• 検索結果がありません。

CLASSIFICATION OF WEAK CONTINUITIES AND DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "CLASSIFICATION OF WEAK CONTINUITIES AND DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

PII. S0161171204402373 http://ijmms.hindawi.com

© Hindawi Publishing Corp.

CLASSIFICATION OF WEAK CONTINUITIES AND DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY

JINGCHENG TONG Received 24 February 2004

We first introduce 20 weak forms of continuity, which are closely related to 5 known weak forms of continuity. Then we classify them into 9 groups and give 12 decompositions of continuity.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 54C05, 54C08.

1. Introduction. Continuity is one of the most important concepts in mathematics.

In order to find deep properties of continuity, many weak forms of continuity were introduced in the literature. For instance, we have Levine’s weak continuity [2] and semicontinuity [3], M. K. Singal and A. R. Singal’s almost continuity [6], Husain’s al- most continuity [1],α-continuity of Mashhour et al. [4], and many others. Each of the above forms of continuity is strictly weaker than continuity. Theoretically, for each weak form of continuity, there is another weak form of continuity such that both of them imply continuity. In this connection, there is one result [3] for the general case.

A special case is discussed in [7]. In this note, we develop these results. We introduce 20 weak forms of continuity, which are closely related with the above-mentioned weak continuities. Then we classify them into 9 groups and give 12 decompositions of con- tinuity.

2. Preliminaries. We recall some known definitions.

Definition2.1[3]. A subset S in a topological spaceXis said to be semiopen if there is an open setO inX such thatO⊂S clO, where clO denotes the closure ofO.

Definition2.2[3]. A mappingf:X→Y is said to be semicontinuous if for each open setV inY,f−1(V )is a semiopen set inX.

Definition2.3[2]. A mappingf:X→Yis said to be weakly continuous if for each x∈Xand each open setVinY containingf (x), there is an open setUinXcontaining xsuch thatf (U)⊂clV.

Definition2.4[5]. A subsetS in a topological space is said to be anα-set ifS⊂ int cl intS.

Definition2.5[4]. A mappingf:X→Yis said to beα-continuous if for each open setV inY,f−1(V )is anα-set inX.

(2)

There are two different definitions of almost continuous mappings, one is given by Husain [1]; the other one is given by M. K. Singal and A. R. Singal [6]. In this note, following Mashhour et al. [4], we use precontinuity for Husain’s almost continuity, and use almost continuity particularly for M. K. Singal and A. R. Singal’s.

Definition2.6[1]. A mappingf :X→Y is said to be precontinuous if for each x∈Xand each open setVinY containingf (x), clf1(V )is a neighborhood ofx.

Definition2.7[6]. A mappingf:X→Yis said to be almost continuous if for each x∈Xand each open setVinY containingf (x), there is an open setUinXsuch that f (U)⊂int clV.

The relations of the above five weak forms of continuity are as follows [4]:

semicontinuity

continuity α-continuity precontinuity

almost continuity weak continuity

(2.1)

3. Classification of some weak continuities. The following results are known.

Lemma3.1. LetSbe a subset in a topological spaceX. Then (i) int intS=intS;

(ii) cl clS=clS;

(iii) int cl int clS=int clS; (iv) cl int cl intS=cl intS.

Our classification is based onLemma 3.1.

In the following group of weak continuities, (i) is trivial, (ii) and (iii) are given in [4].

Definition3.2. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂intf−1(V ); (ii) f is precontinuous if and only iff1(V )⊂int clf1(V ); (iii) f isα-continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂int cl intf−1(V ).

It is known [2] that a mappingf:X→Y is weakly continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂ intf−1(clV ). From this we have the following group of definitions.

Definition3.3. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is weakly continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂intf−1(clV ); (ii) f is pre-weakly continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂int clf−1(clV ); (iii) f isα-weakly continuous if and only iff1(V )⊂int cl intf1(clV ). In the above definitions, (ii) and (iii) are new.

(3)

CLASSIFICATION OF WEAK CONTINUITIES AND DECOMPOSITION... 2757 It is known [6] that a mappingf:X→Yis almost continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂ intf1(int clV )for each open set V in Y. From this we have the following group of definitions.

