• 検索結果がありません。

QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS"

Copied!
13
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

I nt. J. Math. Math. Si.

Vol. No.

2

(1980) 255-266

255

QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

K. INAYAT NOOR and D.K. THOMAS

Kerman University P. O. Box 182

Kerman, Iran

University College of Swansea SWANSEA SA2 8PP, Wales

(Received May 9, 1979 and

n

Revised form in June 25, 1979)

ABSTRACT. In this paper, a new class of normalized univalent functions is intro- duced. The properties of this class and its relationship with some other sub- classes of univalent functions are studied. The functions in this class are close- to-convex.

1980

MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES: Primary OA2; Secondary 0A34 KEFWORDS AND PHRASES.

Univalent

functions, Quasi-nvex, Close-to-nvex.

1 INTRODUCTION

Denote by S the class of functions f which are regular and univalent in the

,

unit disc E and satisfy f(0) 0 and f’

(0)

i. The subclasses S and C of star- like and convex functions respectively are well known and have been extensively

,

studied. S and C are connected by the basic property

(2)

,

f C if and only if

zf’

e S (i.i)

The subclass K of S consisting of close-to-convex function is also well

,

known and many of the properties of S can be extended to the wider class K.

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a natural analogue of the class C

in terms of the property defined in (i.i).

2. MAIN RESULTS.

Def. Let f be regular in

E

with f(O) 0 and

f’(0)

I. Then f is said to be

quasi-convex

in

E

if there exists a convex function g with g(0) 0,

g’(0)

1 such that for z e

E,

Re

.(zf’ (z))’

g’ (z)"

> 0. (2.2)

Denote the class of quasi-convex functions by Q.

It is clear that when f(z) g(z), C Q so that C c Q. We show first that Q c K, so that every quasi-convex functions is univalent.

THEOREM I. Let f e Q. Then, for z e

E,

Re

__zf..’.(z).

> 0

g(z)

and so Q c K c S thus, every quasi-convex function is close-to-convex and hence univalent in

E.

PROOF: A result of Libera [4] shows that, if s and t are functions re-

,

gular in E with s(0) t(0) 0 and t e S then for z E,

Re

__s.’_(z)

> 0 + Re

s(z)

> O.

t’(z) t(z)

An immediate application of this with s(z) zf’ (z) and t(z) g(z) proves

(3)

QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 257

Theorem i.

It follows at once from the definition that

f Q if and only if zf’ e K. (2.2)

We can thus write

C

>

S

Q

>

K

where the direction of the arrow indicates set inclusion.

Theorem i shows that the image domain for all f e Q is close-to-convex.

However a specific characterisation of the image domain for f e Q remains an open question.

we

state now some basic properties of quasi-convex functions which can easily be extended from the class of convex functions. We omit the proofs as they are simple extensions from the convex case.

THEOREM 2. Let f e Q with f(z) z

+

anzn Then for

zl

r < i,

n=2

(i)

lanl

< i, n 2,3,...,

(+/-i) 2-<

If’(z)

< 2

(l+r) (l-r)

(iii) r <_

If (z) -<

l-rr l+r

(iv) w > 1/2 where

f(z)+

w in E

All inequalities are sharp, equality being attained for

f0(z)

l-zZ

(4)

We now give an example of a function in Q which is not convex.

Example 1 3 1 Let

fl

be the Koebe function; i e

fl(z)

(-z)z 2 Then

fl

maps E i-i conformally onto the w-plane cut from- to along the

x+

z

negative real axis. Let

f2:f2 "(z)

l+xz x E. Then

f2

maps E onto it-

self and takes the origin onto the point x. Define

f3

by

f3(z) fl[f2(z)] fl(x) f3(0)

0 and

f3"

(0) 0 (since

f3

is univalent), and let

f4

f3 (z)

f4 (z) f’0---

z E.

Combining all these transformations, we can write

fl +_z )_ fl(x

F(z) +

xz

f (x) (-Ix i)

z (i- z)2

The function F is close-to-convex. In fact,

fl/X+

z

F’(z) 1 + .z/

fl(x)

(i

+ x--z)2

F"(z) F’

(z)

(i

+

xz)

and

(5)

OUASI-CONVEX

UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

zF"(z) F’

(z)

,,!x +

z

1

x+z

i

+z

f

x+z I (x+z)

(i

+xz)

2xz

z(, .- 1,* lz).

(x+ z) (i +xz) +i

,,/x+z

fl )(" z(- xl +

,/" +_

z

)l (-,-z)" (,,,z)

fl [l+xz

/

(x+z) (t+xz)

i+

)z

fl

(x+z)

(l+x--z) (x+z) (.iz)

Le

ie i8 2

ie x

+

re

i

re (i-

z re r

I

e d8

dq).

is

)

1

+

x re (x

+

re (i

+

xre

For Now,

and

2

with

(i

<

2

), we have correspndlng

81

and 82 with

(I

ie

F"(rei)

} ( f’()} rlei

Re

+

re d8 Re i+ d

;

F’

re

18) fl

()

’i+ rlei f-[ (rlei@)}

Re

----’) d

fl

(6)

Hence, for

0

1 and

81

< 82,

i8

F_’:(

re

iS)I

d8

F’

(re

i8)

02

i

fM(rl ei

Re 1+

rle

I

fl (rlei )i

de >

-

which shows that f e K.

