• 検索結果がありません。

A SIMPLE PROOF OF THE GEOMETRIC-ARITHMETIC MEAN INEQUALITY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "A SIMPLE PROOF OF THE GEOMETRIC-ARITHMETIC MEAN INEQUALITY"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality Yasuharu Uchida vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 56, 2008

Title Page

Contents

JJ II

J I

Page1of 5 Go Back Full Screen

Close

A SIMPLE PROOF OF THE

GEOMETRIC-ARITHMETIC MEAN INEQUALITY

YASUHARU UCHIDA

Kurashiki Kojyoike High School Okayama Pref., Japan

EMail:[email protected]

Received: 13 March, 2008

Accepted: 06 May, 2008

Communicated by: P.S. Bullen 2000 AMS Sub. Class.: 26D99.

Key words: Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Inequality.

Abstract: In this short note, we give another proof of the Geometric-Arithmetic Mean inequality.

(2)

Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality Yasuharu Uchida vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 56, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page2of 5 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Various proofs of the Geometric-Arithmetic Mean inequality are known in the literature, for example, see [1]. In this note, we give yet another proof and show that the G-A Mean inequality is merely a result of simple iteration of a well-known lemma.

The following theorem holds.

Theorem 1 (Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality). For arbitrary positive num- bersA1, A2, . . . , An, the inequality

(1) A1+A2+· · ·+An

n ≥ pn

A1A2· · ·An holds, with equality if and only ifA1 =A2 =· · ·=An.

Lettingai = √n

Ai (i= 1,2, . . . , n) and multiplying both sides byn, we have an equivalent Theorem2.

Theorem 2. For arbitrary positive numbersa1, a2, . . . , an, the inequality (2) a1n+a2n+· · ·+ann≥na1a2· · ·an

holds, with equality if and only ifa1 =a2 =· · ·=an. To prove Theorem2, we use the following lemma.

Lemma 3. If a1 ≥a2, b1 ≥b2, then

(3) a1b1+a2b2 ≥a1b2+a2b1. Proof. Quite simply, we have

a1b1+a2b2−(a1b2+a2b1) =a1(b1−b2)−a2(b1−b2)

= (a1−a2)(b1−b2)≥0.

(3)

Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality Yasuharu Uchida vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 56, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page3of 5 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Iterating Lemma3, we naturally obtain Theorem2.

Proof of Theorem2by induction onn. Without loss of generality, we can assume that the terms are in decreasing order.

1. Whenn = 1, the theorem is trivial sincea11 ≥1·a1.

2. If Theorem2is true whenn=k, then, for arbitrary positive numbersa1, a2, . . . , ak,

(4) a1k+a2k+· · ·+akk ≥ka1a2· · ·ak. Now assume thata1 ≥a2 ≥ · · · ≥ak ≥ak+1 >0.

Exchanging factorsak+1 and ai (i = k, k−1, . . . ,2,1)between the last term and the other sequentially, by Lemma3, we obtain the following inequalities

a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+akk+1+ak+1k+1

=a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+ak−1k+1+akk·ak+ak+1k·ak+1

≥a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+ak−1k+1+akk·ak+1+ak+1k·ak

· · · ·

≥a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+ai−1k+1+aik·ai+· · · +akkak+1+ak+1iai+1ai+2· · ·ak·ak+1. Asaki ≥aik+1ai+1ai+2. . . ak, ai ≥ak+1, we can apply Lemma3so that

(4)

Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality Yasuharu Uchida vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 56, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page4of 5 Go Back Full Screen

Close

a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+ai−1k+1+aik·ai+· · ·

+akkak+1+ak+1iai+1ai+2· · ·ak·ak+1

≥a1k+1+a2k+1+· · ·+ai−1k+1+aik·ak+1+· · ·+akkak+1 +ak+1iai+1ai+2· · ·ak·ai

· · · ·

≥a1kak+1+a2kak+1+· · ·+akkak+1+a1a2a3· · ·ak+1

= (a1k+a2k+· · ·+akk)ak+1+a1a2a3· · ·ak+1. By assumption of induction (4), we have

(a1k+a2k+· · ·+akk)ak+1+a1a2a3· · ·ak+1

≥(ka1a2· · ·ak)ak+1+a1a2a3· · ·ak+1

= (k+ 1)a1a2· · ·akak+1. From the same proof of Lemma3,

if a1 > a2, b1 > b2, then a1b1+a2b2 > a1b2+a2b1.

Thus, in the above sequence of inequalities, if the relationship ai ≥ ak+1 is replaced byai > ak+1for somei, the inequality sign≥also has to be replaced by>at the conclusion. We have the equality if and only ifa1 =a2 =· · ·=an.

(5)

Geometric-Arithmetic Mean Inequality Yasuharu Uchida vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 56, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page5of 5 Go Back Full Screen

Close

References

[1] P.S. BULLEN, Handbook of Means and Their Inequalities, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2003.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Universit´e Paul Sabatier, Labora- toire de Statistique et Probabilit´es, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 09 email: [email protected]..

Boor and Schoenberg [9] proved that the case of equality was true only for the com- parison functions when n ≥ 3 and true for a class of functions which were a modifica- tion of

In order to prove that all equations from the list are really integrable, we find, in Section 4, an auto-B¨ acklund transformation involving a “spectral” parameter for each of

[3] Chen Guowang and L¨ u Shengguan, Initial boundary value problem for three dimensional Ginzburg-Landau model equation in population problems, (Chi- nese) Acta Mathematicae

The measure σ p,n of Theorem 1 assigns to measurable subsets of S p,n (1) their Minkowski surface area, an intrinsic area in that it depends on geodesic distances on the surface..

As a consequence we obtain, using only the exact homology sequence of a pair, a simple proof of the well-known result that rank-selection in a poset preserves the

On the other hand, suppose that X is a 1–dimensional, stable random variable and let Y (1) be the infinitely divisible vector whose L´evy measure is the L´evy measure of X truncated

Stegun (Eds), Handbook of Mathematical Func- tions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, National Bu- reau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55, 4th printing,