• 検索結果がありません。

On Strictly Convex and Strictly Convex

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "On Strictly Convex and Strictly Convex"

Copied!
13
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

ISSN 2219-7184; Copyright ICSRS Publication, 2011c www.i-csrs.org

Available free online at http://www.geman.in

On Strictly Convex and Strictly Convex

According to an Index Semi-Normed Vector Spaces

Artur Stringa

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, Albania

E-mail: [email protected] (Received:22-5-11 /Accepted:16-6-11)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is giving the notion of strictly convex semi–

normed vector spaces according to an index and the notion of an extreme point of a convex set C in a vector space X, according to the semi-norm p in the spaceX. We extend to semi-normed vector spaces, via semi–pre-inner–

products, some known results on strictly convex normed vector spaces, which are characterized in terms of semi-inner-products.

Keywords: extreme point, semi–norm, semi–pre–inner–product, strict con- vexity, strict convexity according to an index.

1 Introduction

Definition 1.1 [3] Let X be a real vector space. We shall say that a real semi-inner-product is defined onX, if to anyx, y ∈X there corresponds a real number [x, y] and the following properties hold:

(1) (i) [x+y, z] = [x, z] + [y, z]

(ii) [λx, y] =λ[x, y], for x, y, z ∈X and λ∈R, (2) [x, x]>0, for x6= 0,

(3) [x, y]2 ≤[x, x]·[y, y].

A vector space with a semi–inner–product (in short s.i.p.) is called a semi–

inner–product space (in short s.i.p.s.). It is a normed linear space withkxk=

(2)

[x, x]1/2[3]. The topology on a s.i.p.s. is the one induced by this norm. It is further prove in [3] that every normed vector space can be made into s.i.p.s.

(in general, in infinitely many different ways).

A pointu of a convex setC in a vector space is called an extreme point of C ifu=t·v+ (1−t)·wwith 0< t <1 andv, w∈C, implies that u=v =w.

A normed linear spaceXis strictly convex if each point of the unit sphere is an extreme point of the unit ball [2]. The following characterizations on strictly convex spaces are available.

Theorem 1.2 [5]A normed linear spaceX is strictly convex if and only if:

kx+yk=kxk+kyk, where x6=y, implies y=λx, for some real λ >0.

Theorem 1.3 [1] A s.i.p.s. X is strictly convex if and only if:

[x, y] =kxk · kyk, where x6=y, implies y=λx, for some real λ >0.

Theorem 1.4 [2] On a s.i.p.s. X, the following conditions are equivalent:

(i) X is strictly convex ;

(ii) If ky+zk ≤ kyk and [z, y] = 0, then z = 0 ; (iii) If ky+zk=kyk and [z, y] = 0, then z = 0;

(iv) If A is a bounded linear on X, if kI + Ak ≤ 1 and if [Ax, x] = 0, for some x in X, then Ax= 0.

Aiming to generalize the condition (2) in the definition of s.i.p. function, we have introduced [7] the concept of the semi-pre-inner-product function, which is a generalization of the s.i.p. function’s concept:

Definition 1.5 [7] Let X be a real vector space. Consider a functional defined on X×X as follows:

X×X →R (x, y)7→[x, y]

If [x, y] satisfies the postulates:

(1)0 [x, x]≥0, x∈X,

(2)0 [λx, y] =λ[x, y], λ∈R and x, y ∈X,

(3)

(3)0 [x+y, z] = [x, z] + [y, z], x, y and z∈X, (4)0 [x, y]2 ≤[x, x]·[y, y], x, y ∈X.

then we say that is a semi-pre-inner-product onX (in short s.p.i.p.). The pair (X,[·,·]) is called a semi-pre- inner-product space (in short s.p.i.p.s.).

The following theorem proves the existence of the s.p.i.p.:

Theorem 1.6 [7] For every semi-norm function p in the vector space X, there is a s.p.i.p. [·,·] , such that p2(x) = [x, x],∀x∈X.

Proof. [7] Let M =p−1(0) = {x∈X/p(x) = 0}. Sincep is a semi–norm on X, we have thatM is a closed subspace of the vector space X. We note that the relationx∼y⇔(x−y)∈M, is a equivalent relation onX. Let us denote byX1 the X/M. For any two points x1 and x2 from the class of equivalence, bx, inequality 0 ≤ |p(x1)−p(x2)| ≤ p(x1−x2), implies p(x1) = p(x2) which gives that the function:

pb:X1 →R+, such that∀xb∈X1,pb(x) =b p(x),

for some x from the equivalence classx, is a norm onb X1. Then, by [3], there exists a s.i.p. onX1×X1:

h·,·i:X1×X1 →R, so thatpb(bx) =hx,b xib 12 ,∀bx∈X1. Let us construct the function:

[·,·] :X×X →R, such that [x, y] =hx,b yib , for x, y ∈X.

The above function is a s.p.i.p. function. So, (i) [x, x] =hbx,xi ≥b 0, for x∈X.

