JAIST Repository: 英国の大学評価REF : 人文社会分野のアウトプットとインパクトの特徴

JAIST Repository

Title 英国の大学評価REF : 人文社会分野のアウトプットと インパクトの特徴

Author(s) 島岡, 未来子; 小林, 直人; Yu, Lily Citation 年次学術大会講演要旨集, 32: 540-545 Issue Date 2017-10-28

Type Conference Paper Text version publisher

URL http://hdl.handle.net/10119/15021

Rights

本著作物は研究・イノベーション学会の許可のもとに 掲載するものです。This material is posted here with permission of the Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management.

㸰

D

㸮㸴

ⱥᅜࡢ኱Ꮫホ౯

REF

ேᩥ♫఍ศ㔝ࡢ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺ࡜࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢ≉ᚩ

A study of the Output and Impact in the field of Humanities and Social Sciences

in the Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the UK

ۑᓥᒸᮍ᮶Ꮚ

/Mikiko Shimaokaࠊᑠᯘ┤ே/Naoto Kobayashi㸦᪩✄⏣኱Ꮫ㸧ࠊ

Lily Yu㸦➲ᕝᖹ࿴㈈ᅋ/Sasakawa Peace Foundation㸧

せ᪨

 ேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝ࡢ◊✲ホ౯ࡢព⩏࡜ᡭἲࡢ㆟ㄽࡀ㏆ᖺ┒ࢇ࡟⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᫖ᖺᗘࡢᮏᏛ఍࡛ࡣࠊ ᡃࠎࡣⱥᅜࡢ኱Ꮫホ౯Research Excellence Framework (REF)࡟࠾ࡅࡿேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ⣔◊✲ࠊ୰࡛ࡶேᩥ Ꮫศ㔝ࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺホ౯࡟╔┠ࡋࡓࠋ஦౛࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊࣂ࣮࣑࣒ࣥ࢞኱Ꮫࡢࢩ࢙࢖ࢡࢫࣆ࢔◊✲ࢆᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓࠋ ࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊ࢙࢘ࣈࡢ࢔ࢡࢭࢫᩘ࡞࡝ࡢᐃ㔞᝟ሗࠊእ㒊ホ౯ࢥ࣓ࣥࢺ➼ࡢᐃᛶ᝟ሗ࡞࡝ࠊ஦౛࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢖ࣥ ࣃࢡࢺホ౯ࡢせ⣲ࢆ」ᩘᢳฟࡋࡓࠋᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣ௨ୗࡢ_{2 Ⅼ࠿ࡽど㔝ࢆᣑ኱ࡍࡿࠋ➨㸯࡟ศᯒࡢᑐ㇟ࢆேᩥ} ⛉Ꮫ࠿ࡽ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡟ᣑ኱ࡋࠊ⤒῭ᏛࠊἲᏛࠊṔྐ࡞࡝」ᩘࡢศ㔝(UoA)ࢆᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿࠋ➨㸰࡟࢖ࣥࣃ ࢡࢺࡢࡳ࡞ࡽࡎ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺ࡟ࡶ╔┠ࡍࡿࠋࡇࢀࡽ࡟ࡼࡾࠊேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ⣔ࡢ◊✲ホ౯࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊࡉࡽ࡟ ࡑࡢ≉ᚩࢆศᯒࡍࡿࠋ

Abstract㸸

 _{Evaluation of research in the humanities and social sciences field has recently become popular in} conjunction with the discussion of its significance and method. Last year, we focused on humanities and social sciences research in UK university evaluation Research Excellence Framework (REF), especially impact assessment in humanities field. For example, we targeted Shakespeare's research in the University of Birmingham. As a result, we extracted a number of factors of impact evaluation, such as quantitative analysis on the number of Web accesses and qualitative information such as external evaluation comments. In this paper, we will expand our view from the following two points. First, we expand the subject of analysis from humanities to social sciences, covering several fields (UoA) such as economics, law, history and so on. Secondly, we pay attention not only to the impact but also to the output. Through these, we analyze characteristics of researches in humanities and social science research evaluation.

