ブラックホール回転エネルギー抽出過程をめぐる因果律論争 Extraction Process for the Rotational Energy of Kerr Black Holes: The Causality Question
8
0
0
全文
(2) Extraction Process for the Rotational Energy of Kerr Black Holes: The Causality Question !. ".
(3) . 191ῌ0034 114ῌ6. e-mail: [email protected]. #$
(4) %&'() *+, ./$ 1980 0123 45678$ 9: BlandfordῌZnajek ; Punsly 4<, gravitohydromagentics =>?@5A$ Blandford & Znajek BCD Punsly ;E*FGHI J KLMNOPM*6 QRS%TUV>WX YZ[\)]^BCD_Z`ab6)]^c%de fg*5HI J. 1. hi$ FG;jk;W lmno. I@ - *AV [8.S,# (qktuH )@ - @ &?8 $%&'8. 1 !"# $%&'( )*+,- ./(01/ 23. &>8 ~5&@ 1-. 4567 89(:;< =; &>). 1977 z Blandford ) Znajek 8 F . &?@ - )A( BC8D&>(E. 4 M¡*. FG=#H- .. u ! ;=klmn o4&. !8./@I&'(JK !8./@8PQ. ¢pq7 4X£*G1)- /8.. R7 )LM7 - S,#T8 U. ¤ BlandfordῌZnajek process )*u}K¥¦1/. VWX@ PQ4YZ V [@ )H\. )# - § .¤¨ziG T. ;< ]# ^ _`ab8 c94defG. ©)#tG( ª= c«¬®¯g @. )4g )hi/ jH#H- )A( . - %°±8²(³´*uH . klmn opqrs4YZt. @ .~5&µ¶4·¸7 ). u
(5) ` I v C w x @ Punsly ) Blandford y @. (@C ¹* «8. 20 zyiGtu{|}f=/uCGPQ. ²(³´*uH#H@ . . T# I8 [J4~7/S,#. ~5&µ¶4·¸@C#H- ª=8ºi|. )LM* NO. » 100 v. » 11 ¼. 601.
(6) ῍῍῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ ῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῎. ^@ _` a b; c F ,dCP Punsly <e fgh@<Oi E@W!AB"# 5D$SP 5
(7) <
(8) 6;jk YlPO- C Punsly mn [Zo E Punsly, Blandford E @p@q rZoP69sSOP m%&'g<6;(tuv w 9:;< AB"#
(9) 6xy@Nz) 6*+ ,-{|$}~'( SIF .. SH 6M< Z o
(10) 1) ^-.%/$0
(11) 1 2 / Zo
(12) 3)ῌ5) FG% SN 02 !>61
(13) 1 2 34 M2
(14) 7) <<PB6 µ1. c[6;34. !"#$%¶GH·Iµ ¶GH !H5g FG% S N ¸^@ J ¹5 BZ ?1) 9JKSP< g AB"# ºN»9 .. 8). 2. C R % $5? . Znajek
(15) . 5
(16) 63c69s L. Macdonald & Thorne ,. %8)-S Blandford, Punsly 6. Thorne, et al.4) 31 . 4 3 6DQu 7. Membrane Paradigm Phinney. 5. MHD . 2.1. 2). 3). 5). !"#$% &'()*. +, - . !"#$%.%. /$0
(17) 1 2345678 9:;< Caltech =%$> . !"#$%. 1). Blandford
(18) ¡4y BZ ?
(19) 6¢^@. 81)£O@ 1977 9¤ Znajek2), 10) (i) :¥(;¦ [ (ii) '<§. &'() Punsly & Coroniti BZ. E9=N< . ?-@
(20) AB. field line ¨©>ª W ?@ (WF «WH) . 5 C.%/$0
(21) 1 2. (iii) 6 WF A896. D8<678 E FG. N< (iv) .%/$0
(22) 1 2. H6<IJKL MN<. 348< < B¬6S@. 6). !"#$%6. OP OQ 20 RFSPTDU. E9 WF Cª
(23) I ®¯Y. V-@ABWXY6<P Z[<Q.
