Basic theoretical outlook about recapitalization of rapid growth private companies toward autogenious order societies developing countries : Several Fundamentals about principal's decision making models about recapitalization studies : Topics in Economics

(1)

Basic theoretical

outlook

about

recapitalization

of

rapid

growth private

companies

toward

autogenious

order

societies

developing

countries.

∼

Several

Fundamentals about principal’s decision

making

models about

recapitalization

studies∼

Akihiko

Henmi

Marketing

Grand

Design

Laboratory

Inc.

7-16-12

YS build.3F

Nishi-Shinjuku Shinjuku-ku Tokyo

1600023

Japan.

faridatky@hotmail.

com

January.31.2001.

Abstract

In this paper

Iintended

to

describe

some

introduction

scopes

and

scalable

biographical categories

about

advocacy

overlap

layerd

structurism

studies of

developing countries.Usually, advocacy

studies

belongs

to

political process

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

social

structurism

sociology

studies.But on

the

contrary recapitalization

mearsurement

econometrical studies

have

serious standstills about mearsurabilities of medium

security agent

based

market research

problems

which

consists of

non

observate issues of

developing

countries

especially

in the domestic geometric

markets,

informal

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

are

circumstances of indutriarized

metropolitans

of

developing countries.Usually,

definitions of informal

sectors

consists

in

small

business

agent

based

concepts,and

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

cannot

get

correct

due

deligent

management

informations

about

recapitalization

management

decisions

.Especially,

for IPO

phased rapid

growth

companies,

there

always

have

serious

antinomy

between business wide

broard

scoping

visions

and

inferiority

of informations

about

recapitalization

management

decisions.

And

oftenly,

these

antinomy

causes

to

build

huge

capital

rents

of IPO’s

capital

gains.Under these

backward

viewpoints ,as

one

sort of fronteer

management accounting

structure

studies,I

intend

to

describe

measurment equations and

measurment fundamental econometrics

theorems in order to make

observate

advocacy

specificated

accounting structure

overlap

layered

management

数理解析研究所講究録 1215 巻 2001 年 210-231

(2)

Introduction

This study

intends and aims about

measurabiltles of

manegement

accounting

structures

includes

finance

portoforio accounting

structures

and outward

manegement

accounting

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}$

example

incdancial geometrical

informal

sectors

economic

area’s description

versus

$\mathrm{a}.\mathrm{g}$

.

standing traditional

statistical

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

have several

difficulties

about

recapitalizations

management

decisions

of

private

forein

companies.In

this

study

Iintended

to legitimate private

foreign

companies

into

rapid

growth

IPO

phased companies.And

Itry

to

describe

principal

decision making

using

several sorts

of legal sociology studies and

top

management

basiness administration studies.Generaly measurability

manegement

accounting

structures

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}$

almost all very

vital

influences under

agent

theories of

business administration

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

unti

harmonized

recognition

theories.about

cooperaate

governance

communication

studies.

This

study

consists

in

several main constitution

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

one

is

endowsment

due

dehgent

economic

models

and

model

definition studies

aboutconsohdational network structual model of domestic national market

models,developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

sectors.

And in

this

first

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$

capitals

developing countries

still remain

in

the

positions

of

minority

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

the

viewpoints

of stakeholder conditions of

private

companies

which make

management

decisions

about recapitalzation

to

developing

countries.And therefore

in

these

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$

is

under conditions of

Commercal Code based

Jurisprudences

of

minority principals.In

this

study, Itry

to

refer

Commercal Code

and

Labour Law based Jurisprudences

of

minority principals

as

Jurisprudence

based endowsment studies and

endowsment

RBF

network

replicable

studies.

Nothing to

say,

these arguement structures depend

on

several sub

categolzed

biographical

preceding

studies,

for

examples

,Advocacy

social

policymaking

structurism

studies like P.A.Sabatier

$[\mathrm{i}],\mathrm{N}.\mathrm{W}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s}.[2],\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{m}$

studies

lJce

$\mathrm{T}.\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{K}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}[3],\mathrm{K}.\mathrm{E}.\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}’\mathrm{s}[4]\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}1$

transagent

studies. And

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}$

biographical preceding

studies

to

these

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{h}.\mathrm{z}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$

structurism

studies,

I

try

to

refer

$\mathrm{J}$

Rawls[5],

Dewei[6], Brudoueu[7],

Personstsj,

Sapiap].

