• 検索結果がありません。

ON SOME PROPERTIES OF POLYNOMIAL RINGS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "ON SOME PROPERTIES OF POLYNOMIAL RINGS"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Internat.

J. Math.

&

Math. Sci.

Vol. i0 No. 2

(1987)

311-314

311

ON SOME PROPERTIES OF POLYNOMIAL RINGS

H. AL-EZEH

Department of Mathematics University of Jordan

Amman Jordan

(Received February

4,

1986 and in its revised form April

29,1986)

ABSTFCT. For a commutative ring with unity

R,

it is proved that R is a PF ring if and only if the annihilator,

an(a),

for each a e R is a pure ideal in

R,

Also it is

proved that the polynlmial ring,

R[X],

is a PF-ring if and only if R is a PF-ring.

Finally, we prove that R is a PP-ring if and only if

R[X]

is a PP-ring.

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES. Polynomial Rings, Pure ideal, PF-ring, PP-ring, R-flatness, and idempotent elements.

1980 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODE: 13B.

1. INTRODUCTION.

All our rings in this paper are commutative with unity.

An

ideal I of a ring R is called pure if for any x e

I,

there exists y e

I

such that xy x A ring is called a PF-ring if every principal ideal aR is a flat R-module. A ring R is called a PP-ring if every principal ideal aR is a projective R-module. One can easily show that aR is projective if and only if the annihilator,

an(a),

is generated by an idempotent element,

(see

First, we state a proposition characterizing flat R-modules elementwise. This is a well known result in commutative ring theory,

(see [3]).

PROPOSITION

I.

An R-module M is a flat R-module if and only if for any pair of fi- nite subsets {x1, x2,

Xn

and

{al, a2,... an

of M and R respectively, such that

n

Y.

x.a.

0 there exists elements z zk e M and

bij

e R; i

1,2,...,k

i=l 1 1

n k

such that E b a

i 0 j=l 2, k, and x

i E z b

i’ i 2 n.

i=l j j=l j

In

the following theorem we establish that R is a PF-ring if and only if

ann(a)

R for each a e R is B pure ideal.

THEOREM

I.

For any ring

R,

R is a PF-ring if and only if

an(m)

for each m e R

is a pure ideal.

n

PROOF. Let xI, x

2,...,x

n e

n

and

al, a2,... an

e R with

i=II xiai

0. Then

there exists mI,

m2,... mn

e R such that x

i

mim

i

I, 2,...,

n. So

n

i=Z! mmia

i 0. Hence m e

ann(R

i

=Imiai )"

(2)

312 H.

AL-EZEH

n n

Since

ann(iElmfai)

R is a pure ideal, there exists b e

ann(=imiai)_

R such that bm m.

n

Now take m e mR and bmI,

bm2,..., bmn

R. These elements satisfy

II=l bmlai

0 and

bm.m

m m x

i i 2 n Therefore mR is a flat R-module

Conversely, let b

ann(m).

Then mb O. Since bR is a flat R-module, there exists R

c E bR and d e R such that dm 0 and b cd. Now c

Clb,

so b cd

bCld.

Moreover

Cld

e

ann(m).

Therefore

ann(m)

is a pure ideal.

R R

LEMM I.

n Let

I.i, 12 In

be a finite set of pure ideals df a

rin R,

then

J

n

I. is a pure ideal.

j=1 J

PROOF.

Let

x e

J.

Then x e

I.

J for each j. Thus there exists

Yl II’ Y2

e

12 Yn

e

In

with

xyj x, I,

2, n. Then y

ylY2...yne

J and xy x.

Let R be a reduced without nonzero nilpotent elements) ring. Let h(X) h

0

+ hIX + +

h

xn

e R[X]. Than and

h(X))

NIX] where N is the annihilator

n R[XJ

of the ideal generated by h0, h

hn,

that is N

ann(h0’R hI’’’’’ hn --i-- 0an(h i).

Moreover if f(X) a

0 /

alX + .+

am

X

m e annR[X](h(X)) then a hi j 0 for all i 2 m and

I,

2 n (see

[4]).

LEMMA

2. Let R be a PF-ring, then R is reduced.

PROOF. Let a be a nilpotent element in

R,

a

O.

Let n be the least positive integer greater than such that an 0. Hence a

ann(an-l).

Since ann(an-l

)-

is

(an_

R n-1 R

pure, there exists b e ann with ab a. Now o ban- a since ba a.

R Contradiction. Thus R is reduced.

THEOREM 2. The ring of polynomials,

R[X],

is a PF-ring if and only if R is a PF-ring.

PROOF.

Let

f(X)

a

0

+ alX + +am Xm

e ann (h(X)) where

h(X) ho+hiX+...+ hn Xn"

R

X

Since R[X] has no nonzero

nil.potent

elements,

a e

J N ann(h ) i o, I, 2, ,m

By Lemma I,

J is pure. Hence there exist b

I,

b2,..., bm

e J such that

aib

i a i, i i,

2,

m. Now our aim is to find c e J such that c

f(X)

f(X). We construct this element inductively.

