• 検索結果がありません。

Zonal polynomials for wreath products

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Zonal polynomials for wreath products"

Copied!
27
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

DOI 10.1007/s10801-006-0031-6

Zonal polynomials for wreath products

Hiroshi Mizukawa

Received: 11 July 2005 / Accepted: 11 July 2006 / Published online: 18 August 2006

CSpringer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Abstract The pair of groups, symmetric group S2n and hyperoctohedral group Hn, form a Gelfand pair. The characteristic map is a mapping from the graded algebra generated by the zonal spherical functions of (S2n,Hn) into the ring of symmetric functions. The images of the zonal spherical functions under this map are called the zonal polynomials. A wreath product generalization of the Gelfand pair (S2n,Hn) is discussed in this paper. Then a multi-partition version of the theory is constructed. The multi-partition versions of zonal polynomials are products of zonal polynomials and Schur functions and are obtained from a characteristic map from the graded Hecke algebra into a multipartition version of the ring of symmetric functions.

Keywords Zonal polynomial . Schur function . Gelfand pair . Hecke algebra . Hypergeometric function

1. Introduction

It is a well-known fact that the characteristic map ch gives an isomorphism be- tween the character ring of the symmetric groups and the ring of symmetric functions [7, I-7]. This mapping sends the irreducible characters to the Schur functions:

ch(χλ)=Sλ(x),

whereχλis an irreducible character of a symmetric group indexed by a partitionλ. There are various similar results for other algebras. Below, we introduce two characteristic maps related to the symmetric groups.

Dedicated to Professor Eiichi Bannai on his 60th birthday.

H. Mizukawa ()

Department of Mathematics, National Defense Academy in Japan, Yokosuka 239-8686, Japan e-mail: mzh@nda.ac.jp

(2)

The first case is the character theory for the wreath products of a finite group with a symmetric group [7, I-Appendix B]. In this case the characteristic map sends the character ring of the wreath product into the multi-partition version of the ring of symmetric functions

(G)=C[ pr(C); C is a conjugacy class of G, r≥1],

where pr(C)’s are r -th power sum symmetric functions indexed by the conjugacy classes of G with variables (xC1,xC2, . . .). Again, the characteristic map can be defined to be an isometry between these two rings. Then we see that the image of an irreducible character is a multi-partition version of Schur function.

Secondly, we consider the zonal spherical functions of the Gelfand pair (S2n,Hn) (see [7, VII7-2]), where Hn is the centralizer of the element (1,2)(3,4)· · ·(2n− 1,2n). The precise definition of zonal spherical functions shall appear later (see Section 3). The zonal spherical functions of the Gelfand pair (S2n,Hn) are indexed by the partitions of n. We define a graded ringHas a direct sum of Hecke algebras,

H=

n≥0

eHnCS2neHn, where eHn = 1

|Hn|

h∈Hn

h.

In this case, the characteristic map Ch is an isomorphism betweenHand the ring of symmetric functions. The images of the zonal spherical functions are the zonal poly- nomials (cf. [3, 12, 13]); the Jack symmetric functions Jλα(x) [7, 11] at the parameter α=2.

Several authors have (cf. [1, 2, 8–10]) written about Gelfand pairs of wreath prod- ucts. In this paper, we generalize the theory of the Gelfand pair (S2n,Hn) to wreath products. It might be expected that the images of the resulting zonal spherical function are products of zonal polynomials. This expectation is almost true but it runs out that we shall need the Schur functions as well as the zonal polynomials (see Theorem 11.2).

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we establish notations. In Sec- tion 3 we recall the theory of Gelfand pairs of finite groups and in Section 4 we define the subgroup H Gn of SG2n =GS2n. Section 5 analyzes the double cosets of H Gn in SG2n and shows that the pair (SG2n,H Gn) is a Gelfand pair.

We recall the representation theory of wreath products in Section 6 and in Sec- tion 7 we determine the irreducible decomposition of the permutation representa- tion 1SGH G2nn. Here we compute two special types of zonal spherical functions. In Sec- tions 8 and 9, we prepare algebraic setting for obtaining our main result. We con- struct a graded Hecke algebra and the multipartition version of the ring of sym- metric functions. In Section 10 we define the characteristic map between these two algebras and in Section 11 we determine the images of zonal spherical functions of (SG2n,H Gn) under the characteristic map (Theorem 11.2). In the last section, we apply our main theorem to discrete orthogonal polynomials of hypergeometric type.

