ANNUAL REPORT ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION 2014

(1)

ANNUAL REPORT

ON

PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

2014

(2)

This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source but not for commercial use or sale.

Further information may be obtained from:

The Tokyo MOU Secretariat Ascend Shimbashi 8F

6-19-19 Shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo Japan 105-0004 Tel: +81-3-3433-0621 Fax: +81-3-3433-0624

This Report is also available at Tokyo MOU web-site (http://www.tokyo-mou.org) on the Internet.

(3)

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

FOREWORD

We are pleased to present the Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region 2014.

We feel proud to acknowledge that the development of port State Control activities of the Tokyo MOU has contributed to the promotion of performance and quality of shipping in the Asia-Pacific region positively. It is encouraging to note that both the number of detentions and the detention percentage have continuously declined and, on the other hand, that the number and potion of quality ships have been increasing and ships with high and very high targeting factor values have been falling. Following the introduction of new inspection regime (NIR) in 2014, the Tokyo MOU PSC inspections will be further improved in the coming years.

This annual report summarizes the port State control developments and activities of the Tokyo MOU in 2014. Furthermore, the report also provides port State control statistics and analysis on the results of inspections carried out by member Authorities during the year.

Although the level of compliance and performance of ships operating in the region has been seen improving gradually in the recent years, it is not yet the time to relax and to celebrate, bearing in mind that there are still unsafe and under-performing ships trading around the region. In this regard, the Tokyo MOU will make the everlasting efforts to enhance, improve and harmonize PSC activities in order to reach the final goal of eradication of sub-standard ships in the region.

Abdul Samad Bin Shaik Osman Mitsutoyo Okada

Chairman Secretary

Port State Control Committee Tokyo MOU Secretariat

(4)

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

page

Figure 1 Inspection percentage ……….. 14

Figure 2 Port State inspections - contribution by Authorities ……… 14

Figure 3 Type of ship inspected ……….. 15

Figure 4 Detentions per flag ……… 15

Figure 5 Detention per ship type ……… 16

Figure 6 Deficiencies by main categories ……… 16

Figure 7 Most frequent detainable deficiencies ………. 17

Figure 8 No. of inspections ……….. 18

Figure 9 Inspection percentage ……….. 18

Figure 10 No. of inspections with deficiencies ………. 18

Figure 11 No. of deficiencies ………. 19

Figure 12 No. of detentions ……….………... 19

Figure 13 Detention percentage ……….………... 19

Figure 14 Comparison of inspections per ship type ………... 39

Figure 15 Comparison of detentions per ship type ……….… 39

Figure 16 Comparison of inspections with deficiencies per ship type …….. 41

Figure 17 Comparison of number of deficiencies by main categories …….. 47

Figure 18 Comparison of most frequent detainable deficiencies ……… 49

Table 1 Status of the relevant instruments ……… 20

Table 1a Status of MARPOL 73/78 ……….. 22

Table 2 Port State inspections carried out by Authorities ………. 23

Table 2a Port State inspections on maritime security ……….. 24

Table 3 Port State inspections per flag ……….. 25

Table 4 Port State inspections per ship type ………. 28

Table 5 Port State inspections per recognized organization …….……….. 29

Table 6 Deficiencies by categories ……….. 32

Table 7 Black – Grey – White Lists ………... 33

Table 8 Inspections and detentions per flag ………. 35

Table 9 Inspections and detentions per ship type ……….. 40

Table 10 Inspections with deficiencies per ship type ……….. 42

Table 11 Inspections and detentions per recognized organization ……….. 43

Table 12 Performance of recognized organization ……… 45

Table 13 Comparison of deficiencies by categories ……….. 48

Table 14 Comparison of most frequent detainable deficiencies ……… 50

Table 15 List of under-performing ships ……….. 51

(6)

O V E R V I E W

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region is published under the auspices of the Port State Control Committee of the Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region (Tokyo MOU). This annual report is the twentieth issue and covers port State control activities and developments in the 2014 calendar year.

The Memorandum was formed in Tokyo on 1 December 1993. The following maritime Authorities in the Asia-Pacific region are the signatories to the Memorandum: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam. The Memorandum came into effect on 1 April 1994.

In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum, Authorities which have signed and formally accepted the Memorandum or who have been accepted by unanimous consent of the Port State Control Committee become full members. Currently, the Memorandum has 19 full members, namely:

Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation,

Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam. A maritime Authority that has declared its intention to fully adhere to the Memorandum within a three-year period would be accepted as a co-operating member by unanimous consent of the Port State Control Committee.

Peru is participating in the Tokyo MOU as a co-operating member Authority at the moment.

The main objective of the Memorandum is to establish an effective port State control regime in the Asia-Pacific region through co-operation of its members, harmonization of the members activities, to eliminate substandard shipping, to promote maritime safety, to protect the marine environment and to safeguard seafarers working and living conditions on board ships.

The Port State Control Committee established under the Memorandum monitors and controls the implementation and on-going operation of the Memorandum. The Committee consists of representatives from the member Authorities, co-operating member Authorities and observers. Observer status has been granted to the following maritime Authorities and inter-governmental organizations by the Committee: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Macao (China), Solomon Islands, Tonga, United States Coast Guard, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Paris MOU, the Viña del Mar Agreement, the

(7)

Indian Ocean MOU, the Black Sea MOU and the Riyadh MOU. The Secretariat of the Memorandum is located in Tokyo, Japan.

For the purpose of the Memorandum, the following instruments are the basis for port State control activities in the region:

 the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966;

 the Protocol of 1988 relating to the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, as amended;

 the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended;

 the Protocol of 1978 relating to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974;

 the Protocol of 1988 relating to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974;

 the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, as amended;

 the International Convention on Standards for Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended;

 the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972;

 the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships,

1969;

 the Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (ILO Convention No. 147);

 the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006;

 the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships, 2001; and

 the Protocol of 1992 to amend the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969.

REVIEW OF YEAR 2014

The new inspection regime (NIR) was smoothly implemented in the Tokyo MOU, as scheduled, from the beginning of 2014.

Introduction of NIR enables Authorities to enhance inspection targeting and to improve effective use of limited PSC resources. In addition to relevant information and explanations on the NIR, actual ship risk profile data for each ship and company performance for every ISM company as recorded in the Tokyo MOU PSC database is also published on the Tokyo MOU web-site.

This provides industry and the general public with timely and transparent information on implementation of the NIR.

