• 検索結果がありません。

FOR QUADRATIC FUZZY EQUATIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "FOR QUADRATIC FUZZY EQUATIONS"

Copied!
22
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

FOR QUADRATIC FUZZY EQUATIONS

JUAN J. NIETO AND ROSANA RODR´IGUEZ-L ´OPEZ Received 8 November 2004 and in revised form 8 March 2005

Some results on the existence of solution for certain fuzzy equations are revised and extended. In this paper, we establish the existence of a solution for the fuzzy equation Ex2+Fx+G=x, whereE,F,G, andxare positive fuzzy numbers satisfying certain con- ditions. To this purpose, we use fixed point theory, applying results such as the well- known fixed point theorem of Tarski, presenting some results regarding the existence of extremal solutions to the above equation.

1. Preliminaries

In [1], it is studied the existence of extremal fixed points for a map defined in a subset of the setE1of fuzzy real numbers, that is, the family of elementsx:R[0, 1] with the properties:

(i)xis normal: there existst0Rwithx(t0)=1.

(ii)xis upper semicontinuous.

(iii)xis fuzzy convex, xλt1+ (1λ)t2

minxt1

,xt2

, t1,t2R[0, 1]. (1.1) (iv) The support ofx, supp(x)=cl({tR:x(t)>0}) is a bounded subset ofR. In the following, for a fuzzy numberxE1, we denote theα-level set

[x]α=

tR:x(t)α (1.2)

by the interval [xαl,xαr], for eachα(0, 1], and [x]0=clα(0,1][x]α=

x0l,x0r

. (1.3)

Note that this notation is possible, since the properties of the fuzzy numberxguarantee that [x]αis a nonempty compact convex subset ofR, for eachα[0, 1].

Copyright©2005 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2005:3 (2005) 321–342 DOI:10.1155/FPTA.2005.321

(2)

We consider the partial orderinginE1given by

x,yE1, xy⇐⇒xαlyαl, xαryαr, α(0, 1], (1.4) and the distance that providesE1the structure of complete metric space is given by

d(x,y)= sup

α[0,1]

dH[x]α, [y]α, forx,yE1, (1.5) beingdH the Hausdorffdistance between nonempty compact convex subsets ofR(that is, compact intervals).

For each fuzzy numberxE1, we define the functionsxL: [0, 1]R,xR: [0, 1]R given byxL(α)=xαlandxR(α)=xαr, for eachα[0, 1].

Theorem1.1 [1, Theorem 2.3]. Letu0,v0E1,u0< v0. Let B

u0,v0

=

xE1:u0xv0

(1.6)

be a closed set ofE1such thatu0,v0B. Suppose thatA:BBis an increasing operator such that

u0Au0, Av0v0, (1.7)

andAis condensing, that is,Ais continuous, bounded andr(A(S))< r(S)for any bounded setSBwithr(S)>0, wherer(S)denotes the measure of noncompactness ofS. ThenAhas a maximal fixed pointxand a minimal fixed pointxinB, moreover

x= lim

n−→+vn, x= lim

n−→+un, (1.8)

wherevn=Avn1andun=Aun1,n=1, 2,...and

u0u1≤ ··· ≤un≤ ··· ≤vn≤ ··· ≤v1v0. (1.9) Corollary1.2 [1, Corollary 2.4]. In the hypotheses ofTheorem 1.1, ifAhas a unique fixed pointx¯inB, then, for anyx0B, the successive iterates

xn=Axn1, n=1, 2,... (1.10)

converge tox, that is,¯ d(xn, ¯x)0asn+.

Theorem 1.1is used in [1] to solve the fuzzy equation

Ex2+Fx+G=x, (1.11)

whereE,F,Gandxare positive fuzzy numbers satisfying some additional conditions. In this direction, consider the class of fuzzy numbersxE1satisfying

(i)x >0,xL(α),xR(α)1/6, for eachα[0, 1].