(3)

2. Notation

Throughout this paper we use the following notation. Letλ=(λ1, λ2, . . .) be a par- tition of n. We write|λ| =n orλn.We denote by mr =mr(λ)= | {i;λi=r} |the multiplicity of r inλ=(λ1, λ2, . . .)n and we writeλ=1m12m23m3. . . .Let X be a (finite) set. Ifρ=(ρ(x)|x∈ X ) is an|X|-tuple of partitions and

xX(x)| =n then we say thatρ is a (|X|-tuple of) partition(s) of n and write|ρ| =n orρn.If ρ(x)=1m1(x)2m2(x)3m3(x). . . (xX ) we put

xX

ρ(x)=1x∈Xm1(x)2x∈Xm2(x)3x∈Xm3(x). . . .

Let Sn be the symmetric group on n letters. Letρ=(ρ1, ρ2, . . .) be a partition of n.

Define [ρ]∈Snby

[ρ]=(1,2, . . . , ρ1)(ρ1+1, ρ1+2, . . . , ρ1+ρ2)(ρ1+ρ2+1, . . . ,). . . . Let G be a finite group. Let Gbe the set of irreducible characters of G and Gthe set of conjugacy classes of G. Let Vχdenote the irreducible G-module affording a character χG and letχ(C) be the irreducible character χ evaluated at an element of the conjugacy class C. LetCG be the group ring of G. We always identify

xG f (x)x∈ CG with the corresponding function f on G. If H is a subgroup of G the Hecke algebra is

H(G,H )=eHCGeH, where eH= 1

|H|

hH

h.

Viewed as functions,H(G,H ) is the algebra of functions on G which are constant on each double coset in H\G/H . Let

1GH=IndGH1∼=GC[G/H ]∼=GCGeH

denote the permutation representation of G onC[G/H ]. The scalar product onCG is defined by

f,gG= 1

|G|

xG

f (x)g(x).

The primitive idempotent corresponding to the Vχ-isotopic component ofCG is writ- ten by eχ or eVχ. The following proposition (cf. [7, I, (2.1)]) about double cosets for the Gelfand pair (S2n,Hn) is frequently used in this paper.

Proposition 2.1. A complete set of representatives of the double cosets Hn\S2n/Hn

is given by

{[2ρ];ρ n}.

(4)

3. Gelfand pair of finite groups and their zonal spherical functions

Throughout this section G is a finite group and H is a subgroup of G. We assume thatCGeHis multiplicity free so that (G,H ) is a Gelfand pair. With this assumption CGeHis a direct sum of non-isomorphic irreducible G-modules, say

1GH =CGeH∼= s

i=1

Vi.

Proposition 3.1 [4, pp. 283 (11.27)]. Vi =CGeieH(1≤is),where ei =eVi. It follows from Frobenius reciprocity thatωi = dim V|G|ieieH is the unique H -invariant element in the Viisotypic component of 1GHsuch thatωi(1)=1. The functionsωi(1≤ is) are the zonal spherical functions of the Gelfand pair (G,H ). In terms of the inner product,

ωi(x)=dim Vi

|G| eieH(x)= eieH,xeieHG/ eieH,eieHG, (1≤is, xG).

From this expression it is clear that the zonal spherical functions are constant on double cosets. See [7, VII, (1.4)] for other properties of the zonal spherical functions. The following proposition is useful for computing the zonal spherical functions.

Proposition 3.2 [7, VII, (1.3)]. Suppose that W is a realization of Vi with a G-invariant Hermitian scalar product ,. Let F be a non-zero H -invariant element of W . Then the zonal spherical functionωi is given by

ωi(x)= F,x F/ F,F.

4. The pair (SG2n,HGn)

Let S2nbe the group of permutations of{1,2, . . . ,2n}and let Hnbe the subgroup of S2n which is the centralizer of the involution (1,2)(3,4). . .(2n−1,2n)S2n. We remark that Hncan be viewed as permutations of{{2i−1,2i}; 1≤in}. Let G be a finite group. Let SG2nbe the wreath product of G with S2nand letG= {(g,g)|gG}be the diagonal subgroup of G×G. Letθbe the action of S2non G2ngiven by permuting the factors and letθ|Hnbe the restriction ofθto Hn. Then (G)nG2nis an invariant subset forθ|Hn. Now let ˜θbe the action of Hnon (G)ninduced byθ|H nand define a subgroup of SG2n by

H Gn=(G)nθ˜ Hn. Note that H Gnis the normalizer of (G)n in SG2n.

