• 検索結果がありません。

Hecke eigenforms and Koecher-Maass series

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

シェア "Hecke eigenforms and Koecher-Maass series"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Hecke eigenforms and Koecher-Maass series

Winfried Kohnen

Mathematisches Institut der Universit¨at Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 288

69120 Heidelberg Germany

In this short note we briefly want to discuss the question how a Hecke eigenform of genus n is uniquely determined by certain of its Fourier coefficients. More precisely, let f and g be two cuspidal Hecke eigenforms of integral weight k w.r.t. the Siegel modular group Γn of genus n and write a(T) resp. b(T) for the Fourier coefficients of f resp. g, where T is a positive definite symmetric half-integral matrix of size n.

If n = 1, of course, one knows by classical Hecke theory that if a(1) = b(1) and a(p) =b(p) for all primes p, then f =g.

If n= 2 one can a prove a weaker statement.

Theorem [2]. Suppose that n= 2 and a(mT) = b(mT) for all primitive matrices T and all squarefree positive integers m. Then f =g.

Let us briefly outline the proof (for details cf. [2]). By the results of Imai [4] it is sufficient to show that

(1) Df,ϕ(s) =Dg,ϕ(s)

for all Gr¨ossen characters ϕ, where Df,ϕ(s) resp. Dg,ϕ(s) for Re(s) 0 denote the associated Koecher-Maass series.

On the other hand, using results of Andrianov [1] relating eigenvalues to Fourier coefficients in the genus 2 case, one can derive a (technically complicated) identity relating these Koecher-Maass series to the corresponding spinor zeta functions Zf(s) resp. Zg(s).

Under the conditions posed in the Theorem, it follows from the latter that Df,ϕ(s) is not identically zero if and only if this is true for Dg,ϕ(s), and then the equality

Df,ϕ(s)

Dg,ϕ(s) = Zf(2s) Zg(2s)

holds for alls Cas an identity between meromorphic functions. Exploiting the different types of functional equations of the Koecher-Maass series and the spinor zeta functions, one easily deduces (1).

Very recently, Breulmann and myself [3] were able to give a weak generalization of the above result to the case of arbitrary genus n 3, assuming that the spinor zeta

1

(2)

functions have good analytic properties. The latter (in particular a functional equation) were conjectured in [1] and certainly are widely believed, but so far have not yet been proved. In [3] under the latter conditions it is shown that if a(mT) = b(mT) for all primitive T and all positive integers m such that vp(m) 2n2 for all primes p (where vp is the usual p-adic exponent), then f = g. The proof is technically more involved and uses the Spn-converse theorem of Weissauer [5,6] and certain results of ˜Zarkovskaja on a relation between eigenvalues and Fourier coefficients for arbitraryncontained in the paper [7].

References

[1] A.N. Andrianov: Euler products corresponding to Siegel modular forms of genus 2.

Russ. Math. Surv. 29:3, 45-116 (1974)

[2] S. Breulmann and W. Kohnen: Twisted Maass-Koecher series and spinor zeta functions. To appear in Nagoya Math J.

[3] S. Breulmann and W. Kohnen: On Hecke eigenforms of degree n. Preprint 1999 [4] K. Imai: Generalization of Hecke’s correspondence to Siegel modular forms. Amer.

J. Math., vol. 102, no. 5., 903-936 (1980)

[5] T. Sugano: Weissauer’s converse theorem. This volume

[6] R. Weissauer: Siegel modular forms and Dirichlet series. Unpublished manuscript [7] N.A. ˜Zarkovskaja: On the connection of eigenvalues of Hecke operators and the Fourier

coefficients of eigenfunctions of Siegel’s modular forms of genus n. Math. USSR Sb. 25, no. 4, 549-557 (1975)

2

参照

関連したドキュメント