• 検索結果がありません。

(1)JJ J I II Go back Full Screen Close Quit RESULTS ON DIMENSION THEORY AND SOME GENERALIZATIONS OF COMPACT SPACES H

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "(1)JJ J I II Go back Full Screen Close Quit RESULTS ON DIMENSION THEORY AND SOME GENERALIZATIONS OF COMPACT SPACES H"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

RESULTS ON DIMENSION THEORY AND SOME GENERALIZATIONS OF COMPACT SPACES

H. Z. HDEIB and K. Y. AL-ZOUBI

Abstract. In this paper we introduceGδ-sequential spaces as a generalization of sequential spaces, and obtain some product theorems for [n, m]-compact spaces and for spaces with large inductive dimension

n.

1. Introduction

Dimension theory dates back at least to the work of P. Urysohn [11] and K. Menger [8]. Since then many mathematicians have contributed to the development of this theory. There are three notions of dimension of a topological spaceX, small inductive dimension (denoted by ind(X)), large inductive dimension (denoted by Ind(X)) and covering dimension (denoted by dim(X)). If ind(X) = 0, thenX is called a zero-dimensional space. If dim(X) = 0, thenX is called a strongly zero-dimensional space.

In Section 2, we introduce Gδ-sequential spaces as a generalization of sequential spaces, and obtain some product theorems for [n, m]-compact spaces and for spaces with large inductive di- mension≤n. Theorems2.9,2.10,2.11,2.13and2.17formulate the main results of this paper. In

Received June 3, 2012; revised September 5, 2012.

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54B10, 54D20, 54D30, 54D55.

Key words and phrases. Small (large) inductive dimension; covering dimension; ultraparacompact;Gδ-sequential;

[n, m]-compact.

(2)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

this paper, all spaces are assumed to beT1 topological spaces. For terminology not defined here, see Engelking [3] and Willard [12].

2. Product theorems

Franklin [4] introduced sequential spaces as generalization of first countable spaces. In this section, we define Gδ-sequential spaces as a generalization of sequential spaces. We also obtain some product theorems for [n, m]-compact spaces and spaces with large inductive dimension≤n.

Definition 2.1([4]). A subset A of a space X is called sequentially open if each sequence in X converging to a point inA is eventually inA. A spaceX is called a sequential space if every sequentially open subset ofX is open.

Definition 2.2. A spaceX is calledGδ-sequential if every sequentially open subset is aGδ-set.

Definition 2.3. LetX be an arbitrary space. TheGδ-topology ofX is the topology generated by theGδ-sets of X.

Definition 2.4 ([7]). A spaceX is called scattered if every non-empty closed subsetA ofX has an isolated point.

Definition 2.5 ([1]). A space X is called [n, m]-compact if every open cover U of X with

|U | ≤mhas a subcover of cardinality< n. IfX is [n, m]-compact for allm > n,then it is called [n,∞]-compact. [ℵ0, m]-compact spaces will be called simplym-compact.

Definition 2.6([2]). A spaceX is called paracompact if every open coverU ofX has a locally finite open refinement.

Definition 2.7. A mappingf from a spaceX onto a spaceY is calledσ-closed iff maps closed sets ontoFσ-sets.

(3)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

It is clear that every sequential space isGδ-sequential. However aGδ-sequential space may fail to be sequential (see Arens-Fort example [10, page 54]).

Kramer [6] showed that ifXis a sequential space andY is a countably compact space, then the projection mapping P:X ×Y →X is closed. A similar theorem concerning σ-closed mappings can be obtained usingGδ-sequential spaces. For this purpose we need the following lemma which can be obtained by modifying the proof of Kramer [6, Lemma 5.3].

Lemma 2.8. Let X be a Gδ-sequential space and Y be a countably compact space. Let F be a closed subset of X ×Y and V be an open subset of Y. Let x be a point of X such that F(x) ={y∈Y |(x, y)∈F} ⊂V. Then there is aGδ-setU containingxsuch thatz∈U implies F(z)⊂V.

Theorem 2.9. LetX be a Gδ-sequential space andY be a countably compact space. Then the projection mappingP:X×Y →X isσ-closed.

The proof follows from Lemma2.8by takingx∈X−P(F) andV =φ.

Theorem 2.10. Let f be a continuous σ-closed mapping from a space X onto a spaceY such thatf−1(y)ism-compact for eachy∈Y. ThenX is[n, m]-compact if theGδ-topology of Y is so.