(5)

5. Description of double cosets

Let x =(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n;σ)∈SG2n. The G-colored graphG(x)= {VG(x),EG(x)} is the graph with vertices

VG(x)= {g1,g2, . . . ,g2n} and edges

EG(x)=

{g2i1,g2i},

gσ(2 j1),gσ(2 j )

; 1≤i,jn . Here we call{g2i−1,g2i} ∈EG(x) broken and

gσ(2i−1),gσ(2i )

EG(x) straight.

Example 5.1. If G=Z/3Z= {0,1,2} and x =(0,1,2,2,1,0; (123)(56))∈SG6

then we have

G(x)= 1s

2s 0s 0s 2s 1s

JJ

J J .

The following proposition shows thatG(x)=G(y1x y2) for y1,y2H Gn. Proposition 5.2. Let x =(g1, . . . ,g2n;σ) be an element of SG2n. The following con- ditions are equivalent.

(1) {gi,gj} ∈EG(x).

(2) {gi,gj} ∈EG(y1x y2), where yi =(1, . . . ,1; hi)∈ H Gn (i=1,2).

Proof: (2)⇒(1):

Case 1:{gi,gj}is a broken edge ofG(x). In this case there is a number ksuch that {gi,gj} =

gh−1

1 (2k−1),gh−1

1 (2k)

and the right hand side is a broken edge of EG(y1x y2).

Case 2:{gi,gj}is a straight edge ofG(x). By the definition ofG(x) we can put i =σ(2k11) and j =σ(2k1) for some k1. Then there exists a number k2 such that{h2(2k2−1),h2(2k2)} = {2k1−1,2k1}. Therefore we have

gh−11 (h1σh2(2k21)),gh−11 (h1σh2(2k2))

=

gσ(2k11),gσ(2k1)

and the left hand side is a straight edge ofG(y1x y2). This establishes (1)⇒(2).

The claim (2)⇒(1) is proved similarly.

Proposition 5.3. Let x =(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n;σ)∈SG2n, y1=(k1,k1, . . . ,kn,kn; 1)

H Gn and y2=(l1,l1, . . . ,ln,ln; 1)∈ H Gn.

(1) If{ki1g2i1lj1,ki2g2ilj2}is a broken edge ofG(y1x y2) then i1=i2. (2) If{ki1gσ(2i1)lj1,ki2gσ(2i )lj2}is a straight edge ofG(y1x y2) then j1= j2.

(6)

Proof: Since the first claim is clear we have only to show the second claim. Put l2i −1=l2i =li. We calculate

x y2 =

g1lσ−1(1),g2lσ−1(2). . .g2nlσ−1(2n);σ .

We have gσ(2i1)lσ1(σ(2i1))=gσ(2i1)li and gσ(2i )lσ1(σ(2i ))=gσ(2i )li. Note that any element of H Gncan be written as

y=(1, . . . ,1; h)(k1,k1, . . . ,kn,kn; 1), with hHn and kiG.

With this in mind the following proposition follows from Propositions 5.2 and 5.3.

Proposition 5.4. Let x =(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n;σ)∈SG2n, y1=(k1,k1, . . . ,kn,kn; h1)

H Gn, and y2=(l1,l1, . . . ,ln,ln; h2)∈ H Gn. Suppose that{gi,gj} ∈EG(x). Then (1) {kn1gilm1,kn2gjlm2} ∈ EG(y1x y2) for some 1n1,m1,n2,m2n,

(2) If{kn1gilm1,kn2gjlm2} ∈EG(y1x y2) is a straight edge then lm1 =lm2, (3) If{kn1gilm1,kn2gjlm2} ∈EG(y1x y2) is a broken edge then kn1=kn2.

Fix an element x =(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n;σ)∈SG2n. Let L be a cycle ofG(x). As- sume that L has vertices{gij; 1≤ j2k}. Let{{gi2 j−1,gi2 j}; 1≤ jk}be the broken edges of L and{{gi2 j,gi2 j+1},{gi2k,gi1}; 1≤ jk−1}the straight edges of L.

Definition 5.5. The circuit product of L is

p(L)= k

j=1

gi−12 j−1gi2 j.

If L has 2k edges then p(L) is a circuit product of length k.

