• 検索結果がありません。

COMMUTING CONTRACTIONS の SIMULTANEOUS UNITARY DILATION(Linear Operators and Inequalities)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "COMMUTING CONTRACTIONS の SIMULTANEOUS UNITARY DILATION(Linear Operators and Inequalities)"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

DILATN13.TEX; 1994/01/31

COMMUTING

CONTRACTIONS

SIMULTANEOUS UNITARY

DILATION

山形大学理学部 岡安隆照 (Takateru OKAYASU)

The following matter is realy fundamental:

Sz.-Nagy’s Unitary Dilation Theorem. Let $T$ be a contraction on a

Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. Then, there exist an enlarged Hilbert space $\mathcal{K}\supseteq \mathcal{H}$ and a

unitary $U$, called a unitary dilation of $T$, on $\mathcal{K}$, such that

$T^{m}=PU^{m}|\mathcal{H}$ for $m=0,1,2,$ $\cdots$ ,

where $P$ is the projection on $\mathcal{K}$ onto $\mathcal{H}$

.

This yields, and, is yielded by, the so-called

von

Neumann Inquality. Let $T$ be a contraction on a Hilbert space.

Then,

$||p(T)|| \leq||p||=\sup_{z\in T}|p(z)|$

holds for any polynomial $p$ with complex coeflicients.

(2)

Theorem [6]. If a set of commuting contractions on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$,

$T_{1},$ $T_{2},$

$\cdots,$$T_{n}$, admits a simultaneous unitary dilation, namely, there exist a

Hilbert space $\mathcal{K}\supseteq \mathcal{H}$ and commuting unitaries $U_{1},$ $U_{2)}\cdots,$ $U_{n}$ on $\mathcal{K}$, such

that

$T_{1}^{m_{1}}T_{2}^{m_{2}}\cdots T_{n}^{m_{n}}=PU_{1}^{m_{1}}U_{2}^{m_{2}}\cdots U_{n}^{m_{n}}|\mathcal{H}$

for $m_{1},$ $m_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $m_{n}=0,1,2,$ $\cdots$, where $P$is the projection on

$\mathcal{K}$ onto $\mathcal{H}$, then

$T_{1)}T_{2},$ $\cdots,$$T_{n}$ enjoys the von Neumann ineqality, namely,

$||(p_{i}j(T_{1}, T_{2}, \cdots, T_{n}))||\leq||(p_{ij})||=\sup_{z_{1)}z_{2))}z_{n}\in T}||(p_{ij}(z_{1)}z_{2)}\cdots, z_{n}))||$

holds for any $m\cross m$ matrix $(p_{ij})$ whose entries are polynomials with complex

coeffieients; and vice versa.

On the other hand, the following theorems are known:

And\^o’s Theorem [1]. Any pair of commuting contractions on a Hilbert

space admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

And\^o’s Theorem [2]. Any triple ofcommuting contractions on aHilbert

space, one of which duoble commutes with others, admits a simultaneous

unitary dilation.

We, aside, have examples of triples of commuting contractions which do

not admit a simultaneous unitary dilation, [4], [8] and [9]. In [6] we

gave

the following theorem and corollary:

Theorem. Suppose each of sets of commuting contractions, $S_{1}\rangle$ $S_{2)}\cdots$,

$S_{m}$ and $T_{1},$$T_{2,}T_{n}$, on a Hilbert space, admits a simultaneous unitary

dilation, and every $S_{j}$ double commutes with all $T_{k}$

.

If the set $S_{1},$ $S_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $S_{m}$

generates a nuclear $C^{*}$ algebra, then the set $S_{1},$ $S_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $S_{m},$ $T_{1},$ $T_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $T_{n}$

admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

Collorary. Suppose $S$ is a $GCR$ contraction, i.e., a contraction which

generates a $GCR$ (postliminal) algebra, $T_{1},$ $T_{2},$

$\cdots,$$T_{n}$ commuting

(3)

dilation. and $S$ double commutes with all $T_{k}$. Then the set $S,$$T_{1},$ $T_{2},$ $\cdots,$$T_{n}$

admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

The following, furtheremore, turned out to be true [7]:

Theorem. Suppose each of sets of commuting contractions, $S_{1},$ $S_{2}$,

$\ldots,$ $S_{m}$ and $T_{1},$ $T_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $T_{n}$, on a Hilbert space, admits a simultaneous

unitary dilation, and every $S_{j}$ double commutes with all $T_{k}$. If the set

$S_{1},$ $S_{2},$

$\cdots,$ $S_{m}$ generates an injective von Neumann algebra, then the set

$S_{1},$ $S_{2},$ $\cdots,$ $S_{m},$$T_{1},$$T_{2,}T_{n}$ admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

Collorary. Suppose $S$ is a type I contraction, i.e., a contraction which

generates a type I von Neumann algebra, $T_{1},$$T_{2},$

$\cdots,$ $T_{n}$ commuting

contrac-tions, on a Hilbert space, the set $T_{1},$$T_{2},$

$\cdots,$ $T_{n}$ admits a simultaneous unitary

dilation and $S$ double commutes with all $T_{k}$. Then, the set $S,$$T_{1)}T_{2},$ $\cdots,$$T_{n}$

admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

We here will improve the theorem, by making the assumption thin as the

following

Theorem. Suppose each of sets of commuting contractions, $S_{1},$ $S_{2}$,

$\ldots,$ $S_{m}$ and $T_{1},$$T_{2},$ $\cdots,$$T_{n}$, on a Hilbert space, admits a simultaneous

uni-tary dilation, and every $S_{j}$ double commutes with all $T_{k}$

.

