• 検索結果がありません。

The Printed Book and Electronic Book (Ebook) Experiences of Digital Natives in Indonesia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "The Printed Book and Electronic Book (Ebook) Experiences of Digital Natives in Indonesia"

Copied!
13
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

第 55 卷 第 6 期

2020 年 12 月

JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY

Vol. 55 No. 6

Dec. 2020

ISSN: 0258-2724 DOI:10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.6.17

Research article

Social Sciences

T

HE

P

RINTED

B

OOK AND

E

LECTRONIC

B

OOK

(E

BOOK

)

E

XPERIENCES OF

D

IGITAL

N

ATIVES IN

I

NDONESIA

印尼数字母语人士的印刷书籍和电子书籍(电子书)体验

Dyah Puspitasari Srirahayu a, b, *, Gancar Candra Premananto c

a Library Study Program, Faculty of Vocational Study, Universitas Airlangga Indonesia

Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan 28-30, Surabaya, Indonesia

b Doctoral Student at Management Science, Faculty of Economy and Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga Indonesia

Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan 28-30, Surabaya, Indonesia

c

Department of Management Science, Faculty of Economy and Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga Indonesia Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan 28-30, Surabaya, Indonesia, [email protected]

Received: June 18, 2020 ▪ Review: September 6, 2020 ▪ Accepted: October 3, 2020

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Abstract

Information about the use of ebook or printed book that use by the digital natives could assist libraries and school professionals in selecting reading materials for their students. The purpose of this study is to understand the experience in using printed books rather than e-books. This study use qualitative and phenomenological study explored and compared the experiences of digital natives in regards to ebooks and printed books. Data collection was carried out through interviews with 26 digital natives in Indonesia with the criteria of reading book more than ebook and at least reading 2 printed books in one month. The result of tis study are printed books have their own uniqueness, such as experience of holding a book, the texture of the paper that can be touched directly (each publisher has a different type of paper), to the fragrance of the book that wafts out as each page is opened, none of these can be replaced with digital technology and when the digital natives use e-book they often distracted by social media. Moreover, due to emotional attachments, connections to identity, social rituals, and an ease of use related to printed books, the participants would not use ebooks exclusively. This study has limitations, namely the number of samples is small, so that future research can increase the sample so that the results can be generalized.

Keywords: Preference, Printed Book, E-Book, Experience, Digital Native

摘要 数字本地人使用的有关电子书或印刷书籍的使用信息可以帮助图书馆和学校专业人士为其学

生选择阅读材料。这项研究的目的是了解使用印刷书籍而不是电子书籍的经验。本研究使用定性 和现象学研究,探索并比较了数字本地人在电子书和印刷书方面的经验。数据收集是通过采访印

(2)

度尼西亚的 26 位数字原生代进行的,其标准是读书要比电子书多,并且至少要在一个月内阅读两 本印刷书籍。研究的结果是印刷书籍有其独特性,例如拿着书的经验,可以直接触摸的纸张的质 地(每个出版商使用不同类型的纸张)以及飘散的书籍的香气。当打开每个页面时,所有这些都 无法用数字技术代替,而当数字本地人使用电子书时,它们通常会被社交媒体分散注意力。此外 ,由于情感上的依恋,与身份的联系,社会礼节以及与印刷书籍相关的易用性,参与者不会只使 用电子书。这项研究有局限性,即样本数量少,因此未来的研究可以增加样本数量,从而可以推 广结果。 关键词: 偏好,印刷书籍,电子书,经验,数字原生

I. I

NTRODUCTION

The development of information technology has impacted various fields of life, including the forms of media and information consumed by the public, where one of them is a book that now have electonic book (e-book). Gardiner and Musto [1] defined them as “books in digital form consisting of text, images, or both that c[ould] be read on a computer or other electronic device.” Ebooks were first created and popularized in the United States [2], and the first text made available in digital form was the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America; it was followed by the country’s Bill of Rights. This digitization was by Michael Hart in 1971 for Project Gutenberg, which aimed to provide books that are cheaper and easy to use to the public. Originally, Project Gutenberg’s goal was to have 10,000 books available to consumers in electronic format by 2001 [2]. By August 31, 2010, it had surpassed 37,500 titles, had made plans to provide 40,000 books to the public, and would continue to grow [2].

Several studies found that some students choose ebooks over printed books for learning activities such as Buckley and Johnson [3] and also Khalid [4]. Khalid [4] also found that the majority of ebook purchases by students were caused by the mandates of teachers.

In regards to book formats used in the United States from 1994 to 2004, some readers preferred print [9]. Liu [5] found that some consumers printed digital articles in order to feel more comfortable when reading them, and Leibowitz [6] noted that sales of printed, or traditional, books rose about 5% in the United States in 2016, while ebook sales fell about 17%. An initiative by the Pew Research Center, called the Internet and American Life Project, showed that although ebooks and numbers of ebook readers had increased, ebooks were not in a position to replace printed books [7], [8]. Later, the Pew Research Center found that among adolescents surveyed in the United States, printed books

(65%) were more popular than ebooks (25%). The study also showed a decrease in ebook use due to the introduction of audiobooks, which were used by one in five people in America [9]; in fact, there was not only a decline in ebook readers but also a decline in ebook sales.