(ii)|xL(α)xL(β)|<(M/6)|αβ| and |xR(α)xR(β)|<(M/6)|αβ|, for every α,β[0, 1].

Denote this class byᏲ.

(3)

Theorem1.3 [1, Theorem 2.9]. LetM >0 be a real number. Suppose thatE,F,GᏲ.

Then (1.11) has a solution in BM=

xE1: 0x1,|xL(α)xL(β)| ≤M|αβ|,

|xR(α)xR(β)| ≤M|αβ|,α,β[0, 1]. (1.12) Here, 0,1 referred to fuzzy numbers represent, respectively, the characteristic functions of 0 and 1, that is,χ{0}andχ{1}.

In the proof ofTheorem 1.3, in addition toTheorem 1.1, the following results are used.

Theorem1.4 [1, Theorem 2.6]. For each fuzzy numberx, functions

xL: [0, 1]−→R, xR: [0, 1]−→R (1.13) are continuous.

Theorem1.5 [1, Theorem 2.7]. Suppose thatxandyare fuzzy numbers, then d(x,y)=maxxLyL,xRyR

. (1.14)

Theorem1.6 [1, Theorem 2.8]. BMis a closed subset ofE1. Lemma1.7 [1, Lemma 2.10]. Suppose thatBE1. If

BL=

xL:xB, BR=

xR:xB (1.15)

are compact in(C[0, 1], · ), thenBis a compact set inE1.

InSection 2, we point out some considerations about the previous results and justify the validity of the proof ofTheorem 1.3given in [1], presenting a more general existence result. Then, inSection 3, we study the existence of solution to (1.11) by using some fixed point theorems such as Tarski’s fixed point theorem, proving the existence of extremal solutions to (1.11) under less restrictive hypotheses.

2. Revision and extension of results in[1]

First of all,Theorem 1.4[1, Theorem 2.6] is not valid. Indeed, take for example,x:R [0, 1] defined as

tR−→x(t)=

1

2, t[1, 0)(0, 1], 1, t=0,

0, otherwise,

(2.1)

which represents [2, Proposition 6.1.7] and [3, Theorem 1.5.1] a fuzzy real number since the level sets ofxare the nonempty compact convex sets

[x]α=

[1, 1], if 0α1 2, {0}, if1

2< α1.

(2.2)

(4)

Then,xL: [0, 1]Ris given by

xL(α)=

1, if 0α1 2, 0, if1

2< α1,

(2.3)

andxR: [0, 1]Ris

xR(α)=

1, if 0α1 2, 0, if1

2< α1,

(2.4)

which are clearly discontinuous. Note thatxLandxR are left-continuous see [3, Theo- rem 1.5.1] and [2, Propositions 6.1.6 and 6.1.7]. In the proof ofTheorem 1.4[1, The- orem 2.6], it is considered a sequenceαn> αwithαnαasn+. ThenxLn) is a nonincreasing and bounded sequence, hence,xLn) converges to a numberL. At this point, one cannot affirm thatx(L)αn. For example, in the previous case, takingα=1/2 andαn=1/2 + 1/n, with n >2, thenxLn)=0. HencexLn) converges toL=0, but x(L)=x(0)=1> αn=1/2 + 1/nfor alln >2.

A fuzzy number is not necessarily a continuous function, just upper semicontinuous, thusTheorem 1.4[1, Theorem 2.6] is not valid in the general context of fuzzy real num- bers. However, it is valid for continuous fuzzy numbers, that is, fuzzy numbers continu- ous in its membership grade, as we state below. Here᏷1Cdenotes the space of nonempty compact convex subsets ofRfurnished with the HausdorffmetricdH.

Definition 2.1. We say that a fuzzy numberx:R[0, 1] is continuous if the function

[x]·: [0, 1]−→1C (2.5)

given byα[x]αis continuous on (0, 1], that is, for everyα(0, 1], and>0, there exists a numberδ(,α)>0 such thatdH

[x]α, [x]β<, for everyβδ,α+δ)[0, 1].

