• 検索結果がありません。

Problems for Recitation 4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Problems for Recitation 4"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Problems for Recitation 4

The purpose of this problem set is to construct the normalization of an integral scheme. We accomplish this in a series of steps.

1. Let X be an irreducible topological space. Show that every non-empty open subset U ⊂ X is dense and that U itself is an irreducible topological space. (A space X is irreducible if whenever X = V 1 ∪ V 2 with V 1 , V 2 ⊂ X closed, then either V 1 = X or V 2 = X or both.)

2. A scheme X is integral if for every open subset U ⊂ X , the ring Γ(U, O X ) is an integral domain. Show that a scheme is integral if and only if it is reduced and irreducible. (A scheme X is reduced if for every open subset U ⊂ X , the ring Γ(U, O X ) does not contain any nilpotent elements.)

3. Let f : X → X 0 be a morphism between integral schemes. Show that the following are equivalent:

(i) the image f (X ) ⊂ X 0 is dense;

(ii) if U ⊂ X and U 0 ⊂ X 0 are affine open subsets such that f (U ) ⊂ U 0 , then the composite ring homomorphism

Γ(U 0 , O X

0

) → Γ(f −1 (U 0 ), O X

0

) → Γ(U, O X ) is injective.

Such a map f is called dominant. (Hint: to show that (i) implies (ii), show that if f is in the kernel, then for all x 0 ∈ U 0 , f (x 0 ) = 0. Conclude that f = 0. To show that (ii) implies (i), show that f maps the generic point of U to the generic point of U 0 .)

4. An integral scheme X is normal if for every affine open subset U ⊂ X , the ring Γ(U, O X ) is integrally closed (in its quotient field). Let X be an integral scheme.

A dominant morphism f : ˜ X → X with ˜ X normal is called a normalization of X if it is universal with this property, i.e. if every dominant morphism g : Z → X with Z normal factors uniquely through f .

(i) Suppose that X = Spec R is affine, and let R → R ˜ be the canonical map from R to the integral closure of the ring R in its quotient field. Show that the induced map Spec ˜ R → Spec R is a normalization.

(ii) Suppose that ˜ X → X is a normalization and let U ⊂ X be an open subset.

Show that the projection U × X X ˜ → U is a normalization. (Hint: Use the universal properties.)

(iii) Show that every integral scheme X has a normalization ˜ X → X . (Hint: Let {U i } be an affine open cover of X; use (i) to find a normalization ˜ U i → U i ; and use (ii) to show that the schemes ˜ U i can be glued together to give ˜ X . Show that the maps ˜ U i → U i glue to give ˜ X → X .)

1

参照

関連したドキュメント

In Section 5 we consider substitutions for which the incidence matrix is unimodular, and we show that the projected points form a central word if and only if the substitution

THEOREM 4.1 Let X be a non-empty convex subset of the locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space E, T an upper hemicontinuous mapping of X into 2 E’, T(x) is a non-empty

We have formulated and discussed our main results for scalar equations where the solutions remain of a single sign. This restriction has enabled us to achieve sharp results on

This paper is a sequel to [1] where the existence of homoclinic solutions was proved for a family of singular Hamiltonian systems which were subjected to almost periodic forcing...

It is shown in Theorem 2.7 that the composite vector (u, A) lies in the kernel of this rigidity matrix if and only if (u, A) is an affinely periodic infinitesimal flex in the sense

It is known that a space is locally realcompact if and only if it is open in its Hewitt-Nachbin realcompactification; we give an external characterization of HN- completeness

We show that the C ∗ -algebra of a locally compact, Hausdorff and principal groupoid is a Fell algebra if and only if the groupoid is one of these relations, extend- ing a theorem

In this paper relatively realcompact sets are defined, and it is shown that a space is nearly pseudocompact iff every relatively realcompact open set is relatively compact..