Printed books have remained more popular than ebooks in the Republic of Indonesia as well; Julisar [10] found that digital natives (i.e., people born between 1980 and 2009, when the internet was developed [11]) preferred printed books over ebooks for learning. Santoso, Siswandari, and Sawiji [12] found the same result regarding students in rural areas. However, significant research had not been conducted regarding the reasons digital natives in Indonesia preferred printed books over ebooks This phenomenon creates a problem formulation namely: digital native experience in using printed books rather than e-books.

II. L

ITERATURE

R

EVIEW

Owing to the advances in information and communication technology, there are many innovations in book format, which may impact reading preferences, especially for younger readers who may substitute printed books by electronic books, also known as e-books [13].

According to the Indonesian Language

Dictionary, “preference is defined as a tendency / choice / priority to choose something that is emotionally preferred”. Preference can also be interpreted as an evaluative assessment by making comparisons on other similar objects, so can describe the benefits obtained after making a choice.

Even though those reading printed books are typically referred to as “readers,” as e-books are accessed through electronic media, they are often denoted as “users.” Thus, their use preferences play a role in determining the types of products they will purchase. According to Grimm [14], customer preferences are influenced by attribute perceptions, affective responses and personality

(3)

congruence. Affective response reflects consumers' feelings towards the product.

These factors are pertinent to the present study, as they affect book reading behavior, given that e-books may provide a different user experience from that offered by printed books [15].

III. R

ESEARCH

M

ETHOD

The aim of this qualitative study based on the descriptive phenomenological method was to gain an in-depth understanding of the digital native generation’s reading preferences [16], [17].

The informants for this study were selected by purposive sampling, as the aim was to choose digital natives who actively read books (i.e., typically complete at least one printed book and one e-book per month and understand their content). Based on these inclusion criteria, 26 participants were chosen to take part in a semi-structured interview. Prior to commencing the study, all participants signed the confidentiality

agreement. Moreover, even though each

interview was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, no identifying information was used.

Data processing and data analysis was conducted using the three-tier approach described by Corley and Gioia [18], resulting in (1) First Order Concepts, whereby raw data was transformed into sentences that are easy to understand; (2) Second Order Themes, whereby categories were created by labelling similar concepts; and (3) Aggregate Dimensions, which required grouping the previously generated themes into narrower dimensions. These coding results were interpreted and analyzed based on the findings reported in pertinent literature.

IV. R

ESULTS AND

D

ISCUSSION

The study sample comprised of 26 informants (22 females and 4 males) aged 18−30 years, with the mean age of 20. With respect to their educational background, fifteen participants were pursuing Bachelor’s or Associate's Degree, nine had a Bachelor’s Degree and were working in formal institutions or as freelancers, and the remaining two had Associate's Degree and were working in government and non-government institutions.

A. Experience of Using Printed Books

From Table 1, we can find out the reader experience data in reading printed books. A total of 12 informants stated that the experience of flipping paper and physically touching the book directly is an experience that cannot be obtained from reading an eBook. Whereas 12 informants also stated that the experience of giving notes or small notes using sticky notes was a pleasant experience when reading printed books. And as many as 8 informants also stated that the aroma that emanated from books both new and old books has its own sensation that cannot be felt when reading books in electronic form. Uniquely, one of the informants also mentioned the experience gained when reading a printed book is that it can be used as social media content if there are quotable sentences or readings.

B. The Constraints in Using Printed Books

From the table, it can be seen that the obstacle of reading printed books that has been mostly experienced by informants is that printed books are difficult to carry anywhere. A total of 14 informants stated that thick and heavy printed books make informants feel uncomfortable when carrying printed books. While 13 other informants stated that the obstacle of reading a printed book is a high risk of damage, if the printed book is not cared for properly then the book will be damaged quickly and if left too long the book will change color to slightly yellowish. In addition, printed book can also be damaged because of food and drinks that the informant often bring when reading a book.

About 38% of informants revealed that a number of printed books were found to be difficult to obtain. A total of 9 informants also stated that the obstacle in reading other printed books is the high price. The informant said that to get a printed book, he or she must set aside daily money for several days in advance because the unit price of an original book is often above IDR 80,000,00. The informant also stated that it was more convenient to buy an original book than a pirated book because buying a pirated book is tantamount to killing the author.

Table 1.

Experiences felt when reading a printed book

First order Second order Aggregate

Can be read multiple times (1) Readable (1)

Experience using printed books The experience of opening a newly

purchased plastic book (3)

(4)

Smell its special aroma (10) The sensation when turning the paper (5)

Can create notes in important parts of the book

(12)

Can touch books directly (3) Book as a travel companion (2)

Able to imagine Immersion and escape (2)

Can exchange books with friends

Social Ritual (3) Can lend books

Go to the bookstore

Can be photographed to be used as

social media content Content Social Media (2)

The admiration that arises for the author after reading

Admire the Author (2) Can get an autograph from the

author on the front page of the book

Books can be displayed and added to the collection

home

Ownership and identity (5) Proud of getting a limited-edition

book

Enjoy seeing typography and

compiled content neatly Aesthetics (1)

Comfort when reading books

without obstacles Convenience (1)

The contents of printed book are easy to understand and remember

Easy to understand (5) Reading a printed book feels more

real

First order Second order Aggregate

Big amount of money has been spent to buy a book

Cost (9)

Constraints on Using a Printed Book Have to set aside money to buy a

book

The price is more expensive than an e-book

The access of international books or books / novels in language foreign

Accessibility (1) Sometimes it's not available in the

library, so you have to search on iPusnas.

Availability (10) If the book is sold out, shipping

takes a long time

especially for imported books. Often out of stock: if it's rare, the price will soar.