Theorem2.2. Letxbe a fuzzy number, thenxis continuous if and only if functions xL: [0, 1]−→R, xR: [0, 1]−→R (2.6) are continuous.

Proof. Suppose thatxE1is continuous and letα(0, 1] and>0. Sincexis continu- ous atα, then there existsδ(,α)>0 such that for everyβδ,α+δ)[0, 1],

dH[x]α, [x]β=max|xαlxβl|,|xαrxβr|

=max|xL(α)xL(β)|,|xR(α)xR(β)|

<, (2.7) which implies that

xL(α)xL(β)<, xR(α)xR(β)<, (2.8)

(5)

for everyβδ,α+δ)[0, 1], proving the continuity ofxLandxRatα. Reciprocally, continuity ofxLandxRtrivially implies the continuity ofx.

Remark 2.3. For a givenxE1,x, [x]·,xLandxRare trivially continuous atα=0. Indeed, let>0. The 0-level set ofx(support ofx) is the closure of the union of all of the level sets, that is,

[x]0=clβ(0,1]

xL(β),xR(β). (2.9)

SincexL(β) is nondecreasing inβandxR(β) is nonincreasing inβand those values are bounded, then

xL(0)= inf

β(0,1]xL(β), xR(0)= sup

β(0,1]

xR(β). (2.10)

For>0, there existβ1,2,(0, 1], such that xL(0)xL

β1,

< xL(0) +, xR(0)< xRβ2,

xR(0). (2.11)

By monotonicity,

xL(0)xL(β)xL β1,

< xL(0) +, for 0< ββ1,, xR(0)< xRβ2,

xR(β)xR(0), for 0< ββ2,. (2.12) Hence, takingδ=min{β1,2,}>0, we obtain

xL(0)xL(β)< xL(0) +, xR(0)< xR(β)xR(0), (2.13) for every 0< βδ, and

dH

[x]0, [x]β=maxxL(0)xL(β),xR(0)xR(β)<, β[0,δ]. (2.14)

As a particular case of continuous fuzzy numbers, we present Lipschitzian fuzzy num- bers.

Definition 2.4. We say thatxE1is a Lipschitzian fuzzy number if it is a Lipschitz func- tion of its membership grade, in the sense that

dH

[x]α, [x]βK|αβ|, (2.15) for everyα,β[0, 1] and some fixed, finite constantK0.

(6)

This property of fuzzy numbers is equivalent (see [2, page 43]) to the Lipschitzian character of the support functionsx(·,p) uniformly inpS0, where

sx(α,p)=sp, [x]α=supp,a:a[x]α, (α,p)[0, 1]×S0, (2.16) andS0is the unit sphere inR, that is, the set{−1, +1}.

If we consider a Lipschitzian fuzzy numberx, thenx is continuous and, in conse- quence, xL and xR are continuous functions. Moreover, we prove that these are Lips- chitzian functions.

Theorem2.5. LetxE1. Thenxis a Lipschitzian fuzzy number, with Lipschitz constant K0, if and only ifxL: [0, 1]RandxR: [0, 1]RareK-Lipschitzian functions.

Proof. It is deduced from the identity dH

[x]α, [x]β=max|xαlxβl|,|xαrxβr|

=max|xL(α)xL(β)|,|xR(α)xR(β)|

, for everyα,β[0, 1].

(2.17) Note thatTheorem 1.5 [1, Theorem 2.7] is valid for · considered in the space L[0, 1], but not in C[0, 1], since for an arbitrary fuzzy numberx,xL andxR are not necessarily continuous. Nevertheless, fromTheorem 2.2, we deduce that the distanced

can be characterized for continuous fuzzy numbers in terms of the sup norm inC[0, 1], and also for Lipschitzian fuzzy numbers.

