• 検索結果がありません。

Is the invariant ring C[z1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Is the invariant ring C[z1"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Abstracts

Finite and infinite generation of Nagata invariant ring Shigeru MUKAI

An m-dimensional linear representation of an (algebraic) group G induces an action on the polynomial ringC[z1, . . . , zm] of m variables.

This is called a linear action on the polynomial ring. In 1890, Hilbert showed that the invariant ring was finitely generated for classical rep- resentations of the general and special linear groups. The following is known as his (original) fourteenth problem ([1]):

Question. Is the invariant ring C[z1, . . . , zm]G of a linear action of an algebraic group finitely generated?

The answer is affirmative for the (1-dimensional) additive algebraic group Ga ([3]). In 1958, Nagata considered the standard unipotent linear action

(t1, . . . , tn)Cn C[x1, . . . , xn, y1, . . . , yn] =: S

(1)

xi →xi

yi →yi+tixi , 1≤i≤n,

of Cn on the polynomial ring S of 2n variables and showed that the invariant ring SG with respect to a general linear subspace G Cn of codimension 3 was not finitely generated for n = 16. I studied this example systematically and obtained the following:

Theorem 1. The invariant ring SG of (1) with respect to a general linear subspace G Cn of codimension r is finitely generated if and only if

1 2 +1

r + 1

n−r >1.

This inequality is equivalent to the finiteness of the Weyl group W(T2,nr,r) of the Dynkin diagram T2,nr,r with three legs of length 2,n−r andr. There are four infinite series [I]–[IV] and five exceptonal cases [V]–[IX] where this holds:

[I] [II] [III] [IV] [V] [VI] [VII] [VIII] [IV]

r 1 2 3 3 4 3 5

n−r 1 2 3 4 3 5 3

diagram An An Dn Dn E6 E7 E7 E8 E8

The ‘if’ part of the theorem is proved case by case. In the cases [I]

and [III], the invariant ring is very explicit and the proof is immediate.

The case [II] is classical and the invariant ringSG is the homogeneous coordinate ring of a Grassmannian variety. In the case [IV], that is, dimG = 2, the invariant ring is the total coordinate ring, or the Cox ring, of the moduli space of parabolic 2-bundles on an n-pointed pro- jective line. Note that the following part of the 14th problem seems still open:

1

(2)

Question. Is the invariant ring C[z1, . . . , zm]G of a linear action of the 2-dimensional additive group G=Ga×Ga finitely generated?

See [2] for the ‘only if’ part.

References

1. Nagata, M.: On the fourteenth problem of Hilbert, Proc. Int’l Cong. Math., Edingburgh, 1958, pp. 459–462, Cambridge Univ.

Press, 1960.

2. Mukai, S.: Counterexample to Hilbert’s fourteenth problem for three dimensional additive groups, RIMS preprint, #1343, 2001.

3. Seshadri, C.S.: On a theorem of Weitzenb¨ock in invariant theory, J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 1(1962), 403–409.

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

Nilpotent and solvable Lie groups, orbit method, unitary rep- resentations of locally compact Lie groups.. The author would like to extend his sincere appreciation to the Deanship

In the ODE case, Henshaw and McCluskey [7] established the global asymptotic stability of the unique equilibrium using an appropriate Lyapunov functional.. it is a valid

Nonlinear operator equation in a Banach space, a priori boundedness principle, functional differential equation, periodic solution.... Then the equation (1)

In this sense, the submissions should es- pecially address how the results of estimated computational models (e.g., ANN, support vector machines, evolutionary algorithm, and

Since both rA and rB are non-unital and two-sided ideals in rM (A) and rM (B ), respectively, by construction, they can only be either C ∗ -isomorphic to the re- spective C ∗

For the ring clearance problem, a special case of practical interest, our algorithm achieves this running time for rings of any size n k ≥ 2.. This yields the first

However, if both groups are absolutely irreducible, then there may be several different choices of normal subgroup that can be embedded in GL(n/s, q s ), so the loop in Step 4(d) is

A pebbling move consists of taking two pebbles off a vertex u and adding one pebble on an adjacent vertex v (we can think of this as paying a toll of one pebble for using the edge {