• 検索結果がありません。

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "JJ II"

Copied!
12
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

volume 3, issue 5, article 72, 2002.

Received 9 September, 2002;

accepted 10 October, 2002.

Communicated by:H.M. Srivastava

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

SHIGEYOSHI OWA AND JUNICHI NISHIWAKI

Department of Mathematics Kinki University

Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502 Japan.

EMail:[email protected]

URL:http://163.51.52.186/math/OWA.htm

2000c Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 109-02

(2)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract

For some realα(α >1), two subclassesM(α)andN(α)of analytic fuctions f(z)withf(0) = 0andf0(0) = 1inUare introduced. The object of the present paper is to discuss the coefficient estimates for functionsf(z)belonging to the classesM(α)andN(α).

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:30C45.

Key words: Analytic functions, Univalent functions, Starlike functions, Convex func- tions.

Contents

1 Introduction and Definitions . . . 3 2 Inclusion Theorems Involving Coefficient Inequalities. . . 5

References

(3)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

1. Introduction and Definitions

LetAdenote the class of functionsf(z)of the form:

f(z) = z+

X

n=2

anzn,

which are analytic in the open unit disk U = {z : z ∈ C and |z| < 1}. Let M(α)be the subclass of A consisting of functionsf(z)which satisfy the in- equality:

Re

zf0(z) f(z)

< α (z ∈U)

for someα(α >1). And letN(α)be the subclass ofAconsisting of functions f(z)which satisfy the inequality:

Re

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

< α (z ∈U)

for some α (α > 1). Then, we see that f(z) ∈ N(α)if and only ifzf0(z) ∈ M(α).

Remark 1.1. For1< α≤ 43, the classesM(α)andN(α)were introduced by Uralegaddi et al. [3].

Remark 1.2. The classes M(α)and N(α)correspond to the case k = 2 of the classes Mk(α) andNk(α), respectively, which were investigated recently by Owa and Srivastava [1].

(4)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

We easily see that Example 1.1.

(i) f(z) = z(1−z)2(α−1) ∈ M(α).

(ii) g(z) = 2α−11 {1−(1−z)2α−1} ∈ N(α).

(5)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

2. Inclusion Theorems Involving Coefficient Inequalities

In this section we derive sufficient conditions for f(z)to belong to the afore- mentioned function classes, which are obtained by using coefficient inequali- ties.

Theorem 2.1. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|} |an|52(α−1)

for somek(05k 51)and someα(α >1), thenf(z)∈ M(α).

Proof. Let us suppose that

(2.1)

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|} |an|52(α−1)

forf(z)∈ A.

It suffices to show that

zf0(z) f(z) −k

zf0(z)

f(z) −(2α−k)

<1 (z ∈U).

(6)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

We note that

zf0(z) f(z) −k

zf0(z)

f(z) −(2α−k)

=

1−k+P

n=2(n−k)anzn−1 1 +k−2α+P

n=2(n+k−2α)anzn−1

5 1−k+P

n=2(n−k)|an||z|n−1 2α−1−k−P

n=2|n+k−2α| |an||z|n−1

< 1−k+P

n=2(n−k)|an| 2α−1−k−P

n=2|n+k−2α| |an|. The last expression is bounded above by 1 if

1−k+

X

n=2

(n−k)|an|52α−1−k−

X

n=2

|n+k−2α| |an|

which is equivalent to our condition:

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|}|an|52(α−1)

of the theorem. This completes the proof of the theorem.

If we takek = 1and someα 1< α5 32

in Theorem2.1, then we have Corollary 2.2. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

(n−α)|an|5α−1

for someα 1< α5 32

, thenf(z)∈ M(α).

(7)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

Example 2.1. The functionf(z)given by

f(z) =z+

X

n=2

4(α−1)

n(n+ 1)(n−k+|n+k−2α|)zn belongs to the classM(α).

For the classN(α), we have Theorem 2.3. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

(2.2)

X

n=2

n(n−k+ 1 +|n+k−2α|)|an|52(α−1)

for some k(0 5 k 5 1) and some α(α > 1), then f(z) belongs to the class N(α).

Corollary 2.4. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

n(n−α)|an|5α−1

for someα 1< α5 32

, thenf(z)∈ N(α).

Example 2.2. The function f(z) =z+

X

n=2

4(α−1)

n2(n+ 1)(n−k+|n+k−2α|)zn belongs to the classN(α).

(8)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Further, denoting byS(α) andK(α) the subclasses ofA consisting of all starlike functions of orderα, and of all convex functions of orderα, respectively (see [2]), we derive

Theorem 2.5. If f(z) ∈ A satisfies the coefficient inequality (2.1) for some α 1< α5 k+22 5 32

, thenf(z)∈ S 4−3α3−2α

. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the coeffi- cient inequality (2.2) for someα 1< α5 k−22 5 32

thenf(z)∈ K 4−3α3−2α . Proof. For some α 1< α5 k+22 5 32

, we see that the coefficient inequality (2.1) implies that

X

n=2

(n−α)|an|5α−1.