Theorem2.6. Suppose thatxandyare continuous fuzzy numbers (in the sense ofDefinition 2.1), then

d(x,y)=maxxLyL,xRyR

. (2.18)

Proof. Indeed,

d(x,y)= sup

α[0,1]

dH[x]α, [y]α

= sup

α[0,1]

max|xL(α)yL(α)|,|xR(α)yR(α)|

=max

sup

α[0,1]

|xL(α)yL(α)|, sup

α[0,1]

|xR(α)yR(α)|

=maxxLyL,xRyR .

(2.19)

ForM >0 fixed, consider the set

BM=

xE1:χ{0}xχ{1},xisM-Lipschitzian. (2.20)

(7)

Note thatBMcoincides with the set with the same name defined inTheorem 1.3[1, Theo- rem 2.9] and thatBM is a closed set inE1. For the sake of completeness, we give here another proof. Letxna sequence inBM such that limn+xn=xE1inE1. We prove thatxBM. Given>0, there existsn0Nsuch that

d

xn,x= sup

α[0,1]

dH[xn]α, [x]α<, fornn0. (2.21)

Then, fornn0, dH

[x]α, [x]βdH

[x]α, [xn]α+dH

[xn]α, [xn]β+dH

[xn]β, [x]β

<2+Mαβ, for everyα,β[0, 1]. (2.22) Since>0 is arbitrary, this means that

dH

[x]α, [x]βM|αβ|, for everyα,β[0, 1], (2.23)

andxisM-Lipschitzian. We can easily prove thatχ{0}xnχ{1}, for allnimplies that χ{0}xχ{1}.Therefore,xBM.

ConcerningLemma 1.7[1, Lemma 2.10] we have to restrict our attention to relatively compact sets, since we are not considering closed sets. On the other hand, ifBcontains noncontinuous fuzzy numbers,BLandBRare not subsets ofC[0, 1]. We prove the corre- sponding result.

Lemma2.7. Suppose thatBE1consists of continuous fuzzy numbers, hence BL=

xL:xB, BR=

xR:xB (2.24)

are subsets ofC[0, 1]. IfBLandBR are relatively compact in(C[0, 1], · ), thenBis a relatively compact set inE1.

Proof. Let{xn}nB a sequence inB and I=[0, 1]. SinceBL is relatively compact in (C(I), · ), then{(xn)L}nhas a subsequence{(xnk)L}kconverging inC(I) tof1C(I).

Using thatBR is relatively compact in (C(I), · ), then{(xnk)R}k has a subsequence {(xnl)R}l converging inC(I) to f2C(I). We have to prove that {[f1(α),f2(α)] :α [0, 1]}is the family of level sets of some fuzzy numberxE1and, hence,xL=f1,xR=f2. Indeed, intervals [f1(α),f2(α)] are nonempty compact convex subsets ofR, since

xnl

L(α) xnl

R(α), α[0, 1],lN, (2.25) and, thus, passing to the limit asl+,

f1(α) f2(α), α[0, 1]. (2.26)

(8)

Moreover, if 0α1α21, xnlLα1

xnlLα2

, xnlRα1

xnlRα2

, l, (2.27)

so that

f1

α1

f1

α2

, f2

α1

f2

α2

, (2.28)

then

f12),f22)

f11),f21). (2.29) Finally, letα >0 and{αi} ↑α, then{[f1i),f2i)]}is a contractive sequence of compact intervals, and, by continuity of f1and f2,

i1

f1i),f2i)=

αilim−→αf1i), lim

αi−→αf2i)=

f1(α),f2(α). (2.30) Applying [2, Proposition 6.1.7] or also [3, Theorem 1.5.1], there existsxE1such that

[x]α=

f1(α),f2(α), α(0, 1], (2.31) and

[x]0=cl0<α1[f1(α),f2(α)]=

αlim−→0+f1(α), lim

α−→0+f2(α)=

f1(0),f2(0) (2.32) again by continuity of f1, f2. Note thatxL= f1 andxR= f2are continuous, thusxis a continuous fuzzy number and alsoxnlis, for everyl. Then, byTheorem 2.6,

d(xnl,x)=max(xnl)Lf1,(xnl)Rf2 l+

−−−−→0, (2.33)

and{xnl}lxinE1, completing the proof.

