• 検索結果がありません。

Nonstationary Process (i.e., variance depends on timet.) Difference betweenysandyt(s&gt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Nonstationary Process (i.e., variance depends on timet.) Difference betweenysandyt(s&gt"

Copied!
25
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

6. Summarizing the results up to now,T( ˆφ1−φ1), not √

T( ˆφ1−φ1), has limiting distribution in the case ofφ1 =1.

T( ˆφ1−φ1)= (1/T)∑ yt1t

(1/T2)∑

y2t1 −→ a distribution. 7. Basic Concepts of Random Walk Process:

(a) Model: yt =yt1+t, y0= 0, tN(0,1).

Then,

yt =t +t1+ · · · +1.

(2)

Therefore,

ytN(0,t).

=⇒ Nonstationary Process (i.e., variance depends on timet.) Difference betweenysandyt(s> t) is:

ysyt =s+s1+ · · · +t+2+t+1. The distribution ofysyt is:

ysytN(0,st).

(3)

(b) Rewrite as follows:

yt =yt1+t

=yt1+e1,t+e2,t+ · · · +eN,t,

wheret =e1,t +e2,t+ · · · +eN,t.

e1,t,e2,t,· · ·,eN,t are iid withei,tN(0,1/N).

That is, suppose that there are N subperiods between time t and time t+1.

(4)

The limit whenN → ∞is acontinuous time (連続時間)process known asstandard Brownian motionorWiener process.

The value of this process at timetis denoted byW(t).

Definition:

Standard Brownian motionW(t) denotes a continuous-time variable at timetand a stochastic function.

W(t) fort∈[0,1] satisfies the following:

i. W(0)=0

(5)

ii. For any time periods 0 ≤ r1 < r2 < · · · < rk ≤ 1, W(r2)−W(r1), W(r3)−W(r2),· · ·,W(rk)−W(rk1) are independently multivariate normal withW(s)W(t)∼ N(0,st) for s> t.

iii. W(t) is continuous intwith probability 1.

An example:

σW(t)N(0, σ2t),

which denotes the Brownian motion with varianceσ2. Another example;

W(t)2t×χ2(1).

(6)

(c) Assumet ∼ iid (0, σ2). DefineXT(r) forr ∈[0,1] as follows:

XT(r)=















0, 0≤r < 1

1 T

T, 1

Tr < 2 1+2 T

T , 2

Tr < 3

... ... T

1+2+ · · · +T

T , r= 1

(7)

Let [T r] be the largest integer which is less than or equal toT ×r.

XT(r)≡ 1 T

[T r]

t=1

t, √

T XT(r) −→ N(0,rσ2). Note that

1 T

[T r]

t=1

t = [T r]

T 1 [T r]

[T r]

t=1

t, [T r]

T −→ r, 1

√[T r]

[T r]

t=1

t −→ N(0, σ2),

T XT(r)= [T r]

T

T

[T r]

√1 [T r]

[T r]

t=1

t,

T

[T r] −→ 1

r.

(8)

Therefore, we obtain:

T XT(r) −→ N(0,rσ2).

Moreover, we have the following results:

T(XT(r2)−XT(r1))

σ −→ N(0,r2r1),

T XT(r)

σ −→ W(r)

(9)

For example, consider:

XT(1)= 1 T

T t=1

t.

Then, √

T XT(1)

σ = 1

σT

T t=1

t −→ W(1)= N(0,1).

(10)

(d) Consideryt =yt1+t, y0 =0 andtN(0, σ2).

XT(r) is defined as follows:

XT(r)=



















0, 0≤r < 1 T, y1

T, 1

Tr < 2 T, y2

T, 2

Tr < 3 T, ... ...

yT1

T , T −1

Tr<1, yT

T , r =1.

(11)

DefineST(r) as follows:

ST(r)=





















0, 0≤ r< 1 T, y21

T, 1

Tr < 2 T, y22

T, 2

Tr < 3 T, ... ...

y2T1

T , T −1

Tr<1, y2T

T , r =1.

(12)

To obtain

1 0

XT(r)drand

1 0

ST(r)dr, we compute a sum of rectangu- lars as follows:

1 0

XT(r)dr≈ y1 T

(2 T − 1

T )

+ y2 T

(3 T − 2

T )

+ · · · + yT−1 T

(

1− T −1 T

)

= y1 T2 + y2

T2 + · · · + yT1 T2 = 1

T2

T t=1

yt,

1

0

ST(r)dr≈ y21 T

(2 T − 1

T )

+ y22 T

(3 T − 2

T )

+ · · · + y2T1 T

(

1− T −1 T

)

= y21 T2 + y22

T2 + · · · + y2T1 T2 = 1

T2

T t=1

y2t.

(13)

We have already known that √

T XT(r) −→ σW(r).

Therefore, ∫ 1 0

T XT(r)dr −→ σ

1 0

W(r)dr. That is,

1 T3/2

T t=1

yt −→ σ

1

0

W(r)dr.

(14)

FromST(r)≡(√

T XT(r))2

,

ST(r) −→ σ2(W(r))2, which is called the continuous mapping theorem.

(*)Continuous Mapping Theorem (連続写像定理):

ifxT −→ x(convergence in distribution) andg(·) is a continuous func- tion, theng(xT)−→ g(x) (convergence in distribution).

(15)

Threfore, we have the follwoing result:

1 T2

T t=1

y2t −→

1 0

ST(r)dr =σ2

1 0

(W(r))2dr.

