• 検索結果がありません。

Generating the mapping class group of a surface by torsion

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Generating the mapping class group of a surface by torsion"

Copied!
52
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Generating the mapping class group of a surface by torsion

Kazuya Yoshihara

2016/12/22

(2)

Orientable surface

Σ

g,n

: a closed orientable surface of genus g with arbitrarily chosen n points.

we call punctures P = {x

1

, x

2

, · · · , x

n

} Diff

+

g,n

) := { f : Σ

g,n

Σ

g,n

| orientation preserving differomorphism, f(P ) = P } Diff

0

g,n

) := {f Diff

+

g,n

) | f is isotopic to identity }

Mod(Σ

g,n

) := Diff

+

g,n

)/Diff

0

g,n

) : the mapping class group of Σ

g,n

b

g

b

3

b

2

b

1

a

g

a

3

a

2

a

1

c

1

c

2

x

1

x

2

x

n

closed orientable surface

(3)

Dehn twist

a : simple closed curve on Σ

g,n

. t

a

:= the Dehn twist along a

a

t

a

The Dehn twist along a

(4)

relation for Mod(Σ

g,n

)

Lemma 1.1

a : a simple closed curve on Σ

g,n

For f Mod(Σ

g,n

),

f t

a

f

−1

= t

f(a)

.

an ordered set of c

1

, c

2

, . . . , c

n

of simple closed curves on Σ

g

forms n-chain

⇐⇒ c

i

and c

i+1

intersect transversely at one point for i = 1, 2, . . . , n 1 and c

i

is disjoint from c

j

if | i j |≥ 2.

If n is odd, the boundary of regular neighborhood of n-chain has two components d

1

and d

2

.

Lemma 1.2

{ c

1

, c

2

, c

3

, c

4

, c

5

} : chain on Σ

g,n

we have following relation.

(t

c1

t

c2

t

c3

t

c4

t

c5

)

6

= t

d1

t

d2

(5)

Dehn twist generators

Theorem 1.1 (Dehn,1938)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by finitely many Dehn twists.

Theorem 1.2 (Lickorish, 1961)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 3g 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, . . . , t

ag

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

. Theorem 1.3 (Humphries, 1979)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 2g + 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

.

This is the minimum number of Dehn twists generating Mod(Σ

g,0

).

(6)

Dehn twist generators

Theorem 1.1 (Dehn,1938)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by finitely many Dehn twists.

Theorem 1.2 (Lickorish, 1961)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 3g 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, . . . , t

ag

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

.

Theorem 1.3 (Humphries, 1979)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 2g + 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

.

This is the minimum number of Dehn twists generating Mod(Σ

g,0

).

(7)

Dehn twist generators

Theorem 1.1 (Dehn,1938)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by finitely many Dehn twists.

Theorem 1.2 (Lickorish, 1961)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 3g 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, . . . , t

ag

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

. Theorem 1.3 (Humphries, 1979)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by 2g + 1 Dehn twists t

a1

, t

a2

, t

b1

, t

b2

, . . . , t

bg

, t

c1

, t

c2

, . . . , t

cg−1

.

This is the minimum number of Dehn twists generating Mod(Σ

g,0

).

(8)

Involution generators

Theorem 1.4 (MacCarthy-Papadopoulus, 1987) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by infinitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.5 (Luo, 1998)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by finitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.6 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 3, n = 0 or g 4, n 1) Theorem 1.7 (Kassbov, 2003)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 8) (2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 6) (3) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 4)

Theorem 1.8 (Monden, 2008)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 7)

(2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 5)

(9)

Involution generators

Theorem 1.4 (MacCarthy-Papadopoulus, 1987) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by infinitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.5 (Luo, 1998)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by finitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.6 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 3, n = 0 or g 4, n 1) Theorem 1.7 (Kassbov, 2003)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 8) (2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 6) (3) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 4)

Theorem 1.8 (Monden, 2008)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 7)

(2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 5)

(10)

Involution generators

Theorem 1.4 (MacCarthy-Papadopoulus, 1987) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by infinitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.5 (Luo, 1998)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by finitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.6 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 3, n = 0 or g 4, n 1)

Theorem 1.7 (Kassbov, 2003)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 8) (2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 6) (3) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 4)