Saussure

$[10\mathrm{b}$

and

other circumference studies.This

recapitalzation measurability study aimes to

build

some

inspiracies

between

backward biographical

preceding

studies,

fundamental

Advocacy

social pohcymaking

structurism

studies,

transnationalzm

studies and

econometrical fundamental

measurability studies.

In

these advanced

arguements, Itry to

make

introduction

dueviewpoints

of

braking down due deligent

measurabile studies of

recapitalization management

administration

decisions.

(3)

For

Jurisprudence

rules

about

transfer

management

resources

from

foreign economic geometrical markets to

domestic

markets developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}$

must refer

internal variable studies about

peculiar

introduction

$\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

external

variables

of

Jurisprudence

structures,

iusing

some

speculate

biographical preceding

of

$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(\mathrm{i}\mathrm{i}$

],

and

Hart[12].

And

for

the arguements

of

minority

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

Jurisprudencestudies,

We must

refer

as

typical Jurisprudence

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\dot{\mathrm{m}}$

cipalJurisprudence

studies.And

in

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}$

convolusion

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}$

measurement

equation

$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should

try

to

refer

Olson’s

problems

as

collective

action

theorems.

And

almost

needless

to say to

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{b}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$

measurability study

about

recapitalizations

should

be argued by the

viewpoints

of

endowsment

Jurisprudence

study

for

example

Wendt[is].

And

another

$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$

of

informal sectors

developing countries

should be argued in

this

paper.Another objective

theme of

this paper is arguements of

hypothesis

of

reenginieering

of

labour

and

consumer

markets

of informal

sectors

developing

countries.This

hypothesical

theme of

this paper

should

depends

on

mathmatical sociological

econometrics fundamental studies

mainly.In

this

$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{I}$

intend to due this

viewpoint

to biographicals labour economic

Baysian

model

lke Douglas and

other

very

traditional

Overlap Layered

Multi

variable

non

linier

regression

model

studies also very traditional

studies,

and

also,

$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{F}$

fundamental

Neural Network Models.These biographical selection shows

that

this study depend

on

fundamental

interdiciplinary lnkages

between econometrics

arguements

and

other

fundamental

deciplnary

structures.And

$\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$

study

aims

at giving

fundamental

viewpoint

models about

building

measurable

advocacy

social

structure

models

for

recapitalization

management

administration

decisions.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$

structure

model building has

remarkable

viewpoints

to

developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}’\mathrm{s}$

informal

sector

measurable

advocacy

social

structure model

studies.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s}$

structual

advocacy

social

model

would

be able

to

progress

integral

social

structual

advocacy

social semantics model of

developing

countrie’s

informal

sector societies.

1. Biographicals

of General Broad Models

about

Principal study

of

IPO

phased companies.

$\mathrm{U}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$

decisions

of IPO

phased

companies

about

multinational

recapitalization

tend

to depend

on

hidden management knowledges

of

founders

$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{O},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

almost

always

have characteristic difficulties to

monetary intermediacy.

Generally,

flow model based finance motivation stands under economic conditions of

macro

finance

information which is prepared for

recapitalzation management

decisions.And in this

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$

synmetrical specification

of

information and

internal

agent

confidential

capitals

are

restricted

by

economic conditions of

macro

(4)

finance information.For

example

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}^{-}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}$ $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$

is very clear that

hosehold

economy

and

social

capital

resumes

should

be

included

in

finance

restriction

definitions.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

cercularfLows

should

be

consisted

in

the

contexts of

finance restriction

$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

utilize values

of cashflows demands.And

also,

Hicks,Clower

and

Taisingiujand

Robertsons[15]

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$

economic models about

finance restriction definitions have vital specifications

as

Finance

Motivations.And

also Robertsons says

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{F}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}$

Restriction

opposed against time series

multiplicated

effects which

are

build practical

cashflows.In

these

contexts

about

Finance Restriction

$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should

be

argued

under

conditions of

building

multi

dimentional character

equations

which have

parrarell

conditions to time

discount

cashflow values.

As

Sammuelson and

Striker[i6]says

and

refer

in

their biographicals, For

independent

divergence analysis

about

product equations

restricted

by

geometrical

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{W}\mathrm{e}$

need convolusional

overlap

layerd

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$

$\mathrm{E}$

models. These

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$ $\mathrm{E}$

models

should be constructed based maximize utilze

equational

theorems for

household

economy

agent

$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

also these

agent

models should be convoluted labour

contract

models which

includes vital conditions of

restriction equations

of

product

technological

restriction,

time

discount values

restriction,

fiscal

pohcy

restriction,

geometrical

discount restriction.