(24) D2) 9 . Thorne, Phinney, Coroniti 9WO.
(25) E'*° ±g~. -\DC Blandford ] Punsly . {³$%´F slow-rotation limit . 7). 602. L8¼M. ²}. 2007 11 ¼.
(26) ῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῍῎ ῍῏ῑῌῐ῎῍῍. (proper) 1)
(27) . Blandford
(28) !P N . WF . !PQ\9*
(29) + %
(30) Mestel. . ! " 30 # $%& '(. meeting (1993) 4 S N “a kind of critical surface” * 9.9 14). )* +῏1. ". 8 y.". BZ , -. WF, I /0
(31) Znajek. $\9*
(32) R SN ST F .
(33) 123 456789*:9 . F
(34) + L)4D9 SN . 8 ;<=>? @896
(35). U T V+.*89. A 4 BC 4D9*. *D8%
(36) SN H}LEF !P13). E Punsly & Coroniti 6), 7) 8 . W X 4D9. 2). 2). . Blandford
(37) MHD F "G. !.
(38) 123#$HIE*. %
(39) 2002 11) MHD F . J FFDE F K 4 . !L)&.. Punsly. 12). . Blandford
(40). 7 YZ (scrupulous) 4D)* .. /[!P Q>hzgS=\T9. IE + EF BC'()5U ]^8) . () BZ , -T9 . M D+.9 3). Blandford
(41) D9| 7BC' /.. 5). BC'() 5. *+. AX U*_`.x.9 7. 8
(42) &. a 4b c ¡zgS=\9. ! 7NOPQNRS /0UV1@W. *Q>h¢xNT\T.T . XY *+Z[ 2\]^3_44 `. *
(43). a5 /.. Q>h*f*E*¦g. NOPQNRS,-.T . %
(44) bc ]def.
(45) ]^3_46 7 g=h .\9 ij *+IE 89k.9 . . 2.2 1). de BZ , £¤\9¥y . Punsly ῌ῎῍ Punsly & Coroniti6), 7)
(46). Znajek
(47). 2l
(48) % m+.9 F I9
(49) . 123
(50) 9 §h ;<=>? . 123 #$H * E:;@W9 <=4. 789
(51). D9 . 4D9*# wD %7 XC ¨[. 11). A . n FK -.o> 3_*.
(52)
(53) 123 *E#© BC'. p?@!3_ qAr]^3_s /T9 . /\9ª 1() .(+*4D.
(54)
(55) (wtWH) Bu Bv SN (wtWFῌ. 9 «C*. ()G i} jk ) Bla-. (1/2)WH) 4D9*XC wD
(56) E. ndford ¨+! 5lmny* . 4). 13). 4D+ *x Blandford
(57) Q>h*. .. EF BC'() y.zgS={6. F. ! |G4 SN H}*E. 4x + 2). Macdonald & Thorne3), Thorne, et al.4),. ()5U . Phinney5) 7no]depq,. # I~2. J* XK. ¬b V)r ¡ %7
(58) 8
(59) . 5L2\9(47 + (. B ®¯sct6° H}ul.. 6M D) y.
(60) Macdonald & Thorne , 3). 5). Phinney. : ! ( ( N T O 8 . . 9 Punsly & Coroniti7)
(61).
(62) ±²h. H} *
(63) =³ E4. @7. ῏1 ! v´
(64) $| 7a} 9(4 MHD/FFDE -. ±²hµ6^ 6 w x¶ y 6Fz! ·{ ¸| }/³~@8. +*Ej D98), 9) qMHD: F ^ª FFDE: >¹º>h6F^ªs 100 ». 11 ¼. 603.
(65) ῌῌ῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌ῍.
(66) . ?DE0,7) : 1BZ >!"!. . #
(67) !:+, 'F. . !