1. ࡣࡌࡵ࡟/Introduction  ➹⪅ࡽࡣ᫖ᖺࡢᮏᏛ఍ᖺḟᏛ⾡኱఍࡟࠾࠸࡚ࠊⱥᅜ࡛ _{2014 ᖺ࡟㛤ጞࡉࢀࡓ኱Ꮫホ౯ REF㸦Research} Excellence Framework㸧࡟࠾ࡅࡿேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ⣔◊✲ࠊ୰࡛ࡶேᩥᏛศ㔝ࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺホ౯࡟╔┠ࡋࡓⓎ ⾲ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ[1-3]ࠋᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣࡉࡽ࡟♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝㸦Panel C㸧࠾ࡼࡧேᩥ⛉Ꮫศ㔝㸦Panel D㸧ࡢ࢔࢘ࢺࣉ ࢵࢺࠊ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᖜᗈࡃࡲࡓ᥀ࡾୗࡆࡓศᯒ࡜⪃ᐹࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ  ㏆ᖺࠊୡ⏺ⓗ࡟ࡶேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝ࡢ◊✲ࡢ㔜せᛶࡀྉࡤࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡢࠊࡇࡢศ㔝ࡣᑐ㇟ࡀከᒱ࡟Ώ ࡾࡑࡢ◊✲ᡂᯝࡶከᵝ࡞ࡓࡵࠊ⌮ᕤᏛศ㔝ࡸ⏕࿨⛉Ꮫศࡸ࡟ẚ࡭࡚ࠊᐃ㔞ⓗホ౯࠿ࡀ㞴ࡋࡃࠊ୍ᚊ࡞ホ౯ ࡀ㐺ࡉ࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣࠊ_{REF ࡟⌧ࢀࡓᙜヱศ㔝ࡢ◊✲࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࡸ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢ≉ᚩࢆᢳ} ฟ࣭ศᯒࡋࠊࡇࡢศ㔝ࡢ◊✲࡟┦ᛂࡋ࠸ホ౯ࡢ࠶ࡾ᪉ࢆ⪃ᐹࡍࡿࠋ 㸦࡞࠾ࠊPanel A ࡣ⏕࿨⛉Ꮫศ㔝ࠊPanel B ࡣᕤᏛ࠾ࡼࡧ≀⌮⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡍ࡛࡟௚࡛Ⓨ⾲ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚ ࠸ࡿ[4]ࠋ㸧

2. ேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࡢ≉ᛶ / Outputs in Humanities and Socoal Scieces

 ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝Panel C ࡟ࡣ඲㒊࡛ 11 ࡢ UoA㸦Unit of Assessment㸧ࡀ࠶ࡾ 1965 ௳ࡢ submission ࡀ࠶ ࡗࡓࠋ௨ୗ࡟ࡑࡢ␒ྕࠊศ㔝࠾ࡼࡧ㸦㸧ෆ࡟submission ࡢᩘࢆ♧ࡍࠋ16. Architecture, Built Environment and Planning (142)ࠊ17. Geography, Environmental Studies and Archaeology (235)ࠊ18. Economics and Econometrics (98)ࠊ19. Business and Management Studies (411)ࠊ20. Law (216)ࠊ21. Politics and International Studies (166)ࠊ22. Social Work and Social Policy (187)ࠊ23 . Sociology (97)ࠊ24. Anthropology and Development Studies (80)ࠊ25. Education (215)ࠊ26. Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and

Tourism(122)࡛࠶ࡿࠋࣅࢪࢿࢫศ㔝ࡢ submission ᩘࡀᅽಽⓗ࡟ከࡃࡇࡢศ㔝ࡢ◊✲ࡀⱥᅜࡢከࡃࡢ኱Ꮫ ࡛⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀศ࠿ࡿࠋ

