• 検索結果がありません。

Then-th convergent of the continued fraction expansion is denoted bypn/qn= [a0;a1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Then-th convergent of the continued fraction expansion is denoted bypn/qn= [a0;a1"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A PROOF OF THE CONTINUED FRACTION EXPANSION OF e2/s

Takao Komatsu1

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, 036-8561, Japan

[email protected]

Received: 3/13/07, Accepted: 6/6/07, Published: 6/19/07

Abstract

We give a proof of the continued fraction expansion ofe2/s, wheres≥3 is an odd integer, by expressing the error between e2/s and its each convergent explicitly in terms of integrals.

1. Introduction

Letα = [a0;a1, a2, . . .] denote the simple continued fraction expansion of a real α, where α =a0 + 1/α1, a0 ="α#,

αn =an+ 1/αn+1, an ="αn# (n ≥1).

Then-th convergent of the continued fraction expansion is denoted bypn/qn= [a0;a1, . . . , an], and pn and qn satisfy the recurrence relation:

pn =anpn1+pn2 (n ≥0), p1 = 1, p2 = 0, qn =anqn1+qn2 (n ≥0), q1 = 0, q2 = 1.

An irrational number α is well approximated by its n-th convergent pn/qn. In fact, for n≥0

1

qn(qn+1+qn) <

!!

!!α− pn

qn

!!

!!< 1 qnqn+1

([4, p. 20]). Precisely speaking, by using the algorithm mentioned above, we can express ([1, Lemma 5.4]) the error as

α− pn qn

= (−1)n

qnn+1qn+qn1).

1This research was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific research (C) (No. 18540006), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

(2)

Osler [5] gave a remarkable proof of the simple continued fraction e1/s = [1; (2k−1)s−1,1,1]k=1 (s≥2)

by expressing this error explicitly in terms of integrals. Namely, when pn/qn is the n-th convergent of the continued fraction of e1/s, he showed that for n≥0

p3n

q3n −e1/s =− 1 q3n

" 1 0

xn(x−1)n

sn+1n! ex/sdx , p3n+1

q3n+1 −e1/s = 1 q3n+1

" 1 0

xn+1(x−1)n sn+1n! ex/sdx

and p3n+2

q3n+2 −e1/s = 1 q3n+2

" 1 0

xn(x−1)n+1

sn+1n! ex/sdx .

This was the direct extension of the result given by Cohn [2] concerninge. A similar expres- sion can be seen in [3] too.

It is known that the continued fraction expansion of e2/s is given by e2/s =#

1;(6k−5)s−1

2 ,(12k−6)s,(6k−1)s−1

2 ,1,1$ k=1,

where s >1 is odd (See [6], §32, (2)). We shall give another proof of the continued fraction expansion of e2/s by showing similar errors explicitly. For convenience, forn ≥0 put

An=

%2

s

&3n+1" 1 0

x3n(x−1)3n

(3n)! e2x/sdx , Bn= 23n+1

s3n+2

" 1 0

x3n+1(x−1)3n+1

(3n+ 1)! e2x/sdx , Cn=

%2

s

&3n+3" 1 0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+2

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx , Dn=

%2

s

&3n+3" 1 0

x3n+3(x−1)3n+2

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx , and

En =

%2

s

&3n+3" 1 0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+3

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx . Then, our main theorem is stated as follows.

(3)

Theorem 1.1. Letpn/qn be then-th convergent of the continued fraction of e2/s. Then, for n≥0

p5n

q5n −e2/s =− 1 q5n

An, p5n+1

q5n+1 −e2/s =− 1 q5n+1

Bn, p5n+2

q5n+2 −e2/s =− 1 q5n+2

Cn, p5n+3

q5n+3 −e2/s = 1 q5n+3Dn,

and p5n+4

q5n+4 −e2/s = 1 q5n+4

En.

2. The Continued Fraction of e2/s

The proof of the main theorem is based upon the following identities.

