• 検索結果がありません。

Exercise 3.25. Let X; ¹ X

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Exercise 3.25. Let X; ¹ X"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Prof. N. Kajino, Probability Theory WS 2012/2013

Problem set 12, submit solutions by 05.12.2012

The Problems below will be discussed in the tutorial on 10.12.2012.

(The Exercises are additional and will be discussed only if time permits.) In the problems and the exercises below, .; F; P/ denotes a probability space and all random variables are assumed to be defined on .; F; P/.

Exercise 3.25. Let X; ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

be real random variables with X

n

!

P

X and suppose X 6D 0 a.s. Prove that X

n1

1

¹Xn6D0º

P

! X

1

. (Use Theorem 3.52, similarly to the proof of Corollary 3.53-(2).)

Problem 3.26. Let .S; B / be a measurable space and let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

be i.i.d. .S; B /- valued random variables. Let .E; E / be a measurable space and let f W S ! E be B = E -measurable. Prove that ¹ f .X

n

/ º

1nD1

is i.i.d. .E; E /-valued random variables.

Problem 3.27. Let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

L

1

. P / be i.i.d. and set Y

n

WD e

Xn

for each n 2 N . Prove that

.Y

1

Y

n

/

1=n a:s:

! exp EŒX

1



: (3.85)

(.Y

1

Y

n

/

1=n

D exp

1n

P

n kD1

X

k

, to which Theorem 3.61 applies.) Problem 3.28. Let N 2 N and let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

L

N

.P/ be i.i.d. Prove that

1 n

X

n

kD1

X

kN a:s:

! EŒX

1N

: (3.86)

(Apply Theorem 3.61 to ¹ X

nN

º

1nD1

, which is i.i.d. by Problem 3.26.)

Problem 3.29. Let m 2 R , v 2 .0; 1 / and let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

be i.i.d. with X

1

N.m; v/.

Prove that P

n

kD1

X

k

P

n

kD1

X

k2

a:s:

! m

m

2

C v : (3.87)

(Divide both the numerator and the denominator by n and apply Theorem 3.61.) Problem 3.30. Let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

L

2

.P/ be i.i.d. Prove that

1 n

X

n

kD1

X

k

EŒX

1



2 a:s:

! var.X

1

/: (3.88)

Problem 4.1. Let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

be i.i.d. real random variables with X

1

Po.1/, and set S

n

WD P

n

kD1

X

k

for each n 2 N . Prove the following statements:

(1) L

S

n

n p n

L

! N.0; 1/: (Simply apply Theorem 4.4-(1).) (2) P ŒS

n

n D e

n

X

n

kD0

n

k

kŠ for any n 2 N . (Use Exercise 3.18.)

(3) lim

n!1

e

n

X

n

kD0

n

k

kŠ D 1

2 : (Theorem 4.4-(2) applies by (2) above.)

23

(2)

Problem 4.2. Let y 2 R and let X; ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

; ¹ Y

n

º

1nD1

be real random variables such that

X

n L

! X and Y

n

P

! y: (4.78)

(1) Prove that X

n

C Y

n L

! X C y and that X

n

Y

n L

! yX. (Since .X

n

; Y

n

/

L

! .X; y/

by Proposition 4.11, Corollary 3.53-(3) applies to .X; y/ and ¹ .X

n

; Y

n

/ º

1nD1

.) (2) Suppose y 6D 0. Prove that

X

n

Y

n

1

¹Yn6D0º L

! X

y : (4.79)

(Use Exercise 3.25 to apply the latter assertion of (1).)

Remark. Note that in the statements of Problem 4.2, the random variable X is involved only in terms of its law L.X / since the laws of X C y; yX; X=y are determined solely by L .X / and y. In particular, the statements of Problem 4.2 are valid even if X is replaced by another real random variable X

0

with L .X

0

/ D L .X / which is defined on a different probability space.

Exercise 4.3 ([2, Exercise 3.4.4]). Let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

be i.i.d. Œ0; 1 /-valued random vari- ables with E ŒX

1

 D 1 and v WD var.X

1

/ < 1 . Set S

n

WD P

n

kD1

X

k

for each n 2 N . (1) Prove that for any n 2 N ,

p S

n

p

n D S

n

n p n

1 1 C p

S

n

=n : (4.80)

(2) Prove that

L p S

n

p

n

L

! N.0; v=4/: (4.81)

((4.81) can be rephrased as “ p S

n

p

n

L

! Z=2” for a real random variable Z with Z N.0; v/, and Theorem 4.4-(1) can be also rephrased in the same way. Apply this version of Theorem 4.4-(1) to .S

n

n/= p

n and then use (4.80) and the latter part of Problem 4.2-(1), noting that it is irrelevant on which probability space Z is defined.) Problem 4.4 ([2, Exercise 3.4.5]). Let ¹ X

n

º

1nD1

L

2

.P/ be i.i.d. with EŒX

1

 D 0 and v WD var.X

1

/ > 0. Prove that

L P

n

kD1

X

k

qP

n kD1

X

k2

1 ¹

PnkD1Xk26D0

º

!

L

! N.0; 1/: (4.82)

( P

n kD1

X

k

= qP

n

kD1

X

k2

D

p1n

P

n kD1

X

k

= q

1

n

P

n

kD1

X

k2

on ®P

n

kD1

X

k2

6D 0 ¯ . Similarly to Exercise 4.3-(2), use Theorem 4.4-(1) and Problem 4.2-(2).)

24

参照

関連したドキュメント

Instead an elementary random occurrence will be denoted by the variable (though unpredictable) element x of the (now Cartesian) sample space, and a general random variable will

But if the drifts are allowed to be unequal, then the asymptotic behaviour of τ x and that of the conditioned random walk might be different, see [16] for the case of Brownian

Greenberg and G.Stevens, p-adic L-functions and p-adic periods of modular forms, Invent.. Greenberg and G.Stevens, On the conjecture of Mazur, Tate and

The measure µ is said to be an invariant measure of F if and only if µ belongs to the set of probability measures on X (i.e. According to Katok and Hasselblatt [20, Th.. for

The proof uses a set up of Seiberg Witten theory that replaces generic metrics by the construction of a localised Euler class of an infinite dimensional bundle with a Fredholm

We remind that an operator T is called closed (resp. The class of the paraclosed operators is the minimal one that contains the closed operators and is stable under addition and

The time-frequency integrals and the two-dimensional stationary phase method are applied to study the electromagnetic waves radiated by moving modulated sources in dispersive media..

Using the batch Markovian arrival process, the formulas for the average number of losses in a finite time interval and the stationary loss ratio are shown.. In addition,