Definition3.4. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is almost continuous if and only iff1(V )⊂intf1(int clV ); (ii) f is pre-almost continuous if and only iff1(V )⊂int clf1(int clV ); (iii) f isα-almost continuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂int cl intf−1(int clV ).

In the above definitions, (ii) and (iii) are new.

It is easily seen that a mappingf:X→Y is semicontinuous if and only iff1(V )⊂ cl intf1(V ). From this we have the following group of definitions.

Definition3.5. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is semicontinuous if and only iff1(V )⊂cl intf1(V ); (ii) f is weak semicontinuous if and only iff1(V )⊂cl intf1(clV ); (iii) f is almost semicontinuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂cl intf−1(int clV ).

In the above definitions, (ii) and (iii) are new. The following definitions are all new.

Definition3.6. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is pre-semicontinuous if and only iff1(V )⊂cl int clf1(V ); (ii) f is pre-weak-semicontinuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂cl int clf−1(clV ); (iii) f is pre-almost-semicontinuous if and only iff−1(V )⊂cl int clf−1(int clV ). The following chart gives the relationships of all the weak forms of continuity in this section:

weak continuity α-weak continuity pre-weak continuity

almost continuity α-almost continuity pre-almost continuity

continuity α-continuity precontinuity

semicontinuity pre-semicontinuity

almost semicontinuity pre almost-semicontinuity

weak semicontinuity pre-weak-semicontinuity (3.1)

(4)

4. Classification of relative continuities. Let f :X →Y be a mapping and let V be an arbitrary open set in Y. Then f is continuous if and only if f1(V ) is an open set in X. If we relax the requirement on f−1(V ) from being open in X to being open in a subspace, then we can obtain many new weak forms of continuity.

For instance, we have the following group of weak continuities corresponding to Definition 3.2.

Definition4.1. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is continuous#if and only iff1(V )is an open set in the subspacef1(V ); (ii) f is pre#-continuous if and only if f−1(V ) is an open set in the subspace

clf1(V );

(iii) f is α#-continuous if and only if f1(V ) is an open set in the subspace cl intf−1(V ).

It is easily seen that any mapping is a continuous#mapping. We have the following group of definitions corresponding toDefinition 3.3.

Definition4.2. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is weak# continuous if and only if f1(V ) is an open set in the subspace f1(clV );

(ii) f is pre-weak#continuous if and only iff−1(V )is an open set in the subspace clf1(clV );

(iii) f isα-weak# continuous if and only iff1(V )is an open set in the subspace cl intf−1(clV ).

We have the following group of definitions corresponding toDefinition 3.4.

Definition4.3. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) f is almost#continuous iff−1(V )is an open set in the subspacef−1(int clV ); (ii) f is pre-almost# continuous if f1(V ) is an open set in the subspace

clf1(int clV );

(iii) f is α-almost# continuous if f−1(V ) is an open set in the subspace cl intf1(int clV ).

Now we go to the last group of definitions.

Definition4.4. Letf:X→Y be a mapping and letVbe an arbitrary open set inY. Then

(i) fis pre-semi#-continuous iff1(V)is an open set in the subspace cl int clf1(V); (ii) f is pre-weak-semi#- continuous if f−1(V ) is an open set in the subspace

cl int clf−1(clV );

(iii) f is pre-almost-semi#-continuous if f1(V ) is an open set in the subspace cl int clf−1(int clV ).

(5)

CLASSIFICATION OF WEAK CONTINUITIES AND DECOMPOSITION... 2759 The following chart gives the relationships of all the weak continuities in this section:

weak#continuity α-weak#continuity pre-weak#continuity

almost#continuity α-almost#continuity pre-almost#continuity α#-continuity pre#-continuity

pre-semi#-continuity

pre-almost-semi#-continuity

pre-weak-semi#-continuity

(4.1) 5. Decompositions of continuity. We need an important lemma.

Lemma5.1. Letα: 2X2Xbe a mapping withα(A∩B)⊂αA∩αBand letβ: 2X2X be another mapping withV⊂βV for each open setV inX. Letf:X→Y be a mapping such that for each open setVinY,

(i) f1(V )⊂intαf1(βV );

(ii) there is an open setOinXsuch thatf−1(V )=αf−1(βV )∩O. Thenf is continuous.