The bookstore sometimes doesn’t have the stock (hard to find) Must pre order first and the process is rather long

Heavy to carry everywhere Taking up space when going to be taken away

Carrying (14) Less effective if taken while

traveling

Not practical. Taking a lot of places

Taking up a lot of places

Spend space (3) Taking up place while the

bookshelves are full Limited storage for books (constraints room)

(5)

some page to be missing When borrowed it is easy to disappear

Paper can be damaged if stored for a long time

Easily worn if frequently bent Vulnerable to wetness, folded, torn Often become dirty, getting splashes of water, coffee, and tea spills

Sometimes paper and print are not good quality

Legibility (2) Sometimes printed book has a too

big or too small font

First order Second order Aggregate

If reading take too long, it makes the eyes feel hot

Discomfort/difficulty reading from the screen (11)

Constraints using the E-Book Electronic media will make the

eyes tired and dizzy

The style of letters is sometimes less suitable to the eye reader Time constraints can only be about 1-2 hours

Money

Cost (2) Sometimes it's not free

Must continue to subscribe, when we don't subscribe then we can't read the book

Restrictive platforms and licenses (1) It’s difficult to read or to

understand because physical form is not on hand

Legibility (2) The writing is irregular

Often get the pdf that is not pleasing to the eye

The device whose specifications can’t support to open the e-book

Cannot add small notes Annotate (1)

Can't collect books for real Ownership (1)

Sometimes the phone's memory is

not enough to save the e-book Capacity (1)

Not all texts are in e-book format

Availability (3) The desired book is not yet

available digitally or not available due to restrictions from party’s provider for certain countries Not all books have a digital edition Reading e-book in an electronic device making the user to be easily distracted (opening social media and so on)

Distracted (6) Many things can disturb your

reading process such as notification

The lack of focus to understand The difficulty in downloading an e-book due to its download

procedure

Complexity (3) Not all media can be used to access

digital books because of information limitations There are many terms and links that must be fulfilled

Connection

Connection (3) Slow internet connection.

Networks that sometimes must be opened via online

Digital devices that I have are not

(6)

book, I also have to be careful. C. Obstacles in Using eBooks

From the table above, it can be seen that there are obstacles faced by the reader when reading electronic books, or eBooks. Forty-two percent of informants stated that eBooks were not eye-friendly, meaning that the use of electronic media used to open eBooks could interfere with one’s vision or eyes if used for a long time. The side effects of the use of electronic media vary from tiredness and sore eyes, to dizziness. Informants who have visual impairment in the form of myopia (nearsightedness) feel tired more quickly. Some 8% of informants stated that another major eBook obstacle was the payment for a subscription. One informant stated that the eBook would not be accessible if the subscription period had expired even though the file had already been downloaded. Another payment obstacle is the use of credit cards, with informants not having a credit card feel constrained in this regard. As many as 12% of the informants also stated that they have constraints due to the limitations of electronic facilities owned, such as the problem regarding specifications of a device used on a very slow network. Twenty-four percent of informants are also easily distracted when reading digital books, turning aside to watch videos, check social media and other diversions.

D. Experience in Reading Printed Books

According to Korwitts [19], since eBooks exist and are popular, reading activities can be done easily, especially on the sidelines when someone is traveling. Korwitts [19] also states that the reason someone has an eBook rather than a printed book is because they enjoy the ease of eBook readers and the eBook itself can be easily held and fits in the hand, by only supporting eight ounces of weight. With that weight, the e-book device can store more than 1000 e-book titles on the device.

Different from the results of the research explored above, in Nigeria, Okocha [20] found students to prefer e-books to printed books. Research conducted at the Graduate School of Education (GSE) in New York City, shows that students use e-books more, although printed books with the same titles are available. Although e-books are available with unlimited access, the printed version is still in use by students [21]. It should be noted that the use of e-books and printed e-books, in terms of learning, does not affect the understanding of the contents of a book [22]. However, printed books and e-books have unique attributes and serve different

functions to meet people’s needs that may differ depending on an individual’s demographic and contextual and situational factors [7]. The choice of the form of the book media also depends on the attitude of a person [8]. If a person simply wants to browse or scan or just read for a brief period, books on electronic devices are suitable. However, for deeper reading and understanding of the contents, a printed book is chosen [5].

Some people say that reading an e-book is not like reading a printed book because the sensations when reading a printed book, such as the smell of the book, the weight of a book, the feeling when opening the next page, are missing when they read an e-book. In other words, according to Leibowitz [6], an e-book does not provide the same satisfying visual and tactile sensation that the reader gets while reading a physical book. Printed books create an identity and a visible sense of achievement together with a sense of ownership of goods that e-books will not create [23]. According to Hakkinen et al. [45] reading printed books is indeed tiring to the eyes, but reading e-books for more than 20 minutes is more significant or increasingly tiring to the reader's eyes, that is one of the factors that makes printed books still in great demand.

The selection of printed books in digital native circles is also caused by the many experiences they get when reading printed books that they cannot get when reading e-books. Many experiences related to social (social ritual), such as when reading a printed book can exchange books with friends, can borrow books, and go to a bookstore while looking and choosing books to buy, experiences like giving a distinctive impression in their minds. Just as the results of research conducted by Chen & Granitz [23] show that those who prefer printed books is because they put more emphasis on aspects of experience gained from printed books, such as exchanging printed books are considered as rituals that can add to familiarity, print bookstores and the library is considered a pleasant meeting place. Printed books show a sense of ownership of an item and a person's identity and there are visual experiences such as touch and smell and can add depth to the characters in the book, while those who choose electronic books because they emphasize more aspects of the use value provided by electronic books such as access and convenience to reading, convenient to carry everywhere and save storage space, zooming in or zooming out according to the needs of the reader.