Recall equation (1.11)

Ex2+Fx+G=x. (2.34)

Here, the productx·yof two fuzzy numbersxandyis given by the Zadeh’s extension principle:

x·y:R−→[0, 1]

(x·y)(t)=sup

s·s=t

minx(s),y(s). (2.35) Note that [x·y]α=[x]α·[y]α, for everyα[0, 1]. See [2, page 4] and [3, page 3].

(9)

In the following, we make reference to the canonical partial orderingonE1as well as the orderdefined by

x,yE1,xy⇐⇒[x]α[y]α, α(0, 1], (2.36) that is,

xαlyαl, xαryαr, α(0, 1]. (2.37) Remark 2.8. Note that, for a givenxE1, it is not true in general that

x2χ{0}, x2χ{0}. (2.38) Indeed, forx=χ[3,3],

χ[3,3]

2

=χ[9,9]χ{0}, (2.39) and, fory=χ[1,2], we obtain

χ[1,2]

2

=χ[1,4]χ{0}. (2.40)

The proof ofTheorem 1.3[1, Theorem 2.9] can be completed using the revised results.

In fact, the same proof is valid for a more general situation. Note that, ifG=χ{0}, then x=χ{0}is a solution to (1.11).

Theorem2.9. LetM >0be a real number, andE,F,Gfuzzy numbers such that (i)E,F,Gχ{0},d(E,χ{0})1/6,d(F,χ{0})1/6,d(G,χ{0})4/6.

(ii)E,F,Gare(M/6)-Lipschitzian.

Then (1.11) has a solution inBM. Proof. We define the mapping

A:BM−→BM, (2.41)

byAx=Ex2+Fx+G. To check thatAis well-defined, letxBMand then (Ax)L(α)(Ax)L(β)

=EL(α)x2L(α) +FL(α)xL(α) +GL(α)EL(β)xL2(β)FL(β)xL(β)GL(β)

EL(α)EL(β)xL2(α) +EL(β)xL(α) +xL(β)·xL(α)xL(β) +FL(α)FL(β)xL(α) +FL(β)xL(α)xL(β)+GL(α)GL(β)

M

6 αβ+2M

6 αβ+M

6 αβ+M

6αβ+M

6 αβ

=Mαβ, α,β[0, 1],

(2.42)

(10)

and, analogously,

(Ax)R(α)(Ax)R(β)M|αβ|, for everyα,β[0, 1], (2.43)

therefore, by Theorem 2.5,AxE1 isM-Lipschitzian and, using the hypotheses and χ{0}xχ{1}, we obtain

0EL(α)x2L(α) +FL(α)xL(α) +GL(α)=(Ax)L(α)

(Ax)R(α)=ER(α)xR2(α) +FR(α)xR(α) +GR(α)

1 6+1

6+4 6=1,

(2.44)

forα[0, 1], achievingAxBM. Moreover,Ais a nondecreasing and continuous map- ping (useTheorem 2.6).Ais bounded, since

d

Ax,χ{0}

=d

Ex2+Fx+G,χ{0}

1, forxBM. (2.45) LetSBM a bounded set (consisting of continuous fuzzy numbers) withr(S)>0, and prove thatA(S) is relatively compact. In that case,

rA(S)=0< r(S) (2.46)

and the proof is complete by application ofTheorem 1.1[1, Theorem 2.3]. LetA(S)E1 and prove thatA(S)LandA(S)Rare relatively compact inC[0, 1]. Indeed, using that for yA(S),χ{0}yχ{1}, we obtain thatA(S)Lis a bounded set inC[0, 1],

yL

d y,χ{0}

1, yA(S). (2.47)

Let f A(S)L, then f isM-Lipschitzian, andA(S)Lis equicontinuous. This proves that A(S)Lis relatively compact by Arzel`a-Ascoli theorem, and the same forA(S)R.Lemma 2.7 guarantees thatA(S) is relatively compact and, therefore,Ais condensing. Besides,χ{0}

andχ{1}are elements inBM andχ{0}{0},{1}χ{1}. This completes the proof. In fact, there exist extremal solutions betweenχ{0}andχ{1}. Remark 2.10. Note that ourTheorem 2.9do not imposeGR(α)1/6 for allα[0, 1]

and, therefore, improves the results of [1].