Proof. LetU ={Uα|α∈Λ}, |Λ| ≤mbe an open cover of X. Let Γ denote the family of all finite subsets of Λ. Then|Γ| ≤m. Sincef−1(y) ism-compact, we have that for eachy∈Y, there exists a finite subsetγ of Λ such thatf−1(y)⊂S

{Uα|α∈γ}. LetVγ =Y −f(X−S

α∈γUα).

Then y ∈ Vγ, Vγ is a Gδ-set and f−1(Vγ) ⊂ ∪ {Uα|α∈γ}. Thus {Vγ |γ∈Γ} cover of Y, of which each element is a Gδ-set, and |Γ| ≤ m. Since theGδ-topology of Y is [n, m]-compact, {Vγ |γ∈Γ}has a subcover of cardinality < n. ThereforeX is the union of less than nmembers of

f−1(Vγ)|γ∈Γ . But for each γ ∈ Γ, the set f−1(Vγ) is contained in the union of finitely

many members ofU. Hence X is [n, m]-compact.

(4)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

Theorem 2.11. Let X be a scattered, paracompact Hausdorff space. Then the Gδ-topology of X is paracompact.

Proof. LetU be a cover ofX byGδ-sets. Let

F ={x∈X |x∈U andU is open implies U cannot be covered by a σ-locally finite open refinement ofU }.

Obviously F is closed. Suppose F 6= φ. Since X is scattered, F has an isolated point x. Thus there exists an open set V ⊆ X such that V ∩F = {x}. Choose U ∈ U such that x ∈ U. Without loss of generality we can assume thatU= T

{Vn|n= 1,2, . . .} where Vn is open for eachn = 1,2, . . ., and Vn+1 ⊆Vn+1 ⊆ Vn ⊆ V. For each n= 1,2, . . ., (Vn−Vn+1)⊆ X−F. Therefore eachy∈(Vn−Vn+1) has a neighborhoodMy which can be covered by aσ-locally finite open refinement ofU.

NowM=

My|y∈(Vn−Vn+1) is an open cover ofVn−Vn+1. SinceVn−Vn+1is closed and Xis paracompact,Mhas a locally finite (inX) open (inX) refinement, sayHn={Hα|α∈Λn}.

For each α ∈ Λn, Hα is covered by a σ-locally finite open refinement of U, say S

i=1Aαi. Let Biα = {Hα∩A|A∈ Aαi} and Kni = {B|B ∈ Bαi, α∈Λn}. Then Kni is a locally finite open refinement of U, because if x ∈ X, there exists an open set Nx such that Nx∩Hα = φ for all except finitely many indices, sayα1, α2, . . . , αn. Each one of the collectionsBiα1, Bαi2, . . . ,Biαn is locally finite. Hence for eachj = 1,2, . . . , n, there exists an open set Wij and eachWij intersects at most finitely many members ofBαij. HenceWi1∩. . .∩Win∩Nxis an open neighborhood ofx which intersects finitely many members ofKni.

NowS

i=1Kni is an open σ-locally finite open refinement ofU which covers Vn−Vn+1. Con- sequently, (S

n=1

S

i=1Kni )∪ {U} is an openσ-locally finite open refinement of U which covers V. This contradicts the fact that x∈ V. Thus F = φ. Therefore, for each x ∈V, there is an open neighborhoodGx ofxsuch that Gx can be covered by aσ-locally finite open refinement of

(5)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

U. SinceX is paracompact,{Gx|x∈X}has a locally finite open refinement{Dβ|β∈Γ} where for eachβ∈Γ, Dβ is covered by aσ-locally finite open refinement ofU, sayS

i=1Ciβ. Let Gi = n

C|C∈ Ciβ, β∈Γo

. Then it is easy to see that Gi is locally finite. Therefore S

i=1Gi is aσ-locally finite open refinement ofU which coversX. Hence theGδ-topology ofX is

paracompact.

Theorem 2.12([5]). Let X be an [n,∞]-compact scattered space. Then the Gδ-topology ofX is[n,∞]-compact.

The proof follows by a similar method used in Theorem2.11.

Theorem 2.13. Let Y be anm-compact space andX be aGδ-sequential scattered space. Then X×Y is[n, m]-compact ifX is[n,∞]-compact.

Proof. By Theorem 2.9, the projection mapping P:X×Y →X is closed. By Theorem2.10,

X×Y is [n, m]-compact.