Now,

+ x+

l+z z)

F’

(z)

l+xz 1

+

l+x

l+xZ!

i- l-x

(i -x)3 i (i +x)

(l+xz)2

(1

+

(i z)3

l+x

,

i- x

=z

B=I+x 1-’x

Intergrating, we have for z e E,

’F(z)

z(l

+

--

z)

(i z)

We notice that F maps E onto the w-plane cut along a half-line

".

nce

the choice of the point x in E is arbitrary, we can select x in such a way that the half-line does not pass through the origin in

F(E),

which

means F is not, in general, starlike. Because of relationships (3) and (1) between the classes Q and K and S we conclude that, in general,

(7)

QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 261 2

the function

f,

defined in E by

f,(z)

F ()

d

belongs to Q but not to 0

C.

3. SOME GROWTH PROBLEMS

Clunle and Keogh [i] showed that, if f C with f(z) z

+

n=2

.

a zn and fCE) has finite area. Then n a o(I) as n / and the exponent Is best pos-

n

slble. We extend this result to quasl-convex functions.

THEOREM 3. Let f Q with f(z) z

+

a zn If f(E) has finite area, then n=2 n

n a o(1) as n +

,,

the index of n being 5est possible.

n

PROOF: We use a modified version of themethod of Clunie and Pommerenke [2].

By

(2),

we can write

(zf’(z))’ g’(z)h(z),

where Re h(z) )0 for z E and

h(0)

i. Thus,

z(zf’(z))’ 2zg’(z)

Reh(z)

zg’

(z)

h(z),

and so with z rei8 0 < r < i, Cauchy’s formula gives for n > I

2 1

n a

z(zf’ (z))’e-nSd8

n 21[rn 0

21[ _in0

d

1

zg’(z)Re

h (z)e O-

1[rn 0 Since Re h(z) > 0 for a E,

21[

n21a

n

-<

in

J [zg’(z) IRe

h(z) dO

+

i

1[r 0 21[rn

21[

I zg

2rn 0

’(z) h(z)e-in0dO.

21[

’(z)

h(z)eIn0 dO (3.2)

(8)

Re[z(zf,(z)),e-larg zg’(z)]

from

(3.1),

and so inte- grating the first of the above two integrals by parts we have

1

[zg’(z) IRe

hCz)dO Re 1

z(zf’Cz)) ’e-larg

z

g’ (z)de

--

2/[ -i arg z

g’ (Z)de

e

Re

----I zf’(z)e

z g

wrn 0

(z))

Also,

zg’(z)

h(z)

z(zf,(z)),e-21

arg z

g’(z)

and so (3.2) and (3.3) give 2

n

[a n] -< --n

r Re

f’(z)e

-i arg g

’(z) do(arg

Z

g’(z))

i 2r2n

2/[

-2i arg z

g’(Z)do

zn+l

(’f’ (z))’

e 0

1 1

II

+ -12

say.

n 2n

r

(3.4)

To estimate

II,

we note that, since f is regular in E and the area of

f(E) is finite,

M(r,f’) 0.(i)

as r- i

1 -r

2

where M(r,f)

xl(reiS.) I-

Since d0 (arg z

g’(z))

2, we have 0

o(I) as r + i.

I1

1-r

(9)

OUASI-CONVEX

UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 263

Integrating

12

by parts gives

12

2 Fn(z)e-2i arg z

g’ (Z)Re(zg’ (z))’

d0

0

g’(z)

where

z

Fn(Z)

tn

(tf’(t))’dt zn+if’(z) -nfn(Z),

0

and

z

f (z)

tnf ’(t)dt.

0

Now

r

IF

n (z) <

rn+iM(

tn

r,f’) + nM(r,f’)

dt 0

<

2rn+iM(r, f’).

2w

dO 2, we have

(z’ (z))_’

Since Re

(z) g 0

12

<

8rn+iM(r,f,)_. o(I)i

-r as r + i as before.

Finally, choosing r 1- i in (3.4) the estimates for I

I

and

12

give

n

na o(i) as n / and Theorem 3 is proved.

n

An examination of the proof of Theorem 3 gives

COROLLARY: Let f e Q, Er {z:

Izl

r < i} and A(r) be the area of

f(Er).

Then, for n > 2,

(10)

n[anl

0(i) A(I

1_)%

n

(3.5)

We remark that

(3.5)

holds for the class S

,

but appears still to be an open

problem for the class K.

Denote by C(r) the closed curve which is the image of f(E

r)

and by L

(r)

the

length of C(r). We prove

THEOREM 4. Let f e Q. Then, for 0 < r ,e i,

2/(A(r))

< L(r) <

2/ (A(/r))

(io

l/_r

Further, if A(r) < for 0 < r < i, then

L(r) o(i)

(lo_ir)1/2

as r +. I.

