• 検索結果がありません。

Accepted 9 July 2006 We give some characterizations of weak-open compact images of metric spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Accepted 9 July 2006 We give some characterizations of weak-open compact images of metric spaces"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

ZHIYUN YIN

Received 2 August 2005; Revised 29 June 2006; Accepted 9 July 2006

We give some characterizations of weak-open compact images of metric spaces.

Copyright © 2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction and definitions

To find internal characterizations of certain images of metric spaces is one of central problems in general topology. Arhangel’ski˘ı [1] showed that a space is an open compact image of a metric space if and only if it has a development consisting of point-finite open covers, and some characterizations for certain quotient compact images of metric spaces are obtained in [3,5,8]. Recently, Xia [12] introduced the concept of weak-open map- pings. By using it, certaing-first countable spaces are characterized as images of metric spaces under various weak-open mappings. Furthermore, Li and Lin in [4] proved that a space isg-metrizable if and only if it is a weak-openσ-image of a metric space.

The purpose of this paper is to give some characterizations of weak-open compact images of metric spaces, which showed that a space is a weak-open compact image of a metric space if and only if it has a weak development consisting of point-finitecs-covers.

In this paper, all spaces are Hausdorff, all mappings are continuous and surjective.N denotes the set of all natural numbers.τ(X) denotes the topology on a spaceX. For the usual product spacei∈NXi,πidenotes the projectioni∈NXiontoXi. For a sequence {xn}inX, denotexn = {xn:nN}.

Definition 1.1 [1]. Let=

{x:xX}be a collection of subsets of a spaceX.ᏼis called a weak base forXif

(1) for eachxX,xis a network ofxinX,

(2) ifU,Vx, thenWUVfor someWx,

(3)GX is open inX if and only if for eachxG, there existsPx such that PG.

xis called a weak neighborhood base ofxinX, every element ofxis called a weak neighborhood ofxinX.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2006, Article ID 87840, Pages1–5

DOI 10.1155/IJMMS/2006/87840

(2)

Definition 1.2. Let f :XYbe a mapping.

(1) f is called a weak-open mapping [12], if there exists a weak baseᏮ= ∪{y:y Y}forY, and for each yY, there existsxy f1(y) satisfying the following condition: for each open neighborhoodUofxy,By f(U) for someByy. (2) f is called a compact mapping, if f1(y) is compact inXfor eachyY. It is easy to check that a weak-open mapping is quotient.

Definition 1.3 [2]. LetXbe a space, andPX. Then the following hold.

(1) A sequence{xn}inXis called eventually inP, if the{xn}converges tox, and there existsmNsuch that{x} ∪ {xn:nm} ⊂P.

(2)Pis called a sequential neighborhood ofxinX, if whenever a sequence{xn}inX converges tox, then{xn}is eventually inP.

(3)Pis called sequential open inX, ifP is a sequential neighborhood at each of its points.

(4)Xis called a sequential space, if any sequential open subset ofXis open inX.

Definition 1.4 [7]. Letᏼbe a cover of a spaceX.

(1)ᏼis called acs-cover forX, if every convergent sequence inXis eventually in some element ofᏼ.

(2)ᏼis called ansn-cover forX, if every element ofᏼis a sequential neighborhood of some point inX, and for anyxX, there exists a sequential neighborhoodP ofxinXsuch thatPᏼ.

Definition 1.5 [7]. Let{n}be a sequence of covers of a spaceX.

(1){n}is called a point-star network forX, if for eachxX,st(x,ᏼn)is a net- work ofxinX.

(2){n}is called a weak development forX, if for eachxX,st(x,n)is a weak neighborhood base forX.

2. Results

Theorem 2.1. The following are equivalent for a spaceX.

(1)Xis a weak-open compact image of a metric space.

(2)Xhas a weak development consisting of point-finitecs-covers.

(3)Xhas a weak development consisting of point-finitesn-covers.

Proof. (1)(2). Suppose that f :MX is a weak-open compact mapping with M a metric space. Let{n}be a sequence consisting of locally finite open covers ofM such thatᐁn+1is a refinement ofᐁnandst(K,ᐁn)forms a neighborhood base ofKinMfor each compact subsetKofM(see [7, Theorem 1.3.1]). For eachnN, putᏼn= f(ᐁn).

Since f is compact, then{n}is a point-finite cover sequence ofX.