Definition 2.14. An open (closed) rectangle in X×Y is a set of the formU×V where U is an open (closed) subset ofX andV is an open (closed) subset ofY.

The following definition was introduced by Nagata [9] to study the dimension of the products.

Definition 2.15. Let X and Y be two spaces. Then the product space X ×Y is called an F-product if whenever H and K are disjoint closed sets in X ×Y, then there is an open cover U ={Uα|α∈Λ} ofX×Y and a closed coverF ={Fα|α∈Λ} ofX×Y such that:

(i) F consists of closed rectangles andU consists of open rectangles.

(ii) U isσ-locally finite.

(iii) Fα⊂Uα for allα∈Λ.

(6)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

(iv) U refines{(X×Y)−H, (X×Y)−K}.

Kramer [6] proved that if X is sequential, paracompact and Hausdorff while Y is countably compact and normal, thenX×Y is anF-product.

In caseX is a Gδ-sequential space, we have the following theorems

Theorem 2.16. Let X be a Gδ-sequential, paracompact, scattered and Hausdorff space. LetY be a countably compact normal space. ThenX×Y is an F-product.

The proof follows from Theorem 2.11and a similar technique used in the proof of the above Theorem of Kramer.

Nagata [9] showed that if X and Y are non-empty with Ind(X) ≤n while Ind(Y) ≤ m and X×Y is a totally normalF-product, then Ind(X×Y)≤n+m. Using this result together with Theorem2.16, we get the following theorem.

Theorem 2.17. SupposeX andY are given as in Theorem2.16. IfInd(X)≤n, Ind(Y)≤m andX×Y is a totally normal, thenInd(X×Y)≤n+m.

1. Alexandroff P. and Urysohn P.,emoire sure les espaces topologiques compacts, Verh. Kon. Akad. Van Weten.

Te Amsterdam,14(1929), 1–96.

2. Dieudonn´e J.,Une generalization des espaces compacts, J. Math. Pures Apple.,23(1944), 65–76.

3. Engelking E.,Outline of general topology, Amsterdam, 1968.

4. Franklin S.,Spaces in which sequences suffice, Fund. Math.,57(1965), 107–115.

5. Hdeib H.,n-compact and scattered spaces, Bull. Fac. Sci., King Saud University,14(1)(1983), 187–191.

6. Kramer R., On the product of two topological spaces, General Topology and Appl.,6(1976), 1–16.

7. Kuratowski K.,Topology, Vol. I, New York-London-Warszawa, 1966.

(7)

JJ J I II

Go back

Full Screen

Close

Quit

8. Menger K.,Uber die Dimensionalit¨¨ at von Runktmengen. I,Monatsh. f¨ur Math. and Phys.33(1923), 148–160.

9. Nagata J.,Product theorems in dimension theory I, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys.,15 (1967), 439-448.

10. Steen L. A. and Seebach, Jr., J. A.,Counterexamples in Topology, Holt, New York, 1970.

11. Urysohn P.,Les multiplicates Cantoriennes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,157(1922), 440–442.

12. Willard S.,General Topology, Addison Wesley, 1970.

H. Z. Hdeib, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of science, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan, e-mail:[email protected]

K. Y. Al-Zoubi, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of science, Yarmouk University, Irbid-Jordan, e-mail:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

We construct an example that the class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings include properly the class of nonexpansive mappings in locally convex spaces, prove a theorem on

The existence of positive solution for a class of nonlinear fractional differential equations are investigated by the method of upper and lower solutions and using Schauder and

We introduce the notion of modular G–metric spaces and obtain some fixed point theorems of contractive mappings defined on modular G–metric spaces.. Introduction

In this note, we establish an inequality of Ostrowski-type involving functions of two inde- pendent variables newly by using certain integral inequalities.. Introduction In [3],

This class of metric spaces, called convex metric spaces, had been used to obtain some generalizations of fixed point results on Banach spaces, for example, by ´ Ciri´ c for

The decision-makers belong to the various players in the inter- modal transport world, namely, drayage operators, terminal operators, network operators, or intermodal operators..

By contrast with the well known Chatterji result dealing with strong convergence of relatively weakly compact L 1 Y (Ω, F, P )-bounded martingales, where Y is a Banach space, the

Papers dis- cussing dynamical properties, statistical and mathematical results, stability investigation of the phase space structure, the phenomenon of Fermi acceleration,