The Tokyo MOU has enacted measures that target under-performing ships for the past four years. It is encouraging that the implementation of these measures has produced very positive results. Based on data analysis, the total number of under-performing ships identified and the number of individual

(8)

ships involved in 2014 has decreased by 40%

and 30% respectively, comparing with the numbers from three years ago. This proves that the measures taken to target under-performing ships are proving to be correct and effective.

The concentrated inspection campaign (CIC) on STCW Hours of Rest was carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2014. During the three-month CIC period, a total of 8,182 PSC inspections were conducted by the member Authorities, of which 6,392 were related to a CIC inspection. There were a total of 206 detentions recorded during the CIC inspections, among which 16 or 7.8% of them were detained as the direct results of the CIC.

A total of 1,589 CIC related deficiencies were recorded. The most significant deficiencies found during the campaign were related to documentation and labour conditions, including records of seafarers daily hours of work/rest 997 (63%), manning specified by the minimum safe manning document 241 (15%), and shipboard working arrangements 232

(15%). The overall results of the CIC demonstrate that considerable room for improvement exists in the areas of record keeping and labour conditions. The CIC on STCW Hours of Rest was launched jointly by the Paris and the Tokyo Memoranda. Regional PSC regimes of the Black Sea MOU, the Indian Ocean MOU, the Mediterranean MOU and the Viña del Mar Agreement also participated in the CIC.

THE PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE

The Port State Control Committee held its twenty-fifth meeting from 10 to 13 November 2014 in Queenstown, New Zealand. The meeting was hosted by Maritime New Zealand.

Mr. Abdul Samad Bin Shaik Osman, Principal Assistant Director, Maritime Industry Control Division, Marine Department Malaysia, chaired the meeting.

The meeting was attended by representatives from the member Authorities of Australia,

The twenty-fifth Committee meeting, Queenstown, November 2014.

(9)

Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam; co-operating member Authority of Peru; and observers of Macao (China), the United States Coast Guard, the Black Sea MOU, the Indian Ocean MOU and the Viña del Mar Agreement.

The Committee considered applications for observer status by Tonga and the Riyadh MOU. In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum, the Committee agreed unanimously to grant observer status to Tonga and the Riyadh MOU. The Committee considered a report of analysis of important key performance indicators (KPIs) adopted at its previous meeting. The Committee agreed that analysis of KPIs would be produced on an annual basis.

The Committee was informed that the new inspection regime (NIR) had been implemented from 1 January 2014 successfully. The Committee received a preliminary analysis on ship risk profile data under the NIR during the initial period. The Committee agreed to instruct the intersessional group on NIR to continue the analysis over a longer period so as to get a clearer picture on implementation of the NIR.

The Committee noted with satisfaction that measures taken to target under-performing ships had been implemented effectively. As a result, positive results both in the number of under-performing ships identified each month and the number of individual ships involved each year have been achieved.

The Committee considered the final report of the CIC on Propulsion and Auxiliary

Machinery, 2013. The Committee approved the arrangements for the CIC on Crew Familiarization for Enclosed Space Entry that will be carried out jointly with the Paris MOU from 1 September to 30 November 2015. The Committee also considered the preliminary arrangements and preparations for CICs in 2016 and 2017 respectively.

Furthermore, the Committee also gave consideration and made decisions on the following:

 assessment of performance of member Authorities;

 review of achievements and status of the action plan developed based on the strategic plan;

 approval of approved the amendments to the guidelines for the responsibility assessment of RO, the guidelines for the detention review panel and the guidelines for PSC officers on MLC 2006;

 adoption of a new procedure/time window for verification of rectification of deficiencies for a period of twenty-four months;

 approval of arrangement for finalizing the new version of the PSC Manual;

 obtaining of observer status at the Asia Pacific Heads of Maritime Safety Agencies (APHoMSA) Forum; and

 awarding of the winner of the best deficiency photo of the year.

In conjunction with the Committee meeting, an open forum with industry was conducted. The

(10)

International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) and the Association of Asian Classification Societies (ACS) were invited to the forum for discussion and exchange of views on issues of mutual interest.

The twenty-sixth meeting of the Port State Control Committee will be held in Malaysia in October 2015.

TECHICAL WORKING GROUP (TWG)

The eighth meeting of the Technical Working Group (TWG) was held in Queenstown, New Zealand, from 6 to 7 November 2014, immediately before the twenty-fifth meeting of the Committee. The TWG08 meeting was chaired by Mr. Kenny Crawford, Manager, Navigation, Environment and International Operations (NEIO), Maritime New Zealand.

The TWG meeting discussed and made recommendations to the Committee on matters relating to:

 cases considered by the detention review panel;

 periodical revision of the PSC Manual;

 development and review of PSC guidelines;

 preparation and arrangements for on-going and upcoming CICs;

 reports of intersessional groups: advisory group on information exchange (AG-IE), intersessional group on batch protocol (IG-BP) and intersessional group on statistics (IG-Statistics);

 activities and operation of the APCIS system;

 management and maintenance of the coding system;

 analysis and statistics on PSC;

 information exchange with other regional PSC databases; and

 reports and evaluations of technical co-operation activities.

ASIA-PACIFIC COMPUTERIZED INFORMATION SYSTEM (APCIS)

For reporting and storing of port State inspection results and facilitating exchange of information in the region, a computerized database system, the Asia-Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS), was established. The central site of the APCIS is located in Moscow, under the auspices of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation.

The APCIS system is connected by member Authorities on-line or by batch protocol for searching ships for inspection and for inputting and transmitting inspection reports. The APCIS also supports on-line publication of PSC data on the Tokyo MOU web-site (http://www.tokyo-mou.org) on a real time basis. Based on data stored in the database, the APCIS produces annual and detailed PSC statistics.

For inter-regional information exchange, the APCIS has established deep hyperlinks with the databases of:

(11)

Training course for PSC officers

 THETIS of the Paris MOU;

 BSIS of the Black Sea MOU;

 IOCIS of the Indian Ocean MOU; and

 CIALA of the Viña del Mar Agreement.

Furthermore, the Tokyo MOU PSC data is also provided to GISIS and EQUASIS.

TRAINING AND SEMINARS FOR PORT STATE CONTROL OFFICERS

The fourth general training course for PSC officers was held in Yokohama, Japan, from 25 August to 19 September 2014. This was the tenth training course jointly organized by IMO and the Tokyo MOU. A total of 19 PSC officers participated in the training course.

Twelve of them were from the Tokyo MOU Authorities of China, Indonesia, Macao (China), Malaysia, the Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Peru, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam.