(e) DecomposeT−3/2

T t=1

yt1as follows:

T−3/2

T t=1

yt−1= T−3/2(1+(1+2)+(1+2+3)+ · · ·

+(1+2+ · · · +T1))

(16)

= T3/2((T −1)1+(T −2)2+(T −3)3+ · · · +2T2+T1)

= T3/2

T t=1

(T −t)t =T1/2

T t=1

tT3/2

T t=1

tt

We utilize the following fact:







T1/2

T t=1

t

T3/2

T t=1

tt





−→ N ( (0

0 )

, σ2





1 1

2 1 2

1 3



) tis stationary. =⇒ Apply CLT to (1/T)∑T

t=1t.

(17)

tt/T is stationary. =⇒ Apply CLT to (1/T)∑T

t=1tt/T. Using a matrix form, we ca rewrite as follows:

T3/2

T t=1

yt1 =(1 −1)







T−1/2

T t=1

t

T3/2

T t=1

tt





. Then, the variance ofT3/2T

t=1yt−1is given by:

V( T3/2

T t=1

yt1)

= σ2(1 −1)





1 1

2 1 2

1 3





( 1

−1 )

= σ2 3 . Therefore,T3/2T

t=1yt1N(0, σ2/3).

(18)

We have already known:

T3/2

T t=1

yt1 −→ σ

1

0

W(r)dr, 1

T

T t=1

t −→ σW(1).

That is, the following relationship holds:

σ

1 0

W(r)drT−3/2

T t=1

yt1 =T−1/2

T t=1

tT−3/2

T t=1

tt

≈σW(1)T3/2

T t=1

tt

(19)

Therefore, we obatain the following result:

T3/2

T t=1

tt −→ σW(1)−σ

1

0

W(r)dr= N(02 3 ). (f) Some Formulas: Model: yt =yt1+t.

i. T1/2

T t=1

t −→ σ W(1)= N(0, σ2)

ii. T1

T t=1

yt1t −→ 1 2σ2(

(W(1))2−1)

= 1 2σ2(

χ2(1)−1) Note that we obtain (W(1))2 ∼χ2(1) fromW(1)=N(0,1).

iii. T3/2

T t=1

tt−→σ W(1)−σ

1

0

W(r)dr = N(02 3 )

(20)

iv. T3/2

T t=1

yt1−→σ

1 0

W(r)dr= N(02 3 ) v. T2

T t=1

y2t1 −→ σ2

1

0

(W(r))2dr

vi. T5/2

T t=1

t yt1 −→ σ

1

0

r W(r)dr

vii. T−3

T t=1

t y2t1 −→ σ2

1 0

r (W(r))2dr

viii. T(ν+1)

T t=1

tν −→ 1

ν+1 forν =0,1,· · ·.

(21)

8. Asymptotic Distribution of AR(1) Model:

(a) True Model: yt = yt1 +t and Estimated Model: yt = φ1yt1 +t

OLSE ofφ1, denoted by ˆφ1, is given by:

φˆ1 =

T

t=1yt−1yt

T

t=1y2t11+

T t=1yt−1t

T t=1y2t1 Usingφ1= 1 and some formulas shown above, we obtain:

T( ˆφ1−1)= T1T

t=1yt1ut T2T

t=1y2t1 −→

1 2

((W(1))2−1)

1

0

(W(r))2dr

(22)

Remember that T−1

T t=1

yt1ut −→ 1 2σ2(

(W(1))2−1) and

T2

T t=1

y2t1 −→ σ2

1

0

(W(r))2dr, where (W(1))22(1).

We say that ˆφ1issuper-consistent (超一致性)orT-consistent.

Remember that when|φ1| < 1 we have √

T( ˆφ1−φ1) −→ N(0,1−φ21), and in this case we say that ˆφ1is √

T-consistent.

(23)

Conventionalttest statistic is given by:

tT = φˆ1−1 sφ , where

sφ=



s2T/∑T

t=1

y2t1



1/2

and s2T = 1 T −1

T t=1

(yt −φˆ1yt1)2.

(24)

Next, considertstatistic.

Thettest statistic, denoted bytT, is represented as follows:

tT = φˆ1−1

sφ = T( ˆφ1−1) T sφ

The denominator is:

T sφ =



s2T/ 1 T2

T t=1

y2t1



1/2

−→

( σ2/(

σ2

1 0

(W(r))2dr ))1/2

= (∫ 1

0

(W(r))2dr )−1/2

, wheres2 −→ σ2 is utilized.

(25)

Therefore, we have the following asymptotic distribution:

tT = φˆ1−1 sφ −→

1 2

((W(1))2−1)

1 0

(W(r))2dr / (∫ 1

0

(W(r))2dr )1/2

= 1 2

((W(1))2−1) (∫ 1

0

(W(r))2dr )1/2.

Therefore, the distribution of the tT statistic shown above is different from thetdistribution.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this paper, we will be concerned with a degenerate nonlinear system of diffusion-convection equations in a periodic domain modeling the flow and trans- port of

We present 15 new partial difference sets over 4 non-abelian groups of order 100 and 2 new strongly regular graphs with intransitive automorphism groups.. The existence of

Since we are interested in bounds that incorporate only the phase individual properties and their volume fractions, there are mainly four different approaches: the variational method

Therefore Corollary 2.3 tells us that only the dihedral quandle is useful in Alexander quandles of prime order for the study of quandle cocycle invariants of 1-knots and 2-knots..

のようにすべきだと考えていますか。 やっと開通します。長野、太田地区方面  

[r]

This can often be done by solving the Stein equation using standard solution methods for differential equations and then using direct calculations to bound the required derivatives

Finally, as a corollary Theorem 4.7 and Proposition 4.9, we obtain the relative birational version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for smooth curves over subfields of finitely