Example 5.6. The circuit products of x for Example 5.1 are

−0+1−2+2=1 and −1+0=2.

Note that the circuit product p(L) is not unique. Indeed there are two choices, the starting point and the orientation, clockwise or counterclockwise. Nonetheless, any circuit product p(L) is an element of the set

x p(L)x1,x p(L)1x1; xSG2n

.

(7)

Now we define

G∗∗= {R=CC1; CG}, where C1= {g1; gC}.

A circuit product p(L) determines a unique RG∗∗such that R= {x p(L)x−1,x p(L)−1x−1; xSG2n}.

We call a conjugacy class real (resp. complex) when C =C1(resp.C=C1).

Definition 5.7. Put

mk(R)= |{L; L is a 2k-cycle ofG(x) and p(L)R}|.

Define a tuple of partitions

ρ(x)=(ρ(R); R∈G∗∗),

whereρ(R)=(1m1(R),2m2(R), . . . ,nmn(R)). This tuple of partitionsρ(x) is called the circuit type of x.

Example 5.8. If G=Z/3Z= {0,1,2}, then G∗∗= {R0= {0},R1= {1,2}}. For Example 5.1,

ρ(x)=(ρ(R0), ρ(R1))=((∅),(2,1)) is the circuit type of x.

The following proposition is a consequence of Proposition 5.4.

Proposition 5.9. Put xSG2nand y1,y2H Gn. Then ρ(x)=ρ(y1x y2).

We will show that the converse of Proposition 5.9 holds. If x and y are elements of the same double coset write xd y. We may assume thatσ =h1[2ρ]h2S2n(ρn), where h1and h2are elements of Hn. Then

x=(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n;σ)

=(g1,g2, . . . ,g2n; h1[2ρ]h2)

d (gh1(1),gh1(2), . . . ,gh1(2n); [2ρ])

d (1, . . . , 1,c1 ρ1

,1, . . . , 1,c2 ρ2

, . . . ,1, . . . , 1,c

ρ

; [2ρ])=x.

(8)

In the last relation above, can be any element of G which is conjugate to

ρi

j=1

gh11(2ui+2 j1)gh1(2ui+2 j )

u1=0 and ui =

i1

k=1

ρk

which is obtained by solving

(k1,k1, . . . ,kn,kn; 1)(gh1(1),gh1(2), . . . ,gh1(2n); [2ρ])(l1,l1, . . . ,ln,ln; 1)=x. Fix an element ySG2nwith the same circuit type as x and let ybe such that

y=(1, . . . ,1,c1

ρ1

,1, . . . ,1,c2

ρ2

, . . . ,1, . . . ,1,c

ρ

;σρ)∼d y.

Because of our assumptions we can choose an element ciK which satisfies cior c−1iK , where K = {ci;ρi =k}and K= {ci;ρi =k}. Let (K)1 = {c1|cK}. Then the converse of Proposition 5.9 will be established by showing that K(K)1is an H Gndouble coset. Consider the following four operations.

(OP1) Ifρi =ρithen multiply yby

1, . . . ,1;

ρi−1 j=0

(2(ui+j)+1,2(ti+ j)+1)(2(ui+j)+2,2(ti+ j)+2)

H Gn

on both sides. Here ui =i−1

k=0ρkand ti =i−1

k=0ρkfor 1≤k,k. (OP2) Multiply yby

(1, . . . ,1,ci−1,c−1i

1+···+2ρi

,1, . . . ,1; 1)∈ H Gn

on the left.

(OP3) Multiply yby

(1, . . . ,1; (2ui+1,2ui+3, . . . ,2ui+2ρi−1)1(2ui+2,2ui+4, . . . , 2ui+2ρi)1)∈ H Gn

on the right, where ui =i1 j=0ρj. (OP4) Multiply yby

1, . . . ,1;

u

i1

j=1

(2ui+j,2ui+2ρij−1)

(2(ui+ρi)−1,2(ui+ρi))

H Gn

on both sides, where ui =i−1

j=0ρj.

(9)

The following example illustrates these operations.

Example 5.10. We take an element

x=(g1, . . . ,g6,g7, . . . ,g12; (1,2,3,4,5,6)(7,8,9,10,11,12)). (OP1) Take a=(1,7)(2,8)(3,9)(4,10)(5,11)(6,12) and compute

axa=x=(g7, . . . ,g12,g1, . . . ,g6; (1,2,3,4,5,6)(7,8,9,10,11,12)).