 ࡲࡓேᩥ⛉Ꮫศ㔝Panel D࡟ࡣࠊ඲㒊࡛9ࡢUoAࡀ࠶ࡾ1617௳ࡢsubmissionࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡑࡢෆヂࡣ௨ୗ ࡢ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ27. Area Studies (69)ࠊ28. Modern Languages and Linguistics (190)ࠊ29. English Language and Literature (281)ࠊ30. History (263)ࠊ31. Classics (59)ࠊ32. Philosophy (98)ࠊ33. Theology and Religious Studies (75)ࠊ34. Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory (231)ࠊ35. Music, Drama, Dance and Performing Arts (194) ࠊ 36. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management (159)࡛࠶ࡾࠊࡇࡇ࡛ࡣᩥᏛࠊṔྐࠊⱁ⾡࡟㛵ࡍࡿsubmission㟿ሯ⮩ሧሶቋሯ⒕ሮቮᇭ Table 1࡟Panel C㸦♫఍⛉Ꮫศ 㔝㸧ࡢ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࡢ≉ᚩࢆ♧ ࡍࠋ⌮ᕤᏛศ㔝ࡸ⏕࿨⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡜ ␗࡞ࡿ≉ᚩࡣࠊ୺࡞ࡿ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵ ࢺࡣࠊ඲య࡜ࡋ࡚Ꮫ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼࣝ ࡛࠶ࡾࡑࡢ๭ྜࡣ81㸣࡛᭱኱࠶ ࡿࡀࠊⴭ᭩ࡸᮏࡢ❶ࡢᇳ➹ࡶࡑࢀ ࡒࢀ8.2%ࠊ7.1%⛬ᗘࢆ༨ࡵࡿࠋ  ⤒῭Ꮫศ㔝(UoA18)࡛ࡣᏛ⾡ࢪ ࣮ࣕࢼࣝࡀ91㸣ࢆ༨ࡵࡿࡢ࡟ᑐ ࡋ࡚ࠊ≉࡟ἲᏛ_{(UoA20)ࡸᨻ἞Ꮫ} (UoA21)࡜࡞ࡿ࡜Ꮫ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼࣝ ࡢ๭ྜࡣࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀ_{61㸣࡜70㸣ࡲ} ࡛ୗࡾࠊ཯ᑐ࡟ⴭ᭩ࡸᮏࡢ❶ࡢᇳ ➹ࡢ๭ྜࡀ㧗ࡃ࡞ࡾࠊࡑࢀࡒࢀἲ Ꮫ࡛17%࡜21%ࠊ ᨻ἞Ꮫ࡛19%, 16%࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀศ࠿ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓ≉࡟࢜ࢵࢡࢫࣇ࢛࣮ࢻ኱ Ꮫ࡜ࢣࣥࣈࣜࢵࢪ኱Ꮫࡢ୧኱Ꮫ ࡛ࡣࠊྜࢃࡏ࡚⤒῭Ꮫศ㔝࡛ࡣࠊ Ꮫ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼࣝ㸦_{89%㸧ࠊⴭ᭩} 㸦1%㸧ࠊ❶ᇳ➹㸦2%㸧࡛࠶ࡾࠊ ἲ Ꮫ ศ 㔝 ࡛ ࡣ Ꮫ ⾡ ࢪ ࣕ ࣮ ࢼ ࣝ (57%)ࠊⴭ᭩㸦15%㸧ࠊ❶ᇳ➹㸦27%㸧 ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊⴭ᭩ࡸᮏࡢ❶ࡢᇳ ➹ࡢ๭ྜࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ୍᪉ Table 2 ࡟ࡣ Panel D㸦ே ᩥ⛉Ꮫศ㔝㸧ࡢ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࡢ ✀㢮࡜ᩘࢆ♧ࡍࠋ඲య࡛19,796 ௳࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊከ࠸㡰࡟Ꮫ⾡ࢪࣕ ࣮ࢼࣝࡀ75%ࠊᮏࡢ❶ᇳ➹ࡀ 46%ࠊⴭ᭩ࡀ 43%࡛࠶ࡿࠋṔྐ Ꮫ㸦UoA30㸧࡛ࡣࠊᏛ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕ ࢼࣝࡀ39%ࠊⴭ᭩ࡀ 32%ࠊᮏࡢ ❶ᇳ➹ࡀ23%࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓⱁ⾡ ࠾ࡼࡧࢹࢨ࢖ࣥ㸦_UoA34㸧࡛ ࡣࠊᏛ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼࣝࡀ28%ࠊⴭ ᭩ࡀ_{11%ࠊᮏࡢ❶ᇳ➹ࡀ 18%ࠊ} ᒎ♧ࡀ19㸣ࠊࡉࡽ࡟㡢ᴦ࣭₇ ๻࣭⯙㋀࡞࡝ _{(UoA35)࡛ࡣᏛ⾡} ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼࣝࡀ31%ࠊⴭ᭩ࡀ 15%ࠊ❶ᇳ➹ࡀ 20%ࠊస᭤ࡀ 16㸣࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡟ேᩥ⛉ Ꮫࡢ୰࡛ࡣࠊࡑࡢ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺ

 Table 1: Number and types of research outputs of Panel C㻌

Valueࡣ୧⪅ࡢ✚ࢆ⾲ࡍࠋValueࡣ௒ᅇศᯒࡢࡓࡵ࡟ᑟධࡋࡓᣦᶆ࡛㉁࣭㔞࡜ࡶ࡟኱ࡁ࡞࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࢆⓎ᥹ ࡋࡓࡇ࡜ࡀ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦㉥Ꮠࡣ≉࡟ඃࢀࡓ኱Ꮫࡢࣘࢽࢵࢺࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠶ࡿ㸧ࠋ

 ࡞࠾୺せ10኱Ꮫࡣேᩥ♫఍Ꮫศ㔝࡟࠾࠸࡚⥲ྜⓗ࡟ຊࡀ࠶ࡿ኱Ꮫ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊᆅᇦᛶࡸ≉Ⰽࡢ࠶ࡿ኱Ꮫ ࢆຍ࠼࡚࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ⾲ࢆぢࡿ࡜London School of Economics and Political Scienceࡀ⤒῭ᏛࡸἲᏛ࡛኱ࡁ ࡞ຊࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ୍᪉࡛ࠊOxford኱Ꮫࡣ୓㐢↓ࡃຊࢆⓎ᥹ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊEdingburgh኱Ꮫࡶ≉Ⰽࡢ࠶ࡿ࢖ࣥࣃ ࢡࢺࢆⓎ᥹ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀศ࠿ࡿࠋ

4. ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺ๰ฟࡢ஦౛/ Case studies for creation of impacts

ୖ㏙ࡢ㏻ࡾ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡜ேᩥ⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡛ࡣࠊ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢཬࡰࡍ㡿ᇦ࡟኱ࡁ࡞㐪࠸ࡀ࠶࠶ࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟ࠊ ྠࡌศ㔝࡛ࡶᏛ⾡ศ㔝࡟ࡼࡗ࡚኱ࡁ࡞㐪࠸ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡀཬࡰࡍ኱ࡁ࡞㡿ᇦ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ⤒῭Ꮫศ㔝 (UoA18)࡛ࡣ⤒῭(51௳)ࠊᨻ἞(28௳)ࠊ♫఍(10௳)ࠊἲᏛศ㔝(UoA20)࡛ࡣἲᚊ(119௳)ࠊ♫఍(48௳)ࠊᨻ἞ 㸦35௳㸧ࠊṔྐᏛศ㔝(UoA30)࡛ࡣᩥ໬(147௳)ࠊ♫఍(99௳)ࠊᨻ἞(2௳)ࠊⱁ⾡࡜ࢹࢨ࢖ࣥศ㔝(UoA34)࡛ ࡣࠊᩥ໬_{(147௳)ࠊ♫఍(99௳)ࠊᨻ἞(2௳)࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ}  ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊᑐ㇟㸲ศ㔝ࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢ஦౛⥲ᩘ㸦808௳㸧ࢆㄪ࡭ࠊ≉࡟ୖ఩ࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺ㡿ᇦࡀ኱ ࡁ࠸⤒῭ࠊᨻ἞ࠊ♫఍ࠊᩥ໬࡬ࡢ஦౛ࢆྲྀࡾୖࡆࠊ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢෆᐜ࠾ࡼࡧ๰ฟࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ≉ᚩⓗ࡞௨ ୗࡢ஦౛ࢆ㑅ᢥࡋࡓࠋ௨ୗ࡟ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢศ㔝஦౛ࡢ࠺ࡕᑐ㇟࡜࡞ࡿ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺ㡿ᇦࡀࡑࢀࡒࢀ㐪࠺୍ࡘ ࡎࡘࡢ஦౛ࡢᴫ␎ࢆ⤂௓ࡍࡿࠋ

4. 1 ⤒῭Ꮫ࠾ࡼࡧィ㔞⤒῭Ꮫ / Economics and Econometrics

 ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺᑐ㇟㡿ᇦ㸸⤒῭ / Economic

(1) ࢱ࢖ࢺࣝ㸸බⓗ㒊㛛࡜Ẹ㛫㒊㛛࡟࠾ࡅࡿࣔࢹࣜࣥࢢ࡜ண ᨵၿ

Improving modelling and forecasting in the public and private sectors

(2) ᐇ᪋኱Ꮫ㸸University of Oxford

(3) ෆᐜ㸸ᮏ◊✲࡛㛤Ⓨࡉࢀࡓ୍㐃ࡢィ㔞⤒῭Ꮫⓗ᪉ἲ࡜ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ࡣࠊᨻᗓᶵ㛵ࠊᅜ㝿ᶵ㛵࠾ࡼࡧ

ᗈ⠊ᅖࡢࣅࢪࢿࢫ࡛ᶆ‽࡜ࡋ࡚᥇⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏᡭἲࡣከḟඖᵓ㐀ࢩࣇࢺ࡟ᑐᛂࡍࡿ㧗ḟඖ࡛

Table 4: Characteristic cases of impact creation for humanities and social Sciences