And

along

these

equational preconditions

of

recapitalization

$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

are

following

vital

issues

about

recapitalzation

renmas.One of

these

were

Nominal and Substantial Labour

Supply

$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

other,Agent-Organization

Proplem

and

Controll Based Committment

Problem.Nominal

and

Substantial Labour Supply Problem shows that there

is fundamentally

no

functions

between disguised umemployment labour

fource and

spreads

between

nominal and

substantial labour

supply

fource.Disguised

umemployment

labour

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}$

Nurkse

shows[n]

fundamentally

have

no

lnkages

between geometrical specfication functions

and nominal

and substantial labour

supply

functions.

In

another

$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{S}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$

problems

about labour supply

functions’

measurabilty

still remain under

condition

of

adopting

geometrical

specfication

functions.

But

still

remaining

conditions of

disguised unemployment labour

measurable

$\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}$

functions about informal

sectors developing countries take marginalze by

geometrical

specification

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}$

the network overlap

models

like

$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}.\iota 18[.\mathrm{s}$

marginal

organization agent

models.

And another

point

of

$\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{w},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$

organization proplem

and control based

commitment problem

are

described

as

follows.

Productivity

estimation studies about management decision

of

private

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$

some

kind

of

overlap

layered optimize

structures

productivity equation

model studies.

Overlap

layered optimize productivity models

should be

structured

getting

optimize

management

conditions

from estimation of structured

optimize

management teams.

For

biographicals.Dess,Preim[i9]

shows

homogeniousity

of

(5)

structured

optimize

management

team

members have high level correlation

between

productivities

of

management

decisions and homogeniousty

of

top

management

teams.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

of

internal communications

of

top

management

teams

contributed

on

correlations between

productivities

and management

decisions

types.And

in

the context of

recapitalization management

decisions

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$

is

vital

key

factors

how

reposition

and

estimate

have had

specific

diversences

very correlate

with membership structures.This

viewpoints

of

specific diversences

of

management

decisions have been

indicated

by Hambrick and Mason’s biographicals.pojThese

academic view of

management membership

structures have

important

lnkages

about

agent types

analysis

studies of

advocacy

overlap

layered structures.In

these studies of

agent

types

analysis

$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

order to

reflect

and make

conjunction to

recapitalization

studies

and in

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}$

conjunction

to geometrical

non

descrete

class structured semantic market

fiame

structures,

there

are

some

vital academic

biographicals

of these

$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h},\iota 21\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$ $\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{K}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(22$

]

$.\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

says that diversities of

network structures

includes

cooperate alliances

and institutional mutual interactions

of

joint

management issues

of

network organizational

structures.And

in

add,

organizational

class layered structures belonging with diversities

of

management

external conditions have

some

specifications

of

gradualy

processing

organizational

innovations

under

management

conditions

of

non

descrete varriances.On the

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$

descreate

management

conditions

which

have unti consecutive

alliance

conditions

of

$\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}$ $\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$

decision

making

between foreign

private companies

and under developing

organizations developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}i\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

organizations private companies

which should bestand under

gradually processing organizational in0vati0n8

under

management conditionsusually

have internal oriented learning specifications

and tend

to

have

impossibilities

of

learning

recapitalization

conditions.

And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

other context

$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{T}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

says

also

that

recapitalzation

decisions

including

capital

retransfer

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

on

not only contract strategies but also

aIh.ance and

cooperate

informal organizational lnkages.

In

these

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

must notice

that

non

descreate

recapitalze

medium

studies includes principal

agents’

specificated

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

stands under

overlayered

and classiq structures

,and

have variations along with principal

.

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s}’\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$

and also have

specificated

aliance semantic structures.But

on

the

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

also

have dfferences between recapitalzation theoretical dividence

studies

and typological agents

types

studies.And

we

shold

build divergence

advocacy

overlap

layered

developing

country

structures by

dividencial typologies

of

agent types

which

are

made by aliance

types

and

top

management divergency types.