IfxV withV open inX, then f1(x)f1(V). Since f1(x) compact inM, then st(f1(x),ᐁn) f1(V) for somenN, and sost(x,n)V. Hencest(x,n)forms a network ofxinX. Therefore,{n}is a point-star network forX.

We will prove that everyᏼk is acs-cover forX. Since f is weak-open, there exists a weak base Ꮾ= ∪{x:xX} for X, and for eachxX, there exists mx f1(x)

(3)

satisfying the following condition: for each open neighborhoodUofmxinM,Bf(U) for someBx.

For eachxXandkN, let{xn}be a sequence converging to a pointxX. Take Uk withmxU. ThenB f(U) for some Bx. Since Bis a weak neighbor- hood ofxinX, thenBis a sequential neighborhood ofxinXby [6, Corollary 1.6.18], so f(U)k is also. Thus{xn} is eventually in f(U). This implies that eachᏼk is a cs-cover forX. Since f(U) is a sequential neighborhood ofxinX, thenst(x,k) is also.

Obviously,Xis a sequential space. Sost(x,ᏼk)is a weak neighborhood base ofxinX.

In words,{n}is a weak development consisting of point-finitecs-covers forX.

(2)(3). By Theorem A in [5],Xis a sequential space. It suffices to prove that ifᏼis a point-finitecs-cover forX, then some subset ofᏼis ansn-cover forX. For eachxX, denote (ᏼ)x= {Pi:ik}, where (ᏼ)x= {Pᏼ:xP}. If each element of (ᏼ)x is not a sequential neighborhood ofx inX, then for eachik, there exists a sequence{xin} converging tox such that{xin}is not eventually inPi. For eachnN andik, put yi+(n1)k=xin, then{ym}converges toxand is not eventually in eachPi, a contradiction.

Thus there existsPxᏼsuch thatPxis a sequential neighborhood ofxinX. Put= {Px:xX}, thenᏲis ansn-cover forX.

(3)(1). Suppose{n}is a weak development consisting of point-finitesn-covers for X. For eachiN, letᏼi= {Pα:αΛi}, endowΛiwith the discrete topology, thenΛiis a metric space. Put

M=

α=i)

i∈N

Λi:Pαi

forms a network at some pointxαinX

, (2.1)

and endowMwith the subspace topology induced from the usual product topology of the collection{Λi:iN}of metric spaces, thenMis a metric space. SinceXis Hausdorff, xαis unique in X. For eachαM, we define f :MX by f(α)=xα. For eachxX andiN, there existsαiΛisuch thatxPαi. From{i}being a point-star network forX,{Pαi:iN}is a network ofxinX. Putα=i), thenαMand f(α)=x. Thus f is surjective. Supposeα=i)Mand f(α)=xUτ(X), then there existsnN such thatPαnU. Put

V= βM: thenth coordinate ofβisαn

. (2.2)

ThenαVτ(M), and f(V)PαnU. Hence f is continuous.

For eachxXandiN, put

Bi= αiΛi:xPαi

, (2.3)

theni∈NBi is compact ini∈NΛi. Ifα=i)

i∈NBi, then Pαi is a network of x in X. SoαM and f(α)=x. Hence i∈NBi f1(x); If α=i) f1(x), then x

i∈NPαi, soα

i∈NBi. Thus f1(x)

i∈NBi. Therefore, f1(x)=

i∈NBi. This implies that f is a compact mapping.

(4)

We will prove that f is weak-open. For eachxX, since everyiis ansn-cover forX, then there existsαiΛisuch thatPαiis a sequential neighborhood ofxinX. From{i} a point-star network forX,Pαiis a network ofxinX. Putβx=i)

i∈NΛi, then βxf1(x).

Let{Ux}be a decreasing neighborhood base ofβxinM, and putx= fUx

:mN ,

=x:xX, (2.4)

thenᏮsatisfies (1), (2) inDefinition 1.1. SupposeGis open inX. For eachxG, from βxf1(x), f1(G) is an open neighborhood ofβxinM. ThusUxf1(G) for some mN, so f(Ux)Gand f(Ux)x. On the other hand, supposeGX and for xG, there existsBx such that BG. LetB= f(Ux) for somemN, and let {xn}be a sequence converging toxinX. SincePαi is a sequential neighborhood ofxin Xfor eachiN, then{xn}is eventually inPαi. For eachnN, ifxnPαi, letαin=αi; if xnPαi, pickαinΛisuch thatxnPαin. Thus there existsniNsuch thatαin=αifor alln > ni. So{αin}converges toαi. For eachnN, put

βn=in)

i∈N

Λi, (2.5)

then fn)=xnand{βn}converges toβx. Since Ux is an open neighborhoodβx in M, then{βn}is eventually inUx, so{xn}is eventually inG. HenceGis a sequential neighborhood ofx. SoGis sequential open inX. ByXbeing a sequential space,Gis open inX. This impliesᏮis a weak base forX.