(7)

The next experience gained when reading a printed book is emotional attachment. Many digital natives make the emotional attachment experience as the main reason to keep reading printed books, even though e-books provide a lot of ease of access and storage. The emotional attachment experience gained by digital native can be seen in Table 1. Waheed [44] explains that the emotional attachment of an individual towards a printed book (as a product currently used) is considered as a factor influencing the reading process of electronic book readers, which is a barrier for someone in reading a book. This is also reinforced by the results of studies that show that someone does not use e-books because they do not get a sense when holding a book, smell the book, book as self-identity [23], give notes [5], [15], and sharing books with friends as gifts [6].

As we know that digital native are those who are born when the internet is present. According to McCrindle [11], digital native is a generation born in 1995 until 2009. Palfrey & Gasser [24] states that the generation of digital natives is different from the previous generation of digital immigrants. Digital native generation is so familiar with social media [25], they can spend hours in a day when surfing on social media [26]. They can do many things on social media, such as uploading pictures or videos and giving comments to each other [27]. There is an interesting finding from this research, namely reading print books by digital native can be used as material / content for their activities on social media. Digital native photographs the books that are being read, then they upload them on social media accounts.

According to Kouis & Konstantinou [28] e-books can replace printed e-books but not in the near future. It takes a lot of preparation from various parties to be able to maximize the use of e-books. Likewise, according to Kolowich [29] there are some students who easily navigate the e-book interface and the digital tools they use, but there are also some who are still struggling to understand the function of e-book such as creating user accounts, entering access codes, finding pages, make bookmarks, highlighting, and write notes.

E. Obstacles Encountered in Reading Books

From the results of this study, both printed books and e-book costs become one of the obstacles to get both printed book and e-book, especially for students who have a limited budget to buy books [30]. Although e-books are often found free on the internet, they are actually expensive. The results of research conducted by

comparing the prices of printed books and e-books on the same book title result in a conclusion that the price of e-books is much more expensive than printed books [21]. Many choose to spend money to buy printed books rather than e-books. Because after we buy it, the printed book has become our property, while for e-books there are some which are limited by subscriptions, so the price we give is the price for a subscription with a certain amount of time. After the time period expires, we cannot open the e-book.

Legibility is also an obstacle in printed books and e-books. Poor-quality printed books make readability suboptimal. Digital e-books in PDF format may be more difficult to read, and opening the file on different devices may result in irregular writing or visual changes to the text. One thing that is certain is that e-books need tools to read them, and some also require an internet connection to be able to read the text. This connection requirement also becomes an additional obstacle of using e-books. Some people may choose printed books to avoid accessing books requiring internet connectivity [31]. Others may choose to print e-books and then read them on paper [32], to avoid using electronic devices.

Availability is also an obstacle in both book formats. Sometimes printed books are only available in limited printings; if that book has a lot of devotees, readers must wait for production to begin again. Besides the required waiting time, this reprinting will also result in an increase of the book's price. The results of a study conducted by Foasberg [33] explained that due to the limited availability of books in printed form, students increase demands towards the publisher to increase the number of copies. The same also applies to e-books. There are some books that are not available online, or there may be restrictions on a title in certain countries, so accessibility is an obstacle. In addition, there are constraints felt by digital natives when accessing e-books even if they are verfy familiar with digital devices. The obstacles they face when accessing e-books are difficulties in browsing, as there are several steps to download e-books, making it more difficult to obtain them [34]. There are also several printed books in other countries that are difficult to ship to Indonesia. In contrast to the results of this study, Bunkell & Dyas-Correia [35], Kimball, Ives, & Jackson [36] and Taylor [37] stated that e-books are the most accessible source of information and easiest to find from various places.

(8)

Printed books and e-books also have a constraint on durability. Printed books are easily damaged if not handled properly. When reading books, readers may often have drinks or snacks that can accidentally spill onto their books, or they can fold paper to mark the end of the page they are reading. Streaks on the book can also cause books to be easily damaged. Durability is also the second obstacle felt by digital natives [34], [38]. The same thing can happen to the hardware used to read books, as many of these e-readers are not waterproof. E-book files can also be affected by viruses, preventing them from being be opened or read.

A printed book is an item that is physically present so that it has mass. A major disadvantage when use a book is having to carry it, especially when traveling so this is one of the reasons they use e-books. Many people prefer to read e-books for company while they are traveling, because carrying a printed book can be awkward [39]. Printed books have mass, which requires space for storage [40], and this is a further obstacle that is felt by the digital native, namely space spend. E-books have similar constraints in that there is a limitation on storage capacity in e-book readers, mobile phones, and hard drives so that some digital natives also feel constraints related to storage capacity.

The use of e-books appears to have additional problems besides those mentioned above, one of which is discomfort when reading from the screen. There are many complaints from digital natives that reading from the screen makes their eyes tired, hot, and causes dizziness. Digital natives can only manage to do read e-book for a maximum of 2 hours, which is different from when they read a printed book. Many studies have revealed that one of the reasons for choosing printed books over e-books, is that they cannot stand reading for long in front of the screen [41].

