• 検索結果がありません。

The proof should read as follows: Define Ω = {u∈ B | u(x)>0 on (0,1] and u′(0)>0}

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "The proof should read as follows: Define Ω = {u∈ B | u(x)>0 on (0,1] and u′(0)>0}"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 2012, No. 28, 1-1;http://www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/

ADDENDUM TO

METHODS OF EXTENDING LOWER ORDER PROBLEMS TO HIGHER ORDER PROBLEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF SMALLEST EIGENVALUE

COMPARISONS

JEFFREY T. NEUGEBAUER

Abstract. This paper serves as an addendum to the paper titled Methods of extending lower order problems to higher order problems in the context of smallest eigenvalue comparisons appearing in EJQTDE no. 99, 2011.

This addendum concerns the paper with the above title found in EJQTDE99, 2011. In the proof of Lemma 3.1, ǫ0 is picked sou(0)−ǫ0 >0 and u(x)−ǫ0 >0 for 0< x≤1. This would implyu(0)6= 0, which is contradictory to the fact thatu∈ B. The proof should read as follows:

Define

Ω = {u∈ B | u(x)>0 on (0,1] and u(0)>0}.

Note Ω⊂ P. Choose u∈Ω and define Bǫ(u) ={v ∈ B | ||u−v||< ǫ} for ǫ >0. We will show that for sufficiently small ǫ, Bǫ(u)⊂Ω.

Since u(0)> 0, we can choose ǫ1 > 0 such that u(0)−ǫ1 >0. Then, since u(0) = 0 and u(0)> ǫ1, there exists anawith 0 < a≤1 such thatu(x)≥xǫ1 on [0, a]. Also, since u(x)>0 on (0,1], we can choose ǫ2 such that u(x)−ǫ2 > 0 on [a,1]. Let ǫ0 = min{ǫ21, ǫ2}. So for v ∈Bǫ0(u), ||v−u||= sup

0x1

|v(x)−u(x)|< ǫ0. So v(0)> u(0)−ǫ0 >0. Now, for x∈(0, a],

|v(x)−u(x)| ≤ ||v−u||x < xǫ0. So v(x) > u(x)−xǫ0 ≥ xǫ1−xǫ0 ≥x ǫ1ǫ21

>0, and so v(x)>0 on (0, a]. Finally, forx∈[a,1],|v(x)−u(x)| ≤ ||v−u||< ǫ0, sov(x)>0 on [a,1] and hence v(x)>0 on (0,1]. Sov ∈Ω. Therefore Bǫ0(u)⊂Ω⊂ P and Ω⊂ P, so P is solid in B.

The proof to Lemma 4.1 should be changed in a similar manner. I regret any inconvenience this may have caused any reader.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Ken- tucky 40475 USA

E-mail address: [email protected]

EJQTDE, 2012 No. 28, p. 1

参照

関連したドキュメント

We aim at developing a general framework to study multi-dimensional con- servation laws in a bounded domain, encompassing all of the fundamental issues of existence,

On the other hand Theorem 1.2 is valid for any space dimension, but it is restricted to positive solution and a special type of nonlinearities..

– Asymptotic behavior of solutions for second order nonlinear autonomous differential equations, NoDEA – Nonlinear Differ.. – Equazioni Differenziali nel Campo Reale, Nicola

However, the method of upper and lower solutions for the existence of solution is less developed and hardly few results can be found in the literature dealing with the upper and

It is noted that a similarity solution exists only when the distance between the plates varies as Kt a 0 1/2 , and squeezing flow takes place for K &lt; 0 and a 0 &gt; 0 as for as Kt

Zeddini; On the existence of positive solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal.. R˘ adulescu; Blow-up boundary solutions of semilinear elliptic

In this section we prove that the functional J defined in (1.5), where g and its primitive G satisfy the conditions in (A1)–(A5), satisfies the (PS) c condition provided that c 6=

Zhang, Existence of positive solutions for elliptic systems with nonstandard p(x)-growth conditions via sub-supersolution method, Nonlinear Anal. Zhikov, Averaging of functionals of