㐍໬ࡍࡿ⤒῭ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆࣔࢹࣝ໬ࡋ࡚ண ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟タィࡉࢀࠊ㛤Ⓨࡉࢀࡓィ㔞⤒῭ⓗࢯࣇࢺ࢘ ࢙࢔㸦PcGive㸧ࡣ᭱Ⰻ஦౛⤖ᯝᡭ㡰ࢆᥦ౪ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ (4) ලయⓗຠᯝ࡜๰ฟࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸸 PcGive ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ࡣ࢖ࣥࢢࣛࣥࢻ㖟⾜ࠊ㐃㑥‽ഛไᗘ⌮஦఍ࠊᅜ 㝿㏻㈌ᇶ㔠㸦IMF㸧ࠊୡ⏺㖟⾜ࠊ୰⡿㛤Ⓨ㖟⾜࠾ࡼࡧከࡃࡢḢᕞ୰ኸ㖟⾜࡛฼⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ࡢၟᴗ໬ࡢᡂຌࡣࠊ࢜ࢵࢡࢫࣇ࢛࣮ࢻࢳ࣮࣒࡟ࡼࡗ࡚タィࡉࢀࡓ㢳ᐈ୰ᚰࡢᗈ⠊࡞ ࢺ࣮ࣞࢽࣥࢢࢥ࣮ࢫࡢᥦ౪࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᨭ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋIMFࠊ୰ኸ㖟⾜㸦2009 ᖺ㸧ࠊࣈࣛࢪࣝࠊḢ ᕞ୰ኸ㖟⾜➼࡛ᐃᮇⓗ࡟カ⦎ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ⌧ᅾPcGive ࡣୡ⏺ࡢ᭱ඛ➃ࡢィ㔞⤒῭Ꮫᡭἲࡢ୍ࡘ࡜⪃ ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ 4.2 㽤ⷵ /DZ ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺᑐ㇟㡿ᇦ㸸ᨻ἞ / Political (1) ࢱ࢖ࢺࣝ㸸EU ඲యࡢ㟁Ẽ㏻ಙᕷሙつไࡢㄪᩚ

Improving the co-ordinated regulation of telecoms markets across the EU

(2) ᐇ᪋኱Ꮫ㸸University of Bristol (3) ෆᐜ㸸ᮏ◊✲ࡣEU඲య࡟┤᥋ᙳ㡪ࢆ୚࠼ࡓ㏻ಙつไ࡟㛵ࡍࡿࡶࡢࠋḢᕞ㟁Ꮚ㏻ಙつไᙜᒁ㸦BEREC㸧 ࡢయไ࡜ࡑࡢᐇ㉁ⓗ࡞ᨵ㠉ࢆࡶࡓࡽࡋࡓࠋEU ጤဨ఍ࠊḢᕞ㆟఍ࠊຍ┕ᅜ㛫ࡢᑐヰᙧᡂࠋEU ㆟఍ࡢ ሗ࿌᭩࡟ᙳ㡪ࢆ୚࠼ࠊBEREC ࡜ࡑࡢ஦ົᡤ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ⤌⧊㛫ࡢᅽຊࡢཎືຊ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ (4) ලయⓗຠᯝ࡜๰ฟࣉࣟࢭࢫ: BEREC ࡜ࡑࡢ㛵㐃஦ົᡤࡣࠊEU ຍ┕ᅜ 28 ࢝ᅜࡍ࡭࡚ࡢ㟁Ẽ㏻ಙᕷ ሙ࡟࠾ࡅࡿつไୖࡢពᛮỴᐃࢆ᳨ウࡍࡿ㈐௵ࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ_{Bristol ኱Ꮫࡢ◊✲⪅ࡣ EU ጤဨ఍࠿ࡽ EU 㟁} Ẽ㏻ಙつไᯟ⤌ࡳࠊBEREC ࡢᶵ⬟࡟㛵ࡍࡿ࢞ࣂࢼࣥࢫ㠃ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡼ࠺ồࡵࡽࢀࡓࠋࡇࡢሗ࿌᭩ ࡀ඲㠃ⓗ࡟ྲྀࡾୖࡆࡽࢀᡭ⥆ࡁࡀྜ⌮ⓗ࡟ᡂຌࡋࠊEU ඲య࡛ࡼࡾ୍㈏ࡋࡓつไ࡟ࡘ࡞ࡀࡗࡓ࡜⤖ ㄽ࡙ࡅࡽࢀࡓࠋᮏ◊✲ࡣEU ጤဨ఍࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ฟ∧ࡉࢀࠊ◊✲⪅ࡽࡢලయⓗ࡞㈉⊩࡟ࡣᨵ㠉ࡢࡓࡵࡢ ᥎ዡ஦㡯ࡀྵࡲࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡑࢀࡣBEREC ࡢᡭ㡰ࢆ౑⏝ࡍࡿ᪉ἲ࡟┤᥋ᙳ㡪ࢆ୚࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ  4.3 㸃⚁ⷵ +LVWRU\ ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺᑐ㇟㡿ᇦ㸸ᩥ໬ / Cultural (1) ࢱ࢖ࢺࣝ㸸࣐ࢢࢼ࣭࢝ࣝࢱ࠿ࡽ㆟఍ᅜᐙ࡬: ࣮࣊ࣥࣜ3 ୡ᫬௦ࡢ㈈ົグ㘓

