THE MACKEY CONVERGENCE CONDITION FOR SPACES WITH WEBS
THOMASE.GILSDORF
Department
ofPureandApplied Mathematics Washington State UniversityPullman, WA
99164 (Received December 3, 1987)ABSTRACT. If eachsequenceconvergingto 0 in alocallyconvex space isalso Mackey convergent to0,that space is said tosatisfy theMac]eyconvergencecondition. Theproblem ofcharacterizing those locallyconvex spaces with thispropertyis still open.
In
this paper, spaces with compatible websare used toconstructboth anecessaryand asucient condition for a locallyconvexspace tosatisfy theMac]eyconvergencecondition.KEY
WORDS AND PHHA,;ES. Compatibleweb,
fast completespace, lackey convergentse- quence, inductive limit.1980MATHEMATICS SUBJECTCLASSIFICATION CODE. Primary46A05; Secondary46A30.
1. INTRODUCTION.
In a locally convex space, it sometimes happens that every convergentsequence is also con-
vergentwith respect to a normed topologyon somesubspace. Since normed spaces have many tangible properties, it is importanttoknowfor whichlocallyconvexspaces this condition holds.
Such spaces satisfytheso-called Mackeyconvergencecondition.
Throughoutthis paper,
E
will denotea Hausdorfflocallyconvextopologicalvector space. An absolutelyconvexset in Ewill becalled a disk. IfB
is a disk inE,
weequip its linearhullEB
withthe semi-normedtopology generated by theMinkowski functional ofB. IfBisbounded, the Minkowski functional ofB generates a normed topology on
Es.
IfEs
is aBanachspace, B iscalled aBanach disk. E isfast complete ifeach boundedset in
E
iscontained in aboundcdBanach disk. Everysequentially completelocallyconvex spaceisfast complete.
In Jarchow
([1], 10.1)
it is stated that no concise description of locally convexspaces which satisfy the Mackey convergence conditionexists. Thisproblemis stillopen.In
thispaperwewill examinethis characterizationproblemwithinthecontext of spaces possessing webs.DEFINITION 1: Asequence
(x,)
in alocallyconvexspaceEisMackey convergent tox if there is aboundeddiskBCE
suchthatzn
--, zinthenormtopology ofEv.
Ifx 0,wesaythat
(xn)
isaMackey null(or
locallynull)
sequence.Sincethenormtopology
T
B onEB
isfinerthan theinducedtopologyonEv,
everyMackey null sequence is anullsequenceforthe original topologyonE.
This prompts the followingdefinition ofthe converse, due to Jarchow[1].
DEFINITION 2: A locally convexspace satisfies the Mac:key convergence condition if eachofitsnullsequences is aMackey null sequence.
Mackeyconvergence is defined by Mackey in
[2]. In
DeWilde[3] (Prop. III.l.10),
it is shownthatevery Frgchet space satisfiesthe Mackey convergence condition. Several results concerning the Mackey convergence conditionare obtained in Jarchow and Swart
[4]. In
their paper, it is shown thatE
satisfiesthe Mackey convergencecondition if and only ifT,(E’, E)
is a Schwartztopologyon
E’,
whereT(E’,E)
is the topology ofuniformconvergenceon all null sequences of E. Theyalso investigate theMackeyconvergenceconditionforspaces whicharefastcompleteand bornological. Specifically, thefollowingisobtained(see [4l):
THEOREM3: Let
E
befast complete. Then the followingareequivalent:(a)
Eisbornological andsatisfiestheMackeyconvergence condition.(b)
E indline E,
where eachEa
is aseparable Banach space, and each nullsequence inEis null sequence insome2. SEQ UENTIALL
Y
WEBBED SPACES.
Wewill nowexaminethe Mackey convergenceconditionforspaces withwebs. The readeris referred to Robertson
[5]
fora description of websinatopologicalvector space. Further informa-tionconcerningwebsmaybefoundinRobertson and Robertson
[6],
andin DeWilde[3].
DeWildeoriginally used websto obtainseveralgeneralizedversionsof the Closed Graph Theorem; see
[3].
In
this paperwewill workonlywith locallyconvexspaces andwewill assume, asin[6],
thateachmember ofaweb isabsolutelyconvex. The following aspectsof webswill alsobeuseful.
DEFINITION4: Astrandof aweb is acollectionof membersof
,
onefrom eachlayer,withthek
+
1member of thestrandcontained in the the k-th member. Strandswill be denoted by(W).