(68) '>+FG(?+HI#$. ! " #$%& '(
(69) . )*+,. @ w ( , + X5 '
(70) 1" ; . Punsly !
(71) Blandford - . / 0 ,. GpG>G <++ . 1234!! #5 $6#7. @
(72) :J #5 m$#X) /. 8
(73) BZ 9!:+,$%&
(74) ;. ;(,'$ 19). 3). <'(=>? @
(75) ABC MHD D. 6). Caltech n ) Punsly !
(76). EFGHI#@J
(77) KLMNO . Blandford ) YY+, 1Punsly !. 12345 P@ MHD QR . '$K @#,
(78)
(79) 1!. b KFFDE !. @#,5 1!
(80) ¡L MBN¢$. !" I $C#O ST<(. ,$%& @ MHD EUVW$ 0, Michel “minimum-torque solution”. 15). !
(81). 8m£¤_F;(,'$BOP@#, (!
(82) 1 # Blandford /. % minimum entropy $#X4&. ¥QR+,'$¢
(83) Caltech . 0PXSY,$%&, '('(!Z [). nSJ
(84) 1 BZ 9!:+,$#X. S F 1* 3 45 & 0 $ ! \ < #. /T# TJ+,
(85) BZ.
(86) ]^_>!+Y<# 'PX. 9!¦§ +,$#X Punsly #K
(87). @
(88) C+,`-ab MHD EUVW!. Blandford ¨©US+V$<#W. . #$ @ YX
(89) Kennel,. C!1|X . Fujimura, & Okamoto16) perfect MHD critical. /¥QR+,<$#&, 1. wind theory YJ)"$/0 17) '( 1. [R!
(90) ª«_ \.
(91) c)*+,. '$¬Y,. 4). Blandford 234'de. 2fg!
(92) Punsly Y0Y0 Perfect FFDE/ MHD . 3+h4#i '(<-a. 2.3 1).
(93) YZJ Blandford . ῏῍ῌῐ῎ ] '^®_7¯°`§. !
(94) abN13)uG¤ Blandford
(95). !j5:$ @
(96) ab. 1990 cUC±d + :J@Ah. gravitohydromagnetics 67 1 . ²}VF³T <+, N!
(97) 1aw }~. !L8k9l+ @#@
(98) ( mPX. ^5 P@
(99) ´ SN O. nHop+,#!)qSY,
(100) :<. w0,'$
(101) (P@ MHD/FFDE .d. @## 1!";rsturvVw(. 1dµxy<z5 ,'$m:<. 1xy<z={ #w>5 | }~^. @# [ #'$
(102) !]. 0,J$%&
(103) '( ~. |XJ:J@A5¶> @#. pV EV`x$mXB. $#&, MBe·fg
(104) hi$ @j<. ?:+, 1$@
(105) . 1Blandford ! B
(106) Punsly @#,5 $. b . 18). $ . 6 @ # W ! ¸
(107) 1 Blandford .
(108)
(109) 1!@A>S #)<. + <+, ] Blandford ¹#¬T. #b(@# . !
(110) 2002 cº Punsly N12) uG¤. 7). 5) 604. Punsly & Coroniti !;<BCT,. »k;( º<+, lN¼m. 2007 c 11 ¼.
(111) ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌ῍ ῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ῌῌ. 2). Punsly Blandford . 29%9#!sRS2* ..
(112) . * P/#!([\.