We take

y=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,ci; (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)). (OP2) Take b=(1,1,1,1,ci 1,ci1; 1) and compute

by=(1,1,1,1,1,1,c−1i ,1; (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)) (OP3) Take c=(1,1,1,1,1,1; (7,5,3,1)(8,6,4,2)) and compute byc=(1,1,1,1,1,1,ci1,1; (8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1)). (OP4) Take d =(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1; (1,6)(2,5)(3,4)(7,8)) and compute

dbycd=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,ci 1; (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)).

The role of (OP1) is to interchange any two elements of K. Operations (OP2), (OP3) and (OP4) make it possible to change ci to ci1, namely

. . .1, . . . ,1,ci. . . ; [2ρ])∼d(. . .1, . . . ,1,c−1i , . . .; [2ρ] .

This establishes the following proposition.

Proposition 5.11. If x,ySG2nand x and y have the same circuit type then xd y.

Moreover, using the operations (OP2) and (OP3) gives the following proposition.

Proposition 5.12. xd x1, for all xSG2n.

Remark 5.13. A consequence of Proposition 5.12 is that the pair (SG2n,H Gn) is a Gelfand pair (cf. [7, VII, (1.2)]).

Consequently we have the following theorem.

(10)

Theorem 5.14. Let x,ySG2n. Then (1) xd yρ(x)=ρ(y).

(2) ρ(x)=ρ(x−1).

We know that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the double cosets H Gn\SG2n/H Gnand the set of|G∗∗|-tuples of partitions of n;

H Gn\SG2n/H Gn

↔ {ρ1:1 =(ρ(R)|RG∗∗);|ρ| =n}.

The remainder of this section is devoted to computation of the cardinality of the double coset indexed byρ=(ρ(R); R∈G∗∗)=ρ(R)=(1m1(R),2m2(R), . . . ,nmn(R)).

First, we recall a proposition about the double cosets in Hn\S2n/Hn.

Proposition 5.15 [7, VII, (2.3)]. Let σ =h1[2ρ]h2S2n (h1,h2Hn) then

|HnσHn| = |Hz2nρ|2, where zρ=1m12m2. . .m1!m2!. . . forρ=1m12m2. . ..

Suppose that the circuit type xSG2n is ρ=(ρ(R)|R∈G∗∗) and let ρ =

R∈G∗∗ρ(R). Then the multiplicity of r inρis mr =

RG∗∗

mr(R)

and an easy computation gives

|Hn|2

z2ρ = |Hn|2

RG∗∗z2ρ(R)

mk!

RG∗∗mk(R)!

1

.

This is the number of elements in S2nx S2n. Then, for each element of S2n as in Proposition 5.15, there are

mk!

R∈G∗∗

mk(R)!

ways of distributing mkcycles of length 2k in the G-colored graph and for each cycle there are

(|G|2k1|R|)mk(R)

(11)

corresponding elements of G which correspond to the same distribution. Hence,

|H Gnx H Gn| = |Hn|2 z2ρ

n k=1

RG∗∗

(|G|2k1|R|)mk(R)× n k=1

mk!

RG∗∗mk(R)!

= |Hn|2n k=1

RG∗∗(|G|2k1|R|)mk(R)

RG∗∗2(ρ(R))1m1(R)2m2(R). . .nmn(R)

RG∗∗mr(R)!

= |Hn|2n

k=1

RG∗∗(|G|2k−1|R|)mk(R)

RG∗∗z2ρ(R)

= |Hn|2|G|2n

RG∗∗z2ρ(R) ×

R∈G∗∗|R|(ρ(Ri))

|G|(ρ) .

Proposition 5.16. Suppose xSG2nhas circuit typeρ(x)=(ρ(R)|RG∗∗), where ρ(R)=(1m1(R),2m2(R), . . . ,nmn(R)). LetζC = ||GC|| for CG. Then

|H Gnx H Gn| = |Hn|2|G|2n

RG∗∗z2ρ(R) ×

RG∗∗|R|(ρ(R))

|G|(ρ)

= |Hn|2|G|2n

R=CG∗∗

C=C1

1

z2ρ(R)ζC(ρ(R)) ×

R=CC1G∗∗

C=C−1

1 zρ(R)ζC(ρ(R)).

In Section 8 we will use this result to properly normalize the inner product on the multi-partition version of the ring of symmetric functions.