Theorem 1.8 (Monden, 2008)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 7)

(2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 5)

(11)

Involution generators

Theorem 1.4 (MacCarthy-Papadopoulus, 1987) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by infinitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.5 (Luo, 1998)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by finitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.6 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 3, n = 0 or g 4, n 1) Theorem 1.7 (Kassbov, 2003)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 8) (2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 6) (3) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 4)

Theorem 1.8 (Monden, 2008)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 7)

(2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 5)

(12)

Involution generators

Theorem 1.4 (MacCarthy-Papadopoulus, 1987) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by infinitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.5 (Luo, 1998)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by finitely many involutions.

Theorem 1.6 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 3, n = 0 or g 4, n 1) Theorem 1.7 (Kassbov, 2003)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 8) (2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 6) (3) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 6 involutions. (g 4)

Theorem 1.8 (Monden, 2008)

(1) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 4 involutions. (g 7)

(2) Mod(Σ

g,n

) is generated by 5 involutions. (g 5)

(13)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.9 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 2g + 2, 4g + 2, 2.

Theorem 1.10 (Korkmaz, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by two elements of order 4g + 2.

Theorem 1.11 (Monden, 2012) When g 3,

(1) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 3. (2) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 4.

Theorem 1.12 (Du, 2015)

(1) When g 4, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three involutions and a element of order 3.

(2) When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four involutions and a element of order 3.

(14)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.9 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 2g + 2, 4g + 2, 2.

Theorem 1.10 (Korkmaz, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by two elements of order 4g + 2.

Theorem 1.11 (Monden, 2012) When g 3,

(1) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 3. (2) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 4.

Theorem 1.12 (Du, 2015)

(1) When g 4, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three involutions and a element of order 3.

(2) When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four involutions and a element of order 3.

(15)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.9 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 2g + 2, 4g + 2, 2.

Theorem 1.10 (Korkmaz, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by two elements of order 4g + 2.

Theorem 1.11 (Monden, 2012) When g 3,

(1) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 3.

(2) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 4.

Theorem 1.12 (Du, 2015)

(1) When g 4, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three involutions and a element of order 3.

(2) When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four involutions and a element of order 3.

(16)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.9 (Brendle-Farb, 2004)

When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 2g + 2, 4g + 2, 2.

Theorem 1.10 (Korkmaz, 2004)

Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by two elements of order 4g + 2.

Theorem 1.11 (Monden, 2012) When g 3,

(1) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 3.

(2) Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 4.

Theorem 1.12 (Du, 2015)

(1) When g 4, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three involutions and a element of order 3.

(2) When g 3, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four involutions and a element of order 3.

(17)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.13 (Y)

(1) When g 10, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 6.

(2) When g 5, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 6.

Theorem 1.14 (Lanier)

For k 5 and g (k 1)(k 3), Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order k.

If k is also a multiple of three, then only three elements of order k are required.

(18)

Torsion generator

Theorem 1.13 (Y)

(1) When g 10, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by three elements of order 6.

(2) When g 5, Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order 6.

Theorem 1.14 (Lanier)

For k 5 and g (k 1)(k 3), Mod(Σ

g,0

) is generated by four elements of order k.

If k is also a multiple of three, then only three elements of order k are required.

(19)

Lantern relation

The key idea generating a Dehn twist is to use lantern relation .

Lemma 1.3

(lantern relation) Let x

1

and x

2

be simple closed curves as shown in below. Then we have

t

a1

t

c1

t

c2

t

a3

= t

x1

t

x2

t

a2

. a

1

a

2

a

3

c

1

c

2

x

1

x

2

Then rewrite lantern relation as follow,

t

a1

= (t

x1

t

−1c1

)(t

x2

t

−1a3

)(t

a2

t

−1c2

).

(20)

Generating Dehn twist

Suppose that we can find elements of order six f and h such that f

4

(a

2

) = x

1

, f

2

(a

2

) = x

2

, f

4

(c

2

) = c

1

, f

2

(c

2

) = a

3

and h(c

2

) = a

2

. Let k be t

c2

h

−1

t

−1c2

. k has order six.