From Magna Carta to the Parliamentary State: the fine rolls of King Henry III

(2) ᐇ᪋኱Ꮫ㸸King's College London

(3) ෆᐜ㸸ⱥᅜ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ 13 ୡ⣖ࡢ࣐ࢢࢼ࣭࢝ࣝࢱ࠿ࡽ㆟఍ᅜᐙ࡬ࡢṔྐࡢ୰࡛ࠊ࣮࣊ࣥࣜ3 ୡ἞ୡࡢ㈈ ົグ㘓ࡢ⭾኱࡞ㄪᰝ◊✲ࡀᐇ᪋ࡉࢀࡓࠋࡇࡢ◊✲ᡂᯝࡀ࢙࢘ࣈࢧ࢖ࢺୖ࡛⮬⏤࡟฼⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡟ ࡞ࡾࠊ࣐ࢢࢼ࢝ࣝࢱ࡟ᑐࡍࡿᅜẸࡢ⌮ゎ࡟኱ࡁࡃ㈉⊩ࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓ2015 ᖺࡢ 800 ᖺ⚍࡟ࡣከࡃࡢ࢔ ࢪ࢙ࣥࢲᙧᡂ࡟㈉⊩ࡋࡓࠋᮏ◊✲ࡣᚑ᮶୙ྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㐣ཤࡢṔྐ࡜ࡢ⤖ྜᡭἲࢆᥦ౪ࡋࡓࠋ (4) ලయⓗຠᯝ࡜๰ฟࣉࣟࢭࢫ: ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡣ࣮࣊ࣥࣜ_{3 ୡࡢ἞ୡࡢࡍ࡭࡚ࡢ 66 ࡢ஦ົグ㘓ࢆࠊ㈨ᩱ} ࡢᢏ⾡ⓗㄢ㢟ࢆඞ᭹ࡋ࡚ⱥㄒ࡟⩻ヂࡋࡓࠋ㈈ົグ㘓ࡢㄪᰝࡣ⣙_{200 ୓ㄒ࡟㐩ࡋࠊ⣙ 30,000 ࡢሙᡤ࡜} 35,000 ே㸦16㸣ࡀዪᛶ㸧ࡢᙧែࢆグ㘓ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏ◊✲ᡂᯝࡣࠊ࢙࢘ࣈࢧ࢖ࢺୖ࡛㟁Ꮚⓗ࡟᳨⣴ྍ ⬟࡟ࡉࢀࠊ」ᩘᙧᘧࡢศᯒࡀྍ⬟࡜࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇࢀࡲ࡛࡟ᩘ㐌㛫࠿࠿ࡗ࡚࠸ࡓ◊✲ࡣࠊᩘศ࡛࡟▷⦰ ࡉࢀࡓࠋࡇࡢඛ㥑ⓗ࡞᪉ἲ࡛ࣜࢯ࣮ࢫࡀࣟࢵࢡࡉࢀࠊࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࢳ࣮࣒ࡣ࣮࣊ࣥࣜ_{3 ୡࡢ἞ୡୗ} ࡛⨩㔠ࡢ౯್ࡀⴭࡋࡃపୗࡋࡓࡇ࡜ࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡋࡓࠋ2012 ᖺ 6 ᭶࠿ࡽ 2013 ᖺ 6 ᭶ࡢ㛫࡟ࠊእ㒊ࣘ ࣮ࢨ࣮ࡀᮏ◊✲࢙࢘ࣈࢧ࢖ࢺࢆ22,931 ᅇゼၥࡋࠊ࢙࢘ࣈ࣮࣌ࢪࡀ 102,191 ᅇぢࡽࢀࡓࠋࡇࡢࣉࣟ ࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡣࠊ࣐ࢢࢼ࣭࢝ࣝࢱࡢ㔜せᛶࢆ෌ゎ㔘ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢ㔜せ࡞᝟ሗ※࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 4.4



Critical Design and its impact on design and the public understanding of science

(2) ᐇ᪋኱Ꮫ㸸Royal College of Art

(3) ෆᐜ㸸1997 ᖺ௨᮶ DunneࠊRaby ࡽࡣࠊ୺せ࡞ࢹࢨ࢖ࣥᒎ♧ࠊ఍㆟ࠊ௻ᴗ࡜ࡢᑓ㛛ᐙ࡟ࡼࡿࢥࣛ࣎

ࢡࢩࣙࣥ࡬ࡢ⤌ࡳ㎸ࡳࢆ㏻ࡌ࡚ࠊ⛉Ꮫᢏ⾡ࡢ୺࡞ㄢ㢟࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢᅜẸࡢ⌮ゎࢆ㧗ࡵࠊᩥ໬ⓗ⏕ά࡟ ᙳ㡪ࢆ୚࠼࡚ࡁࡓࠋ⌧ᅾࢡࣜࢸ࢕࢝ࣝࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࡣୡ⏺୰࡛᪂ࡓ࡞ືࡁࢆཬࡰࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ

(4) ලయⓗຠᯝ࡜๰ฟࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸸ࢡࣜࢸ࢕࣭࢝ࣝࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࡣࠊ⛉Ꮫ࡜ࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࡢ᥋Ⅼ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ୍⯡ࡢ⌮