DEFINITION 5: A web on a locally convex space is compatible with
E
if for each 0-neighborhoodUinE
andfor each strand(Wt)
of,
thereisak0
ENsuchthatWt c
U.REMARK: Itisto be notedherethatwewillassume
(in
accordancewithRobertson[5])
thatforeach strand
(Wt)
andfor eachk EN1
(1.1)
Supposenowthat
xn
--,0inE,
and suppose that forlargeenough n,(x,)
iscontainedinsome finite collectionof strandsfrom.
Since Definition 5implies that themembers of areinsome sensesmaller than the 0-neighborhoods inE,
thisisactually enoughto coerce(x)
tobeaMackeynullsequence. Wehavenowmotivatedthefollowing definition.
DEFINITION6: A locallyconvex space
E
issequentially webbed ifE hasacompatible web suchthatforeach null sequence(x)
inE,
thereisafinite collectionofstrands,from suchthat for each k Nthereexistsan
Nt N
such that foreachn_ N,
Let usfindsomesequentiallywebbedspaces.
PROPOSITION 7: Everymetrizablelocallyconvex space is sequentiallywebbed.
PROOF" If
(Uk
k EN}
is a base ofabsolutely convex0-neighborhoods of the metrizable spaceE,
such that(Vk
EN),
Sk+ c k,
1then
{Uk"
kN}
iseasilyseento beacompatiblewebonE {see [5]
or[6]).
Certainly, every inEsuch that 0 iseventually contained inthe{only)
strd(U).
Thefollowing definitionmaybe foundinFloret
[71.
DEFINITION8" LetE ind
lim En
be the inductivelimitofthe locallyconvexspaces whereE1 c E2
C and the injectionidEn
--,En+I
iscontinuousfor eachn. Then Eiscalledsequentiallyretractiveifeach sequence convergingin
E
isconvergent to thesamepoint in someEn.
PROPOSITION 9:
A
sequentiallyretractive inductivelimit of sequentially webbed spaces issequentially webbed.PROOF: Let
E
indlin En,
and let("}
denote the webonE,
foreachn.In E,
wedefine acompatibleweb as follows: Let the first layer be thecollection of all the first layers of the webs(").
Definethe second layer of tobethe collection ofall the second layers of the webs1(n),
andsoforth. Certainly, is acountablecollection ofabsolutelyconvexsets, andsincewe haveused all webs(")
simultaneously, the otherproperties of webs(as
in[6])
areeasilyverifiedfor
.
Asfor compatibility, let
U
bea0-neighborhoodinE,
andlet(W)
beastrandfrom.
Notethat
W1
is inthefirstlayer ofEo,
forsomen0N.
SinceW+I c W
for eachk,thenW
for eachk.
Hence,
sinceE
cE c
itfollows that foreach/EN, Wk
isa memberofsome(i),
where1_
j_ no.
IfanyW
E(f},
where j’<
no,then all succeeding membersof areinE0.0),
since wemusthaveWt+l c Wk
for all k.In
fact, for large enough k, all succeeding membersof(W)
must be in(’0)
forsomej0; i.e., thereis ak0
ENsuchthatforall ]
_ k0.
Without lossofgenerality,assumeJ0
1. Thensince U1E
is a0-neighborhood inE1
and (1) iscompatible withE,
thereis a/N
suchthatW c UNE c U.
This makes 1/ acompatibleweb onE.
Finally,givensomen E
N,
amember of the kthlayer of14/(n) isalsoamemberof thekthlayer of,
andthisholds for eachk EN. Hence,
each strandfrom the web(n)
isalso astrandof.
Nowassumeall the spaces
E
aresequentiallywebbed,
and that E is seqlentiallyretractive.If z, 0 in
E,
then z,--*0 in someEn. Thus, (z,n)
is contained ina finite union ofstrandsof the web(n).
Sincetheseare also strands of,
itfollows thatE
issequentiallywebbed. []COROLLARY 10" Everystrict inductive limit of sequentially webbedspaces is sequentially webbed.
PROOF: Everystrict inductivelimit ofsequentially webbed spaces issequentiallyretractive sincethetopology of the inductive limit inducestheoriginal topologyon each of theconstituent spaces. []
COROLLARY 11:
Every (LF)-space
issequentiallywebbed.3.
A
NECESSARY
CONDITION.We are nowready todescribe acollectionof locally convex spaces which satisfy the Mackey convergence condition.
THEOREM 12:
Every
sequentially webbedlocallyconvex space satisfiesthe Mackeyconver- gencecondition.PROOF: Assume
E
is sequentially webbed.Let
z, 0 in E. By KSthe[8],
28.3,(z)
isa Mackey nullsequence ifand only ifthere is a sequence
(rn)
in(0, oo)
such thatr
cx asn oo, and r,z, 0 inE. We seek to find suchasequence
(rn).