Theorem 2.11. LetE,F,G be Lipschitzian fuzzy numbers withE,F,Gχ{0}. Moreover, suppose that there existk >0,S0such that

ER(0)k2+FR(0)k+GR(0)k, (2.48) MEk2+ER(0)2kS+MFk+FR(0)S+MGS, (2.49)

(11)

whereME,MF,MGare, respectively, the Lipschitz constants ofE,FandG. Then (1.11) has a solution in

Bk,S:=

xE1:χ{0}xχ{k},xisS-Lipschitzian. (2.50) Proof. Define

A:Bk,S−→E1, (2.51)

byAx=Ex2+Fx+G. We show thatA(Bk,S)Bk,S. Indeed, forxBk,S, and everyα [0, 1],

0EL(α)x2L(α) +FL(α)xL(α) +GL(α)=(Ax)L(α)

(Ax)R(α)=ER(α)x2R(α) +FR(α)xR(α) +GR(α)

ER(α)k2+FR(α)k+GR(α)ER(0)k2+FR(0)k+GR(0)

k,

(2.52)

which proves thatχ{0}Axχ{k}.Besides, forxBk,S, andα,β[0, 1], (Ax)L(α)(Ax)L(β)

EL(α)EL(β)x2L(α) +EL(β)xL(α) +xL(β)·xL(α)xL(β) +FL(α)FL(β)xL(α) +FL(β)xL(α)xL(β)+GL(α)GL(β)

MEk2+EL(β)2kS+MFk+FL(β)S+MG|αβ|

MEk2+ER(0)2kS+MFk+FR(0)S+MG

|αβ| ≤S|αβ|,

(2.53)

and, similarly,

(Ax)R(α)(Ax)R(β)S|αβ|, (2.54) provingAxBk,S. The proof is completed in the same way ofTheorem 2.9.

Remark 2.12. Inequalities (2.48) and (2.49) inTheorem 2.11are equivalent to d

E,χ{0}

k2+d F,χ{0}

k+d G,χ{0}

k, (2.55)

MEk2+d E,χ{0}

2kS+MFk+d F,χ{0}

S+MGS, (2.56) since, forxE1,xχ{0},

d x,χ{0}

= sup

α[0,1]

maxxL(α),xR(α)=xR(0). (2.57)

(12)

Corollary2.13. InTheorem 2.11, takeER(0)1/6,FR(0)1/6,GR(0)4/6, andME= MF=MG=M/6, withM >0, to obtainTheorem 2.9.

Proof. Conditions inTheorem 2.11are valid fork=1 andS=M. Indeed, ER(0)k2+FR(0)k+GR(0)1=k,

MEk2+ER(0)2kS+MFk+FR(0)S+MG

=M

6 +ER(0)2M+M

6 +FR(0)M+M 6 M.

(2.58)

3. Other existence results

Now, we present some results on the existence of extremal solutions to (1.11), based on Tarski’s fixed point Theorem [6]. For the sake of completeness, we present it here, and note that the proof is not constructive.

Theorem3.1. LetXbe a complete lattice and

F:X−→X (3.1)

a nondecreasing function, that is,F(x)F(y)wheneverxy. Suppose that there exists x0Xsuch thatF(x0)x0. ThenFhas at least one fixed point inX.