One interesting element is the distraction felt by the digital native when using e-books. The distraction that they often experience is the notification that appears when reading e-books. Notifications can come from promotions carried out by the website that is the source of the e-book, or it can be from social media that is installed in our e-book reader media such as WhatsApp notifications, Facebook and so on, which ultimately stops them from focusing on reading, in order to open the notification [42]. Many people claim that they have many difficulties focusing on electronic texts and feel frustrated because they cannot interact with e-books

properly, as they are accustomed to interacting with printed books [33], [43].

V.

C

ONCLUSION

From the digital native’s experience of using printed books, I have reached the conclusion that printed books have their own uniqueness. The experience of holding a book, from the volume of the book that can be seen in plain view, to the texture of the paper that can be touched directly (each publisher has a different type of paper), to the fragrance of the book that wafts out as each page is opened, none of these can be replaced with digital technology. The digital native is willing to wait and pay more to buy printed books, especially the limited edition. The digital native generation does not deny that they also use e-books for schoolwork, or work, or for other reasons; but e-books will not replace printed books, and vice versa. Both will continue to exist and be used by the next generation because they have different characteristics.

R

EFERENCES

[1]

GARDINER, E. and MUSTO, R.G.

(2010) The Electronic Book. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

[2]

MANLEY, L. and HOLLEY, R.

(2012) History of the eBook: The Changing

Face of Books. Technical Services Quarterly,

29, pp. 292-311.

[3]

BUCKLEY, M. and JOHNSON, M.

(2013) The why's and how's of integrating

downloadable academic eBooks. Computers

in Libraries, 33 (1), pp. 9-32.

[4]

KHALID, A. (2014) Text Books:

eBook Vs. print. Journal of Education and

Human Development, 3 (2), pp. 243-258.

[5]

LIU, Z. (2005) Reading behavior in

the

digital

environment.

Journal

of

Documentation, 61 (1), pp. 700-712.

[6]

LEIBOWITZ, G. (2017) 7 Reasons

Why Ebook Sales Are Falling--and Print

Book Sales Are Rising Again. [Online]

Available from:

https://www.inc.com/glenn-

leibowitz/heres-why-anebook-can-never-

live-up-to-joy-of-reading-an-old-fashioned-hardcover.html

[Accessed 23/05/20].

[7]

ZHANG, Y. and KUDVA, S. (2014)

E-books Versus Print Books: Readers’

Choices and Preferences Across Contexts.

(9)

Science and Technology, 65 (8), pp.

1695-1706.

[8]

BERGSTROM, A. and HOGLUND,

L. (2018) E-books: In the shadow of print.

Convergence: The International. Journal of

Research into New Media Technologies, 26

(4), pp. 1-17.

[9]

PERRIN, A. (2019) One-in-five

Americans now listen to audiobooks.

[Online]

Available

from:

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-

tank/2019/09/25/one-in-five-americans-now-listento-audiobooks/

[Accessed 23/05/20].

[10]

JULISAR. (2017) Text-book versus

E-book: Media for learning process in

generation Z. In: Proceedings of the

International Conference on Information

Management and Technology, Yogyakarta,

November 2017. Piscataway, New Jersey:

Institute of Electrical and Electronics

Engineers, pp. 139-143.

[11]

MCCRINDLE, M. (2014) The ABC

of

XYZ:

Understanding

the

Global

Generation. Sydney: McCrindle Research.

[12]

SANTOSO,

T.N.B.

and

SISWANDARI,

S.H.

(2018)

The

effectiveness of eBook versus printed books

in

the rural schools in Indonesia at the

modern learning era. International Journal of

Educational Research Review, 3 (4), pp.

77-84.

[13]

BANDO, R. (2017) Books or

laptops? The effect of shifting from printed

to digital delivery of educational content on

learning. Economics of Education Review, 61,

pp. 162-173.

[14]

GRIMM, P.E. (2005) Ab components

impact on brand preference. Journal of

Business Research, 58 (4), pp. 508-517.

[15]

MILLAR, M. and SCHRIER, T.

(2015) Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which

do Students Prefer and Why? Journal of

Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15 (2), pp.

166-185.

[16]

GHONY, M.D. and ALMANSHUR,

F. (2012) Qualitative Research Methods.

Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

[17]

MOLEONG, L.J. (2007) Metodologi

Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Penerbit PT

Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

[18]

CORLEY, K.G. and GIOIA, D.A.

(2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the

wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative

Science Quarterly, 49 (2), pp. 173-208.

[19]

KORWITTS, K. (n.d.) Print books vs.

e-books: What’s the future of reading?

[Online]

Available

from:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/curiosity/pri

nt-books-vs-e-books-whats-the-future-of-reading/

[Accessed 23/05/20].

[20]

OKOCHA, F.O. (2019) Determinants

of electronic book adoption in Nigeria.

DESIDOC

Journal

of

Library

and

Information Technology, 39 (4), pp. 175-179.

[21]

HAUGH, D. (2016) How do you like

your books: Print or digital? An analysis on

print and e-book usage at the Graduate

School of Education. Journal of Electronic

Resources Librarianship, 28 (4), pp. 254-268.

[22]

AMANDA, J.R., JENNIFER, C.K.C.,

and DAVID, B. (2013) Electronic versus

traditional print textbooks: A comparison

study on the influence of university students’

learning. Computers & Education, 63, pp.

259-266.

[23]

CHEN, S.C. and GRANITZ, N.

(2012) Adoption, rejection, or convergence:

Consumer attitudes toward book digitization.

Journal of Business Research, 65 (8), pp.