Assumethat we have found strands(W(1)),..., (W (’))
fromthe web such thatforeachk Nthere isanN
Nsuch that(v _> N),
i--!
Noticethatby
(1.1),
foreachiand foreachk6N
Hence, (’v’l e N)
wz{0
1W{0
tz{01W{0
1W{
0"k+2 k
"’k+l C k C k+lC
W
(0 c1W(0
k+ 2 k
Fork6
N,
wemayfindl,
6N
such thatThen,bydefining
wehave
W(*)
k,+k,’
1W(t)
Wl
(I) C1-’--W(’)
C k k,21k,
Similarly,there is an
lk,
6Nsuchthatandsoforth.
Let
1
W(2)
1W(2)
WC)c-,_
k, 2k,c
lk maz{lk{
i 1,...,m}.
Thenthereis
N
k61Nsuchthatfor eachn_> k
"
,=,U w, c ,U,
1w,,) . 1w{,, .
1i=1 i=1
Thus,
(Vn >_ Nk)
Futhermore,thereis an
Nk+
1e
Nsuch thatNk+
1> Nk,
and(Vn >_ Nk.l)
k+l i=1
and this continuesforallk6N.
Nowdefine
(r.)
by lettingr.=k,
forN
k_n<Nk+
1.lim r,, limk oo.
Itremains to beshown that
r.z.
0inE. To
provethis, let Ubea0-neighborhoodinE. By the compatibility ofW,
there arepositive integersK1,...,K,
such thatChoosing
wehave
"’"Kin CU.
K rnax{K
1,...,c Moreover,
wemay find2’VIK N
suchthatforn_> Nbc
by
(3.1). Hence, r..
0inE,
and(z.)
is aMackeynullsequence.REMARK:
NoticethatbyProposition9,eachsequentiallyretractive inductive limit of sequen- tially webbedspaces satisfies the Mackey convergencecondition.In
particular, each(LF)-space
satisfiesthe Mackeyconvergencecondition.
If
E
indlim E,
asin Definition8,thenE
isregularifeachsetboundedinE
iscontained in andboundedinsomeE,. Floret[9]
provedthataregularinductivelimitEofFrgchetspacesis sequentially retractive ifandonlyifE
satisfiestheMackeyconvergencecondition. Thisprovides uswiththe following:COROLLARY 13" Let
E
bearegular inductivelimitofFrdchetspaces. ThenEis sequen- tially retractive if andonlyifE
issequentially webbed. []Inordertopresentanexample,weneed the followingfact.
LEMMA
14:(E, 7")
isfast complete if and only if(E, 7")
isfast complete, where7"
is any topologywhichiscompatiblewiththe dualityPROOF: If B is a bounded Banach disk in
E
with respect to the topologyT,
thenB
is boundedinE
withrespecttoany compatible topologyT’. Hence,
Bis aboundedBanach disk in EwithrespecttoT’.
[]The following simple example showsthat, in additiontothe bornologicalspaces in Theorem 3,therearefast complete, non-bornologicalspaceswhichsatisfy the Mackeyconvergence condition.
EXAMPLE
15: Consider11
with itsweak topology aa(ll ,loo).
Evidently,11
under itsnormtopology
T
is bornologicai; hence,(11,7")
is aMackeyspace, aT,
since otherwise wouldhave finite dimension(see [10],
page10).
Thus,(11 ,a)
is notaMackey space;hence, isnotbornological.However, (11 ,a)
is fast complete byLemma
14, and the following shows that(l, a)
issequentially webbed.Since
(/1, T)
is a Frdchetspace, it has aneighborhood web consisting of the strand(Uk),
asin Proposition 7. Furthermore, a
c T,
so every weak 0-neighborhoodV contains a strong 0- neighborhoodU. Thus,for the neighborhood strand(Uk),
of the web,
thereis ak0
ENsuch thato c c V,
so ]# is also compatiblewith a.
Now,
ifx --
0 in(11 ,a),
thenxn
0 in(/1, T)
by Shur’sTheorem
([10],
ChapterVII,
page85).
That is, foreachkEN
there isanNt
N such that for everyn>_ N,
hence,
(/1, a)
issequentially webbed.4. A SUFFICIENT CONDITION.