The other seven were invited by IMO, one each from the Abuja MOU, the Black Sea

MOU, the Caribbean MOU, the Indian Ocean MOU, the Mediterranean MOU, the Riyadh MOU and the Viña del Mar Agreement. The course was conducted with the assistance of the Shipbuilding Research Center of Japan (SRC).

The general training course consisted of two-weeks of classroom lectures which provided participants with a wide range of information. The main focus being IMO conventions and regulations relevant to port State control (PSC) implementation. On site practical training was carried out in the following two weeks. Experts from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan (MLIT), SRC and the Secretariat delivered lectures on relevant subjects. During the onboard training, participants were divided into eight groups to receive practical training on PSC inspections at ports of Yokohama, Niigata, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe, Hiroshima, Takamatsu or Hakata respectively. In addition, a technical visit to a liferaft manufacturer was also arranged.

The twenty-second seminar for PSC officers and the Workshop on Effective Implementation of IMO Conventions were held in Manila, the Philippines, from 21 to 25 July 2014. The seminar and workshop were hosted by the Philippine Coast Guard. Participants from Authorities of Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Macao (China), Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines,

(12)

Onboard training

the Russian Federation, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam attended the seminar and the workshop.

The major topics of the seminar were the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on STCW Hours of Rest, Introduction of STCW Manila Amendments, PSC relating to ECDIS and results of CIC on

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 2013. Experts from the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), Directorate General of the Maritime Territory and Merchant Marine (DIRECTEMAR) of Chile and MLIT of Japan delivered the comprehensive and informative presentations on the relevant topics.

Two case study sessions were carried out to discuss actual cases

provided by Authorities or reviewed by the detention review panel. In conjunction with the seminar, a Workshop on Effective Implementation of IMO Conventions was organized jointly by IMO and the Tokyo MOU. Experts from the Korean Register of Shipping and the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) designated by IMO gave presentations on status and matters relating to implementation of MLC 2006 and PSCO decision support tool.

At the kind invitation of the China Maritime Safety Administration (MSA), the fifth specialized training course was organized in Ningbo, China, from 18 to 20 June 2014. The subject of this specialized training course was Fire Safety. Participants from Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Macao (China), Malaysia,

(13)

Specialized training course The twenty-second seminar for PSC officers

the Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam attended the training course. The course was conducted by the China MSA.

There were three expert missions carried out in 2014. One mission was conducted in Port Kelang, Malaysia, from 19 to 30 May 2014 by experts from the Republic of Korea. Another

mission was held in Suva, Fiji, from 24 to 28 November 2014 with expert from Singapore dispatched to provide the training. The final mission was organized in Hai Phong, Viet Nam, from 1 to 5 December 2014 with experts from Japan conducting the training.

Nine PSC officer exchanges were completed in 2014, namely one PSC officer from Australia to Chile, one from New Zealand to Hong Kong (China), one from Chile to Australia, one from the Republic of Korea to Singapore, one from the Russian Federation to the Republic of Korea, one from Singapore to the Russian Federation, one from Canada to New Zealand, one from Japan to Canada and one from Hong Kong (China) to Japan.

Currently, the PSC officers exchange programme is implemented among the Authorities of Australia, Canada, Chile, China,

Hong Kong (China), Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand,

the Russian Federation and Singapore.

The successful and effective implementation of technical co-operation programmes promotes improvements and harmonization of PSC activities within the Tokyo MOU. The Nippon Foundation

(14)

Expert mission training course for the Viña del Mar Agreement

kindly provided funding for the Tokyo MOU technical co-operation activities.

CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER REGIONAL PORT STATE CONTROL AGREEMENTS

Establishment and effective operation of regional co-operation regimes on port State control has formed a worldwide network for elimination of substandard shipping. Currently, there are a total of nine regional port State control agreements (MOUs) covering the major part of the world, namely:

 Abuja MOU

 Black Sea MOU

 Caribbean MOU

 Indian Ocean MOU

 Mediterranean MOU

 Paris MOU

 Riyadh MOU

 Tokyo MOU

 Viña del Mar Agreement As one of the inter-governmental

organizations (IGO) associated with IMO, the Tokyo MOU has attended meetings of the Flag State Implementation (FSI) Sub-Committee since 2006. The Tokyo MOU Secretariat attended the first meeting of the Sub-Committee on Implementation of IMO Instruments (III), the former FSI, in July 2014.

In support of inter-regional collaboration on port State control, the Tokyo MOU holds observer status within the Paris MOU, the Caribbean MOU and the Indian Ocean MOU.

In a similar manner, the Tokyo MOU has granted observer status to the Paris MOU, the Indian Ocean MOU, the Viña del Mar Agreement and the Black Sea MOU.

The Tokyo MOU has established, and maintains, effective and close co-operation with the Paris MOU at both administrative and technical levels. Representatives of the two Secretariats attend the Port State Control Committee meetings of each MOU on a regular basis. During the period of 2013, continuous efforts and further coordinated actions by the two Memoranda were made on the following:

 carrying out the joint CIC on STCW Hours of Rest 2014;

(15)

Expert mission training course for the Indian Ocean MOU

 preparation of the joint CICs on Crew Familiarization for Enclosed Space Entry 2015;

 co-ordination on subjects of future joint CICs;

 continuous submission to IMO on annual list of flags targeted by the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU and the United States Coast Guard; and

 continuous analysis of performance of flag and RO and joint submission of the outcome to IMO.

The second PSC training course was held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, from 10 to 21 March 2014, under the project of technical co-operation with the Viña del Mar Agreement.

The course was organized jointly by the Tokyo MOU, the Viña del Mar Agreement and IMO.

Training was conducted by experts from the Tokyo MOU Authorities of Australia, Canada, Chile and Japan and an officer from the Tokyo MOU Secretariat. A total of 19 participants from the Latin American Authorities and six other regional PSC regimes attended the course.

Under the AusAID project, the second PSC training course for the Indian Ocean MOU was carried out in Durban, South Africa, from September 29 to 10 October 2014. Experts from the Tokyo MOU Authorities of Australia, New Zealand and Japan and an officer from the Tokyo MOU Secretariat were dispatched to carry out the training. A total of 19 participants from the Indian Ocean MOU Authorities participated in the training course.

(16)

PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE TOKYO MOU, 2014

INSPECTIONS

In 2014, 30,405 inspections, involving 16,761 individual ships, were carried out on ships registered under 99 flags. Figure 2 and Table 2 show the number of inspections carried out by the member Authorities of the Tokyo MOU.

Out of 30,405 inspections, there were 19,029 inspections where ships were found with deficiencies. Since the total number of individual ships operating in the region was estimated at 24,128*, the inspection rate in the region was approximately 69%** in 2014 (see Figure 1).