1219-1225.

[24]

PALFREY, J. and GASSER, U.

(2008) Born Digital: Understanding the first

generation of Digital Natives. New York:

Basic Books.

[25]

VERCIC, A.K. and VERCIC, D.

(2013) Digital natives and social media.

Public Relations Review, 39 (5), pp. 600-602.

[26]

NIKOU,

S.,

MEZEI,

J.,

and

BRANNBACK, M. (2018) Digital natives’

intention to interact with social media: Value

systems

and

gender.

Telematics

and

Informatics, 35 (2), pp. 421-435.

[27]

FRIEDL, J. and VERCIC, A.T.

(2011) Media preferences of digital natives’

internal communication:

A pilot study.

Public Relations Review, 37 (1), pp. 84-86.

[28]

KOUIS, D. and KONSTANTINOU,

N. (2014) Electronic textbooks advantages

and challenges for the Hellenic higher

education

and

publishing

community.

Library Review, 63 (6/7), pp. 531-543.

[29]

KOLOWICH, S. (2011) Pumping the

e-brakes.

[Online]

Inside

Higher

Ed.

(10)

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/1

2/23/daytona-state-reins-its-pushtoward-etextbooks

[Accessed 23/05/20].

[30]

WOODY, W.D., DANIEL, D.B., and

BAKER, C.A. (2010) E-books or textbooks:

Students prefer textbooks. Computers &

Education, 55, pp. 945-948.

[31]

SHELBURNE, W.A. (2009) E-book

Usage in an Academic Library: User

Attitudes and Behaviors. Library Collections.

Acquisitions & Technical Services, 33 (2/3),

pp. 55-59.

[32]

BRIDDON, J., CHELIN, J., INCE, G.,

REDMAN, J., SLEAT, A., and WILLIAMS,

E. (2009) E-books Are Good If There Are No

Copies Left’: A Survey of E-book Usage at

UWE

Library

Services.

Library

and

Information Research, 3 (104), pp. 45-65.

[33]

FOASBERG, N.M. (2014) Student

Reading Practices in Print and Electronic

Media. CUNY Academic Works, pp. 705-723.

Available

from

http://academicworks.cuny.edu/qc_pubs/10.

[34]

ISMAIL, R. and ZAINAB, A.N.

(2005) The Pattern of E-Book Use Amongst

Undergraduates in Malaysia: A Case of To

Know Is to Use. Malaysian Journal of

Library & Information Science, 10 (2), pp.

1-23.

[35]

BUNKELL, J. and DYAS-CORREIA,

S. (2009) E-Books vs. Print: Which is the

Better Value? The Serials Librarian, 56 (1-4),

pp. 215-219.

[36]

KIMBALL, R., IVES, G., and

JACKSON, K. (2009) Comparative Usage of

Science E-book and Print Collections at

Texas A&M University Libraries. Collection

Management, 35 (1), pp. 15-28.

[37]

TAYLOR, D.M. (2013) Comparison

of Selected e-Books and Equivalent Print

Books: Have Handheld Portable Devices

Increased

Use

in

Three

Aggregated

Resources? Journal of Electronic Resources

in Medical Libraries, 10 (1), pp. 11-24.

[38]

KRETON, S. and NALETELICH, K.

(2016) How e-readers have changed personal

connections with books. Qualitative Market

Research: An International Journal, 19 (4),

pp. 433-452.

[39]

MARSHALL, C.C. and RUOTOLO,

C. (2002) Reading-in-the-Small: A Study of

Reading on Small Form Factor Devices. In:

Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint

Conference on Digital Libraries, Portland,

Oregon, July 2002. New York: Association

for Computing Machinery, pp. 59-60.

[40]

ABDULLAH, N. and GIBB, F.

(2008) Using a Task-Based Approach in

Evaluating the Usability of BoBIs in an

E-book Environment. In: MACDONALD, C.,

OUNIS, I., PLACHOURAS, V., RUTHVEN,

I., and WHITE, R.W. (eds.) Advances in

Information Retrieval. ECIR 2008. Lecture

Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4956.

Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 246-257.

[41]

TOSUN, N. (2014) A study on

reading printed books or e-books: reasons for

student-teacher’s

preferences.

TOJET:

The Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 13 (1), pp. 21-28.

[42]

RAFIQ, S. and WARRAICH, N.F.

(2018) Medical undergraduate students’

perception towards the use and non-use of

e-books: a case from Pakistan. Collection

and Curation, 38 (2), pp. 32-38.

[43]

OLIVEIRA,

S.M.D.

(2012)

E-textbooks usage by students at Andrews

University: A study of attitudes, perceptions,

and behaviors. Library Management, 33 (8/9),

pp. 536-560.

[44]

TAYLOR, P., WAHEED, M., KAUR,

K., AIN, N., and SANNI, S.A. (2015)

Emotional attachment and multidimensional

self-efficacy:

extension

of

innovation

diffusion theory in the context of eBook

reader. Behaviour & Information Technology,

34 (12), pp. 1147-1159.

[45]

HÄKKINEN, J., JÄRVENPÄÄ, T.,

and PÖLÖNEN, M. (2012) Reading e-books

on a nearto-eye display: Comparison between

a small-sized multimedia display and a hard

copy. Displays, 33 (3), pp. 157-167.

[46]

DARMAWAN, H. (2017) Presiden

Jokowi Resmikan Gedung Fasilitas Layanan

Perpustakaan

Nasional

RI.