Proof. Consider the setY= {xX:F(x)x}, which is a nonempty set sincex0Y. Letz=supY (x0z). Note that, for everyxY,F(x)x, so thatF(F(x))F(x)x andF(x)Y. LetxY, thenxz, andxF(x)F(z), which implies thatzF(z).

On the other hand,zY, so thatF(z)Y, thenF(z)zandzis a fixed point forFin X. Note thatzis thus the maximal fixed point inX.

Remark 3.2. In the hypotheses of the previous result, if there exists x1X such that F(x1)x1, we obtain the minimal fixed point as the infimum of the set Z= {xX: F(x)x}. If, at the same time, there existx0andx1such thatF(x0)x0andF(x1)x1, then

z=supY=sup{xX:F(x)x},

zˆ=infZ=inf{xX:F(x)x} (3.2) are, respectively, the maximal and minimal fixed points ofF inX. Indeed, since there exists at least one fixed point forF, then ˆzz, and any fixed point forF is between ˆz andz.

Lemma3.3. IfE,x,yE1are such thatEχ{0}andχ{0}xy, thenχ{0}ExEy.

Proof. By hypotheses,

0xL(a)yL(a), 0xR(a)yR(a), a[0, 1],

0EL(a), 0ER(a), a[0, 1], (3.3)

(13)

so that, fora[0, 1], [Ex]a=

EL(a)xL(a),ER(a)xR(a), [Ey]a=

EL(a)yL(a),ER(a)yR(a), (3.4) where

0EL(a)xL(a)EL(a)yL(a), 0ER(a)xR(a)ER(a)yR(a), a[0, 1], (3.5) hence

χ{0}ExEy. (3.6)

Theorem3.4. LetE,F,Gbe fuzzy numbers such that

E,F,Gχ{0}, (3.7)

and suppose that there existsp >0such that

ER(0)p2+FR(0)p+GR(0)p. (3.8) Then (1.11) has extremal solutions in the interval

χ{0}{p} :=

xE1:χ{0}xχ{p}

. (3.9)

Proof. Sincep >0,χ{0}< χ{p}. Define

A:χ{0}{p}

−→E1, (3.10)

byAx=Ex2+Fx+G. We show thatA([χ{0},χ{p}]){0}{p}]. Indeed, {0}=E(χ{0})2+{0}+G=χ{0}+χ{0}+G=Gχ{0},

{p}=E(χ{p})2+{p}+G, (3.11) so that, using the conditions, for everya[0, 1], we have

{p}a

=

EL(a),ER(a)p2+FL(a),FR(a){p}+GL(a),GR(a)

=

EL(a)p2+FL(a)p+GL(a),ER(a)p2+FR(a)p+GR(a). (3.12) By hypotheses and using the properties of EL,ER,FL,FR,GL,GR, we obtain, for all a [0, 1],

EL(a)p2+FL(a)p+GL(a)ER(a)p2+FR(a)p+GR(a)

ER(0)p2+FR(0)p+GR(0)p. (3.13)

参照

関連したドキュメント

We establish some fixed common fixed and coincidence point results for mappings verifying some expansive type contractions in cone metric spaces with the help of the concept of

Aydi, “Common fixed point results for mappings satisfying ψ, φ-weak contractions in ordered partial metric spaces,” International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol..

Using truncations, theory of nonlinear operators of monotone type, and fixed point theory (the Leray-Schauder Al- ternative Theorem), we show the existence of a positive

By applying the Schauder fixed point theorem, we show existence of the solutions to the suitable approximate problem and then obtain the solutions of the considered periodic

After that, applying the well-known results for elliptic boundary-value problems (without parameter) in the considered domains, we receive the asymptotic formu- las of the solutions

Using a fixed point theorem of general α-concave operators, we present in this paper criteria which guarantee the existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for two classes

In the current work, we give the associate Green’s function and obtain the existence of multiple positive solutions for BVP (1.1) – (1.2) by employing the Leggett-Williams fixed

By virtue of the Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem and the five functionals fixed point theorem, we analytically establish several sufficient criteria for the existence of at least