• 検索結果がありません。

Categorified Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Categorified Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology"

Copied!
31
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

homology

Jun Yoshida (joint work with Noboru Ito)

The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Mathemtaical Sciences

December 19, 2019

(2)

Contents

1

Introduction Goal of the talk Background: Vassiliev invariants

Backgound: categorification Motivating Question Goal of the talk (continued) Main Theorem 1

Main Theorem 2

2

Review on Khovanov homology As a bigraded module On differential

3

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

Mapping cone as subtraction Genus-1 map

Invariance under elementary moves

Cube of resolutions Example

4

Main Results

Khovanov homology on singular links

Example: “figure-eight”

FI-relation

(3)

Introduction

1

Introduction Goal of the talk

Background: Vassiliev invariants Backgound: categorification Motivating Question Goal of the talk (continued) Main Theorem 1

Main Theorem 2

2

Review on Khovanov homology

3

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

4

Main Results

(4)

Goal of the talk

Goal

To investigate Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology.

Recall

v: a polynomial link invariant.

Vassiliev skein relation:

v

!

= v

!

− v

! .

Extension of v to singular knots/links.

Main Question

What is the appropriate notion of “crossing change” on Khovanov homology?

What properties does extended Khovanov homology enjoy?

(5)

Background: Vassiliev invariants

Convention Singular knot/link

≡ immersed closed 1-manifold in S

3

whose singular values are at worst finite and all transverse double points.

Ambient isotopy classes are mainly considered.

Definition

A polynomial invariant v is said to be of type n if v(K) = 0 for every knot K with at least n double points.

v is called a Vassiliev invariant if it is of type n for some n.

Quantum invariants yield Vassiliev invariants [Birman and Lin, 1993]

Jones

polynomial ∈ Quantum

Invariants Vassiliev

Invariants

Taylor expansion

(6)

Backgound: categorification

Khovanov homology Kh

i,j

(L)

Link invariant values in bigraded abelian groups.

Theorem ([Khovanov, 2000])

For a link L, the graded Euler characteristic of Kh (L), i.e.

[Kh (L)]

q

:= X

i,j

(−1)

i

q

j

dim Kh

i,j

(L) ∈ Z [q, q

−1

] ,

equals the unnormalized Jones polynomial of L.

Slogan: Khovanov homology categorifies Jones polynomial:

if V (L) is the Jones polynomial of a link L, then

[Kh(L)]

q

= (q + q

−1

)V (L) .

(7)

Motivating Question

Kh

V Vassiliev

Invariants

???

Taylor expansion decategorify categorify

???

???

Question

1

How does Khovanov homology relate to Vassiliev invariants?

2

Furthermore, does it produces categorifications of Vassiliev

invariants?

(8)

Goal of the talk (continued)

Target Question

What is the counterpart of Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology?

Approach Consider long exact sequence instead of subtraction.

Recall that a long exact sequence of cohomologies

· · · → H

n

(X ) → H

n

(Y ) → H

n

(Z) → H

n+1

(X ) → . . . yields the identity on the Euler characteristics χ:

χ(X) − χ(Y ) + χ(Z) = 0 . Compare it with Vassiliev skein relation:

v

!

− v

! + v

!

= 0 .

(9)

Main Theorem 1

Theorem (Ito-Y. arXiv:1911.09308)

Khovanov homology (with coefficients in F

2

) extends to a singular link invariant so that there is a long exact sequence

· · · → Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

Φb

−−→ Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

→ Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

→ Kh

i+1,j

; F

2

!

→ . . . .

Remark

The invariant seems to be NEW!

The long exact sequence can be seen as a categorified Vassiliev skein relation.

The map Φ b has an easy description.

(10)

Main Theorem 1

Corollary

Khovanov homology categorifes unnormalized Jones polynomial even on singular links.

Proof Observe that the identity

"

Kh ; F

2

!#

q

"

Kh ; F

2

!#

q

+

"

Kh ; F

2

!#

q

= 0

arising from the long exact sequence is exactly the Vassiliev skein

relation for unnormalized Jones polynomial.

(11)

Main Theorem 2

Theorem (Ito-Y. arXiv:1911.09308)

Khovanov homology (with coefficients in F

2

) satisfies FI-relation; i.e.

Kh ; F

2

!

= 0 .

Equivalently

The genus-1 map Φ b is a quasi-isomorphism on such crossings:

Φ : b C

!

⊗ F

2

→ C

!

⊗ F

2

.

In particular, Φ b is non-trivial.

