• 検索結果がありません。

FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS OF ORDER K, MULTINOMIAL EXPANSIONS AND PROBABILITY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS OF ORDER K, MULTINOMIAL EXPANSIONS AND PROBABILITY"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Internat. J. Math. #kh. Sci.

Vol.

6

No.

3

(1983) 545-550

545

FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS OF ORDER K, MULTINOMIAL EXPANSIONS AND PROBABILITY

ANDREA$

N. PHILIPPOU

Department of Mathematics Unlveristy of Patras

Patras,

Greece

COSTA$ GEORGHIOU

School of Engineering Unlverlsty of Patras

Patras,

Greece

GEORGE N.. PHILIPPOU

Department of General Studies Higher Technical Institute

Nicosia, Cyprus (Received October 31, 1982)

ABSTRACT. The Fibonacci polynomials of order k are introduced and two expansions of them are obtained, in terms of the multlnomial and binomial coefficients, respectively.

A relation between them and probability is also established. The present work general- izes results of

[2] [4]

and

[5].

KEY ORDS AND PHRASES. Fibonacc polynom of ode k, eo, mano d

binomial coeff/e/ents, probability.

1980

MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODE. IOA40.

i. INTRODUCTION.

In the sequel, k is a fixed integer greater than or equal to 2, x is a positive

and

finite real number, and n is a nonnegative integer unless otherwise specified.

Motivated

f(k) (x)

and study

some

introduced the Fibonacci polynomials of order

M

to be denoted by n

of their properties. First we observe that

f(k)(x)

are generalized polynomials, appro- priate extensions for the Fibonacci and Pell numbers of order k

[3], [4],

and identlca/

to the r-bonacci polynomials R (x)(n>_-(r-2)) of [i] for k=r and

n>-O.

Then we state and n

prove a theorem, which provides two expansions of

f(k)(x)

(n>l) in terms of the multimom- n

ial and binomial coefficients, respectively.

Hoggatt

and Bicknell

[i],

amoung other results, give another expansion of

f(k)(x),

in terms of the

n

(2)

546 A.N. PHILIPPOU, C. GEORGHIOU and G. N. PHILIPP J

elements of the left justified k-nomial triangle. The latter, however, are less widely known and used than the multinomial and binomial coefficients, and on this account our expansions may be considered better. As a corollary to our theorem, we derive several results of

[2]-[4]

and

[5].

We also obtain a relation between

f(k)(x)

(n->l) and

n probability.

2. THE FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS OF ORDER K AND MULTINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS.

In this section, we introduce the Fibonacci polynomials of order k and derive two expansions of them im terms of the multinomial and binomial coefficients, respectively.

The proof is along the lines of

[2]

and

[4].

DEFINITION. The sequence of polynomials

{f(k)

n (x)

}

n--0 is said to be the sequel of Fibonacci polynomials of order k if

fk)(x)--O, fk)(x)=l,

and

n7

k-i f(k)(x)

n-i if 2 < n < k

f(k)(x)

n__

<

i=l

I

i=lk

Z xk-i f(k)

n-i(x) if n k

+

i (2.1)

If

frjt (x)=O

for -(r-2)<n<-i Hoggatt and Bick [i] call R

(x)--f ((x)

r) (n>-(r-2))

n n

r-bonacci polynomials.

(k) (k)

Denoting by F

n(x)

fn and Pn respectively, the Fibonacci polynomials

[5],

the Fibonacci numbers of order k

[3],

and the Pell numbers of order k

[4],

it follows from (2.1) that

f(k) (k)

(k) (k)

f(2)

n (x)

Fn(X)

n (!) fn and Fn (2) Pn (2.2)

We now proceed to show the following lemma.

LEMMA.

Let f(k) (x)

}

n=0 be the sequence of Fibonacci polynomials of order k, and denote its generating function

hy gk(s;x).

Then, for

sl <x/(l+xk),

s(l)

s

Zk(S

;x)

k-I

xf(k) _f(k) kf(k)

PROOF. We see from the definition that f

k)(x)=x

(X)

(x) (x)

n n-i -x

n-i for 3Nn<_k+l and xf(k)

(x)

f(k)

(x)=xk

f(k)...(k) (x)

for n>k+2 Therefore

n n-i n-i

Lx)-mn_l_k

(3)

MULTIN(4IAL EXPANSIONS AND PROBABILITY 547

(i

+

x’-)f

"k)(x)

3 < n < k

+

1

f(k__(x)

n-1

n (i

+ k )f(k)(x)

I

f(k) (x)

n > k

+

2

n-i x n-l-k

[(i +

x

k)]n-2

xk-I 2 <n<k+l

_Ix( I + xk)f(k) n-l(X) ---x

1

f(k) n-l-k(X)’

n > k

+

2.

(2.3)

It

may be seen, by means of (2.3) and induction on n, that

f(k)

n

(x)

<

[(l+x k) ]n-2

xk-i n>2

which implies the convergence of

(s;x)

for

Is <x/(l+xk).

observe that

(s;x) E snf(k)(x)

n=0 n

(2.4) Next, by means of (2.3), we

k=l

s

+

7.

sn[(l +

x

k)]n-2xk-I +

n2

I

snf

(k)

n-k+2 n

(x),

(2.5)

and

F.

snf(k)(x) -(l+x k)

n-k+2 n

_n.