2. Linkage

Networks and

Endowsment

Types

Studies

about IPO

phased Rapid

Growth

Companies

and

Relativities against Structuralism Studies

(6)

$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{D}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}$

of

Informal

Sectors Developing

Countries

have

serious

confusisonal

condititions

in

the

viewpoints

of

recapitalzation

measurable

studies.This confusional

problems

causes

standing

statistic designs

of

public

governmemts

and statistical measurability

of

each

smal

businesss

informal

organizations.Almost

always

these

invisible conditions about definisions

of

informal

sectors developing countries

causes

flourish about

implication

anthoroplogical

case

studies and business

administrational

organization

case

studies like N.Uphoff.But

$\mathrm{f}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$

anthoroplogical

case

studies and business

administrational

organization

case

studies

only

have

second

best

academic

inspiracy

of econometric

measure

models

and have

no

direct

means of

real statistic econometric analysis.

$\mathrm{A}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{A}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}[23]$

.

defines informal sectors small

independent

business

agent.But

almost

all of

developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}$

around

industrizational

metropoltans

have not

fulfiled

by

smal

independent

business informal sector

agent.And

in

real

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}$

independent

business

agents

which have

functions

of mutual

support

and subcontract to industrizational

$\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

due

to

own one

part

of geometrical economy surround to industrization

economy.Other

parts

of geometrical economy surrounds

are one

is poverty

economic

class

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

another

is

some

spcificate

household like

organizations

which

owe

apparenticeships

toward young labours who intend to work

as

metropolitan

industrial workers and

some

fews

are

intend to make small businesses informal

sectors

using

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{s}.\mathrm{A}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

the viewpoint

of

recapitalization

measurablity

studies,

informal

sector’s diciplnes

which

due

to

labour

contract

based

agents, do

not have sufficient accountabilities.We should

define

alternative

scopes

about

geometrical economy

surround

to

industrization economy.And

on

this

viewpoints

we

should

use as

semantic

key

$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$

and.jurisprudence

confonmity

based restatement

problems.

Endowsment

policies

of informal sectors should be stand

as

adhoc studies

which

should be defined

by jurisprudence conformity

studies.Restatement

problems

are

measurability issues

of

practical conditionarity pohcies.And supplement policies

of

practical

laws

depend

on

the

activitiesof endowsment of transferable

import

laws.

According to minority

stakeholders of IPO

phased private

company

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

these

contexts of

practical

laws’

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

buildings

of international

private

laws depends

on

alternativities

of

juridical rights

on

national

private

$\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

on

presupositions

of national

jurisdictions. And in

another

is

said

that

conjunction problems

of

proceeding

laws

between national and international

private

laws is

considered

in

the

process of

making superiorities

of

private

company’s

home

nation’s

international

endowsment

laws.And

also

in

one

other

is

said

that

minority

stakeholders of IPO

phased private

company

agents due to

social welfare

$\mathrm{p}$

’

ohcy and

conflict jurisprundences

in

the

conditions of endowsment

investment

businesses.These business

endowsment conditions

so

called

Forum Non

Convenien

ce

(7)

Jurisprundences

are

stand

as

restrict

conditions

of

domestic economic

advocacy

structures.And in

additions,

in

the conditions

of

recapitalizations

of

foreign

private

company

agentstit

is

important

views

of

recapitalzations

that accordance

jurisprundence structures which

are

instituted advocacy economic overlayerd

structures.And

recapitalization capital

gain

of

foreign

private

company

agents

should

be argued by

dividencial study between dividend

and shared

business profits each of

these should be

gain

directry

from instituted

advocacy economic overlayerd

structures.

And

the latter

point

of

views

about observate

synthesis

studies of instituted

advocacy economic overlayerd

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should make clear labour contract

conditions

and

remodelng to make

measure

equation

of

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{M}$$\mathrm{E}$

models

of .

instituted

advocacy

economic overlayerd structures.FundamentaIy,according to labour

management

model

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

are

vital

points

about

utilty

studies of domestic

private

laws

against

powers

of

foreign

mother

countries’

endowsment international

laws,

_and

_another

_vital

viewpoints

about endowsment jurisprundence studies

are

arguements

about

institutional

ownerships

and

organizational

governance

management

studies.

$\mathrm{O}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}$

problems

about

informal sectors

especially

of

developing

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$

management

control

structure

problems

which

have been

described,

N.Uphoff,

A.Sabatierformer have

been

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}$

independence

and

incdance

conditions

about

social structures.These independence structure conditions from

external

development policies,

indecate structurabilty

of

Overlap

layered

external

and

incdancial management

accounting

structures in the

social conditions of

medium

structures

between

industrialzation economy and agricultural economies lke

informal

sectors.