Lemma 2.1.

An =−En1−Dn1, (2.1)

Bn = (6n+ 1)s−1

2 An−En1, (2.2)

Cn = (12n+ 6)sBn+An, (2.3)

Dn =−(6n+ 5)s−1

2 Cn−Bn, (2.4)

and

En=Dn−Cn. (2.5)

These identities correspond with the desired relations:

p5n=p5n1+p5n2, q5n =q5n1+q5n2, p5n+1 = (6n+ 1)s−1

2 p5n+p5n1, q5n+1 = (6n+ 1)s−1

2 q5n+q5n1, p5n+2 = (12n+ 6)sp5n+1+p5n, q5n+2 = (12n+ 6)sq5n+1+q5n, p5n+3 = (6n+ 5)s−1

2 p5n+2+p5n+1, q5n+3 = (6n+ 5)s−1

2 q5n+2+q5n+1, p5n+4 =p5n+3+p5n+2, q5n+4 =q5n+3+q5n+2.

(4)

We shall prove Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 2.1 simultaneously.

Proof. When n = 0, the relations in Theorem 1.1 are true. Indeed, A0 = 2

s

" 1 0

e2x/sdx=e2/s−1 =q0e2/s−p0.

B0 = 2 s2

" 1 0

x(x−1)e2x/sdx= 1 2s

#'2x2−2(s+ 1)x+s2+s( e2x/s$1

0

= s−1

2 e2/s− s+ 1

2 =q1e2/s−p1. C0 =

%2

s

&3

1 2

" 1 0

x2(x−1)2e2x/sdx

= 1 s2

#'2x4 −4(s+ 1)x3+ 2(3s2+ 3s+ 1)x2

−2s(3s2 + 3s+ 1)x+ 3s4+ 3s3+s2( e2x/s$1

0

= (3s2−3s+ 1)e2/s−(3s2+ 3s+ 1) =q2e2/s−p2. D0 =

%2

s

&3

1 2

" 1 0

x3(x−1)2e2x/sdx

=− 1 2s2

#'4x5−(10s+ 8)x4+ (20s2+ 16s+ 4)x3−(30s3 + 24s2+ 6s)x2

+ (30s4+ 24s3+ 6s2)x−(15s5+ 12s4+ 3s3)( e2x/s$1

0

= 15s3

2 + 6s2+3s 2 −

%15s3

2 −9s2+9s 2 −1

&

e2/s=p3−q3e2/s.

E0 =

%2

s

&3

1 2

" 1 0

x2(x−1)3e2x/sdx

=− 1 2s2

#'4x5−(10s+ 12)x4+ (20s2+ 24s+ 12)x3−(30s3+ 36s2+ 18s+ 4)x2

+ (30s4+ 36s3+ 18s2+ 4s)x−(15s5 + 18s4+ 9s3+ 2s2)( e2x/s$1

0

= 15s3

2 + 9s2+9s

2 + 1−'15s3

2 −6s2+ 3s 2

(e2/s =p4−q4e2/s.

Suppose that Theorem 1.1 is true up to some integer n−1(≥0). Since d

dx

'x3n(x−1)3ne2x/s(

= 3nx3n1(x−1)3ne2x/s+ 3nx3n(x−1)3n1+2

sx3n(x−1)3ne2x/s, by integrating from 0 to 1 we get (2.1). Hence,

p5n−q5ne2/s = (p5n−1+p5n−2)−(q5n−1+q5n−2)e2/s

=En−1+Dn−1 =−An.