Information on inspections according to ships’

flag is shown in Table 3.

Figures summarizing inspections according to ship type are set out in Figure 3 and Table 4.

Inspection results regarding recognized organizations are shown in Table 5.

DETENTIONS

Ships are detained when the condition of the ship or its crew does not correspond substantially with the applicable conventions.

Such strong action is to ensure that the ship cannot not sail until it can proceed to sea without presenting a danger to the ship or persons on board, or without presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment.

* Number of individual ships which visited the ports of the region during the year (the figure was provided by LLI).

** The inspection rate is calculated by: number of individual ships inspected/number of individual ships visited.

In 2014, 1,203 ships registered under 64 flags were detained due to serious deficiencies having been found onboard. The detention rate of ships inspected was 3.96%. In comparison to last year, detentions decreased in both the overall number and the percentage.

Figure 4 shows the detention rate by flag for flags where at least 20 port State inspections

(17)

had been conducted and whose detention rate was above the average regional rate. Figure 5 gives the detention rate by ship type. A newly introduced Figure 7 illustrates the most frequent detainable deficiencies found during inspections.

The Black-grey-white list (Table 7) indicates levels of performance of flags over a

three-year rolling period. The black-grey-white list

for 2012-2014 consists of 64 flags,

whose ships were involved in 30 or more inspections during the period. The number of flags in the black list has reduced from 15 to 12 in this reporting period. Georgia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Thailand, Tonga and Viet Nam were removed from the black list, which is seen as a positive indication of improvement of flag State performance. Egypt and Niue joined in the black list in the same period. The number of flags on the grey list remained unchanged at 19 during the reporting period. The white list increased to 33 flags. Curacao, Gibraltar (UK) and Viet Nam being new members of flags in the white list.

A list of under-performing ships (i.e. ships detained three or more times during previous twelve months) is published monthly. A total of 266 vessels, involving 61 individual ships, were identified as under-performing ships in 2014. The list of under-performing ships is provided in Table 15.

DEFICIENCIES

Where conditions on board are found that are not in compliance with the requirements of the relevant instruments by the port State control officers, these are recorded as deficiencies and requested to be rectified.

A total of 86,560 deficiencies were recorded in 2014. The deficiencies found are categorized

(18)

and shown in Figure 6 and Table 6.

It has been noted that fire safety measures, safety of navigation and life-saving appliances continue to be the top three categories of deficiencies discovered on ships. In 2014, 16,654 deficiencies related to fire safety measures, 14,231 safety of navigation related deficiencies and 10,515 deficiencies related to life-saving appliances were recorded, representing almost 50% of the total number of all recorded deficiencies.

The total number of recorded deficiencies has continued to decrease during the last three years. In 2014, deficiencies reduced 5,703 in number or 6.37% by percentage.

Deficiencies relating to the commonly found areas (e.g. fire safety, life-saving appliances, safety of navigation and Load Lines) decreased. On the other hand, an increase has been observed in deficiencies relating to MLC 2006 and hours of rest stemming from the CIC of the year.

OVERVIEW OF PORT STATE CONTROL RESULTS 2004 – 2014

Figures 8-13 show the comparison of port State inspection results for 2004 - 2014.

These figures indicate the trends in port State activities and ship performance over the past eleven years.

(19)

Figure 1: INSPECTION PERCENTAGE

Figure 2: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS - CONTRIBUTION BY AUTHORITIES

Total ships inspected: 16,761 Percentage: 69%

Total individual ship visited: 24,128

Australia 3,742; 12.31%

Canada 389; 1.28%

China 7,361; 24.21%

Hong Kong, China 736; 2.42%

Indonesia 2,605; 8.57%

Japan 5,337; 17.55%

Republic of Korea 1,928; 6.34%

Malaysia 918; 3.02%

New Zealand 239; 0.79%

Papua New Guinea 124; 0.41% Russian Federation 996; 3.28%

Singapore 1,127; 3.71%

Thailand 566; 1.86%

Total inspections: 30,405

Viet Nam 1,397; 4.59%

Chile 901; 2.96%

Philippines 2,016; 6.63%

Fiji 2; 0.01%

Marshall Islands 21; 0.07%

(20)

Figure 3: TYPE OF SHIP INSPECTED

Figure 4: DETENTIONS PER FLAG

Flags:

1. Sierra Leone 2. Tanzania 3. Jamaica 4. Mongolia 5. Korea, Dem. People's Rep. 6. Cook Islands 7. Cambodia 8. Indonesia 9. Niue 10. Iran 11. Togo 12. Bangladesh 13. Sweden 14. Kiribati 15. Saint Kitts and Nevis 16. Philippines 17. Belize 18. Vanuatu 19. Russian Federation 20. Switzerland 21. Antigua and Barbuda 22. Greece 23. Portugal 24. Malta 25. India 26. Liberia 27. Panama

Note: Flags listed above are those flags the ships of which were involved in at least 20 port State inspections and detention percentage of which are above the regional average detention percentage. The complete information on detentions by flag is given in Table 3.

Percentage

oil tanker/combination carrier: 1,950; 6.41%

chemical tanker: 2,201; 7.24%

gas carrier: 652; 2.14%

bulk carrier: 10,899; 5.85%

ro-ro/container/vehicle ship:

5,611; 18.45%

general dry cargo ship:

6,866; 22.58%

refrigerated cargo carrier:

684; 2.25%

passenger ship/ferry:

332; 1.09%

other types:

1,210; 3.98%

0 5 10 15 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Detention percentage Regional average: 3.96%

Detention: 42 Percentage: 18.67%

4 18.18%

4 17.39%

25 13.16%

6 12.50%

34 7.04%

4 12.90%

17 4.93%

Flags

24 17.39%

34 16.59%

3 9.09%

2 5.71%

7 12.07%

24 9.88%

15 7.18%

27 5.38%

2 10%

34 4.14%

183 13.73%

14 5.91%

4 15.38%

7 10.77%

342 3.97%

2

4.35% 3 4.11%

89 4.02%

8 6.67%

(21)

Figure 5: DETENTION PER SHIP TYPE

Figure 6: DEFICIENCIES BY MAIN CATEGORIES

4.88 2.41

6.14

7.03 2.87

3.39 1.27

1.69 2.10 Oil tanker/combination carrier

Gas carrier Chemical tanker Bulk carrier Ro-ro/conrainer/vehicle ship General dry cargo ship Refrigerated cargo carrier Passenger ship/ferry Other types

Detention percentage

Average detention percentage: 3.96%

life saving appliances 10,515; 11.74%

fire safety measures 16,654; 18.60%

stability, structure and relevant equipment 2,671; 2.98%

load lines 5,812; 6.49%

safety of navigation 14,231; 15.89%

others 36,978; 41.29%

ISM related deficiencies 2,699; 3.01%

(22)

Figure 7: MOST FREQUENT DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES

136

98 81

74 71 70 69 68

76

119 Lifeboats (Life saving appliances)

Fire-dampers (Fire safety) Resources and personnel (ISM)

Shipboard operations (ISM) Ventilators, air pipes, casings (Water/weathertight conditions) Oil filtering equipment (MARPOL Annex I) Emergency fire pump and its pipes

(Emergency Systems) Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.)