[Online]

Available

from:

https://www.perpusnas.go.id/news-detail.php?lang=id&id=1709200959580hRjG

CxDMc

[Accessed 20/04/20].

(11)

[1] E. GARDINER 和 R.G. MUSTO 。

(2010)电子书。牛津:牛津大学出版社。

[2] MANLEY , L. 和 HOLLEY , R.

(2012)电子书的历史:书籍的不断变化。

技术服务季刊,29,第 292-311 页。

[3] BUCKLEY , M. 和 JOHNSON , M.

(2013)整合可下载学术电子书的原因和

方式。图书馆中的计算机,33(1),第

9-32页。

[4] KHALID,A。(2014)教科书:电子

书 对 。 打 印 。 教 育 与 人 类 发 展 杂 志 , 3

(2),第 243-258 页。

[5] LIU Z.(2005)在数字环境中的阅读行

为。文件杂志,61(1),第 700-712 页。

[6] LEIBOWITZ,G.(2017)7电子书销

量下降的原因-印刷书销量再次上升。[在

线 ] 可 从 以 下 网 站 获 得 : https :

//www.inc.com/glenn-leibowitz/heres-why-

anebook-can-never-live-up-to-joy-of-reading-an-old-fashioned-hardcover 。 html

[已访问23/05/20]。

[7] ZHANG Y. 和 KUDVA,S.(2014)电

子书与印刷书籍:跨上下文的读者选择和

偏 好 。 信 息 科 学 与 技 术 协 会 学 报 , 65

(8),第 1695-1706 页。

[8] BERGSTROM,A. 和 HOGLUND,L.

(2018)电子书:印刷的阴影。趋同:国

际。新媒体技术研究杂志,26(4),第

1-17 页。

[9] PERRIN,A.(2019)现在,五分之一

的美国人正在听有声读物。 [在线]可从以

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-

tank/2019/09/25/one-in-five-americans-now-listento-audiobooks/ [访问时间20/05/23]。

[10] JULISAR 。 ( 2017 ) 教 科 书 与 电 子

书:Z代学习过程中的媒体。载于:国际

信息管理与技术会议论文集,日惹,2017

年11月。新泽西州皮斯卡塔维:电气与电

子工程师学会,第 139-143 页。

[11] MCCRINDLE,M.(2014)XYZ的美

国广播公司:了解全球一代。悉尼:麦克

林德尔研究。

[12] 桑托索,T.N.B。和 SISWANDARI,

S.H.(2018)在现代学习时代,电子书与

印刷书在印度尼西亚乡村学校中的有效性。

国际教育研究评论杂志,3(4),第

77-84 页。

[13] BANDO,R.(2017)书籍或笔记本

电脑?教育内容从印刷到数字交付对学习

的影响。教育经济学评论,61,第

162-173 页。

[14] GRIMM,P.E.(2005)抗体成分对品

牌偏好的影响。商业研究杂志,58(4),

第 508-517 页。

[15] MILLAR , M. 和 SCHRIER , T.

(2015)数字或印刷教科书:学生偏爱哪

种?为什么? 旅行与旅游教学杂志,15

(2),第 166-185 页。

[16] GHONY,M.D. 和 ALMANSHUR,F.

(2012)定性研究方法。日惹:Ar-Ruzz

媒体。

[17] MOLEONG,L.J.(2007)定性研究

方法论。万隆:出版人PT 罗斯达卡里亚

青年胶印。

[18] CORLEY , K.G 。 和 GIOIA , D.A.

(2004)身份歧义和公司分拆后的变化。

行政科学季刊,49(2),第 173-208 页。

[19] KORWITTS,K。(未注明)印刷书

籍与电子书籍:阅读的未来是什么? [在

线 ] 可 从 以 下 网 站 获 得 :

https://www.surveymonkey.com/curiosity/pri

nt-books-vs-e-books-whats-the-future-of-reading/ [访问日期:20/05/23]。

[20] OKOCHA,F.O.(2019)尼日利亚电

子书采用的决定因素。德西多克图书馆与

信息技术杂志,39(4),第 175-179 页。

[21] HAUGH,D.(2016)您如何看书:

印刷还是数字?教育研究生院的印刷和电

子书使用情况分析。电子资源图书馆杂志,

28(4),第 254-268 页。

[22] AMANDA , J.R. , JENNIFER ,

C.K.C., 和 DAVID,B.(2013)电子与传

统印刷教科书:关于大学生学习影响的比

较研究。计算机与教育,63,第 259-266

页。

[23] CHEN , S.C 。 和 GRANITZ , N 。

(2012)采纳,拒绝或趋同:消费者对图

书 数 字 化 的 态 度 。 商 业 研 究 杂 志 , 65

(8),第 1219-1225 页。

(12)

[24] PALFREY , J. 和 GASSER , U.

(2008)天生数字化:了解第一代数字原

住民。纽约:基础书籍。

[25] VERCIC , A.K. 和 VERCIC , D.