(k)

1 _n:(k)

Z " Zn l(X)’-

x

r. Zn--.. 1(x)

n-k+2 n-k+2

snf (k)

s__(l=x k) Z

(x)-s-

n-0 n

n=

2

sn[--ix(l+xk ]n-2xk-i -sl

k+l

snf

n<k)(x)

s k ik+l 2 k=l

[(z+ )- x 1(’;)-Sx z s"[ (Z+x)]

n-2 k-iX

(2.6)

The last two relations give

s k

s(s;x) , + Z(z +

x

k) s

2

s

k(S;X)

so that

s

(l---)

8

gk(s;x)

z(z+k_s k) z_-+-’"

2

x

We will employ the above leema to establish the following expansions of

f(k)(x) (>i).

n

TnO.

Lt

{re)

(x)

}(R)

n n=0 be the Fibonacci polynomials of order k. Then

nl+" "’+nk) xk(nl +" +nk)-n

ne0

(a)

.(k)

Z

In+ l(x) nl ’nk \nl’" "’nk

(4)

548 A.N.

PHILIPPOU,

C. GEORGHIOU and G. N. PHILIPPOU

where the summation is over all noo-negative integers

nl,..,n

k such that

nl+2n2+../knk-n;

(b)

n/l (x) E (-I)

x

ki

(l+xk)

i-O

x i-O

nl, where, as ual,

Ix]

denotes the greatest interger in x.

PROOF. First we show (a). Let

I,I

<

k)

.o that

lxk[’-/()+.

X

+()kll<l

_Let n

i(l<i<k)

be non-negative integers as specified below Then,using the lemma and the k

multinomial theorem, and replacing n by n-

E

(i-1)ni, we get, i=l

E snf(k)..

{l_xk s

+ s)2+.

s k

}-I

.+tx [ ( ..+()

n-O

s

2+.

s k

}n

kn

r ( ,no

-o’X

n.,,..

nl+ +nk=n

nl+2n2

+.

.+kn k

hr.

s

(nl+"’+nk Ink(nl+’’’+nk)-n’

n-O n

I,... ,nk nl’" ’nk

nl+2n2 +- +knk=n

(2.8)

from which (a) follows.

S(-l+xk

k-

We now proceed to establish (b). Let 0 < s <

x/(l + xk),

so that

iX"

-s < i.

Then, using the lemma and the binomial theorem, replacing n by n-kl, and setting

.l+xk)n [n/Ik+l)]

i

(n )

(l+x

k)

n (-i)

ki xki

(k+l)i

B(k)

(x)

(---- n>O, (2.9)

we ge[:

Z

s

n.(k) n/l(X)=

(1-

s_)

[1-

s_( l+xk-s k)

n-O

x x

s

is_

(i-

) E (1+xk-s k)

n-O x

(5)

MULTINOHIAL EXPANSIONS AND PROBABILITY 549

x I=0 i:O s sn

[n/(k+l)]

(i-

)

Z

(_l)i nkl (l+xk)n-(k+l)i

X-(n-ki)

n=O i=O

(1-s_) E

sn B(k)

(x), by (2.9) x n=0 n

since

Bo(.k)

i+ 7.

sn[B(k)

(x) 1

B(k)

n

" n-l(X) ],

n=l

(2.10)

(x) i from (2.9). The last two relations show part (b) of the theorem.

We have the following obvious corollary to the theorem, by means of relation (2.2).

COROLLARY 2.1. Let F

(x), f(k)

and

p(k)n

denote the Fibonacci polynomials, the

n n

Fibonacci numbers of order k and the Pell numbers of order k, respectively. Then, (a)

Fn+ l(x)

7.

n;i xn-21

i=0 (b)(1) .(k)

rn+

I

%

nI

nk9

n

i+2n2 +. +knk-n

In/(k+l)

(k) 2n

(b)(if)

rn+

I

n0;

n>-0;

?L (_l)i [n[ki)2-(k+l)i

i=O

(c)(1)

p(k)

n=l

/ (k+l)

-2n-

1

(n-l) (-l)i (n-l-ki 2-(k+l)i

n>_l;

i=O i

k(nl+...+n> 2k(rtl+....h.tk)_n

n->O;

,nl,

,n

nI

nk9

n

1+2n2+

+kn

k-n

n/i(+l)

.I+2k n (c)(It)

rn+

I

(---)

i’O

(_l)i (n;ki)2ki(l+2k)-(k+l)i

l.l+2k

n-i

[(n-l)/(k+l)]

(n-l-ki)

t---)

(-i)i i

2kl

(I+2

k)

(k+l)i

i=O nl.

REMARK. Part (a) of Corollary 2.1 was proposed by Swamy F51, who appears to be the first to introduce the Fibonaccl polynomials. Part (b)(1) was first shown in

while (b) and (c), respectively, were later proved by a different method in [2l and [4].