(Water/weathertight conditions)

Fire prevention structural integrity (Fire safety) Charts (Safety of navigation)

(23)

OVERVIEW OF PORT STATE CONTROL RESULTS 2004 - 2014

Figure 8: NO. OF INSPECTIONS

Figure 9: INSPECTION PERCENTAGE

Figure 10: NO. OF INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES

21,400

21,058 21,686 22,039 22,15223,116 25,762

28,62730,929 31,018 30,405

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

14,396 14,421 14,916 14,864 15,298 15,422 16,575 18,650 19,250 18,790 19,029

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 69% 70%

69% 66% 63%

61% 66% 68% 68% 70% 69%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

(24)

Figure 11: NO. OF DEFICIENCIES

Figure 12: NO. OF DETENTIONS

Figure 13: DETENTION PERCENTAGE

73,163 74,668 80,556 83,950

89,478 86,820 90,177

103,549 100,330 95,263

86,560

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

1,393

1,097 1,171 1,238 1,528

1,336 1,411 1,562

1,421 1,395

1,203

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

6.51%

5.21% 5.40% 5.62%

6.90%

5.78%

5.48%

5.46%

4.59%

4.50%

3.96%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

(25)

STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS ANNEX 1

Table 1: STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS (Date of deposit of instruments)

(as at 31 December 2014)

Authority LOAD

LINES 66

LOAD LINES PROT 88

SOLAS 74

SOLAS PROT

78

SOLAS PROT

88

MARPOL 73/78

Australia 29/07/68 07/02/97 17/08/83 17/08/83 07/02/97 14/10/87 Canada 14/01/70 08/04/10 08/05/78 - 08/04/10 16/11/92 Chile 10/03/75 03/03/95 28/03/80 15/07/92 29/09/95 10/10/94 China 05/10/73 03/02/95 07/01/80 17/12/82 03/02/95 01/07/83

Fiji 29/11/72 28/07/04 04/03/83 28/07/04 28/07/04 -

Hong Kong, China* 16/08/72 23/10/02 25/05/80 14/11/81 23/10/02 11/04/85

Indonesia 17/01/77 - 17/02/81 23/08/88 - 21/10/86

Japan 15/05/68 24/06/97 15/05/80 15/05/80 24/06/97 09/06/83 Republic of Korea 10/07/69 14/11/94 31/12/80 02/12/82 14/11/94 23/07/84 Malaysia 12/01/71 11/11/11 19/10/83 19/10/83 11/11/11 31/01/97 Marshall Islands 26/04/88 29/11/94 26/04/88 26/04/88 16/10/95 26/04/88 New Zealand 05/02/70 03/06/01 23/02/90 23/02/90 03/06/01 25/09/98

Papua New Guinea 18/05/76 - 12/11/80 - - 25/10/93

Philippines 04/03/69 - 15/12/81 - - 15/06/01

Russian Federation 04/07/66 18/08/00 09/01/80 12/05/81 18/08/00 03/11/83 Singapore 21/09/71 18/08/99 16/03/81 01/06/84 10/08/99 01/11/90

Thailand 30/12/92 - 18/12/84 - - 02/11/07

Vanuatu 28/07/82 26/11/90 28/07/82 28/07/82 14/09/92 13/04/89 Viet Nam 18/12/90 27/05/02 18/12/90 12/10/92 27/05/02 29/05/91

Peru 18/01/67 24/06/09 04/12/79 16/07/82 21/08/09 25/04/80

DPR Korea 18/10/89 08/08/01 01/05/85 01/05/85 08/08/01 01/05/85 Macao, China* 18/07/05 11/10/10 20/12/99 20/12/99 24/06/05 20/12/99

Solomon Islands 30/06/04 - 30/06/04 - - 30/06/04

Tonga 12/04/77 15/06/00 12/04/77 18/09/03 15/06/00 01/02/96

Entry into force date 21/07/68 03/02/00 25/05/80 01/05/81 03/02/00 02/10/83

* Effective date of extension of instruments.

(26)

(as at 31 December 2014)

Authority STCW

78

COLREG 72

TONNAGE 69

ILO 147**

MLC 2006***

AFS 2001

Australia 07/11/83 29/02/80 21/05/82 - 21/12/11 09/01/07

Canada 06/11/87 07/03/75 18/07/94 25/05/93 15/06/10 08/04/10

Chile 09/06/87 02/08/77 22/11/82 - - -

China 08/06/81 07/01/80 08/04/80 - - 07/03/11

Fiji 27/03/91 04/03/83 29/11/72 - 21/01/13 -

Hong Kong, China* 03/11/84 15/07/77 18/07/82 28/11/80 - -

Indonesia 27/01/87 13/11/79 14/03/89 - - 11/09/14

Japan 27/05/82 21/06/77 17/07/80 31/05/83 05/08/13 08/07/03

Republic of Korea 04/04/85 29/07/77 18/01/80 - 09/01/14 24/07/08 Malaysia 31/01/92 23/12/80 24/04/84 - 20/08/13 27/09/10

Marshall Islands 25/04/89 26/04/88 25/04/89 - 25/09/07 09/05/08

New Zealand 30/07/86 26/11/76 06/01/78 - - -

Papua New Guinea 28/10/91 18/05/76 25/10/93 - - -

Philippines 22/02/84 10/06/13 06/09/78 - 20/08/12 -

Russian Federation 09/10/79 09/11/73 20/11/69 07/05/91 20/08/12 19/10/12 Singapore 01/05/88 29/04/77 06/06/85 - 15/06/11 31/12/09

Thailand 19/06/97 06/08/79 11/06/96 - - -

Vanuatu 22/04/91 28/07/82 13/01/89 - - 20/08/08

Viet Nam 18/12/90 18/12/90 18/12/90 - 08/05/13 -

Peru 16/07/82 09/01/80 16/07/82 06/07/04 - -

DPR Korea 01/05/85 01/05/85 18/10/89 - - -

Macao, China* 18/07/05 20/12/99 18/07/05 - - 07/03/11

Solomon Islands 01/06/94 12/03/82 30/06/04 - - -

Tonga 07/02/95 12/04/97 12/04/97 - - 16/04/14

Entry into force date 28/04/84 15/07/77 18/07/82 28/11/81 20/08/13 17/09/08

** Although some Authorities have not ratified the ILO Convention No.147, parts of the ILO conventions referred to therein are implemented under their national legislation and port State control is carried out on matters covered by the national regulations.