Then, the set

$S_{1},$ $S_{2},$ $\cdots$ , $S_{m},$ $T_{1},$ $T_{2},$ $\cdots$ , $T_{n}$ admits a simultaneous unitary dilation.

This is the aimed theorem of ours. A proof of this is given, on acount of

the Steinspring representation of completely positive maps, by the preceding theorem and the

Arveson Theorem [3, Theorem 1.3.1]. Let $\mathcal{H},$ $\mathcal{K}$ be Hilbert spaces,

$V$ a bounded operator from $\mathcal{H}$ into $\mathcal{K}$, and $\mathcal{B}$ a *subalgebra of $\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{K})$, the

full operator algebra, which satisfies that $[BV\mathcal{H}]=\mathcal{K}$

.

Then, for every

$T\in(V^{*}\mathcal{B}V)’$ there exists a unique $\tilde{T}\in \mathcal{B}’$ such that $\tilde{T}V=VT$, and the

(4)

We have as well

Collorary. Suppose each of pairs of commuting contractions, $S_{1},$ $S_{2}$, and

$T_{1},$$T_{2}$, on a Hilbert space, admits a simultaneous unitary dilation, and each

of $S_{1},$ $S_{2}$ double commutes with $T_{1}T_{2}\rangle$ Then, the set $S_{1}S_{2},$$T_{2}\rangle$$T_{1},$ admits a

simultaneous unitary dilation.

Our theorem, of course, gives a good understanding to And\^o’s “triple“

assertion; on the And\^o’s “pair“ assertion, the next matter sheds light:

Theorem [5, Theorem 6]. Let $T$ be a contraction on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$,

$U$ the minimal unitary dilation of $T$

.

Then for every $S\in\{T\}’$ there exists

$\tilde{S}\in\{U\}’$ such that $S=P\tilde{S}|\mathcal{H}$ and $||\tilde{S}||=||S||$

.

References

1. T. And\^o, On a pair of commuting contractions, Acta Sci. Math.

24(1963), 88-90.

2. T.

And\^o,

Unitary dilation for a triple ofcommuting contractions, Bull.

Acad. Polonaise Math. 24(1976), 851-853.

3. W. B. Arveson, Subalgebras of $C^{*}$ algebras, Acta Math. 123(1969),

141-224.

4. M. J. Crabb, and A. M. Davie, von Neumann’s inequality for Hilbert

space operators, Bull. London Math. Soc. 7(1975), 49-50.

5. R. G. Douglas, P. S. Muhley, and C. Pearcy, Lifting commuting

oper-ators, Michgan Math. Journ. 15(1968), 385-395.

6. T. Okayasu, The von Neumann inequality and dilation theorems for

contractions, Operator Theory: Adv. Appl. 59(1992), 285-291.

7. 岡安隆照, The von Neumann inequality, 日本数学会秋期総合分科会)

(5)

8. I. Parrott, Unitary dilations for commuting contractions, Pacif. Jorn.

Math. 34(1970), 481-490.

9. N. Th. Varopoulos, On an inequality of von Neumann and an appli-cation of metric theory of tensor products to operator theory, Journ.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Light linear logic ( LLL , Girard 1998): subsystem of linear logic corresponding to polynomial time complexity.. Proofs of LLL precisely captures the polynomial time functions via

First we use explicit lower bounds for the proportion of cyclic matrices in GL n (q) (obtained in [9, 14, 20]) to determine a lower bound for the maximum size ω(GL n (q)) of a set

Theorem 1.3 (Theorem 12.2).. Con- sequently the operator is normally solvable by virtue of Theorem 1.5 and dimker = n. From the equality = I , by virtue of Theorem 1.7 it

The following result is useful in providing the best quadrature rule in the class for approximating the integral of a function f : [a, b] → R whose first derivative is

Massoudi and Phuoc 44 proposed that for granular materials the slip velocity is proportional to the stress vector at the wall, that is, u s gT s n x , T s n y , where T s is the

As a special case of that general result, we obtain new fractional inequalities involving fractional integrals and derivatives of Riemann-Liouville type1. Consequently, we get

Applications of msets in Logic Programming languages is found to over- come “computational inefficiency” inherent in otherwise situation, especially in solving a sweep of

John Baez, University of California, Riverside: [email protected] Michael Barr, McGill University: [email protected] Lawrence Breen, Universit´ e de Paris