïðîáëåìà ³ñòîðè÷íî-áîãîñëîâñüêîãî êîð³ííÿ ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöòâà ³, çîêðåìà, ðîë³ âåñëåÿíñüêîãî ðóõó ñâÿòîñò³ â çàðîäæåíí³ êîíôåñ³¿. Îêðåñëèâøè ³ñíóþ÷³ â íàóö³ ï³äõîäè äî öüîãî ïèòàííÿ, àâòîð äîõîäèòü äî âèñíîâêó ïðî êëþ÷îâó ðîëü ðóõó ñâÿòîñò³ ó ñòàíîâëåíí³ ïðîâ³äíèõ ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöüêèõ äîêòðèí, âêëþ÷íî ç â÷åííÿì ïðî õðåùåííÿ Ñâÿòèì Äóõîì ç îçíàêîþ ³íøèõ ìîâ.

Âîäíî÷àñ ó äîñë³äæåíí³ äîâåäåíî, ùî ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöòâî íå óñïàäêóâàëî ìåõàí³÷íî ³äå¿ ðóõó ñâÿòîñò³, à ðîçâèíóëî

¿õ ï³ä âïëèâîì ³íøèõ ïîòóæíèõ ðåë³ã³éíèõ òå÷³é – êåñâ³êñüêèõ êîíâåíö³é, ð³âàéâàë³çìó òà ðåñòîðàö³îí³çìó. Ç ìåòîþ ïðîñòåæåííÿ îñíîâíèõ ñòàä³é çàðîäæåííÿ ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöüêîãî â÷åííÿ ó ñòàòò³ ïðîàíàë³çîâàí³ ïîãëÿäè Ä. Âåñë³ òà ¿õ òðàíñôîðìàö³ÿ ó ïðîâ³äíèõ ïðåäñòàâíèê³â ðóõó ñâÿòîñò³, à òàêîæ ïîêàçàíèé ïðîöåñ ¿õ ïåðåîñìèñëåííÿ â ðàííüîìó ï’ÿòèäåñÿòíèöòâ³.

The historical-theological context of the origin of Pentecostalism: the Holiness movement

Roman Soloviy

This article investigates the historical and theological roots of Pentecostalism, particularly the role of the Wesleyan Holiness movement as it influenced the origin of this branch of

Christianity. Taking a scientific approach to the subject, the author concludes that the Holiness movement played a key role in shaping parts of the main Pentecostal doctrines, in-cluding the doctrine of baptism in the Holy Spirit evidenced by tongues. At the same time, however, research has proven that Pentecostalism did not mechanically inherit the ideas of the Holiness movement, but developed them under the influence of other powerful religious currents, such as the Keswick conventions, along with revivalism and restorationism.

The purpose of this article is to examine the basic stages of the origin of Pentecostal doctrines by analyzing John Wesley’s teachings and their transformation by the main representatives of the Holiness movement, as well as the process of their reinterpretation in early Pentecostalism.

Õðèñòèàíñòâî è ãîñóäàðñòâî

Ëèõîøåðñòîâ Àëåêñàíäð Ëåîíèäîâè÷

Âîïðîñ âçàèìîîòíîøåíèé öåðêâè è ãîñóäàðñòâà èìååò äëèííóþ è ñëîæíóþ èñòîðèþ.  òå÷åíèå ïîñëåäíèõ äâóõ òûñÿ÷ ëåò ìíîãî÷èñëåííûå ìîäåëè ãîñóäàðñòâåííî-öåðêîâíûõ âçàèìîîòíîøåíèé áûëè ðàçðàáîòàíû è âîïëîùåíû â ïîëèòè÷åñêîì óñòðîéñòâå ðàçëè÷íûõ ãîñóäàðñòâ. Ñëåäóåò îòìåòèòü, ÷òî â ñâÿçè ñ âîçìîæíîñòüþ äëÿ Öåðêâè áûòü âîâëå÷åííîé â ïîëèòè÷åñêóþ æèçíü Ðîññèè è Óêðàèíû íåîáõîäèìîñòü áîãîñë îâñê îãî îñìûñëåíèÿ äàííîé òåìû ïðèîáðåòàåò îñ îáóþ çíà÷èìîñòü. Äàííàÿ ñòàòüÿ ñîäåðæèò â ñåáå öåëîñòíûé è âñåñòîðîííèé ïîäõîä ê áîãîñë îâñêîé òåìàòèê å âçàèìîîòíîøåíèé öåðêâè è ãîñóäàðñòâà, èññëåäóÿ óíèêàëüíûé îïûò òåîêðàòèè èóäàèçìà, èñòîðè÷åñêèå ïðåäïîñûëêè ñòàíîâëåíèÿ èäåè öåçàðåïàïèçìà êàê â ÿçû÷åñêèõ, òàê è õðèñòèàíñêèõ ãîñóäàðñòâàõ, áîãîñëîâñêèé ñïîð ìåæäó ìîíàðõè÷åñêîé è áåðäÿåâñêîé øêîëàìè ïî ïîâîäó òåñíîãî àëüÿíñà öåðêâè è ãîñóäàðñòâà, ÷òî, íåñîìíåííî, áóäåò ïðåäñòàâëÿòü çíà÷èòåëüíûé èíòåðåñ äëÿ ìíîãèõ ñîâðåìåííûõ èññëåäîâàòåëåé.

Christianity and the State Alexander Lykhosherstov

The issue of the relationship between church and state has had a long and complex history. During the last two thousand years, many models of church-state relationships have been devised and put into practice in the political structures of dif-ferent states. It should be noted that the possibility of the church’s involvement in secular politics in Russia and Ukraine makes the need for theological conceptualisation in this field especially urgent. The article presents a holistic and comprehensive approach to the theological discussion of the church-state relationship that will certainly be of interest to many contemporary researchers, examining the unique ex-perience of theocracy in Judaism; the historical formation of the idea of Caesaropapism in both pagan and Christian states;

and the theological controversy between the monarchical and Berdyaev schools on the issue of close alliance between church and state.

ÆÓÐÍÀË «ÁÎÃÎÑËÎÂÑÊÈÅ ÐÀÇÌÛØËÅÍÈß»

ドキュメント内 katalog.p65 (ページ 31-34)