Proof. Sincef−1(V )=αf−1(βV )∩O, hencef−1(V )⊂O. Therefore intf−1(V )=intαf−1(βV )∩intO

=intαf1(βV )∩O

⊃f1(V )∩f1(V )

=f−1(V ).

(5.1)

We have proved thatf1(V )is an open set, hencefis continuous.

Now we turn to the decomposition of continuity. Because int(A∩B)=intA∩intB and cl(A∩B)⊂clA∩clB, we know that cl int(A∩B)⊂cl intA∩cl intB. Therefore we have the following theorem.

Theorem5.2. Letf:X→Y be a mapping. Thenf is continuous if and only if (i) f is continuous and continuous#;

(ii) f is precontinuous and pre#-continuous;

(iii) f isα-continuous andα#-continuous;

(iv) f is weakly continuous and weak#continuous;

(v) f is pre-weakly continuous and pre-weak#continuous;

(vi) f isα-weakly continuous andα-weak#continuous;

(6)

(vii) f is almost continuous and almost#continuous;

(viii) f is pre-almost continuous and pre-almost#continuous;

(ix) f isα-almost continuous andα-almost#continuous.

In the above decompositions, (i) is trivial and the other eight are all new.

Since int cl int clf−1(βV )=int clf−1(βV )and cl int cl(A∩B)=cl int clA∩cl int clB, we have the following decompositions.

Theorem5.3. Letf:X→Y be a mapping. Thenf is continuous if and only if (x) f is pre-continuous and pre-semi#-continuous;

(xi) f is pre-weakly continuous and pre-weak-semi#-continuous;

(xii) f is pre-almost continuous and pre-almost-semi#-continuous;

(xiii) f is pre-continuous andα#-continuous.

In the above twelve nontrivial decompositions, if we choose a proper operatorβ other than identity mapping, cl or int cl, we can have infinitely many decompositions.

For instance, we may letβA=A∪E, whereEis a subset ofXsuch thatA∩Eφ. References

[1] T. Husain,Almost continuous mappings, Prace Mat.10(1966), 1–7.

[2] N. Levine, A decomposition of continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly 68 (1961), 44–46.

[3] ,Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly70 (1963), 36–41.

[4] A. S. Mashhour, I. A. Hasanein, and S. N. El-Deeb,α-continuous andα-open mappings, Acta Math. Hungar.41(1983), no. 3-4, 213–218.

[5] O. Nj˙astad,On some classes of nearly open sets, Pacific J. Math.15(1965), 961–970.

[6] M. K. Singal and A. R. Singal,Almost-continuous mappings, Yokohama Math. J.16(1968), 63–73.

[7] B. D. Smith,An alternate characterization of continuity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.39(1973), 318–320.

Jingcheng Tong: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Florida, Jack- sonville, FL 32224, USA

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

We consider new weak and stronger forms of irresolute and semi-closure via the concept sg-closed sets which we call ap-irresolute maps, ap-semi-closed maps and contra-irresolute and

In this note we shall prove a characterization for the fundamental group of a graph of polycyclic-by-finite groups and free-by-finite groups with infinite cyclic edge subgroups to

In this paper we introduce the notions of weak limit shadowing property and strong limit shadowing property of subsets of M which are not equivalent with that of shadowing property,

In this work, we present a new model of thermo-electro-viscoelasticity, we prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution of contact problem with Tresca’s friction law by

To prove the continuity of the equilibrium set, we take a sequence of equilibria in E i ± with a fixed number of zeros and, analyzing the initial slopes of such stationary solutions,

We prove the existence of weak solutions of higher order degenerated quasihnear elliptic equations The mmn tools are the degree theory for generahzed monotone mappings and

In fact, by using known results about normal subgroups of the extended modular group, he found some examples which are M ∗ -groups.. In this paper, we consider the case that q ≥ 5 is

for the case n ≤ 2 the interior H¨ older continuity, and for dimensions n ≥ 3 the interior partial H¨ older continuity of weak solutions to nonlinear parabolic systems the