Then we have

t

a2

t

−1c2

= t

h(c2)

t

−1c2

= ht

c2

h

−1

t

−1c2

= hk.

t

x1

t

c11

= t

f4(a2)

t

f41(c2)

= f

4

t

a2

t

c21

f

4

= f

4

hkf

4

.

t

x2

t

a31

= t

f2(a2)

t

f21(c2)

= f

2

t

a2

t

c21

f

2

= f

2

hkf

2

. By Lantern relation,

t

a1

= (f

4

hkf

4

)(f

2

hkf

2

)(hk).

Hence t

a1

is a product of elments of order six.

(21)

Construct element of order six I

Construct elements f which has order six.

Cut the surface Σ

g

along the curves

a

3

, c

1

, c

2

, ϵ

1

, c

4

, c

5

, a

5i3

, c

5i3

, c

5i2

, c

5i1

, c

5i

, a

5i+1

(i = 2, 3, . . . ,

g55

), and δ

g4

as shown in below.

ϵ

1

a

3

a

7

a

11

b

1

b

2

b

3

b

4

b

5

b

6

b

7

b

8

b

9

b

10

b

11

c

1

c

2

c

4

c

5

c

7

c

8

c

9

c

10

a

g8

a

g4

a

g3

a

g2

a

g1

a

g

b

g8

b

g7

b

g6

b

g5

b

g4

b

g3

b

g2

b

g1

b

g

c

g8

c

g7

c

g6

c

g5

c

g3

c

g1

δ

g4

δ

g2

(22)

Construct element of order six I

S

1

:= Σ

0,6g−18 5

S

j

:= Σ

0,6

s.t. ∂S

j

= a

5j3

c

5j3

c

5j2

c

5j1

c

5j

a

5j+1

(j = 2, 3, . . . ,

g55

) S

1

:= Σ

4,1

s.t ∂S

1

= δ

g4

Let f

1

, f

2

, . . . , f

g−5 5

be

π3

rotation as shown in below.

(23)

Construct element of order six I

Remark that (f

1

)

6

= t

δg−4

.

f

1′′

= (t

ag−3

t

bg−3

t

cg−3

t

bg−2

t

ag−2

)

1

(t

ag−1

t

bg−1

t

cg−1

t

bg

t

ag

).

a

g3

a

g2

a

g1

a

g

c

g−3

c

g−1

δ

g4

δ

g2

b

g3

b

g−2

b

g1

b

g

Note that (f

1′′

)

6

= t

δ1

g−4

. f

1

, f

1′′

, f

2

, . . . , f

g−5

5

define an element f of order six.

(24)

Construct element of order six I

note that f act the curves as follows.

f

4

(a

2

) = x

1

, f

2

(a

2

) = x

2

, f

4

(c

2

) = c

1

, f

2

(c

2

) = a

3

.

magnification

(25)

Construct element of order six II

Construct elements h which has order six. cut the surface Σ

g

along the curves

a

1

, a

2

, c

2

, c

3

, ϵ

2

, ϵ

3

, a

5i5

, c

5i5

, c

5i4

, c

5i3

, c

5i2

,and a

5i1

(i = 2, 3, . . . ,

g5

) as shown

in below.

(26)

Construct element of order six II

T

1

:= Σ

0,6(g−5)+125

T

j

:= Σ

0,6

s.t. ∂T

j

= a

5j3

c

5j3

c

5j2

c

5j1

c

5j

a

5j+1

(j = 2, 3, . . . ,

g55

) Let h

1

, h

2

, . . . , h

g+5

5

be

π3

rotation as follows.

(27)

Construct element of order six II

h

1

, h

2

, . . . , h

g+5 5

define an element h of order six.

note that h(c

2

) = a

2

.

(28)

Non-orientable surface

N

g,n

: a closed non-orientable surface of genus g with n punctures P = { x

1

, x

2

, · · · , x

n

} . Diff(N

g,n

) := {f : N

g,n

N

g,n

|differomorphism, f(P) = P }

Diff

0

(N

g,n

) := {f Diff(N

g,n

) | f is isotopic to identity } Mod(N

g,n

) := Diff(N

g,n

)/Diff

0

(N

g,n

)

: the mapping class group of N

g,n

PMod(N

g,n

) := { f Mod(N

g,n

) | f(x

i

) = x

i

(i = 1, 2, · · · , n) } : the pure mapping class group of N

g,n

Sym

n

:= symmetric group on n letters We have the exact sequence

1 PMod(N

g,n

) Mod(N

g,n

)

π

Sym

n

1.