*** MLC 2006 will supersede ILO147 if the Authority ratified both of them.

(27)

Table 1a: STATUS OF MARPOL 73/78 (Date of deposit of instruments)

(As at 31 December 2014) Authority Annexes I & II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI

Australia 14/10/87 10/10/94 27/02/04 14/08/90 07/08/07

Canada 16/11/92 08/08/02 26/03/10 26/03/10 26/03/10

Chile 10/10/94 10/10/94 10/10/94 15/08/08 16/10/06

China 01/07/83 13/09/94 02/11/06 21/11/88 23/05/06

Fiji - - - - -

Hong Kong, China* 11/04/85 07/03/95 02/11/06 27/03/96 20/03/08

Indonesia 21/10/86 24/08/12 24/08/12 24/08/12 24/08/12

Japan 09/06/83 09/06/83 09/06/83 09/06/83 15/02/05 Republic of Korea 23/07/84 28/02/96 28/11/03 28/02/96 20/04/06 Malaysia 31/01/97 27/09/10 27/09/10 31/01/97 27/09/10 Marshall Islands 26/04/88 26/04/88 26/04/88 26/04/88 07/03/02

New Zealand 25/09/98 25/09/98 - 25/09/98 -

Papua New Guinea 25/10/93 25/10/93 25/10/93 25/10/93 - Philippines 15/06/01 15/06/01 15/06/01 15/06/01 -

Russian Federation 03/11/83 14/08/87 14/08/87 14/08/87 08/04/11 Singapore 01/11/90 02/03/94 01/05/05 27/05/99 08/10/00

Thailand 02/11/07 - - - -

Vanuatu 13/04/89 22/04/91 15/03/04 22/04/91 15/03/04

Viet Nam 29/05/91 19/12/14 19/12/14 19/12/14 19/12/14

Peru 25/04/80 25/04/80 25/04/80 25/04/80 04/12/14

DPR Korea 01/05/01 01/05/01 01/05/01 01/05/01 - Macao, China* 20/12/99 20/12/99 02/11/06 20/12/99 23/05/06 Solomon Islands 30/06/04 30/06/04 30/06/04 30/06/04 -

Tonga 01/02/96 01/02/96 01/02/96 01/02/96 -

Entry into force date 02/10/1983 01/07/1992 27/09/2003 31/12/1988 19/05/2005

(28)

ANNEX 2

PORT STATE INSPECTION STATISTICS

STATISTICS FOR 2014

Table 2: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS CARRIED OUT BY AUTHORITIES

Authority No. of individual ships inspected (a) No. of initial and follow-up inspections (b+c) No. of initial inspections (b) No. of follow-up inspections (c) No. of inspections with deficiencies (d) No. of deficiencies 1) (e) No. of detentions1) (f) No. of individual ships visited2) (g) Inspection rate (a/g%) Detention percentage (f/b%)

Australia³⁾ 3,267 5,631 3,742 1,889 2,357 10,886 269 5,757 56.75 7.19 Canada⁴⁾ 387 389 389 0 200 720 5 1,898 20.39 1.29 Chile 820 1,272 901 371 428 1,169 26 1,718 47.73 2.89

China 5,792 8,658 7,361 1,297 6,180 33,195 476 14,980 38.66 6.47

Fiji 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 219 0.91 0

Hong Kong, China 722 787 736 51 662 3,327 47 5,035 14.34 6.39 Indonesia 2,205 2,816 2,605 211 570 2,148 24 6,489 33.98 0.92 Japan 3,522 6,475 5,337 1,138 3,538 17,434 208 7,374 47.76 3.90 Republic of Korea 1,633 2,542 1,928 614 1,287 5,094 73 9,637 16.95 3.79 Malaysia 768 1,055 918 137 375 1,317 9 6,385 12.03 0.98 Marshall Islands 20 31 21 10 14 90 1 100 20.00 4.76 New Zealand 204 335 239 96 139 620 9 941 21.68 3.77 Papua New Guinea 103 174 124 50 53 196 4 309 33.33 3.23 Philippines 1,516 2,468 2,016 452 533 1,434 2 2,929 51.76 0.10 Russian Federation⁴⁾ 719 1,885 996 889 758 3,960 13 2,488 28.90 1.31

Singapore 957 1,468 1,127 341 853 4,019 28 12,874 7.43 2.48 Thailand 455 658 566 92 141 343 0 3,598 12.65 0

Vanuatu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0

Viet Nam 1,084 1,868 1,397 471 941 3,608 9 2,681 40.43 0.64 Total 16,761 38,514 30,405 8,109 19,029 89,560 1,203 ^Regional

24,128

Regional 69%

Regional 3.96%

1) Numbers of deficiencies and detentions do not include those related to security.

2) LLI data for 2014.

3) Data for Australia is also provided to Indian Ocean MOU.

4) Data are only for the Pacific ports.

(29)

Table 2a: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS ON MARITME SECURITY

Authority No. of inspections No. of inspections with security related deficiencies No. of secuirty related deficiencies No. of security related detentions Detention percentage (%)

Australia 3,742 6 6 0 0

Canada 389 1 1 0 0

Chile 901 27 27 1 0.11

China 7,361 505 573 21 0.29

Fiji 2 0 0 0 0

Hong Kong, China 736 87 88 1 0.14

Indonesia 2,605 24 24 1 0.04

Japan 5,337 365 405 0 0

Republic of Korea 1,928 180 216 3 0.16

Malaysia 918 37 40 1 0.11

Marshall Islands 21 1 1 1 4.76

New Zealand 239 6 6 0 0

Papua New Guinea 124 4 5 0 0

Philippines 2,016 16 16 0 0

Russian Federation 996 50 56 0 0

Singapore 1,127 56 60 0 0

Thailand 566 11 11 0 0

Vanuatu 0 0 0 0 0

Viet Nam 1,397 79 80 1 0.07

Total 30,405 1,455 1,615 30 Regional

0.10%

Note: Security related data showing in the above table and the tables of deficiency by category are excluded from all other statistical tables and figures in this report.