And

these measurabih.ties of

Overlap layered

external

and incdancial

management

accounting

structures in

the

social

conditions

should

be

extended

by

the

former

prestudies

of

R.

$\mathrm{K}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{O}$

Keohane

and

J.S.Nye.[24].8

biographicals.

According

to

R.Kappen’s

trans

international

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

governments

and national

governments

of

developing countries

and other

optimize independent agent

factors

should have

remarkable influences

to

transnational

agents

and sub public sectors

which

usuauy

do not have specificational

public

institutions.And R.O

Keohane and

J.S.Nye

says

regitimate

definitions about transnational

agents

for

developing

countries

as some

domestic economic rational

structures.And

in

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{g}$

to

international

policy

research

studies,

non

governmental

transnational agents should

have specificated semantic mutual relationships and

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}$

overlap

layered

structures

should be build

up

by

means

of

common

expectations

which defines

by

rati0naltie8

of

agent

activities

,and

by objective management

decisions

of

agent

activities.These

arguement

studies of

agent

activities

and boundary structures

between

transnational and domestic class structual advocacy structures also show

dimentional

structual measurment

equations

should be build for econometric social

(8)

measurment studies.

These arguements

of

agent activities

and boundary structures between

transnational and domestic class structual advocacy structures

,there

also

could

be

discovered

in

alternative contexts

of sociological studies

and structual

anthropological

studies.For

example,

F.Boudieu says

dynamic linkages

between

agents

and semantic

variable

spots in

the

viewpoints

of structual social studies. And

P.V.Blache[25]

indicates

social structure

descriptions

about

sf.fl

ness

of

job

selections

about

traditional custom

jurisprundence

based societies.And

as more

microscopic

social structual

studies,

J.Dewey[26]

indicated and suggested due

deligent

faculty

educational endowsment studies about

agent management

decisions

of

informal

sectors of

developing

countries.

Conjunctional

studies between these sociological alternative studies and

Overlap

layered

external

and

incdancial

management accounting

structures studies

of

informal sectors of developing countries needs advanced discussions about

replicabilty

modelng

studies.In this

$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{y}$

,

Iintend to make legitimate

studies

only

excluded by structurism which

are

typicals

in advocacy

social structure

studies.

$3.\ln$

stepping alternative structuralism

modeling

study

about

IPO

phased

private

companies’

recapitalizations

toward domestic

markets

developing

countries.

In

this

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should observe and discuss due

dehgence accounting

measurement

fundamental

viewpoints

according

to

structuralsm

studies.

Iintend to show three

arguement points

in

this

chapter.First point

is

neutralty

theorem

about

taxination pohcy

endowsment

elements. And the second

point

is

prepearatory

fundamental

reviews

about econometrics

measuring equations

which

are

reversion structures

of

Cob Douglas productivity

function

equations.This

productivity

function

equation

stand

as

afundamental condition

equation

of SME

models

useful for measurment studies of Informal sectors

developing

countries.And

the third

point

of this

chapter

is

necessity

rules for

measurment

studies of Informal

sectors developing

countries

which

are

useful

to power guided

endowsment

advocacy

model

studies,

which

one

is

power

selection based endowsment

socio

mathmatical

models and another is

fundamental

unit advocacy

measurment

econometrics model

studies,

household

measurment

fundamental reviews and also second another

views

of this

chapter

is

some

point

of

stochastic accounting measurable

fundamental

study

reviews.Needless to

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}$

study

have

some

aims to get

fundamental measurment

perspectives

for

advocacy

social

structurism

models.

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}$

former theoretical

studies

biographical in

this

chapter

are

almost

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}$

theorems of each

biographical categories.In

order

to

interact real

society

and

real statistic conditions

(9)

we

should

develop

some

biographicals

in

each

statistic, stochastic,

econometrics

academic conditions within

frames of

advocacy

social

structurism

models

studies.

In

the

viewpoints

of

neutralty

theorem

about taxination policy endowsment

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should

notice

that general rules

of

taxination

pohcies

usually stands

outside of

temporary poltical

jurisprudences

and

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$

due deligent taxination

rules have been instituted under short time spread based economic polity decisions of

national government

of

developing countries.Usually management

decisions of

private companies

developing countries should have

management

decision based

informations under conditions of

minority

stakeholders which have been situated

to

majour

stakeholders which intended to make

recapitalzation

to developing countries.