(29)

Non-orientable surface

a

r

a

r1

a

1

b

r

b

r1

b

1

c

r1

c

r2

c

1

d

r

d

r1

d

1

e

1

e

b1

x

1

x

2

x

n

For g = 2r + 1, surface N

g,n

a

r

a

r1

a

1

b

r+1

b

r

b

r1

b

1

c

r

c

r1

c

r2

c

1

d

r

d

r1

d

1

e

1

e

b1

x

1

x

2

x

n

For g = 2r + 2, surface N

g,n

(30)

simple closed curve on N

g,n

c : a simple closed curve on N

g,n

.

c is a two-sided the regular neighborhood of c is an annulus.

c is a one-sided the regular neighborhood of c is a M¨ obius band.

one and two-sided simple closed curves on N

g,n

(31)

Dehn twist of Mod(N

g,n

)

a : two-sided simple closed curve on N

g,n

. Then we can define the Dehn twist t

a

along a.

Lemma 2.1

a : a two-sided simple closed curve on N

g,n

. For f Mod(N

g,n

), t

ϵf(a)

= f t

a

f

−1

Where, N

a

:= the regular neighborhood of a.

f | N

a

is orientation preserving ϵ = 1.

f | N

a

is orientation reversing ϵ = 1.

(32)

Y-homeomorphism

m : one-sided simple closed curve on N

g,n

a : two-sided simple closed curve on N

g,n

K := the regular neighborhood of m a ( = (the Klein bottle with one hole) ) Y

m,a

:= the Y-homeomorphism.

Y

m,a

a m

∂K

Y-homeomorphism on K note that Y

m,a2

= t

∂K

.

Lemma 2.2 (1) Y

m−1,a

= Y

m,a

. (2) Y

m,a−1

= Y

m,a1

.

(3) For f Mod(N

g,n

), f Y

m,a

f

1

= Y

f(m),f(a)

.

(33)

Puncture slide

α : one-sided simple closed curve on N

g,n

, based at the puncture x M := the regular neighborhood of α ( = M¨ obius band with one puncture)

v

α

α x

puncture slide along α on M Lemma 2.3

For f Mod(N

g,n

), f v

α

f

1

is the puncture slide of f(x) along f(α).

(34)

Generator for Mod(N

g,n

)

Theorem 2.1 (Lickorish, 1963)

(1) Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by Dehn twists and Y-homeomorphism.

(2) Mod(N

g,0

) is not generated by Dehn twists.

Theorem 2.2 (Chillingworth, 1969)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by finite generating set. (g 3)

Theorem 2.3 (Korkmaz, 2002)

Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by finite generating set (g 3).

Theorem 2.4 (Szepietowski, 2013 , Hirose, 2016)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by g Dehn twists and a Y-homeomorphism.

Moreover, this generator set is minimal generator set by Dehn twists and

Y-homeomorphisms.

(35)

Generator for Mod(N

g,n

)

Theorem 2.1 (Lickorish, 1963)

(1) Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by Dehn twists and Y-homeomorphism.

(2) Mod(N

g,0

) is not generated by Dehn twists.

Theorem 2.2 (Chillingworth, 1969)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by finite generating set. (g 3)

Theorem 2.3 (Korkmaz, 2002)

Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by finite generating set (g 3).

Theorem 2.4 (Szepietowski, 2013 , Hirose, 2016)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by g Dehn twists and a Y-homeomorphism.

Moreover, this generator set is minimal generator set by Dehn twists and

Y-homeomorphisms.

(36)

Generator for Mod(N

g,n

)

Theorem 2.1 (Lickorish, 1963)

(1) Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by Dehn twists and Y-homeomorphism.

(2) Mod(N

g,0

) is not generated by Dehn twists.

Theorem 2.2 (Chillingworth, 1969)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by finite generating set. (g 3)

Theorem 2.3 (Korkmaz, 2002)

Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by finite generating set (g 3).