The following corollary relates the Fibonaccl polynomials of order k to probability.

(6)

550 A.N.

PHILIPPOU,

C. GEORGHIOU and G. N. PHILIPPOU

COROY 2 2. Let

{f(k)(x))o

n n-0 be the sequence of Fibonacci polynomials of order

k,

and denote by N

k the number of trials until the occurrence of the kth consecutive success in independent trials with success probability p (0<p<l). Then,

P(Nk.n+k pn+k()n/k Zn+

.(k)I

(()l/k),

n>O.

PROOF. It follows directly from Theorem 3.1 of

[3]

and part (a) of the present theorem.

In partlcular, Corollary 2.2. reduces to the following results of [2] and

[4],

respectively, bymeans of (2,2).

Let

N

k be as above, and set

p-(l+2k)

-1 Then 2n

...(k)

>0 (2 ii)

P(Nk=n+k)

(1+2

k)n+k rn+l’

n

Let N

k be as

above,

and set

p=I/2.

Then,

1 ,.(k) n_>O" (2 12)

P

(Nk’n+k)

2

n In+l

REFERENCES

I. HOGGATT, VoE.

nd

BICKNELL,

MARORIE. Generalized Fibonacci Polynomials,

Th___e Fbonacc_ Quarter!y I__i (1973),

457-465.

2,

PIIILIPPOU, A.N.

A Note On Khe Fibonacci Sequence Of Order k and Multinomial Co-

efficients, Th.e Fib0nacci _Quarte.rly 2.1

(1983), in press.

3.

PHILIPPOU, A.N.

and

MUWAFI, A.A.

Waiting for the kth Consecutive Success and the Fibonacci Sequence of Order k, The Fibonacci Quarterly 20

(1982),

28-32.

PHILZPPOU, A.N.

and

PHILIPPOU,

G.N. The Pell Sequence of Order k, Multinomial Coefficients, and Probability, Submitted for publication (1982).

5,, SWAMY M.N.S,

Problem B-

74,

The Fibonacci Quarterly

3_

(1965), 236.

(7)

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Special Issue on

Modeling Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Scenarios

Call for Papers

Thinking about nonlinearity in engineering areas, up to the 70s, was focused on intentionally built nonlinear parts in order to improve the operational characteristics of a device or system. Keying, saturation, hysteretic phenomena, and dead zones were added to existing devices increasing their behavior diversity and precision. In this context, an intrinsic nonlinearity was treated just as a linear approximation, around equilibrium points.

Inspired on the rediscovering of the richness of nonlinear and chaotic phenomena, engineers started using analytical tools from “Qualitative Theory of Di

erential Equations,”

allowing more precise analysis and synthesis, in order to produce new vital products and services. Bifurcation theory, dynamical systems and chaos started to be part of the mandatory set of tools for design engineers.

This proposed special edition of the Mathematical Prob-

lems in Engineering aims to provide a picture of the impor-

tance of the bifurcation theory, relating it with nonlinear and chaotic dynamics for natural and engineered systems.

Ideas of how this dynamics can be captured through precisely tailored real and numerical experiments and understanding by the combination of specific tools that associate dynamical system theory and geometric tools in a very clever, sophis- ticated, and at the same time simple and unique analytical environment are the subject of this issue, allowing new methods to design high-precision devices and equipment.

Authors should follow the Mathematical Problems in Engineering manuscript format described at

http://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. Prospective authors should

submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking System at

http://

mts.hindawi.com/

according to the following timetable:

Manuscript Due February 1, 2009 First Round of Reviews May 1, 2009 Publication Date August 1, 2009

Guest Editors

José Roberto Castilho Piqueira,

Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, The University of São Paulo, 05508-970 São Paulo, Brazil;

[email protected]

Elbert E. Neher Macau,

Laboratório Associado de Matemática Aplicada e Computação (LAC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São Josè dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil ; [email protected]

Celso Grebogi,

Department of Physics, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK;

[email protected]

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

参照

関連したドキュメント

An auxiliary large deviation result for multinomial distribution with increasing number of equiprobable cells may also be of independent interest.. 1 Introduction and

The main subject of this paper is to explain why N = 8n + 2 and M = 4n + 3 are the best choices in such expansions, and also to obtain general form of these expansions, especially

The repeated homogeneous balance method is used to construct new exact traveling wave solutions of the (2+1) dimensional Zakharov- Kuznetsov (ZK) equation, in which the

Abstract: This note presents absolute bounds on the size of the coefficients of the char- acteristic and minimal polynomials depending on the size of the coefficients of the

Dilcher, Recurrence relations for N¨ orlund numbers and Bernoulli numbers of the second kind, F ibonacci Quart.. Carlitz, A note on Bernoulli and Euler polynomials of the second

Development of the qualitative theory of linear and half-linear differential equa- tions in the last decades has proven that the identities (2.4) and (2.5) are very useful tools

They introduced edge average or face average constraints as primal constraints to achieve the same condition number bound as à%ß elliptic problems.. The continuity constraints on

In section 2 we give some examples of application of the abstract concentration inequality to empirical processes that demonstrate some interesting properties of Talagrand’s