• 検索結果がありません。

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "JJ II"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

volume 7, issue 5, article 186, 2006.

Received 22 April, 2006;

accepted 11 December, 2006.

Communicated by:C.E.M. Pearce

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

SOME P.D.F.-FREE UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE DISPERSION σ(X) AND THE QUANTITY σ2(X) + (x−EX)2

N. K. AGBEKO

Institute of Mathematics University of Miskolc

H-3515 Miskolc–Egyetemváros Hungary

EMail:[email protected]

c

2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 118-06

(2)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract

In comparison with Theorems 2.1 and 2.4 in [1], we provide some p.d.f.-free upper bounds for the dispersionσ(X) and the quantityσ2(X) + (x−EX)2 taking only into account the endpoints of the given finite interval.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:60E15, 26D15.

Key words: Dispersion, P.D.F.s.

Contents

1 Introduction and Results. . . 3 References

(3)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

1. Introduction and Results

Let f : [a, b] ⊂ R → [0,∞) be the p.d.f. (probability density function) of a random variableX whose expectation and dispersion are respectively given by

EX = Z b

a

tf(t)dt

and

σ(X) = s

Z b a

(t−EX)2f(t)dt= s

Z b a

t2f(t)dt−(EX)2.

In [1], Theorems 2.1 and 2.4, the following upper bounds were obtained for the dispersionσ(X)

σ(X)≤

























√3 (b−a)2

6 kfk if f ∈L[a, b]

√2 (b−a)1+q−1

2 [(q+ 1) (2q+ 1)]2q

kfkp if f ∈Lp[a, b], p >1,

1

p +1q = 1

√2 (b−a)

2 if f ∈L1[a, b]

(4)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

and the quantityσ2(X) + (x−EX)2 σ2(X) + (x−EX)2

















(b−a) h(b−a)2

12 + x−b+a2 2i

pkfk if f ∈L[a, b]

h(b−x)2q+1+(x−a)2q+1

2q+1

i2q1 q

kfkp if f ∈Lp[a, b], p >1, 1p + 1q = 1

b−a

2 +

x−b+a2

2

if f ∈L1[a, b]

for allx∈[a, b].

In this communication we intend to make free from the p.d.f. the above upper bounds for the dispersion σ(X)and the quantityσ2(X) + (x−EX)2 taking only into account the endpoints of the given finite interval.

Theorem 1.1. Under the above restriction on the p.d.f. we have

σ(X)≤min{max{|a|,|b|}, b−a}.

Proof. First, for any number t ∈ [a, b] we note (via f(t) ≥ 0) that af(t) ≤ tf(t)≤bf(t)leading toa ≤EX ≤b. Consequently,

(1.1) 0≤EX−a≤b−a and 0≤b−EX ≤b−a.

We point out that the functiong : [a, b]→[0,∞), defined byg(t) = (t−EX)2, is a bounded convex function which assumes the minimum at point (EX,0).

(5)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Thus

β := sup

(t−EX)2 :t ∈[a, b]

= max

(a−EX)2, (b−EX)2

≤(b−a)2,

by taking into consideration (1.1). Now, it can be easily seen that

σ(X) = s

Z b a

(t−EX)2f(t)dt ≤ s

β Z b

a

f(t)dt=p

β ≤b−a.

Next, using the facts that function h(t) = t2 decreases on (−∞, 0) and in- creases on(0, ∞)on the one hand and,

σ(X) = s

Z b a

t2f(t)dt−(EX)2 ≤ s

Z b a

t2f(t)dt

on the other, we can easily check that

σ2(X)≤ Z b

a

t2f(t)dt≤





b2 if a≥0

max{a2, b2} if a <0andb >0

a2 if b≤0,

so that σ2(X) ≤ max{a2, b2}. Therefore, we can conclude on the validity of the argument.

(6)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Theorem 1.2. Under the above restriction on the p.d.f. we have q

σ2(X) + (x−EX)2 ≤2 min{max{|a|,|b|}, b−a}

for allx∈[a, b].

Proof. We recall the identity

σ2(X) + (x−EX)2 = Z b

a

(t−x)2f(t)dt, x∈[a, b], from the proof of Theorem 2.4 in [1]. Clearly,

Z b a

(t−x)2f(t)dt ≤max

(t−x)2 :t, x∈[a, b] , so that

q

σ2(X) + (x−EX)2 ≤max{|t−x|:t, x∈[a, b]}.

It is obvious that0≤t−a≤b−aand0≤x−a≤b−a, sincet, x∈[a, b].

We note that we can estimate from above the quantity|t−x|in two ways:

|t−x| ≤ |t−a|+|a−x| ≤2 (b−a) and

|t−x| ≤ |t|+|x| ≤2 max{|a|,|b|}. Consequently,

max{|t−x|:t, x∈[a, b]} ≤2 min{max{|a|,|b|}, b−a}. This leads to the desired result.

(7)

Some p.d.f.-free Upper Bounds for the Dispersionσ(X)and the

Quantityσ2(X) + (xEX)2 N. K. Agbeko

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of7

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(5) Art. 186, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] N.S.BARNETT, P. CERONE, S.S. DRAGOMIR AND J. ROUMELIO- TIS, Some inequalities for the dispersion of a random variable whose pdf is defined on a finite interval, J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 2(1) (2001), Art. 1. [ONLINE: http://jipam.vu.edu.au/article.

php?sid=117].

http://jipam.vu.edu.au Victoria University http://jipam.vu.edu.au/article.php?sid=117].

参照

関連したドキュメント

2000 Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 183-05... Pure

DEBNATH, Some inequalities involving the constant e and an application to Carleman’s

J. Pure and Appl. This proof was presented by G. 249]) but here we follow the presentation which can be found in Professor Lars Hörmander’s book [26, p.. Carleman’s Inequality

AGARWAL, Two inequalities for differen- tiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula, Appl. KRYLOV, Approximate Calculation of

L’HOSPITAL TYPE RULES FOR MONOTONICITY: APPLICATIONS TO PROBABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR SUMS OF BOUNDED RANDOM VARIABLES1.

2000 c Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 109-04... Pure

Theorem 2. We shall detail here only the case i).. Pure and Appl.. Pure and Appl. Again, we shall use a monotonic- ity argument. Thus also the right-hand side inequality in i) holds

J. Pure and Appl. Furthermore, a limiting argument is required for this problem. For the proof of this inequality see [4]. It is open to investigate cases, where the integrand on