Theorem 2.4 (Szepietowski, 2013 , Hirose, 2016)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by g Dehn twists and a Y-homeomorphism.

Moreover, this generator set is minimal generator set by Dehn twists and

Y-homeomorphisms.

(37)

Generator for Mod(N

g,n

)

Theorem 2.1 (Lickorish, 1963)

(1) Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by Dehn twists and Y-homeomorphism.

(2) Mod(N

g,0

) is not generated by Dehn twists.

Theorem 2.2 (Chillingworth, 1969)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by finite generating set. (g 3)

Theorem 2.3 (Korkmaz, 2002)

Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by finite generating set (g 3).

Theorem 2.4 (Szepietowski, 2013 , Hirose, 2016)

Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by g Dehn twists and a Y-homeomorphism.

Moreover, this generator set is minimal generator set by Dehn twists and

Y-homeomorphisms.

(38)

Involution generator for Mod(N

g,b

)

Theorem 2.5 (Szepietowski, 2004)

For g 1, Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by involutions.

The cardinality of this set of generating involutions depends on g and n. Theorem 2.6 (Szepietowski, 2006)

For g 4, Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by 4 involutions.

(39)

Involution generator for Mod(N

g,b

)

Theorem 2.5 (Szepietowski, 2004)

For g 1, Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by involutions.

The cardinality of this set of generating involutions depends on g and n.

Theorem 2.6 (Szepietowski, 2006)

For g 4, Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by 4 involutions.

(40)

Involution generator for Mod(N

g,b

)

Theorem 2.5 (Szepietowski, 2004)

For g 1, Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by involutions.

The cardinality of this set of generating involutions depends on g and n.

Theorem 2.6 (Szepietowski, 2006)

For g 4, Mod(N

g,0

) is generated by 4 involutions.

(41)

Involution generator for Mod(N

g,n

)

Theorem 3.1 (Y)

Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by 8 involutions. (g 13 and g is odd) Mod(N

g,n

) is generated by 11 involutions. (g 14 and g is even) Suppose that g = 2r + 1, r = 2k and n = 2l + 1.

v

j

:= the puncture slide of x

j

along α

j

.

x

j

α

j

(42)

Generator for PMod(N

g,b

)

y := the Y-homeomorphism s.t. y

2

= t

ξ

ξ

S := { a

1

, a

2

, · · · , a

r

, b

1

, b

2

, c

1

, c

2

, · · · , c

r1

, d

1

, d

2

, e

1

, e

2

, · · · , e

n

1 } Theorem 3.2 (Korkmaz, 2002)

PMod(N

g,n

) is generated by following elements.

(1) t

l

for l S . (2) v

j

for 1 j n.

(3) y.

(43)

involution σ

the next figure gives the involution σ.

mirror x

1

x

2

x

l

x

l+1

x

n

x

n−1

x

l+2

b

r

b

r1

b

k+2

b

k+1

b

k

b

k−1

b

2

b

1

a

r

a

r1

a

k+2

a

k+1

a

k

a

k1

a

2

a

1

c

1

c

k1

c

k

c

k+1

c

r−1

The mirror image σ

(44)

involution τ

the next figure gives the involution τ.

mirror x

2

x

3

x

l+1

x

1

x

n

x

n−1

x

l+2

b

r

b

r1

b

k+3

b

k+2

b

k+1

b

k

b

k−1

b

3

b

2

a

r

a

r1

a

k+3

a

k+2

a

k+1

a

k

a

k1

a

3

a

2

a

1

c

2

c

k1

c

k

c

k+1

c

k+2

c

r−1

The mirror image τ

(45)

involution I

We will construct the third involution.

Cut the surface along a

k+3

b

k

c

k

c

k+1

x.

a

k+3

x

c

k+1

c

k

b

k

S

1

:= the five holed sphere bounded by a

k+3

b

k

c

k

c

k+1

x.

S

2

:= N

g8,b

bounded by a

k+3

b

k

c

k

c

k+1

x.

(46)

involution I

the next figure gives the involution I on S

1

. a

k+3

c

k

c

k+1

b

k

mirror x

The mirror image I on S

1

the next figure gives the involution I e on S

2

. a

k+3

c

k

c

k+1

b

k

mirror x

d

2

d

1

b

2

b

1

e

1

e

2

e

l

e

l+1

e

n−1

e

n−2

The mirror image I e on S

2

I and I e define the involution I on N

g,n

.