(5)

Since d dx

'x3n(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= 3nx3n−1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ (3n+ 1)x3n(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n(x−1)3n+1e2x/s

=−3nx3n−1(x−1)3ne2x/s+'

6n+ 1−2 s

(x3n(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s and

d dx

'x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= (3n+ 1)x3n(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ (3n+ 1)x3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s

= 2(3n+ 1)x3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s−(3n+ 1)x3n(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s, by integrating from 0 to 1 and canceling the term ofx3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s we get

s 2(−3n)

" 1 0

x3n1(x−1)3ne2x/sdx+(6n+ 1)s−1 2

" 1 0

x3n(x−1)3ne2x/sdx

− 1 s(3n+ 1)

" 1 0

x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/sdx= 0. Thus, we have (2.2). Hence,

p5n+1−q5n+1e2/s =

%(6n+ 1)s−1

2 p5n+p5n−1

&

%(6n+ 1)s−1

2 q5n+q5n−1

&

e2/s

=−(6n+ 1)s−1

2 An+En1 =−Bn. Notice that

d dx

'x3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s(

= (3n+ 2)x3n+1(x−1)3n+2e2x/s+ (3n+ 2)x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ 2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s

= (6n+ 4)x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s−(3n+ 2)x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s, d

dx

'x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= (3n+ 2)x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s + (3n+ 1)x3n+2(x−1)3ne2x/s+ 2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s

= (6n+ 3)x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s + (3n+ 1)x3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s+ 2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s

(6)

and d dx

'x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= 2(3n+ 1)x3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s−(3n+ 1)x3n(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s. Integrating these three equations from 0 to 1 and canceling the terms of x3n+2(x − 1)3n+1e2x/s and x3n+1(x−1)3ne2x/s, we get

%2

s

&2" 1 0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/sdx

= (12n+ 6)(3n+ 2)

" 1 0

x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/sdx+ (3n+ 2)(3n+ 1)

" 1 0

x3n(x−1)3ne2x/sdx . Thus, we have (2.3). Hence,

p5n+2−q5n+2e2/s ='

(12n+ 6)sp5n+1+p5n

(−'

(12n+ 6)sq5n+1+q5n

(e2/s

=−(12n+ 6)sBn−An =−Cn. Notice that

d dx

'x3n+3(x−1)3n+2e2x/s(

= (3n+ 3)x3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s + (3n+ 2)x3n+3(x−1)3n+1e2x/s +2

sx3n+3(x−1)3n+2e2x/s, d

dx

'x3n+3(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= (3n+ 3)x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ (3n+ 1)x3n+3(x−1)3ne2x/s+2

sx3n+3(x−1)3n+1e2x/s

=

%

6n+ 4 + 2 s

&

x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ (3n+ 1)x3n+2(x−1)3ne2x/s+ 2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s, d

dx

'x3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/s(

=

%

6n+ 4− 2 s

&

x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s−(3n+ 2)x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ 2

sx3n+3(x−1)3n+1e2x/s and

d dx

'x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s(

= (3n+ 2)x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/s+ (3n+ 1)x3n+2(x−1)3ne2x/s+ 2

sx3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s.

(7)

Integrating these four equations from 0 to 1 and eliminating the terms of x3n+3(x− 1)3n+1e2x/s, x3n+2(x−1)3n+1e2x/s and x3n+2(x−1)3ne2x/s, we get

4 s

" 1 0

x3n+3(x−1)3n+2e2x/sdx

=−

%

12n+ 10− 2 s

& " 1 0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+2e2x/sdx−(3n+ 2)

" 1 0

x3n+1(x−1)3n+1e2x/sdx . Thus, we have (2.4). Hence,

p5n+3−q5n+3e2/s =

%(6n+ 5)s−1

2 p5n+2+p5n+1

&

%(6n+ 5)s−1

2 q5n+2+q5n+1

&

e2/s

=−(6n+ 5)s−1

2 Cn−Bn =Dn.

Since x3n+3(x−1)3n+2 −x3n+2(x−1)3n+2 = x3n+2(x−1)3n+3, we get Dn −Cn = En, which is (2.5). Hence,

p5n+4−q5n+4e2/s = (p5n+3+p5n+2)−(q5n+3+q5n+2)e2/s =Dn−Cn =En.