First,

a0b

0 a

0.

Consider

a0

+ alX )(

b0

+

b

blb

0

a0b

0

+ aob a0bob + alb0X + albl

X

alboblX

a0

+ a0b aob + alboX + alX alboX

a0

+

a

iX’

Let c b

0

+

b

blb0,

then

a0

+ alX + a2 X2 )(

c

+

b

2

Clb

2

(a

0

+ alX)C + b2(l Cl)(ao+al X) + a2ClX2 + a2b2 x2 a2b2ClX2

(3)

SOME PROPERTIES OF

POLYNOMIAL

RINGS 313 a0

+ alX + a2ClX2 + a2b2X2 a2cl X2

a0

+ alX + a2 X2

Similarly, c

2 c

+

b

2

Clb2,...

cm cm-i

+

bm cm-

ibm

and

a0

+ alX + ...+ ai Xi)

ci a0

+ alX +...+ aiX

I

i

O, I,

2,..., m. Moreover c

o Cl,..., Cm

e J.

Thus there exist c c e J with cf(X)

f(X).

m

Conversely, assume R[X] is a PF-ring. Let a e P and b e ann(a).

R Then b e ann

(a).

Since R is a

PF-rng

there exists

R[X]

g(X)

c

o + ClX + + ckXk

e ann

R[X] (a)

with b

g(X)

b. Hence bc0 b and

COa O.

Consequently, R is a PF-ring.

THEOREM 3. R is a PP-ring if and 8nly if R[X] is a PP-ring.

PROOF. It is enough to show that ann

(f(X))

is

generated

by an idempotent R[X]

elementin

R]

where f(X) a0

+ alX + +a

nX

n.

Since R is reduced

ann

(f(X))

N[X] where N is the annihilator of the ideal generated by R[X3

a0, al,... an.

N ann

R(aO al,

an

nn_ann(a

i)

i=0 R

e.R, e.

2 e. because R is a PP-ring.

i=0 1 1 I

ele2...e

n

)R eR,

where e

ele2...e

n Hence ann

(f(X)) eR[X],

e2 e

R[X]

Conversely, let R[X] be a PP-ring, let a e

R,

then consider

ann(a).

Since R[X]

R PP-ring 2

a an m

is

RxJ (a)L g(X)R[X]

where

g(X) g(X)

If

g(X)

b0

+ blX +...+

b

xm

2

bo

then b 0 Thus b b

o

We claim

ann(a)

R

boR.

Let b e

anD(a) ,

then ba 0. So b e

g(X)R[X3.

blX +...+ bm Xm )( Co + ClX +’’’+ ct xt )"

Therefore b

b0c

O, that is

+

be bR- o

For the other way

around,

let b e

b0R.

Then b

boC

0

boa O.

That is b e andK

(a).

Thus

ann(a)

R

b0R.

for some c

o

e

R.

Since

(4)

314 H.

AL-EZEH

REFERENCES

i.

EVANS, M.

On commutative PP-rings,

Pac.

Jour. Math., 41(1972) 687-697.

2.

VASCONCELOS,

W. On finitely generated flat modules, Trans. Amer. Math.

Soc.,

138

(1969)

505-512.

3.

LARSON, M.

and

MCCARTHY, P. Multiplicative

Ideal

Theory,

Vol 43 in pure and applied lthematics, Academic

Press,

New York and London

(1971).

4.

BRER, J.

Power series over commutative rings, Lecture notes in pure and applied Mathematics

64,

Marcel

Dekker,

New York and Basel

(1981).

参照

関連したドキュメント

In the present paper, first we determine the extreme points of the class Q(α, β, γ), then we find the coefficient bounds and radius of univalency for functions belonging to this

The author uses certain property of convex functions to prove Bernoulli’s inequality and to obtain a simple proof of monotonicity of power means.. Key words and phrases: Power

However, in the case of our new inequality (1.3), although the result of doing so would be correct, it would add nothing since the left side of the modulus form, when opened, is

In the following, we will see that by using the property of convexity one can also deduce Hölder’s inequality directly from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.. It suffices to assume f, g

In this paper, we obtain a class of refined Carleman’s Inequalities with the arithmetic- geometric mean inequality by decreasing their weight coefficient.. Key words and

A lemma of considerable generality is proved from which one can obtain inequali- ties of Popoviciu’s type involving norms in a Banach space and Gram determinants.. Key words

It might not be capable of proving difficult inequalities that are of interest in their own right (Turán’s inequality seems to be exceptional in this respect), but it might be

The first author was supported by a Buffalo State College Research Foundation Undergraduate Summer Research FellowshipJ. The second author was supported in part by the Buffalo