Capital

alowance motivations

of

management

decisions of

minority

stakeholders of

private companies

developing countries alway\S

should

have be induced not

by

general

rules

of taxination

pohcies

but

by temporary political

jurisprudences and

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}$

due deligent taxination rules.For

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

these introduced

contexts,

H.Hofeiither

and

F.Schneider says

advocacy

structured based money

hallucination

theorems

according to taxination policies.H.Hofeiither and

F.Schneider

says that structured

money hallucination caused taxination

policies

should have

depend

on

mainly

temporary

politicaljurisprudences,

and

temporary

taxination

policies

which have been

structured by

itemized

taxination

laws.

These

itemized

taxination laws

influences

should

be measured

even

in

the

conditions of advocacy structured measuring

equations.In

other

$\mathrm{w}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

SME

models

about

advocacy

based

recapitalization

agent

synthesis

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}$

taxination

laws should be made

as

measurable

equations.Fundamental

theorem

stands

as

complexities

of

taxination

policies

as

follows.

$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}=\mathrm{T}$

A

$\mathrm{T}$

_{$\mathrm{R}Y,$}

$+\mathrm{A}\mathrm{M}$

$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y1$

$\mathrm{D}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{T}t$

:Direct Tax loading

$\mathrm{T}$

A

$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y\mathrm{t}$

:

Avernage

Tax Ratio per labour

fee of

Year.T.

AM

$\mathrm{T}\mathrm{R}Y\mathrm{t}$

:

Marginal

Tax

Ratio per

labour fee of Year.T

$\mathrm{m}$

$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$

I

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}^{=}\mathrm{Z}$

$(\mathrm{R}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{V}1’ )2+\mathrm{Z}$

$(\mathrm{E}\mathrm{X} \mathrm{E}\mathrm{M}_{1t})2$

$‘=1$

$j=1$

$\mathrm{V}$

I

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{T}\mathrm{t}$

:Complexity

of

Taxination

$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$

:Sharing

Ratio

of

Tax item

$\mathrm{i}$

under

gross

Taxination

Recoops

of

.Tax item8

of

Year.T

$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{X}\mathrm{E}\mathrm{M}$ $1\iota$

:

$\mathrm{T}\dot{\mathrm{a}}$

$\mathrm{x}$

free

item

$\mathrm{j}$

among

$\mathrm{n}$

Tax

free

items

of

Year.T

Consequently

these

equational

based

complexities

of

taxination

policies

should

be

structurized

by

sub measurable

equations

models.And these

complexities equations

models

should have build

as

the

viewpoints

of

non

descreate geodetic lne

approval

which is

useful

to optimise

endowsment

geodetic

lines such

as

Kullback

Leibe

$\mathrm{r}$

(10)

diversence

analysis.

And for second

viewpoint

of

this

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r},\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s}$

measuring

equations

which

are

reversion structures

of

Cob Douglas productivity

function

equations

$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{w}\mathrm{e}$

should

discuss

measurabilties

between

productivities

and

labour

equations

structures

which

are

discussed

as

the conditions of SME models

of

developing

countries.Needless to

$\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{y},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}$

are

both marginal increase gradually and marginal

$\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{C}\uparrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$

gradually

productivities equations

in

advocacy developing countries.And

therefore

equational

discount

function

depend

on

measurable

functions

between

non

descreate

geometrical

points

which have been due to diverse

productivities.

And because

equational

functions

of

geometrical

econometrics

fundamental

studies

$\uparrow^{1}$

ften due to the

presupositions

of Parate

$\mathrm{O}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$

equational

functions studies

should

be

discussed under extentions of

optimize recapitalzation

studies

qbout

labour

capitals

and investment stakeholder

capitals.

So,through

of these

studies

we

should build

some

optimize

models

which

can

be accounted

advocacy

overlap

layered

measurment

structures.Fundamentally,advocacy measurment

models

should be constituted semantic network lnkages and endowsment geodetic

functions

and

SME models for

advocacy overlap layered

measurment structures

shogld

_{be structured by due lnkage}

_factors

_{of productivity}

_function

_equations

_issues.

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{F}Y$

t-l

$\cdot$

$\mathrm{C}$ $\mathrm{t}$

$Y$

:

$\mathrm{i}^{1}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}1\mathrm{e}$

Year

$\mathrm{t}.Y$

t-l

:

income

Year

t-l.