(12)

Review on Khovanov homology

1

Introduction

2

Review on Khovanov homology As a bigraded module On differential

3

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

4

Main Results

(13)

As a bigraded module

D: a diagram of an (ordinary) link.

Definition

A state on D is a smoothng of D on all its crossings:

0-smoothing

←−−−−−−− c

1-smoothing

−−−−−−−→ .

a state D

s

is topologically of the form D

s

∼ = (S

1

)

0(Ds)

.

Notation

For a state D

s

, write |s| the number of 1-smoothings.

(14)

As a bigraded module

Definition

For a link diagram D, we set

C

i,j

(D) :=

M

Ds:state

|s|=i

(V

⊗π0(Ds)

)

j−i

,

where V := Z {1, x} is a graded abelian group with deg 1 = 1 and deg x = −1.

Basis

C

i,j

(D) is a free abelian group generated by enhanced states.

Example

An enhanced state on trefoil 3

1

: 1 x ∈ C

1,1

(15)

On differential

Observation

V underlies a (1+1)-TQFT (in the sense of [Atiyah, 1988]) associated to the Frobenius algebra Z [x]/(x

2

).

The saddle operation assigns 1-smoothings to 0-smoothings:

: →

δ

c

: C

i,j

(D) → C

i+1,j

(D) for each crossing c:

p 7→ p

(1)

p

(2)

p q

7→ pq

(16)

On differential

Definition

1

For a link diagram D, put d := X

±δ

c

: C

i,j

(D) → C

i+1,j

(D) ,

where the sum is taken so that δ

c

apply on all the 0-smoothings.

2

n

+

, n

: the numbers of positive and negative crossings.

C

i,j

(D) := C

i+n,j+2n−n+

(D) .

C(D) = (C

∗,?

(D), d) is called the Khovanov complex of D.

Theorem ([Khovanov, 2000])

For every abelian group M , the homology group

Kh

i,j

(L; M ) := H

i

(C

∗,j

(D) ⊗ M )

(17)

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

1

Introduction

2

Review on Khovanov homology

3

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology Mapping cone as subtraction

Genus-1 map

Invariance under elementary moves Cube of resolutions

Example

4

Main Results

(18)

Mapping cone as subtraction

Question

How can we realize the “subtraction”

Kh

!

“−” Kh

!

?

A Consider a map

f : C

!

→ C

!

and take the mapping cone Cone(f ).

(19)

Mapping cone as subtraction

Definition

Let f : X → Y be a chain map. Define a complex Cone(f ) by Cone(f )

i

:= Y

i

⊕ X

i+1

with differential

d =

d

Y

f 0 −d

X

: Y

i

⊕ X

i+1

→ Y

i+1

⊕ X

i+2

.

Lemma

If f : X → Y is a chain map, then the sequence below is exact

· · · → H

n

(X) −→

f

H

n

(Y ) −→

i

H

n

(Cone(f )) −→

p

H

n+1

(X) → . . . i : Y → Cone(f ) is the canonical inclusion;

p : Cone(f ) → X

∗+1

is the canonical projection.

(20)

Genus-1 map

Proposition

The 2-dimensional cobordism

: →

gives rise to a chain map

Φ : b C

!

⊗ F

2

→ C

!

⊗ F

2

.

Remark

As a realization of crossing change, Φ b is not the standard one.

Indeed, the standard one is of degree 6= (0, 0).

(21)

Genus-1 map

Presentation Φ b : C

!

⊗ F

2

→ C

!

⊗ F

2

p 7→ 0

p q 7→ (pq)

(1)

(pq)

(2)

p q

7→ 0

p 7→ p

(1)

p

(2)

(22)

Invariance under elementary moves

Proposition

The chain map Φ b is invariant under elementary moves of double points.

Elementary moves [Bataineh-Elhamadi-Hajij-Youmans, 2018]

ΩIVa

←→

ΩIVe

←→

ΩV

←→

(23)

Invariance under elementary moves

Sketch of the proof of Proposition Show that the genus-1 map

Φ : C

!

→ C

!

is invariant instead of Φ b is.

Invariance is verified as the commutativity of appropriate diagrms: e.g.

C

i,j

 C

i,j

!

C

i,j

C

i,j−2

 C

i,j−2

!

C

i,j−2

Φ

RII RII

Φ

RII RII

.

23 / 31

(24)

Cube of resolutions

Definition

Let D be a diagram of a singular link.

1

c

#

(D): the set of double points in D.