Definition 5.17.

zρ=

R=CG∗∗

C=C−1

z2ρ(R)ζC(ρ(R))×

R=CC−1G∗∗

C=C1

zρ(R)ζC(ρ(R)), where ρ=(ρ(R)|R∈G∗∗).

6. Representation theory of wreath products

In this section we recall a method of constructing the irreducible representations of a wreath product SGn =GSn (cf. [6, 14]). Let c be the cardinality of G.

Let

Cn=

n =(nχ;χG);

χ∈G

nχ =n, nχ ≥0

be the set of c-compositions of n. For nCnlet

P(n)= {(λχ|χ ∈G);λχ nχ}.

(12)

The elements ofP(n) are c-tuples of partitions. The product SG(n)=

χ∈GSGnχ

is an inertia group of SGn. Define two SG(n)-modules for nCnandλ=(λ(χ)|χ ∈ G)∈P(n),

R(n)=

χ∈G

Vχnχ and S(λ)=

χ∈G

Sλ(χ),

where Sλ denotes the irreducible module of the symmetric group indexed by the partitionλ. The action of SG(n) is defined by

(g1, . . . ,gn;σ)v1⊗ · · · ⊗vn =g1vσ−1(1)⊗ · · · ⊗gnvσ−1(n)on R(n), (g1, . . . ,gn;σ)v=σ von S(λ).

For an irreducible representation S(λ)=R(n)S(λ) of SG(n) let S(λ)= S(λ)↑SGSG(n)n .

Theorem 6.1 ([6]). {S(λ); nCn, λP(n)}is a complete system of irreducible rep- resentations of SGn.

7. Gelfand pair (SG2n,HGn)

The following theorem is a result of the analysis in Section 5 (cf. Remark 5.13).

Theorem 7.1. (SG2n,H Gn) is a Gelfand pair.

Since (SG2n,H Gn) is a Gelfand pair 1SGH G2nn is multiplicity free as SG2n-module.

Definition 7.2. A characterχGis real ifχ =χ, and complex ifχ =χ. Let GR be the set of real characters and GC the set of complex characters. Define a relation

on GC by

χχχ =χorχ =χ, and put G∗∗=GRGC/.

Throughout this paper we view G∗∗as a subset of Gby fixing representatives of the equivalence classes in GC/.

Let us record the following basic results (cf. [7, VII-2]).

Proposition 7.3. (S2n,Hn) and (G×G, G) are Gelfand pairs.

Proposition 7.4. 1SH2nn =

λnSand 1G×GG =

χ∈GVχVχ.

(13)

In particular, (Sn×Sn, Sn) is a Gelfand pair and 1SnS×nSn =

λnSλSλ.Using notations as in Section 6 define a subset ofC2nby

Cn∗∗= {(nχ|nχ =2mχ(χ∈GR,mχ ∈Z0), nχ =nχ(χ∈GC))∈C2n}.

Example 7.5. Letηi(0≤in−1) be the irreducible characters of the cyclic group Z/nZ= {0,1,2, . . . ,n−1}given byηi( j )=exp(i j2π

1 n ).

If G =Z/2ZthenCn∗∗= {(nη0,nη1)=(2n2k,2k); 0kn}and if G=Z/3Z thenCn∗∗= {(nη0,nη1,nη2)=(2n2k,k,k); 0kn}.

Define a subset ofP(n) (nCn∗∗) by

P∗∗(n)= {(λχ|χ ∈G)|λχ =2μχ(χGR), λχ =λχ(χGC)}.

PutPn∗∗=

n∈Cn∗∗P∗∗(n).

Example 7.6. If G =Z/2ZthenPn∗∗= {(λη0, λη1)=(2λ,2μ);|λ| + |μ| =n}and if G=Z/3ZthenPn∗∗= {(λη0, λη1, λη2)=(2λ, μ, μ);|λ| + |μ| =n}.

We shall decompose 1SGH G2nn in terms ofPn∗∗. For irreducible representations of SGn

S (λ(χ))=VχnSλandλ=(λχ|χ ∈G)∈P∗∗(n),

S(λ)=

χ∈G

S (λχ(χ))

are irreducible representationsS(λ) of an inertia group of SGn(see Section 6).