PROOF: The left hand inequality follows atonce. from the isoperlmetrlc in- equality. Since f e Q, F(z) zf’ (z) is close-to-convex. Thus from [3,p.45]

2 2

LCr)

[zf

(z)

ld0 [(z);d0

0 0

r

< 2

M(;),zf’) d;)

0

n=l

n=l

n

/

i-1/2

2/(A(/r)

io

ig_r

(11)

QUASI-CONVEX UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS 265

If a(r) < for 0 < r < I, then from (3.7)

L(r)--" 2

[ la

n

Ir

n

n=l N

< 2 n=l

[ lanlr

n

+

n=N

[ nlanl

2n

1/2 21/2 r

n

n=l N

2 n=l

[ lanlrn +

N

logl#r2

1 1/2

where

N

/ 0 as N / Thus L(r) o(i)

Io

"as r /i.

1 1

1/2

The convex function

fl

(z)

log_z

shows that the factor

lOl-r

in

(3.6) is best possible.

For f e C it is well know that L(r) < 2M(r). It follows from

(3.6)

that for f e Q, L(r) 0(i) M(r)

log_r

as r/l. The question of whether the factor

io

can be removed remains open.

In conclusion, we remark that other results for the class C can be extended to quasi-convex functions, often with only minor alterations in the proof. The objective of this paper has been to introduce the class Q, exhibit its basic properties and give some results whose proofs are not trivial extensions from the class C.

(12)

REFERENCES

i. CLUNIE,J.G. and

KEOGH, F.R., "On

starlike and convex schlicht functions", J. London Math.Soc., 35

(1960),

229-233.

2. CLUNIE, J.G. and POMMERENKE, Ch.,

"On

the coefficients of close-to-convex univalent functions", J. London Math.Soc., 41

(1966),161-165.

3.

HAYMAN, W.K.,

’Multivalent functions’ Cambridge, 1967

4

LIBERA,

R.J

"Some

classes of regular univalent functions" Proc.Amer Math Soc., 16

(1965),

755-758.

(13)

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Special Issue on Space Dynamics

Call for Papers

Space dynamics is a very general title that can accommodate a long list of activities. This kind of research started with the study of the motion of the stars and the planets back to the origin of astronomy, and nowadays it has a large list of topics. It is possible to make a division in two main categories: astronomy and astrodynamics. By astronomy, we can relate topics that deal with the motion of the planets, natural satellites, comets, and so forth. Many important topics of research nowadays are related to those subjects.

By astrodynamics, we mean topics related to spaceflight dynamics.

It means topics where a satellite, a rocket, or any kind of man-made object is travelling in space governed by the grav- itational forces of celestial bodies and/or forces generated by propulsion systems that are available in those objects. Many topics are related to orbit determination, propagation, and orbital maneuvers related to those spacecrafts. Several other topics that are related to this subject are numerical methods, nonlinear dynamics, chaos, and control.

The main objective of this Special Issue is to publish topics that are under study in one of those lines. The idea is to get the most recent researches and published them in a very short time, so we can give a step in order to help scientists and engineers that work in this field to be aware of actual research. All the published papers have to be peer reviewed, but in a fast and accurate way so that the topics are not outdated by the large speed that the information flows nowadays.

Before submission authors should carefully read over the journal’s Author Guidelines, which are located athttp://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/guidelines.html. Prospective au- thors should submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking Sy- stem athttp://mts.hindawi.com/according to the following timetable:

Manuscript Due July 1, 2009 First Round of Reviews October 1, 2009 Publication Date January 1, 2010

Lead Guest Editor

Antonio F. Bertachini A. Prado,Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil;[email protected]

Guest Editors

Maria Cecilia Zanardi,São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, 12516-410 São Paulo, Brazil;

[email protected]

Tadashi Yokoyama,Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, 13506-900 São Paulo, Brazil;

[email protected]

Silvia Maria Giuliatti Winter,São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, 12516-410 São Paulo, Brazil;

[email protected]

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

参照

関連したドキュメント

Simons via his open mapping stated (1) in the setting of metrizable locally convex real vector spaces by supposing f is cs-convex (rather than convex and lower semicontinuous) and R

We generalized Definition 5 of close-to-convex univalent functions so that the new class CC) includes p-valent functions.. close-to-convex) and hence any theorem about

Linear Algebra Appl., 420:102–116, 2007] of matrix convex functions of a fixed order defined in a real interval by differential methods as opposed to the characteriza- tion in terms

The sharp function given in the proof of Theorem 4 is independent of the point under consideration whereas the sharp function used for inequality. (19) is dependent on

We generalized Definition 5 of close-to-convex univalent functions so that the new class CC) includes p-valent functions.. close-to-convex) and hence any theorem about

Hallenbeck, Convex hulls and extreme points of some families of univalent functions, Trans.. Minda, Uniformly convex

In recent years many authors had established several generalizations of the Simp- son’s inequality for functions of bounded variation and for Lipschitzian, monotonic, and

The sharp function given in the proof of Theorem 4 is independent of the point under consideration whereas the sharp function used for inequality. (19) is dependent on