(2013)数字原生代和社交媒体。公共关

系评论,39(5),第 600-602 页。

[26] NIKOU , S. , MEZEI , J. 和

BRANNBACK ,M. ( 2018 )数字原住民

与社交媒体互动的意图:价值体系和性别。

远 程 信 息 处 理 与 信 息 学 , 35 ( 2 ) , 第

421-435 页。

[27] FRIEDL , J 。 和 VERCIC , A.T 。

(2011)数字本地人内部沟通的媒体偏

好:一项初步研究。公共关系评论,37

(1),第 84-86 页。

[28] D. KOUIS 和 N.的KONSTANTINOU

(2014)电子教科书对希腊高等教育和出

版 界 的 优 势 和 挑 战 。 图 书 馆 评 论 , 63

(6/7),第 531-543 页。

[29] KOLOWICH,S.(2011)抽电子刹车。

[在线] 高等教育内部。可从以下网站获

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/1

2/23/daytona-state-reins-its-pushtoward-etextbooks [于20/05/23访问]。

[30] 伍 迪 · 伍 德 ( W.D. ) , 丹 尼 尔

(DANIEL)和贝克(Caker)(2010)电

子书或教科书:学生更喜欢教科书。计算

机与教育,55,第 945-948 页。

[31] SHELBURNE,W.A。(2009)高校

图书馆中的电子书使用:用户的态度和行

为。图书馆馆藏。采购与技术服务,33

(2/3),第 55-59 页。

[32] BRIDDON,J.,CHELIN,J.,INCE,

G. , REDMAN , J. , SLEAT , A. 和

WILLIAMS,E.(2009)如果没有剩余副

本,电子书很好。西澳大学图书馆服务的

电子书使用情况调查。图书馆与情报研究,

3(104),第 45-65 页。

[33] FOASBERG,N.M。(2014)印刷和

电子媒体中的学生阅读实践。兔子学术作

705-723

http://academicworks.cuny.edu/qc_pubs/10

获得。

[34] R. ISMAIL 和 A.N. ZAINAB 。

(2005)马来西亚大学生使用电子书的模

式:一个已知的例子。马来西亚图书馆与

情报科学杂志,10(2),第 1-23 页。

[35] BUNKELL,J. 和 DYAS-CORREIA,

S.(2009)电子书与印刷:哪个是更好的

价值?图书管理员杂志,56(1-4),第

215-219 页。

[36] KIMBALL , R. , IVES , G., 和

JACKSON,K.(2009)德克萨斯上午大

学图书馆的科学电子书和印刷品收藏的比

较使用。收款管理,35(1),第 15-28

页。

[37] 泰勒,D.M。(2013)所选电子书和

等效印刷书的比较:手持便携式设备是否

增加了三种汇总资源的使用?医学图书馆

电子资源杂志,10(1),第 11-24 页。

[38] KRETON,S. 和 NALETELICH,K.

(2016)电子阅读器如何改变与书籍的个

人联系。定性市场研究:国际杂志,19

(4),第 433-452 页。

[39] 马 歇 尔 , 抄 底 和 RUOTOLO , C.

(2002)小读本:小型设备阅读研究。

于:2002年7月在俄勒冈州波特兰举行的

第二届ACM /电气工程师学会-CS数字图

书馆联合会议论文集。纽约:计算机协会,

第 59-60 页。

[40] ABDULLAH , N. 和 GIBB , F.

(2008)使用基于任务的方法评估BoBI在

电 子 书 环 境 中 的 可 用 性 。 在 :

MACDONALD , C. , OUNIS , I. ,

PLACHOURAS , V. , RUTHVEN , I. 和

WHITE,R.W.(编辑.)信息检索的进展

中。电子信息交换2008。计算机科学讲座,

第1卷。4956。柏林,海德堡:施普林格,

第 246-257 页。

[41] TOSUN,N。(2014)一项关于阅读

印刷书籍或电子书的研究:学生对教师偏

好的原因。射箭:土耳其在线教育技术杂

志,13 (1),第 21-28 页。

[42] S. RAFIQ 和 N.F. WARRAICH

(2018)医学本科生对使用和不使用电子

书的看法:巴基斯坦的一个案例。收藏与

策展,38(2),第 32-38 页。

(13)

[43] OLIVEIRA,S.M.D。(2012)安德鲁

斯大学学生使用电子教科书的方式:对态

度,看法和行为的研究。图书馆管理,33

(8/9),第 536-560 页。

[44] TAYLOR , P. , WAHEED , M. ,

KAUR,K.,AIN,N。和 SANNI,S.A.

(2015)情感依恋和多维自我效能:在电

子书阅读器的背景下扩展创新扩散理论。

行为 与信 息技 术,34 (12 ), 第

1147-1159 页。

[45] J. HÄKKINEN,T。JÄRVENPÄÄ, 和

M. PÖLÖNEN(2012)在近眼显示器上阅

读电子书:小型多媒体显示器和硬拷贝之

间的比较。显示,33(3),第 157-167

页。

[46] DARMAWAN,H.(2017)主持人:

乔科维·雷斯米坎·格登·法西里塔斯·拉扬

南·佩普斯塔卡昂·纳斯里恩·里斯。[在线]

https://www.perpusnas.go.id/news-detail.php?lang=id&id=1709200959580hRjG

CxDMc [访问时间20/04/20]。

参照

関連したドキュメント

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

Instead an elementary random occurrence will be denoted by the variable (though unpredictable) element x of the (now Cartesian) sample space, and a general random variable will

[3] Chen Guowang and L¨ u Shengguan, Initial boundary value problem for three dimensional Ginzburg-Landau model equation in population problems, (Chi- nese) Acta Mathematicae

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

In our previous paper [Ban1], we explicitly calculated the p-adic polylogarithm sheaf on the projective line minus three points, and calculated its specializa- tions to the d-th

Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the

To be specic, let us henceforth suppose that the quasifuchsian surface S con- tains two boundary components, the case of a single boundary component hav- ing been dealt with in [5]