By the idea ofᏮ, f is weak-open.

We give examples illustratingTheorem 2.1of this note.

Example 2.2. LetX be the Arens spaceS2 (see [6, Example 1.8.6]). It is not difficult to see that the space is a weak-open compact image of a metric space. ButXis not an open compact image of a metric space, becauseXis not developable. Thus the following holds.

A weak-open compact image of a metric space is not always an open compact image of a metric space.

Example 2.3. LetYbe the weak Cauchy space in [10, Example 2.14(3)]. By the construc- tion,Y is a quotient compact image of a metric space. ButY is not Cauchy,Y is not a weak-open compact image of a metric space byTheorem 2.1. Thus the following holds:

A quotient compact image of a metric space is not always a weak-open compact image of a metric space.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the NSF of Hunan Province in China (no. 05JJ40103) and the NSF of Education Department of Hunan Province in China (no. 03C204).

(5)

References

[1] A. V. Arhangel’ski˘ı, Mappings and spaces, Russian Mathematical Surveys 21 (1966), no. 4, 115–

162.

[2] S. P. Franklin, Spaces in which sequences suffice, Fundamenta Mathematicae 57 (1965), 107–115.

[3] Y. Ikeda, C. Liu, and Y. Tanaka, Quotient compact images of metric spaces, and related matters, Topology and Its Applications 122 (2002), no. 1-2, 237–252.

[4] Z. Li and S. Lin, On the weak-open images of metric spaces, Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 54 (2004), no. 2, 393–400.

[5] S. Lin, On the quotient compact images of metric spaces, Advances in Mathematics 21 (1992), no. 1, 93–96.

[6] , Generalized Metric Spaces and Mappings, Chinese Scientific, Beijing, 1995.

[7] , Point-Countable Coverings and Sequence-Covering Mappings, Chinese Distinguished Scholars Foundation Academic Publications, Chinese Scientific, Beijing, 2002.

[8] S. Lin, Y. C. Zhou, and P. F. Yan, On sequence-coveringπ-mappings, Acta Mathematica Sinica 45 (2002), no. 6, 1157–1164.

[9] F. Siwiec, On defining a space by a weak base, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 52 (1974), 233–245.

[10] Y. Tanaka, Symmetric spaces,g-developable spaces andg-metrizable spaces, Mathematica Japonica 36 (1991), no. 1, 71–84.

[11] Y. Tanaka and Z. Li, Certain covering-maps andk-networks, and related matters, Topology Pro- ceedings 27 (2003), no. 1, 317–334.

[12] S. Xia, Characterizations of certaing-first countable spaces, Advances in Mathematics 29 (2000), no. 1, 61–64.

Zhiyun Yin: Department of Information, Hunan Business College, Changsha, Hunan 410205, China

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

More recently it was shown by one of the authors ([6]) that the pointwise closure of I(X, d) is locally compact if the space Σ(X) of the connected components of X is

In general, a topological space having the property that every open cover admits a locally finite refinement is called paracompact.. Stone’s Theorem states that metric spaces (and

in [Notes on an Integral Inequality, JIPAM, 7(4) (2006), Art.120] and give some answers which extend the results of Boukerrioua-Guezane-Lakoud [On an open question regarding an

In [3], an abstract version of Open Problem 1 was posed, respective answers to these two open problems were presented, and the results in [1] were extended.. Now we would like

Also, it is shown that a bilateral Q-F -algebra (not necessarily locally convex) is a regular von Neumann algebra if and only if it is isomorphic algebraically and topologically to

If removing a point p from a compact Hausdorff space results in obtaining a nonnormal subspace, then p is called a nonnormality point of the space.. “Naively”, it is known only

In this note we define Riemann integrabillty for real valued functions defined on a compact metric space accompanied by a finite Borel measure.. If the measure of each open ball

It follows that if a compact, doubling metric space satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 1.5 as well as either condition (2) or condition (3), then it admits a bi-Lipschitz embedding