(113) . (Y\$*\]$. . Punsly !"#$. 2c2c ^*_s 4567`. % &'( )*+*, . %OaE2 2b. $- . /+ Blandford - 01. 4=vw7:* . 2 3*4567
(114) 11). 5). *9.**. ApJ c ed4=vw7P. $8 9 :;<=. / Punsly e2 Punsly f$. >7 . ?! 29.2 2. ghM<M7 %@@. ,2 Punsly @$AB%"#$ $%. 47<22 G2 Punsly a. BZ C&'DE(- !"F% . 4 is$ eKk. )* Blandford, Phinney, Thorne G(H+2. M j , ( k S 03 Q x. . Blandford ,+ 100 '. D E , - I . 2 * * J ,K. s¡,* 4E MHD ',+* . Punsly <LMNO**J,K P/. .¢ldM<m(n 4=vw7. (*+ 'DE(01Q,RS T. R£]¤ o2 .¥ 2G. , 23456U3 V783. p+¦$4567* . 83 W3X 9(Y'. Blandford qz` ApJ ,+ MNRAS . @G:;< Z=2* 2,2 23. r%¨S FG Blandford {© ,,. 783[9>*?*. - st Y4=vw7* . 9.*@<\]ABCDE@<\. ª$- MNRAS $« 4 Y4=vw7u¬. ^_*FG `* A,. 2 2 !wv</ edwv<. !"- ,+'DEaS $*,. v 2 4=vw7 (anonymous) w. 3). $ k§. 3 Y4. H I'% 4E$DE,F. =vw7<xy$ BZ C&z{*|}$. Gbc JGI.(9.Id 2. - ~ 2 !wv<v 2 4=v. ,2 eK SN fg/ [. w7 Blandford ®¯°Y@$- Y. 4). h. 12). Punsly. i)7Lj%Oc9.k . - P/aaO,( ±!². M @$ NOlP-%
(115) 2 PASJ8) . ¥ª'O wv<³¢. mn/ @$op 5 QqrR2 est. m(n d 7 ´rO$- . 2d+ 'u 4=vw7FG $. 2,2 wµ*/ c . - Blandford 1990 QIx,+DE,F. ®h,.$- .@$¶M+*. Gy2Sz{* TU (scrupulous). , f 47<B9 ' . $-%2 |}~78y. Blandford, Phinney c , 2.
(116) 4=vw7V( 7. MNRAS $
(117) ·/ ¸s. 9c WXX YZRS2eY#. PASJ -%
(118) >T<¹2. !$- 2,29%s9#!sRS2. 0Y4=vw7$- . * *+ Sc 4=vw7. º MNRAS e s.*$-. #!YZRS2eY#!$- 2,. .. v 100 ». v 11 ¼. 605.
(119) ῌῌ῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌ῍. W&' *012( YRZ Milne, McCrea . 3. ῎ῌ῍ῐ (sociological) ῑ῏. t %X3"#O[ * 7"i.
(120) 1985 Thorne, et al. 4)
(121) Punsly, Coroniti . iq Eddington S Chandrasekhar FY #W&'-S( +SF Punsly 9:t BZ T. UCLA Blandford, Phinney, Thorne. S< LM* tK '( Blandford . Caltech ! " # . !F,S< 'Fs-#-( WE/. $%&'( )*+,-./*0123 . #+K -( W Punsly \F. 4 Caltech 5 %6738! . q<FLG -]^ m*B6 . 9: ;2# Blandford, Punsly <=;>?@ . _¡ ;2F F#^ ¢` ' <. ! &AB#. CDEF '-.( . F LM30 (flawed) -2¢`Fa& . G H.*03 Blandford I J*. B'3@( q Punsly 3+8 BZ FLG -. Punsly & Coroniti 3 K 'BF. 'b£]d c:* tdo -'. !FLM" N+F N ;2#O PQ. Blandford 3N2ef& -'W¤g0nH. R30ST LM #- '3& #. h¥*0( Blandford F& ¦-§&' . *#-UV3$SW %XF2YB*. b£]ddo7S6 3 ;lEB#. 0&'( +13 Znajek &'(Z[)\*. h it6 #-F^la&'. +]^-2_&',`4 a-.b . +*0(. '( c / 0defg/` 1h#2 3? 4.#3. . + ii DE ¨j ak3, lE#. ( , ,-b5G -. ©ªT*q& mkn«;2 . ( , ,-iW6',*0( ,2 7 2 . ' F0( British astrophysical establishment . Eddington ` ,*0( 98 9jkl:. Eddington ocp Chandrasekhar qGrS#. ^ -29j ;<=> ii0;2Fm. W&'-S3 Caltech astrophysical estab-. .(. lishment <¬R wxsU*q@ Punsly. Blandford, Punsly <=;>? @ ! DE. K qGrS;2 -#-( Blandford. Eddington Chandrasekhar ! DEn-o. F Phinney, Thorne - & ' Y t J u . +7p ( +? ++*q@r s 30. 1v30l %' Punsly YRZ wx#. ( ;tA. S -;2F 1935 uBCD". yy ? (Levinson, van Putten, Lyutikov,. vF=- EwFxGH&I yBz{|}. Krasnopolsky, etc.) Ez ®F¯l{- . 3 +8 "v4~RE"J. Punsly !s& - ;°F±l²=2.