It is well-known that iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

n−β

1−β|an|51

for some β(0 5 β < 1), thenf(z) ∈ S(β)by Silverman [2]. Therefore, we have to find the smallest positiveβ such that

X

n=2

n−β 1−β|an|5

X

n=2

n−α

α−1|an| 5 1.

This gives that

(2.3) β 5 (2−α)n−α

n−2α+ 1

(9)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

for alln= 2,3,4,· · ·. Noting that the right-hand side of the inequality (2.3) is increasing forn, we conclude that

β 5 4−3α 3−2α, which proves thatf(z)∈ S 4−3α3−2α

. Similarly, we can show that iff(z) ∈ A satisfies (2.2), thenf(z)∈ K 4−3α3−2α

.

Our result for the coefficient estimates of functions f(z) ∈ M(α) is con- tained in

Theorem 2.6. Iff(z)∈ M(α), then

(2.4) |an|5 Πnj=2(j+ 2α−4)

(n−1)! (n =2).

Proof. Let us define the functionp(z)by

p(z) = α− zff(z)0(z) α−1

forf(z)∈ M(α). Thenp(z)is analytic inU, p(0) = 1andRe(p(z))>0 (z ∈ U). Therefore, if we write

p(z) = 1 +

X

n=1

pnzn,

(10)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page10of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

then|pn|52 (n=1). Since

αf(z)−zf0(z) = (α−1)p(z)f(z), we obtain that

(1−n)an= (α−1)(pn−1+a2pn−2+a3pn−3 +· · ·+an−1p1).

Ifn= 2, then−a2 = (α−1)p1 implies that

|a2|= (α−1)|p1|52α−2.

Thus the coefficient estimate (2.4) holds true forn = 2. Next, suppose that the coefficient estimate

|ak|5 Qk

j=2(j+ 2α−4) (k−1)!

is true for allk = 2,3,4, · · · , n. Then we have that

−nan+1 = (α−1)(pn+a2pn−1+a3pn−2+· · ·+anp1), so that

n|an+1|5(2α−2)(1 +|a2|+|a3|+· · ·+|an|) 5(2α−2)

1 + (2α−2) + (2α−2)(2α−1) 2! +· · · +Πnj=2(j + 2α−4)

(n−1)!

(11)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page11of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

= (2α−2)

(2α−1)2α(2α+ 1)· · ·(2α+n−4) (n−2)!

+ (2α−2)(2α−1)2α· · ·(2α+n−4) (n−1)!

= Πn+1j=2(j+ 2α−4) (n−1)! .

Thus, the coefficient estimate (2.4) holds true for the case ofk =n+ 1. Apply- ing the mathematical induction for the coefficient estimate (2.4), we complete the proof of Theorem2.6.

For the functionsf(z)belonging to the classN(α), we also have Theorem 2.7. Iff(z)∈ N(α), then

|an|5 Qn

j=2(j+ 2α−4)

n! (n=2).

Remark 2.1. We can not show that Theorem 2.6 and Theorem2.7 are sharp.

If we can prove that Theorem2.6 is sharp, then the sharpness of Theorem 2.7 follows.

(12)

Coefficient Estimates for Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions

Shigeyoshi Owa and Junichi Nishiwaki

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page12of12

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(5) Art. 72, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] S. OWA AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Some generalized convolu- tion properties associated with certain subclasses of analytic func- tions, J. Ineq. Pure Appl. Math., 3(3) (2002), Article 42. [ONLINE http://jipam.vu.edu.au/v3n3/033_02.html]

[2] H. SILVERMAN, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc.

Amer. Math. Soc., 51 (1975), 109–116.

[3] B.A. URALEGADDI, M.D. GANIGI AND S.M. SARANGI, Univalent functions with positive coefficients, Tamkang J. Math., 25 (1994), 225–230.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Key words and phrases: Univalent functions, Starlike functions of order α, Convex functions of order α, Inverse functions, Coefficient estimates.. 2000 Mathematics

Key words and phrases: Convolution (Hadamard product), Integral operator, Functions with positive real part, Convex func- tions.. 2000 Mathematics

Key words: Analytic function; Multivalent function; Linear operator; Convex univalent func- tion; Hadamard product (or convolution); Subordination; Integral operator.... Analytic

For a brief history of the Fekete-Szegö problem for the class of starlike, convex and close-to-convex functions, see the recent paper by Srivastava et

KÜSTNER, Mapping properties of hypergeometric functions and con- volutions of starlike or convex functions of Order α, Comput. Methods

Key words and phrases: Analytic function, p-valent starlike and convex functions, upper bound, second Hankel functional, positive real function, Toeplitz determinants.. Ehrenborg

Making use of Linear operator theory, we define a new subclass of uniformly convex functions and a corresponding subclass of starlike functions with nega- tive coefficientsG. The

We define some classes of analytic functions related with the class of func- tions with bounded boundary rotation and study these classes with reference to certain integral