(30)

Table 3: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER FLAG

Flag

No. of inspections

with deficiencies

No. of deficiencies

No. of detentions

Detention percentage

%

Antigua and Barbuda 502 331 1,424 27 5.38

Australia 3 1 2 0 0

Bahamas 661 346 1,253 16 2.42

Bahrain 4 2 5 0 0

Bangladesh 65 57 304 7 10.77

Barbados 17 13 63 2 11.76

Belgium 24 9 53 0 0

Belize 483 450 2,502 34 7.04

Bermuda (UK) 70 29 93 1 1.43

Brunei Darussalam 6 2 3 1 16.67

Cambodia 1,333 1,299 9,716 183 13.73

Cayman Islands (UK) 107 40 104 0 0

Chile 1 1 6 0 0

China 923 432 1,592 1 0.11

Comoros 6 6 43 2 33.33

Cook Islands 26 15 83 4 15.38

Croatia 24 13 42 0 0

Curacao 20 13 34 0 0

Cyprus 495 298 1,313 19 3.84

Denmark 134 85 395 2 1.49

Dominica 16 14 63 1 6.25

Egypt 14 10 65 2 14.29

Equatorial Guinea 1 1 18 0 0

Estonia 2 2 27 1 50.00

Ethiopia 6 6 27 0 0

Falkland Islands (UK) 3 1 1 0 0

Fiji 1 0 0 0 0

France 38 26 69 0 0

Georgia 1 1 3 0 0

Germany 158 108 437 6 3.80

Gibraltar (UK) 76 31 138 3 3.95

Greece 345 175 589 17 4.93

Honduras 5 5 68 3 60.00

Hong Kong, China 2,916 1,456 5,173 32 1.10

India 73 44 255 3 4.11

Indonesia 190 176 1,393 25 13.16

Iran 48 43 267 6 12.50

Ireland 1 1 1 0 0

Isle of Man (UK) 198 102 376 6 3.03

(31)

Flag

%

Israel 5 5 29 0 0

Italy 106 53 229 2 1.89

Jamaica 23 20 129 4 17.39

Japan 201 105 379 2 1.00

Jordan 2 2 3 0 0

Kiribati 243 209 1,456 24 9.88

Korea, Democratic People's Republic

205 205 1,982 34 16.59

Korea, Republic of 1,471 1,121 5,170 9 0.61

Kuwait 18 12 48 0 0

Liberia 2,214 1,295 5,190 89 4.02

Libya 4 3 9 0 0

Lithuania 1 0 0 0 0

Luxembourg 35 20 87 1 2.86

Malaysia 277 170 864 4 1.44

Maldives 5 5 19 0 0

Malta 821 463 1,921 34 4.14

Marshall Islands 1,809 910 3,354 43 2.38

Mauritius 1 0 0 0 0

Mongolia 138 130 1,018 24 17.39

Montenegro 1 1 1 0 0

Myanmar 6 6 43 1 16.67

Netherlands 126 70 200 0 0

New Zealand 3 2 6 0 0

Nigeria 1 1 7 0 0

Niue 31 31 232 4 12.90

Norway 230 107 311 3 1.30

Pakistan 11 8 40 0 0

Palau 6 3 8 0 0

Panama 8,604 5,420 25,024 342 3.97

Papua New Guinea 9 9 61 3 33.33

Peru 6 4 8 1 16.67

Philippines 209 149 662 15 7.18

Portugal 46 26 99 2 4.35

Qatar 3 1 3 0 0

Russian Federation 237 215 1,076 14 5.91

Saint Kitts and Nevis 33 32 210 3 9.09

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

132 113 471 3 2.27

Samoa 3 3 34 1 33.33

Saudi Arabia 36 21 64 0 0

Sierra Leone 225 218 1,800 42 18.67

(32)

Flag

%

Singapore 2,113 994 3,773 22 1.04

Solomon Islands 2 2 13 0 0

Spain 3 0 0 0 0

Sri Lanka 6 5 19 0 0

Sweden 20 10 42 2 10.00

Switzerland 35 23 88 2 5.71

Taiwan, China 98 56 336 3 3.06

Tanzania 22 22 130 4 18.18

Thailand 282 213 911 10 3.55

Togo 58 57 412 7 12.07

Tonga 3 3 18 0 0

Tunisia 2 0 0 0 0

Turkey 51 25 90 2 3.92

Tuvalu 107 84 412 3 2.80

Ukraine 2 2 14 1 50.00

United Arab Emirates (UAE) 4 4 12 1 25.00

United Kingdom (UK) 167 100 335 4 2.40

United States of America 44 30 103 0 0

Vanuatu 120 78 343 8 6.67

Viet Nam 733 509 2,262 26 3.55

Total 30,405 19,029 89,560 1,203 Regional

3.96

(33)

Table 4: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER SHIP TYPE

Type of ship

%

NLS tanker 45 22 103 1 2.22

Combination carrier 35 13 76 1 2.86

Oil tanker 1,870 892 4,026 39 2.09

Gas carrier 652 296 1,104 11 1.69

Chemical tanker 2,201 1,136 4,558 28 1.27 Bulk carrier 10,899 6,273 26,490 370 3.39

Vehicle carrier 779 350 1,120 20 2.57

Container ship 4,633 2,736 11,028 136 2.94

Ro-Ro cargo ship 199 155 793 5 2.51

General cargo/multi-purpose ship 6,866 5,575 32,566 483 7.03 Refrigerated cargo carrier 684 507 2,643 42 6.14

Woodchip carrier 227 118 436 4 1.76

Livestock carrier 74 65 402 7 9.46

Ro-Ro passenger ship 104 96 476 2 1.92

Passenger ship 228 138 561 6 2.63

Factory ship 1 1 9 1 100.00

Heavy load carrier 115 74 250 4 3.48

Offshore service vessel 142 99 508 8 5.63

MODU & FPSO 5 3 9 2 40.00

High speed passenger craft 26 26 125 0 0

Special purpose ship 52 39 217 5 9.62

Tugboat 257 169 855 13 5.06

Others 311 246 1,205 15 4.82

Total 30,405 19,029 89,560 1,203 3.96

(34)

Table 5: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION

Recognized organization (RO)

No. of overall inspections No. of overall detentions No. of RO responsible detentions Detention percentage% RO responsible detention percentage% Percentage of RO responsible detentions%

American Bureau of Shipping 3,210 81 5 2.52 0.16 6.17 American Register of Shipping 30 4 0 13.33 0 0 Asia Classification Society 4 1 0 25.00 0 0 Belize Maritime Bureau Inc. 4 1 0 25.00 0 0 Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia 104 11 0 10.58 0 0

Bureau Securitas 9 0 0 0 0 0

Bureau Veritas 3,408 133 5 3.90 0.15 3.76 C.T.M. Inspection and Classification

Company, S. de R.L.