(122) *KLMN OP $F^Q&. -#-( /. '( R[ SdT"#3#. G Blandford |#l Punsly F}O~O. CU*0KLMN S[ -+. ´TWG -( wx# 0d'µ". 3 V. ;lq ¶ oE/Fk·F. 20). WF7S'( 9:,S Chandrase-. BZ , %%³-5. khar limit -S( JF& z{|. ( ¸¹#q º #GST#. } <FWX#LM3#GST#. mk * Blandford Eddington b *. #. #-(. W&'( ,S3tK ^( +13. q& LM »F '%%*0(. / <FLM#W&'( ,S3p#. , t %X Punsly K FqWW. 606. CD¼. 2007 11 ¼.
(123) ῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌῌ῍ ῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ῌῌ. BZ
(124) Blandford . BZ !. "
(125) # !$! % & BZ '(! !. ) . " * Blandford !
(126) +, - !. 2 Eddington / -. . 01 BZ 2* 3-4 Punsly 56789:;< *& ! =*) " >? @A-- Punsly !BC DE F -G BZ H. - . +!I "# 99J - *. KLM Punsly NO . P Q BZ. $ KRSP - BC . %T>- K P. \2. P'- Kyz{|}_~kP O~ L S N P'-lmµknL #¶op * ·\_!¸"q r)+ T ¹ -º~_0s I¡ tA*& . ++0*. Blandford K&"'-P (U )*+V. ~L SN zMN. K P +0,W -XYXZ. * ({^_!1 >>. .V . OP'Q kROmST(U'Q. [\]^_ `a /b. * Punsly . 7 c01- d. k V<I . . *BC E2efg) *- . o_}_~W~_!V<d*+T. 7>- . > ~_|]__ |. 4. ῌ. |]__X ;T(U'-]{ GRB. ῍. - ~_¡ x*) 56¢. BZ 5 30 34!hT>, 20 3 4'(!8T> ?6,,:;!<. Y g) &Z ¢Y[ *& £> ¤\ 2¥. T> 7 56T>,. ¦"*]g, - K P (. * > >i Vcj7. Blandford !56 - ^ *& . 8k l . § _`¨©ª*& Ua! E. -7*. ! K9:P i K;m<n_o_P. 2 *& § > * k Punsly b. 7* p .V! *. , . c.V K P «
(127) . =->?V!q>@r . d 2 Eddington Y d * . &!. BZ '(ea Punsly ¬ . AstBC '(- K . d Gamov ®¯{°±²f³´. P uD EF! .V! 15 3. ~( c0g²f³´~h, F.. GH, v -7*w. Hoyle !iQd* 2 Eddington, . xI'-o_yz{|}_~ JKL. 2 Hoyle j©ª . . 100 ». 8). 11 ¼. 607.
(128) ῏῏῍῏ῑῌῐ῎ ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏ῐ.
(129) Blandford !" #$%& '()*+, -./01 .
(130) 2 3456789:;<,=,
(131) > ? @ A B . C D E F % G H 100I JK
(132) ABLM)N AO .PMQRNSR)T U5VW X
(133) 2 YZ [\]^_H`a .