!

3. The Continued Fraction of e2 Let pqn

n be thenth convergent of the continued fraction ofe2 = [7; 3k−1,1,1,3k,12k+ 6 ]k=1. Then, for n≥0 we have

pn

qn = pn+2

qn+2

,

wherepn/qn is then-th convergent of the continued fraction ofe2/s mentioned above. Thus, by replacingpn/qn bypn2/qn2 (n ≥2), Theorem 1.1 with Lemma 2.1 holds fors = 1.

4. Additional Comments

Some results in our theorem can be derived directly from Osler’s results. By the relation for i= 1,2, . . .

[. . . ,1, ai−1

2,1, . . .] = [. . . ,1, a3i2,4a3i1+ 2, a3i,1, . . .],

if we replaces bys/2 in the continued fraction [1; (2k−1)s−1,1,1]k=1, then we have [1; (2k−1)s/2−1,1,1]k=1 =#

1;ks− s+ 1 2 −1

2,1,1$

k=1

=#

1;(6k−5)s−1

2 ,(12k−6)s,(6k−1)s−1

2 ,1,1$ k=1.

(8)

Therefore, if we replaces bys/2 andn by 3n in the Osler’s integral forp3n−q3ne1/s, we get our integral forp5n−q5ne2/s. If we replacesbys/2 andn by 3n+ 2 in the Osler’s integral for p3n+1−q3n+1e1/s, we get our integral for p5n+3−q5n+3e2/s. If we replace s by s/2 and n by 3n+ 2 in the Osler’s integral for p3n+2−q3n+2e1/s, we get our integral forp5n+4−q5n+4e2/s.

5. Acknowledgement

This work was initiated when the author stayed in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tennessee at Martin in 2006. In special, he thanks Sarah Holliday, Bill Austin, Louis Kolitsch, and Chris Caldwell. The author also thanks the anonymous referee for some helpful comments.

References

[1] E. B. Burger, Exploring the Number Jungle: A journey into Diophantine Analysis, STML 8, American Mathematical Society, 2000.

[2] H. Cohn, A short proof of the simple continued fraction expansion ofe, Amer. Math. Monthly 113 (2006), 57–62.

[3] C. S. Davis, On some simple continued fractions connected with e, J. London Math. Soc, 20(1945), 194–198.

[4] A. Ya. Khinchin, Continued fractions, Dover, New York, 1997.

[5] T. Osler, A proof of the continued fraction expansion of e1/M, Amer. Math. Monthly 113 (2006), 62–66.

[6] O. Perron, Die Lehre von den Kettenbr¨uchen, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1950.

参照

関連したドキュメント

The process of changing a topology by some types of its local discrete expansion preserves s-closeness, S-closeness, semi-compactness, semi-T, semi-R, E {0,1,2}, and extremely

(33) Note that the next line of this expansion is the conjugate of the previous line of its conjugate expansion : conjugation reverses a continued fraction tableau.. Because

Actually, in Theorem 4.3 of Section 4 we obtain upper and lower bounds of the convergence rate which provide a near-optimal solution to the Gauss-Kuzmin-L´evy

The contact problem of the plane theory of elasticity is studied for an elastic orthotropic half-plane supported by periodi- cally located (infinitely many) stringers of

Leonhard Euler (1707−1783) named the equation after John Pell by mis- take, studied the infinite continued fractions and proved that a finally periodic continued fraction describes

The repeated homogeneous balance method is used to construct new exact traveling wave solutions of the (2+1) dimensional Zakharov- Kuznetsov (ZK) equation, in which the

A short and computer-free proof (using Euler sums and multiple zeta functions) is provided for a double sum that was recently computed by Pemantle and Schneider using the

By the algorithm in [1] for drawing framed link descriptions of branched covers of Seifert surfaces, a half circle should be drawn in each 1–handle, and then these eight half