(47)

Generating Dehn twist and puncture slide

ρ

1

:= τ t

a1

. Since τ t

a1

τ = t

a11

,

ρ

21

= τ t

a1

τ t

a1

= t

a11

t

a1

= id.

ρ

1

is involution.

ρ

2

:= τ v

1

.

Since τ(α

1

) = α

11

,

τ v

1

τ is the puncture slide of puncture τ(x

1

) = x

1

along τ(α

1

) = α

−11

.

τ v

1

τ = v

11

ρ

22

= τ v

1

τ v

1

= v

−11

v

1

= id.

ρ

2

is the involution.

α

1

α

l+1

α

n

α

1

α

2

α

n

(48)

Generating Y-homeomorphism

ξ x1 xn

x2 xl

xl+1

xl+2 xn−1

Φ

ma

x1 xn x2

xl

xl+1

xl+2 xn−1

mirror

diffeo Φ : N

g,b

N

g,b

s.t. ΦyΦ

1

= Y

m,a

.

w := the reflection of the right model in above figure.

w(m) = m

−1

and w(a) = a

−1

.

wY

m,a

w = Y

w(m),w(a)

= Y

m−1,a−1

= Y

m,a1

. W := Φ

1

wΦ.

ρ

3

:= W y.

W yW = Φ

1

wΦyΦ

1

wΦ = Φ

1

wY

m,a

wΦ = Φ

1

Y

m,a1

Φ = y

1

. Hence, ρ

23

= W yW y = y

1

y = id.

y = W · W y.

(49)

Involution J

the next figure gives the involution J.

x

1

x

2

x

l+1

x

l+2

x

n

e

1

e

2

b

1

e

n1

e

l+1

mirror

The mirror image J on N

g,n

(50)

Generator for Sym

n

Lemma 3.1

Sym

n

is generated by

r

1

= (1, n)(2, n 1) · · · (l, l + 2)(l + 1) r

2

= (2, n)(3, n 1) · · · (l + 1, l + 2)(1)

r

3

= (2, n 1)(3, n 2) · · · (l, l + 2)(1)(l + 1)(n).

π(σ) = (1, n)(2, n 1) · · · (l, l + 2)(l + 1).

π(τ) = (2, n)(3, n 1) · · · (l + 1, l + 2)(1).

π(W ) = (2, n 1)(3, n 2) · · · (l, l + 2)(1)(l + 1)(n).

(51)

Coxeter group

G := g

1

, g

2

, . . . , g

n

| (g

i

g

j

)

mij

= 1 we call the group G Coxter group.

where m

ii

= 1 and m

ij

2 if i ̸= j.

m

ij

= means no relation of the form (g

i

g

j

)

mij

. Cor 3.1

For g 13 and g is odd,

Mod(N

g,n

) can be realized as a quotient of a Coxter group on 8 generators.

For g 14 and g is even,

Mod(N

g,n

) can be realized as a quotient of a Coxter group on 11 generators.

(52)

Thank you for your attention.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this paper we show how to obtain a result closely analogous to the McAlister theorem for a certain class of inverse semigroups with zero, based on the idea of a Brandt

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

In view of Theorems 2 and 3, we need to find some explicit existence criteria for eventually positive and/or bounded solutions of recurrence re- lations of form (2) so that

In analogy with Aubin’s theorem for manifolds with quasi-positive Ricci curvature one can use the Ricci flow to show that any manifold with quasi-positive scalar curvature or

These include the relation between the structure of the mapping class group and invariants of 3–manifolds, the unstable cohomology of the moduli space of curves and Faber’s

Honda discovered that, if we take a convex decomposition of an overtwisted contact structure on M and look at all possible non-trivial isotopies (bypasses) of the cutting surfaces S i

approah, whih is based on a step by step onstrution of the walks [6, 5℄.. We repeat in Setion 3 the proof

We shall say that a profinite group G is a [pro-Σ] surface group (respectively, a [pro-Σ] configuration space group) if G is isomorphic to the maximal pro-Σ quotient of the ´