ゎࢆ㧗ࡵࠊ᪂ࡋ࠸ࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࡢ࢔ࣉ࣮ࣟࢳࢆᑟධࡋࡓࠋ2008 ᖺ࡟ MoMA㸦Museum Of Modern Art㸧

ࡣࠊࠕ_{Design and Elastic Mindࠖᒎ♧఍ࡀᐇ᪋ࡉࢀࠊୡ⏺୰࠿ࡽ 50 ୓ே௨ୖࡢேࠎࡀ᮶ゼࠋ᪂⪺ࠊ}

ᨺ㏦ࠊ_{TV ࡞࡝୺せ࣓ࢹ࢕࢔࡛ࡶㄆࡵࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ༤≀㤋ᒎ♧ࡸ༤≀㤋ࢥࣞࢡࢩࣙࣥ࡬ࡢ⤌ࡳ㎸ࡳ}

ࢆ㏻ࡌ࡚ࠊ⛉Ꮫᢏ⾡࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ࡶࡓࡽࡉࢀࡿ୺せ࡞ㄢ㢟୍⯡ⓗ⌮ゎࢆ㧗ࡵࡓࠋ_{2010 ᖺ࡟ⱥᅜ㈨㔠ᥦ}

౪ᶵ㛵㸦EPSRC ࡜ Nesta㸧ࡣࠊ◊✲ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡟ࢡࣜࢸ࢕࢝ࣝࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࢆ㐺⏝ࡋࡓタィᥦ᱌ࢆ