Now we consider two special types of representations: The irreducible SG2n- modules

S (2λ(χ)), forχGR, and the SGn×SGn modules

S (μ(χ, χ))=(VχVχ)n(SμSμ)∼=S(μ(χ))S(μ(χ)), forχGC. Then

S (χ(2λ))H Gn=((VχVχ)G)n(S2λ)Hn is 1-dimensional, and

S (μ(χ, χ))SGn =((VχVχ)G)n(SμSμ)SGn is nonzero.

(14)

Define idempotents

e2λ(χ)= deg 2λ(χ)

|SG2n|

xSG2n

2λ(χ)(x)x and

eμ(χ,χ)= degμ(χ, χ)

|SGn|2

x∈SGn×SGn

μ(χ, χ)(x)x,

where 2λ(χ) (resp.μ(χ, χ)) is the character of S (2λ(χ)) (resp. S (μ(χ, χ))).

Definition 7.7. Forλ=(λχ;χG)∈Pn∗∗put e(λ)=

χ∈GR

eλχ(χ)

χ∈GC/

eλχ(χ,χ).

For nCn∗∗define a subgroup H G(n) of SG(n) by H G(n)=H GnSG(n)∼=

χ∈GR

H Gnχ ×

χ∈GC/

SGnχ.

By Proposition 7.3,

(SG(n),H G(n)) is a Gelfand pair and thus, by Proposition 3.1,

CSG2ne(λ)eH G(n)∼=CSG2nCSG(n)CSG(n)e(λ)eH G(n) (λPn∗∗) is an irreducible SG2n-module. Consequently,

CSG2ne(λ)eH G(n)

are irreducible representations of SG2nindexed by|G∗∗|-tuples of partitionsλPn∗∗. We recall a lemma of Brauer (cf. [5, Chapter 6 (6.32)]).

Proposition 7.8. |G∗∗| = |G∗∗|.

This proposition induces the following proposition.

Proposition 7.9. |H Gn\SG2n/H Gn| = |Pn∗∗|.

Therefore, if we can prove thatCSG2ne(λ)eH G(n)has a non-zero H Gn-invariant then we have determined the irreducible decomposition of 1SGH G2nn. If ˜λis the function

(15)

on SG2ngiven by

˜λ(x)= eH Gne(λ),xeH Gne(λ)SGn

then

˜λ(x)= eH Gne(λ),xeH Gne(λ)SGn = eH Gnx−1eH Gne(λ),e(λ)G

= 1

|SG2n|

g∈SG2n

eH Gnx1eH Gne(λ)(g)e(λ)(g)

= 1

|SG2n|

gSG(n)

eH Gnx1eH Gne(λ)(g)e(λ)(g1)

= 1

|SG2n|eH Gnx1eH Gne(λ)e(λ)(1)

= 1

|SG2n|eH Gnx1eH Gne(λ)(1)= 1

|SG2n|eH Gne(λ)eH Gn(x). When x =1,

˜λ(1)= eH Gne(λ),eH Gne(λ)G= eH Gne(λ),e(λ)G

= 1

|SG2n|

gSG2n

eH Gne(λ)(g)e(λ)(g)

= 1

|SG2n|

gSG(n)

eH Gne(λ)(g)e(λ)(g−1)

= 1

|SG2n|eH Gne(λ)e(λ)(1)= 1

|SG2n|e(λ)eH Gn(1)

= 1

|SG2n|

|H G(n)|

|H Gn| e(λ)eH GnSG(n)(1)= dim S(λ)

|SG2n||SG(n)|

|H G(n)|

|H Gn| . In particular, ˜λ=0 and soCSG2ne(λ)eH G(n)has an H Gn-invariant. This proves the following theorem.

Theorem 7.10.

1SGH G2nn =

λ∈Pn∗∗

S(λ)

Example 7.11. Letη0, η1andη2be defined as in Example 7.5. If G=Z/2Zthen 1SGH G2nn =

|λ|+|μ|=n

S( 2λ

η0

,2μ

η1

),

参照

関連したドキュメント

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

This paper develops a recursion formula for the conditional moments of the area under the absolute value of Brownian bridge given the local time at 0.. The method of power series

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

So far, most spectral and analytic properties mirror of M Z 0 those of periodic Schr¨odinger operators, but there are two important differences: (i) M 0 is not bounded from below

Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the

In this paper we focus on the relation existing between a (singular) projective hypersurface and the 0-th local cohomology of its jacobian ring.. Most of the results we will present

Under small data assumption, we prove the existence and uniqueness of the weak solution to the corresponding Navier-Stokes system with pressure boundary condition.. The proof is