$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{t}$

:

Consumption

Year

$\mathrm{t}$

$\mathrm{u}$

(

$|$

.

T)

Household

Utilty equation

Product Technology

$\mathrm{R}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}:\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}$

equation

at

geometrical

basic

point(X,Y),

$\pi$

$=\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}$

[

$\mathrm{L}\{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}$

,

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}$

(

$\mathrm{X}$

,

y)

}.

$\mathrm{K}\{\mathrm{k}$

,

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{k}$

(X.

$\mathrm{y}$

$)\}$

]

$-\mathrm{t}$

$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{W}-\mathrm{k}$

$\mathrm{r}$

Time

Restriction

Equation

$\mathrm{T}=\mathrm{T}+$

,

1 A

Household

Budjet

Restriction

Equation

$\pi$

$\mathrm{A}+\mathrm{t}1\mathrm{w}$

A

$\mathrm{t}$

I

$0\overline{rightarrow}|$

But

$\mathrm{u}$

(

$\cdot$

)

:Utilty Equation

$\mathrm{q}$

(

$\cdot$

)

:Product

equation

at

geometrical

basic

point

$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{L}$

(

$\cdot$

),

$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}$

(

$\cdot$

)

:

$\mathrm{q}$

(

$\cdot$

)

Diverce

Differnential

$\mathrm{E}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}$

varince

$\mathrm{k}.\mathrm{L}$

.

$\mathrm{L}$

(

$\cdot$

)

:Practical

Labour

Power

per geometrical

Unit.

,

$\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}$

Labour

power

geometrical

basic

point

$\mathrm{S}\iota$

(X. y)

$\mathrm{K}(\cdot)|$

:Equation

about

practical

investment

capital

per geometrical

basic

point.

K.and

geometrical unit

(

$\mathrm{x}$

,

y)

(

$\mathrm{X}$

,

y)

:geometmrical

factors about Labour

Investment

at

geometrical

$\mathrm{p}$

oint

(X.

y)

$\mathrm{S}\kappa$

(X. Y)

:geometmrical

factors about

Capital

Investment at

geometrical

point

(X.

y)

Internal

Variables

I:Real

Income of

househol

$\mathrm{d}$

(11)

$\mathrm{T}$

:

Resume labour times

$\pi$

:

Real Income of

Agricultual

Product

per

geometrical Unit.

$\mathrm{t}\iota=\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}$

:Pretext

labour

Capital per

geometrical Unit.

Household

labour capitals per geometrical Unit

$\mathrm{Q}1$

,

Labour

capitals

from labour markets per geometrical Unit

$\mathrm{s}$

$\mathrm{h}$

$\mathrm{k}$

:

Pretext

investment capital per geometrical Unit.

External

Variables

$\mathrm{P}$

:

Product

prices

of

agricultures

$\mathrm{W}$

:

Agricultural wages per labour times

$\mathrm{r}$

:

Capital

costs :interest

$\mathrm{T}$

:

Available

times

for hosehold

I

$0$

:

External

income

out

of

agricultures

(X.

y)

_{:Double dimention index about}

productivity point

Subordinate

functions for

other productivity scheme

A:Planted

arrange

area

for

Productivity

Equation

$\mathrm{q}$

(

$\cdot$

)

:Integnal

calcasus of

non

desreate equational

modle of gross

planted arrange

area

Thprefore these

household

utilty

equations

usually

defines

as

subordinate

functions

to

Cob

Douglas productivity equations.And

as

Steiner and Samuelson

have

$\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}8\mathrm{e}$

functional

equations

do not

include dfferential

specifications about

informal

sector labour

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$ $\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{o}$

not

reflect dfferential

conditions between

hired

labour

and

independent

household labour.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}$

functional

equations

stands

independent

observanced conditions of

product

geometrical

points.And

in

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d},\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}$

ratio

of

geometrical

points

are

constant

in

all productivity

points.

Differential

definitions

about labour

productivities

are

able to be argued

as

follows,

as

the

contexts of Steiner and Samuelsons.