2

A resolution of D is a diagram D

r

without double points obtained by resolving double points of D:

b

−-resolution

←−−−−−−− b

+-resolution

−−−−−−−→ b

+

.

3

|r| the number of −-resolutions.

(25)

Cube of resolutions

Observation

Resolutions of D ←→

1:1

subsets of c

#

(D).

If D

r−

and D

r+

differ at only one double point, then Φ : b C(D

r−

) ⊗ F

2

→ C(D

r+

) ⊗ F

2

.

The maps Φ b at different double points commute with each other.

Lemma

For each singular link diagram D, we have a c

#

(D)-cube of Khovanov complexes of resolutions of D and the genus-1 maps.

Definition

We denote by C

∗,?

(D; F

2

) the multiple mapping cone of the

c

#

(D)-cube.

(26)

Example

Cube for b a :

C

a

b

 ⊗ F

2 bΦa

−−→ C

a

+

b

 ⊗ F

2

Φbb

↓ ↓

Φbb

C

a

b

+

 ⊗ F

2 bΦa

−−→ C

a

+

b

+

 ⊗ F

2

(27)

Main Results

1

Introduction

2

Review on Khovanov homology

3

Vassiliev skein relation on Khovanov homology

4

Main Results

Khovanov homology on singular links Example: “figure-eight”

FI-relation

(28)

Khovanov homology on singular links

Theorem (Ito-Y. arXiv:1911.09308) Let L be a singular link and D a diagram.

1

The homology Kh

i,j

(L; F

2

) := H

i

(C

∗,j

(D; F

2

)) is independent of the choice of D.

2

If L has no double point, then Kh

i,j

(L; F

2

) agrees with the ordinary Khovanov homology (with coefficients in F

2

).

3

For each double point of L, there is a long exact sequence

· · · → Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

Φb

−−→ Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

→ Kh

i,j

; F

2

!

→ Kh

i+1,j

; F

2

!

→ . . . .

(29)

Example: “figure-eight”

Kh

i,j

Φb

− → Kh

i,j

→ Kh

i,j

Proposition

The below is the table of the homology groups on the middle (resp. on the right):

i\j −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5

−2 F

2

F

2

−1 F

2

F

2

0 × F

2

× F

2

1 F

2

F

2

2 F

2

F

2

(30)

FI-relation

Theorem (Ito-Y. arXiv:1911.09308)

Khovanov homology (with coefficients in F

2

) satisfies FI-relation; i.e.

Kh ; F

2

!

= 0 .

Proof Direct computation shows the diagram below commutes:

C ; F

2

!

C ; F

2

!

C ; F

2

!

RI RI+

b

.

(31)

[Atiyah, 1988] Atiyah, M. (1988).

Topological quantum field theories.

Publications Mathématiques de l’Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, 68(1):175–186.

[Bataineh et al., 2018] Bataineh, K., Elhamdadi, M., Hajij, M., and Youmans, W. (2018).

Generating sets of reidemeister moves of oriented singular links and quandles.

Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications, 27(14):1850064–1–15.

[Birman and Lin, 1993] Birman, J. S. and Lin, X.-S. (1993).

Knot polynomials and Vassiliev’s invariants.

Inventiones Mathematicae, 111(2):225–270.

[Khovanov, 2000] Khovanov, M. (2000).

A categorification of the Jones polynomial.

Duke Mathematical Journal, 101(3):359–426.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In Section 1, we introduce the mixed bound- ary value/interface problem that we study, namely Equation (6), and state the main results of the paper, Theorem 1.1 on the regularity of

For example, a maximal embedded collection of tori in an irreducible manifold is complete as each of the component manifolds is indecomposable (any additional surface would have to

A new method is suggested for obtaining the exact and numerical solutions of the initial-boundary value problem for a nonlinear parabolic type equation in the domain with the

The Artin braid group B n has been extended to the singular braid monoid SB n by Birman [5] and Baez [1] in order to study Vassiliev invariants.. The strings of a singular braid

Inside this class, we identify a new subclass of Liouvillian integrable systems, under suitable conditions such Liouvillian integrable systems can have at most one limit cycle, and

The focus has been on some of the connections between recent work on general state space Markov chains and results from mixing processes and the implica- tions for Markov chain

Building on the these results in [4], our main statement, Theorem 1.1, translates into the analyticity (smoothness) of the regular free boundary of the obstacle problem for

Splitting homotopies : Another View of the Lyubeznik Resolution There are systematic ways to find smaller resolutions of a given resolution which are actually subresolutions.. This is