With some slight restrictionson
E,
wemay obtain a converseto Theorem12. Westartwitha definition.DEFINITION 16: Atopological vector space
E
hasastrict web ifEhasacompatibleweb suchthat for each strand(W)
of and eachserieso=
xkwithx W
for each kN,
MACKEY CONVERGENCE CONDITION FOR SPACES WITH WEBS 481
_ z isconvergentinE,
and further,
zE
-1,r=+l
foreach k
_>
2. A space withastrictweb is also calledastrictly webbed space.If the last condition, that
isdropped, then
E
issaid tohaveacompleting web. Basically, strictly webbed spaces andspaces with completingwebsarethose which have compatible webs and haveanadditional mild form of completeness. Thereaderis referred to[1], I3],
or[5]
formore details concerning strict webs. It shouldbe noted that in[5]
strictwebsarecalledtight webs.There are plentyof strictly webbedspaces.
In
particular, Frdchet spaces,(LF)-
spaces, and strong duals ofsuchspacesarestrictlywebbed;see sections 10and 11of[5]
forproofs.Thedefinition of strictly webbedspaces is suggestive ofthatfor sequentially webbed spaces.
A connection between these two willbe revealedin Theorem 18 below. First, some preliminary remarksareinorder. Strictly webbedspacesalso originatedinattemptstogeneralize theClosed Graph Theorem. The most well known ofsuchresultsisusually called theLocalization Theorem;
see5.6.3of
[1]
orsection 11 of[5].
Wewillutilize thefollowing specialcaseofthistheorem,which islistedasCorollary2 ofTheorem 19,section 11of[5]:
LEMMA
17: LetE
andF
be Hausdorfftopologicalvector spaces such that F is strictly webbed. LetE -- F
belinearwithaclosedgraph. Then for each bounded sequentiallyclosed diskB
inE,
thereis astrand(W)
inF
such that foreach k GNthereexists anumbera
suchthat
t(B)
c,w.
THEOREM 18" LetEbefastcomplete and strictlywebbed. IfE satisfies the Mackeycon- vergencecondition, then
E
issequentiallywebbed.PROOF" Let beastrictwebon E.
Let
z, -, 0inE. By assumption,(zn)
is a Mackeynull sequence; therefore, by KSthe
[8],
28.3, thereis a sequence(r,)
c(0, x),
with r, c asn xandr,,x,, 0inE. Let
A
{r.z.
:nN}.
ThenA isbounded,soit iscontainedinabounded BanachdiskB. Furthermore,
A
is bounded inthe BanachspaceEz
and by letting Cdenote theEz-elosure
ofthe convex,balancedhull ofA,
then clearly C is a bounded, sequentially dosed disk inEn.
Notice also that the injection idEn
Eiscontinuous, therefore ithasadosed graph. ItfollowsnowbyLemma17 that there existsastrand(Wt)
of such that for everykEN
thereisanumberat suchthatia(c) c c ,w;
therefore,foreverynE
N,
r.x.
EatWk.
Since
rn
oo asn o, forafixedk Nthereis anNk
Nsuchthat forevery n_> N,
Thus,foreveryn
> N
Iw cw,
since we assumethateach
W
isbalanced. []As was mentioned before Lemma 17, the strong dual ofa Frdchet space is strictly webbed.
Moreover,
by Corollary2 ofProposition 1, ChapterVIof[6],
the strong dual ofaFrdchetspace is complete, hencefastcomplete. Thisallowsus tomake the following statement.COROLLARY 19: The strong dual of a Frdehet space satisfies the Mackey convergence condition ifand only if it issequentially webbed. []
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. ThisresearchwassupportedbyWashingtonStateUniversity.
References
1.
JARCHOW, H,
Locally ConvexSpaces, B. G.TeubnerStuttgart,1981.2.
MACKEY,
G.W.,
OnInfinite Dimensional LinearSpaces, Trans.AMS 17
1945,155-207.3. DEWlLDE,
M.,
ClosedGraphTheoremsandWebbedSpaces,Pitman,1978.4.
JARCHOW, H., SWART, J.,
On Mackey Convergencein Locally ConvexSpaces, Israel J..Math,,
1_6, 1973, 150-158.5.
ROBERSTON, W.,
On theClosed Graph Theorem and Spaceswith Webs,Proc,
London Math._ Soc.,2,
1972,692-738.6. ROBERTSON,A.
P.,
ROBERTSONW.,
Topological Vector Spaces, Cambridge UniversityPress,
1973.7.
FLORET, K.,
SomeAspects ofthe Theory of LocallyConvex InductiveLimits, Functional Analysis: SurveysandRecent
ResultsII,
NorthHolland,
1980.8.
KTHE, G.,
TopologicalVector
SpacesI,
Springer,1969.9.
FLORET, K.,
Bases inSequentiallyRetractive Limit-Spaces,Studia Math..38
1970, 221-226.
10.