RCA ࡟ጤクࡋࡓࠋ

5㸬⪃ᐹ࡜ࡲ࡜ࡵ / Discussion and Conclusion

 REF ࡢホ౯ࣃࢿࣝࡣࠊୖ఩ࡢ 4 ࡘࡢ Main Panel ࡢ Chair 4 ྡࠊ36 ྡࡢྛ Main Panel ホ౯ጤဨࠊ1052 ྡࡢSub-panel ホ౯ጤဨ㸦ᖹᆒ⣙ 30 ྡ/ Sub-panel㸹ෆヂࡣ 77%ࡀ࢔࢝ࢹ࣑࢔ጤဨࠊ23%ࡀ࣮ࣘࢨ࣮ഃጤ ဨ㸧࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࠊ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࠊ◊✲⎔ቃࡢࡍ࡭࡚ࡢホ౯ࢆࣆ࢔ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟Pane 㛫ࡢホⅬࡢᆒ⾮ㄪᩚࡶ⾜࠺ࠋ  ୍᪉ࠊேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ◊✲࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺ࡟㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣࠊ➨_{2 ❶࡟♧ࡋࡓࡼ࠺࡟ᴟࡵ࡚ከᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ} ⏕࿨⛉Ꮫࡸ⌮ᕤᏛ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺࡣ 90%௨ୖࡀᏛ⾡ࢪ࣮ࣕࢼ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿࡢ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊᮏศ㔝࡛ࡣⴭ ᭩ࡸᮏࡢ❶➼ࡀከࡃ࠶ࡾࠊࡉࡽ࡟ࡣᒎ♧ࡸస᭤࡞࡝ࡶ࠶ࡿࠋὀ┠ࡍ࡭ࡁࡣ࡝ࡢࡼ࠺࡞࢔࢘ࢺࣉࢵࢺ࡛࠶ࡗ ࡚ࡶࡋࡗ࠿ࡾࡋࡓホ౯ࡀ࡞ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ඲࡚ୖグࡢࡼ࠺࡞ホ౯ࣃࢿࣝ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࣆ࢔ࣞ ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗࡢ௙⤌ࡳࡀసࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡿࠋ㏆ᖺࠊㄽᩥᩘࡸㄽᩥ⿕ᘬ⏝ᩘ➼ࡢィ㔞᭩ㄅᏛⓗᡭἲ࡟ࡼࡗ ࡚◊✲ホ౯ࢆ⾜࠸኱Ꮫࢆࣛࣥࢡࡍࡿᡭἲࡀὶ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫศ㔝࡟ࡣ㥆ᰁࡲ࡞࠸ࡇ࡜ࡀศ ࠿ࡿࠋ  ௚᪉ࠊேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡣࡉࡽ࡟ከᙬ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⤒῭Ꮫ࠾ࡼࡧἲᏛࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺ஦౛࡛ぢ ࡽࢀࡓࡼ࠺࡟ࠊ◊✲⪅⮬ࡽࡢᏛ⾡◊✲ࡢᇶ┙ࡢୖ࡟ᴟࡵ࡚ᐇ㝿ⓗ࡞♫఍ⓗㄢ㢟㸦⤒῭ண ࠊḢᕞ㟁Ẽ㏻ಙ つไ㸧࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࢇ࡛᭷⏝࡞⤖ᯝࢆฟࡋࠊࡑࢀࢆᐇ㝿࡟ᨻᗓࠊᅜ㝿ᶵ㛵ࠊࣅࢪࢿࢫࡢሙ࡛฼⏝ࡉࢀࡿࡼ࠺࡟ ࡋࡓࡇ࡜࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ◊✲⪅ࡢ◊✲ㄢ㢟࡜♫఍ࡢ࡟㛵ࡍࡿᩄឤᛶ(Alertness)ࡀ኱ࡁ࡞ᙺ๭ࢆᯝࡓࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࡉࡽ࡟ࡑࢀࢆᐇ㝿࡟ᐇ⏝࡟౪ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟ࡣPcGive ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ࡢࢺ࣮ࣞࢽࣥࢢࢥ࣮ࢫࡢᐇ㊶ ࡸḢᕞ㆟఍➼࡛ࡢ࡞࡝࣮࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉ㛤ദ࡞࡝ࠊᬑཬດຊࢆᝰࡋࡲ࡞࠸ࡢࡶ≉ᚩ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ  ேᩥ⛉Ꮫ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊṔྐᏛ࡟࠾࠸࡚13 ୡ⣖ࡢ࣐ࢢࢼ࢝ࣝࢱ࡟㛵㐃ࡋࡓグ㘓ࢆヲ⣽࡟ㄪᰝࡋ࡚ࠊࡑ ࡢᡂᯝࢆᅜẸࡸᾏእࡢேࠎࡀᐜ᫆࡟㈨ᩱࢆ฼⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡟ࡍࡿ࡞࡝ࠊ༢࡟Ṕྐ◊✲ࡢࡳ࡟⤊ࢃࡽࡎࠊ 㐣ཤࡢ஦㇟ࡢ⌧௦ព⩏ࢆᥗࡴດຊࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓⱁ⾡࡜ࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࡢศ㔝࡛ࡢࢡࣜࢸ࢕࣭࢝ࣝࢹࢨ࢖ ࣥ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡶྛᆅࡢ⨾⾡㤋࡛ᒎ♧఍ࢆ⾜࠺࡞࡝ᬑཬࡢດຊࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࡣ≉➹࡟್ࡍࡿࠋ  ேᩥ♫఍⛉Ꮫ࡟࠶ࡗ࡚ࡣࠊ⮬↛⛉Ꮫ⣔ࡢ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢ኱༙ࡀ௻ᴗࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚ᕷሙ࡟ฟࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡗ࡚♫ ఍࡟ᬑཬࡍࡿࡢ࡜ࡣ␗࡞ࡾࠊከᵝ࡞ࢫࢸ࣮ࢡ࣍ࣝࢲ࣮㸦ᨻᗓࠊࢥ࣑ࣗࢽࢸ࢖࣮ࠊᏛᰯࠊ࢖ࣥࢱ࣮ࢿࢵ ࢺࠊ⑓㝔ࠊ௻ᴗ㸧࡜ࡢ┦஫స⏝ࡀᚲせ࡜࡞ࡿࠋ௒ᚋࠊᡃࡀᅜࡢࡇࡢศ㔝ࡢ࢔࢝ࢹ࣑࢔ࡀ⏕ࡳฟࡍ࢖ࣥࣃ ࢡࢺ࡟࡜ࡗ࡚ࡶᴟࡵ࡚ཧ⪃࡜࡞ࡿᡂᯝ࡜ゝ࠼ࡼ࠺ࠋ ࠙ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩ࠚ [1] REF ࡢ࢙࢘ࣈࢧ࢖ࢺ㸸http://www.ref.ac.uk/ [2]ᑠᯘ┤ேࠊᓥᒸᮍ᮶Ꮚࠊ୸ᒣᾈᖹ㸸ࠕⱥᅜࡢ᪂ࡓ࡞኱Ꮫ◊✲ホ౯ REF ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢖ࣥࣃࢡࢺࡢศ ᯒࠖࠊhttps://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10119/13248/1/kouen30_154.pdf㸬

[3]ᓥᒸᮍ᮶Ꮚࠊᑠᯘ┤ேࠊྂ㈡ᗣஅࠊLily YuࠊJohn Higginson㸸

ࠕ

https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10119/14039/1/kouen31_186.pdf

[4]ᑠᯘ┤ேࠊᓥᒸᮍ᮶Ꮚࠊྂ㈡ᗣஅࠊLily YuࠊJohn Higginson㸸

ࠕ

https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10119/13901/1/kouen31_180.pdf

[5]͆The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact”, king’s College London and Digital Science, March 2015, http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute/publications/Analysis-of-REF-impact.pdf