5 3 0 60.00 0 0

Ceskoslovensky Lodin Register 3 0 0 0 0 0

China Classification Society 2,718 25 1 0.92 0.04 4.00 Compania Nacional de Registro e

Inspeccion de Naves

2 0 0 0 0 0

Cosmos Marine Bureau 17 1 0 5.88 0 0

CR Classification Society 313 14 1 4.47 0.32 7.14 Croatian Register of Shipping 27 0 0 0 0 0

Cyprus Bureau of Shipping 3 0 0 0 0 0

Det Norske Veritas 3,460 84 3 2.43 0.09 3.57

DNV GL AS 993 36 3 3.63 0.30 8.33

Dromon Bureau of Shipping 2 1 0 50.00 0 0

Ferriby Marine 2 1 0 50.00 0 0

Fidenavis SA 10 1 0 10.00 0 0

Germanischer Lloyd 3,001 113 3 3.77 0.10 2.65 Global Marine Bureau 273 28 3 10.26 1.10 10.71

Global Shipping Bureau 10 0 0 0 0 0

Hellenic Register of Shipping 1 0 0 0 0 0 INCLAMAR (Inspection y Classification

Maritime, S. de. R.L.)

7 0 0 0 0 0 Indian Register of Shipping 86 4 0 4.65 0 0

Intermaritime Certification Services, S.A. 485 32 3 6.60 0.62 9.38 International Maritime Register 7 1 0 14.29 0 0 International Naval Surveys Bureau 27 5 0 18.52 0 0 International Register of Shipping 242 31 4 12.81 1.65 12.90 International Ship Classification 307 34 3 11.07 0.98 8.82 Iranian Classification Society 50 6 0 12.00 0 0 Isthmus Bureau of Shipping 498 29 0 5.82 0 0 Isthmus Maritime Classification Society

S.A.

1 0 0 0 0 0

(35)

Recognized organization (RO)

No. of overall inspections No. of overall detentions No. of RO responsible detentions Detention percentage% RO responsible detention percentage% Percentage of RO responsible detentions%

Korea Classification Society (former Joson Classification Society)

221 34 5 15.38 2.26 14.71 Korea Ship Safety Technology Authority 42 0 0 0 0 0 Korean Register of Shipping 3,009 51 2 1.69 0.07 3.92

Lloyd's Register 4,137 120 3 2.90 0.07 2.50

Macosnar Corporation 45 1 0 2.22 0 0

Maritime Bureau of Shipping 1 0 0 0 0 0 Maritime Lloyd Ltd, Georgia 6 1 0 16.67 0 0 Maritime Technical Systems and Services 10 4 1 40.00 10.00 25.00

National Cargo Bureau Inc. 1 0 0 0 0 0

National Shipping Adjusters Inc 3 0 0 0 0 0

New United International Marine Services Ltd

12 3 0 25.00 0 0

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 9,899 283 11 2.86 0.11 3.89 Overseas Marine Certification Services 436 50 3 11.47 0.69 6.00 Panama Bureau of Shipping 40 4 0 10.00 0 0 Panama Marine Survey and Certification

Services, Inc.

4 0 0 0 0 0 Panama Maritime Documentation Services 421 47 5 11.16 1.19 10.64

Panama Maritime Surveyors Bureau Inc 2 0 0 0 0 0 Panama Register Corporation 64 2 0 3.13 0 0 Panama Shipping Certificate Inc. 5 0 0 0 0 0 Panama Shipping Registrar Inc. 94 11 0 11.70 0 0 Phoenix Register of Shipping 4 0 0 0 0 0 Polski Rejestr Statkow 32 5 1 15.63 3.13 20.00

R.J. Del Pan 1 0 0 0 0 0

Registro Internacional Naval S.A. 36 1 0 2.78 0 0 Registro Italiano Navale 855 30 0 3.51 0 0

RINAVE Portuguesa 5 0 0 0 0 0

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 383 20 1 5.22 0.26 5.00

Ship Classification Malaysia 41 0 0 0 0 0

Shipping Register of Ukraine 2 0 0 0 0 0 SingClass International Pte Ltd 82 14 2 17.07 2.44 14.29

Sing-Lloyd 139 26 1 18.71 0.72 3.85

Turkish Lloyd 2 0 0 0 0 0

Union Bureau of Shipping 876 135 15 15.41 1.71 11.11 Universal Maritime Bureau 301 38 7 12.62 2.33 18.42

Universal Shipping Bureau 25 0 0 0 0 0

Venezuelan Register of Shipping 10 1 0 10.00 0 0 Vietnam Register 765 29 1 3.79 0.13 3.45

Other 28 3 0 10.71 0 0

(36)

Note: The number of overall inspections and overall detentions is calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issued statutory certificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued by more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would be counted to each of them.

(37)

Table 6: DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORIES

Nature of deficiencies No. of deficiencies

Certificate & Documentation

Crew Certificates 1,534

Documents 6,416 Ship Certificates 2,445

Structural Conditions 2,671

Water/Weathertight conditions 5,812

Emergency Systems 5,093

Radio Communications 2,259

Cargo operations including equipment 613

Fire safety 16,654

Alarms 634

Safety of Navigation 14,231

Life saving appliances 10,515

Dangerous goods 183

Propulsion and auxiliary machinery 4,549 Working and Living Conditions Living Conditions 529 Working Conditions 4,134

Labour Conditions

Minimum requirements for

seafarers 74

Conditions of employment 363 Accommodation,

recreational facilities, food and catering

1,017 Health protection, medical

care, social security 983

Pollution prevention

Anti Fouling 7

MARPOL Annex I 1,679

MARPOL Annex II 13

MARPOL Annex III 33

MARPOL Annex IV 1,199

MARPOL Annex V 1,587

MARPOL Annex VI 758

ISM 2,699

Other 876

Total 89,560

ISPS 1,615

Grand total 91,175

ANNUAL REPORT ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION 2014

ANNUAL REPORT

ON

PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

2014

FOREWORD

CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

O V E R V I E W

PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE TOKYO MOU, 2014

STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS ANNEX 1

ANNEX 2

PORT STATE INSPECTION STATISTICS