(134) b, cd CDefghi" O,%) j. 14) Blandford R., 1994, in Cosmical Magnetism, eds. D. Lynden-Bell (Dordrecht: Kluwer) 15) Michel F. C., 1969, ApJ 158, 727 16) Kennel C. F., Fujimura F. S., Okamoto I., 1983, Geophys. Astrophysics. Fluid Dyn 26, 147 17) Punsly B., 1998a, ApJ 497, 640 ῍῍, 1989b, ApJ 506, 790 18) Punsly B., 2001, Black Hole Gravitohydromagnetics (New York: Springer-Verlag) 19) Komissarov S. S., 2001, MNRAS 326, L41 ῍῍, 2004, MNRAS 350, 427 20) Miller A. I., 2005, Obsession, Friendship, and Betrayal in the Quest for Black Holes (Boston: Houghton Mi%in). klDmnopqrsOtOuvVwxy %,OZ. ῎῍῏ῌ 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13). 608. Blandford R. D., Znajek R. L., 1977, MNRAS 179, 433 Znajek R. L., 1977, MNRAS 179, 457 Macdonald D., Thorne K. S., 1982, MNRAS 198, 345 Thorne K. S., et al., 1986, Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm (New Haven: Yale University Press) Phinney E S., 1983, in Astrophysical Jets, eds. A. Ferrari & S. G. Pacholczyk (Reidel) Punsly B., Coroniti F. V., 1989, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3834 Punsly B., Coroniti F. V., 1990, ApJ 354, 583 Okamoto I., 2006, PASJ 58, 1047 ῍῍, 2006, CQG, submitted Okamoto I., Sigalo F. B., 2006, PASJ 58, 987 Znajek R. L., 1978, MNRAS 185, 833 Blandford R., 2002, in Lighthouse of the Universe, eds. M. Gilfanov et al. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) Punsly B., 2003, ApJ 583, 842 Okamoto I., 1992, MNRAS 254, 192. Extraction Process for the Rotational Energy of Kerr Black Holes: The Causality Question Isao OKAMOTO Institute for Black Hole Mining, Ochikawa 114῎6, Hino-shi, Tokyo 191῎0034, Japan Abstract : It is argued that in the active magnetosphere of a Kerr black hole there must exist the pair-creation gap with dual unipolar batteries back to back in the upper null surface SN defined by wzWFῌ(1/2)WH, where w is the frame-dragging angular frequency, WHzw(rH) is the hole’s angular frequency and WF is the field line angular frequency. In the Blandford῎Znajek process there is no driving source for the electric currents in the magnetosphere, which has given rise to the causality question.. {|jk. 2007 } 11 j.
(135)
関連したドキュメント
[9] DiBenedetto, E.; Gianazza, U.; Vespri, V.; Harnack’s inequality for degenerate and singular parabolic equations, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2012),
As is well known (see [20, Corollary 3.4 and Section 4.2] for a geometric proof), the B¨ acklund transformation of the sine-Gordon equation, applied repeatedly, produces
Since the boundary integral equation is Fredholm, the solvability theorem follows from the uniqueness theorem, which is ensured for the Neumann problem in the case of the
Keywords: Lévy processes, stable processes, hitting times, positive self-similar Markov pro- cesses, Lamperti representation, real self-similar Markov processes,
Next, we prove bounds for the dimensions of p-adic MLV-spaces in Section 3, assuming results in Section 4, and make a conjecture about a special element in the motivic Galois group
Transirico, “Second order elliptic equations in weighted Sobolev spaces on unbounded domains,” Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL.. Memorie di
It turns out that the symbol which is defined in a probabilistic way coincides with the analytic (in the sense of pseudo-differential operators) symbol for the class of Feller
Case 1: Without loss of generality, say all the lines are black; then the black con- figuration together with the members of the special class which also have all black lines