Capital

discount ratio: r.and

Labour

power discount ratio

rare as

follows

in

the

context of

geometrical

discount ratios

of Steiner

and

Samuelsons

$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}\iota(\cdot)\underline{8\mathrm{L}}=\mathrm{w}$

a

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}$

$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}$

$( \cdot)\frac{\partial \mathrm{K}}{\partial \mathrm{k}}=\mathrm{r}$

but,

$0<< \frac{\partial \mathrm{L}}{\partial \mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}}1$

’

$0<< \frac{\partial \mathrm{K}}{\partial \mathrm{k}}1$

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}$

the contexts

of

Cob Douglas

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}$

utilitiesgradualy

decrease

markets

of

traditional

agricultual

productivities,

marginal

productivities

about

investment

capitals

for productivity

agents,

have

at

least

same

or

belows toward

productiyities

of product points.And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{P}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

discount ratio of different

product points

are as

follows

according to

Steiner

and

Samuelsons.

$\underline{8\mathrm{L}}<0$

,

$\underline{8\mathrm{K}}<0$

a8

$\mathrm{L}$

a

$\mathrm{e}$ $\mathrm{k}$

(12)

$\mathrm{S}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{x}$

.

$\mathrm{y}$

),

$(\mathrm{x}.

\mathrm{y})$

:Specification

productivity

equation.But

under

conditions

of

pretext

labour and capital

investment

are

const.

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e},\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}$

conditions of

Parate

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

gradually decrease

conditions of

productivities

for investment

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

equation

under

perfect

contest

household markets is

follows

$\pi$

$\mathrm{x}=\mathrm{P}\mathrm{q}$

[

$\mathrm{L}$

[

14,

(X.

y)

1,

$\mathrm{K}\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{x}$

.

$(\mathrm{X},$

$\mathrm{y})$

$1$

]

$-\mathrm{t}$

IL

$\mathrm{W}-\mathrm{k}\mathrm{z}$

$\mathrm{r}$

but

$\mathrm{t}\mathrm{A}$

:

Optimise

labour investment under

parate equbrium

$\mathrm{k}\mathrm{x}$

:

Optimise capital

investment

under

parate

equbrium

In

these

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t},\mathrm{i}\mathrm{f}$

productivity

equation

is under

$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{L}$

(

$\cdot$

)

$>0$

and

$\mathrm{q}\mathrm{k}(\cdot)>0$

$\underline{8\chi \mathrm{x}}=\mathrm{P}$

qL

$(\cdot)\underline{8\mathrm{L}}<0$

a

S

$\iota$

a

S

$\iota$

Therefore

household productivity

equation

is gradually

decrease

functions

as

geometrical

unit productivity

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{s}$

marginal

alternativities

between

dfferent

geometrical

productivity

points.

And

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o},\mathrm{L}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}$

investment

of

different household productivity

equations

are

$\underline{8\mathrm{t}\mathrm{L}}=\underline{8\mathrm{L}}/\underline{\partial \mathrm{L}}<0$

a

S

$\iota$

a

$\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{L}}$

a

t

$\mathrm{L}$

These condition shows that

household

productivity

equations

are

gradually

decrease

functions

even

as

household labour

$\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

also shows marginal

alternativities between

different

geometrical

productivity

points.

And also

P.Krugman

,

$\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\cdot \mathrm{g}$

to

productivity transfer about informal

sectors

,adopting

some

market

models of external

non

perfect and gradualy

decrease

productivity models,

shows

economic

equations

models

which contains industrial

and

agricultual

dual sectors

as

follows.But

in

the following

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{p}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}$

items

and produtivity

Cob

Douglas

equations

are

simmilar

between industrial and

agricultural

sectors,

$\mathrm{u}$

$=\mathrm{C}\mathrm{w}\mathrm{C}u$

.

A

$1\cdot\mu$

1Industrial

goods ratio

of

consumption

$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{M}=[\mathrm{Z}$

$\mathrm{i}$

$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{i}^{(^{\sigma}\cdot 1\prime\sigma_{)]}}\mathrm{t}^{\sigma/\sigma_{-1)}}$

And also,genuine

agricultural productvity is constant

for scales.

$\mathrm{L}$

Aj

$=\mathrm{O}$

Aj

$\llcorner$

Aj :agricultural labours

of constant for scales

0Aj

:agricultural product

of constant for scales

And according to

industrial productvity is

$\mathrm{L}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}=\alpha$$+\beta 0\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}$

and

$\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{A}\mathrm{i}}=\phi$ $\mathrm{j}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{A}$

1

$\mathrm{i}\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{A}$ $\mathrm{j}\mathrm{L}\mathrm{M}$