(ii) [λx, y] =D λx,c ybE

=hλx,b yib =λhbx,byi=λ[x, y], forλ∈R and x, y ∈X, (iii) [x1+x2, y] = D

x\1+x2,byE

= hxb1+xb2,yib = hxb1,yib +hxb1,yib = [x1, y] + + [x2, y], for x1, x2 and y∈X

(iv) [x, y]2 =hbx,byi2 ≤ hbx,bxi · hby,byi= [x, x]·[y, y], for x, y ∈X.

We conclude by noting that:

[x, x] =hbx,xib = [pb(x)]b 2 =p2(x),∀x∈X.

(4)

2 Main Results

Theorem 1.6 allows us to extend some results related to the semi-inner-products on semi-normed spaces.

At first, we note that, if [·,·]1 and [·,·]2 are two semi-pre-inner–products on X, then the function such that:

[x, y] = [x, y]1+ [x, y]2,∀(x, y)∈X2,

is a s.p.i.p.. It is obvious that the function [·,·] satisfies the conditions (1)0, (2)0, (3)0, of Definition 1.5. Let us prove that it satisfies also the condition (4)0. [x, y]2 = ([x, y]1+ [x, y]2)2 = ([x, y]1)2+ 2 [x, y]1·[x, y]2+ ([x, y]2)2

≤ [x, x]1·[y, y]1+ 2 ([x, x]1·[y, y]1·[x, x]2·[y, y]2)12 + [x, x]2·[y, y]2

≤ [x, x]1·[y, y]1+ [x, x]1·[y, y]2+ [x, x]2·[y, y]1+ [x, x]2·[y, y]2 =

= ([x, x]1+ [x, x]2)·([y, y]1+ [y, y]2) = [x, x]·[y, y].

By induction one can prove that every finite sum of s.p.i.–products is also a s.p.i.p. This fact makes it possible that every semi-normed space (X,{pα}α∈A), where{pα}α∈A is a family of semi-norms andA is an index set, can be consid- ered filtered and the filtration concept can be related with the filtration of the s.p.i.products [x, y]α, corresponding to the semi-normspα,α∈ A. Actually the family of semi-norms {pα}α∈A can be replaced with the family of semi-norms {pA}A⊂A, A={α1, α2, . . . , αs}, s∈N, where:

pA(x) = p2α1(x) +p2α2(x) +· · ·+p2αs(x)12

, forx∈X.

It is clear that this function satisfies the first two conditions of a semi-norm, and for the third condition we have that:

pA(x+y) = p2α

1(x+y) +· · ·+p2αs(x+y)12

= v u u t

s

X

i=1

p2α

i(x+y)≤

≤ v u u t

s

X

i=1

(pαi(x) +pαi(y))2 ≤ v u u t

s

X

i=1

p2αi(x) + v u u t

s

X

i=1

p2αi(y)6

≤ pA(x) +pA(y), for x, y ∈X.

The family{pA}A⊂A is filtered since forA1 ⊂A2, we havepA1(x)≤pA2(x), for allx ∈X and furthermore this family is related to the s.p.i.–products family {[x, y]A}A⊂A by the equation

[x, y]A= [x, y]α

1 + [x, y]α

2 +· · ·+ [x, y]α

s, for x, y ∈X.

(5)

If we denote by BA (0, ε) =

s

T

i=1

Bαi(0, ε) the neighborhoods of the origin of the X space for the topology of the semi-normed family {pα}α∈A and with BA(0, ε) ={x∈X/pA(x)< ε}the neighborhoods of the origin of theX space for the topology of the semi-normed family{pA}A⊂A the inclusionsBA(0, ε)⊂ BA(0, ε)⊂√

sBA(0, ε) show that the topologies of these families coincide.

At [5] and [2] some results in the normed vector spaces, characterized in terms of s.i.–products are formulated and proved. Our aim is to extend them in the semi-normed spaces, via s.p.i.–products. Firstly, let us give the following definitions.

Definition 2.1 The semi—normed vector space(X,{pα}α∈A)is called strict- ly convex according to the index α ∈ A,if for every two points x and y in X, such that:

pα(x)6= 0, pα(y)6= 0 and pα(x+y) = pα(x) +pα(y), there exists aλα >0, such that pα(y−λαx) = 0.

Definition 2.2 The semi—normed vector space(X,{pα}α∈A)is called strict- ly convex if it is strictly convex according to the index α, for allα ∈ A.

Letα ∈ A and denote by Xα the X/p−1α (0).

Theorem 2.3 The semi—normed vector space(X,{pα}α∈A)is strictly con- vex according to the index α∈ A if and only if the corresponding space Xα is strictly convex.

Proof. Suppose that the semi-normed vector space (X,{pα}α∈A) is strictly convex according to the index α ∈ A and let xb and ybbe two elements from Xα such that:

pbα(bx+y) =b pbα(x) +b pbα(y)b

By the structure of pbα it derives that if x∈xband y∈ybthen:

pα(x+y) = pα(x) +pα(y).

Thus, there exists a λα >0, such that:

pα(y−λαx) = 0⇔pbα(y\−λαx) = 0 ⇔y\−λαx=b0⇔yb−λαxb=b0⇔ yb = λαx.b

Conversely, let us suppose that Xα is a strictly convex normed space and let x, y be two points in X, such that pα(x+y) = pα(x) +pα(y). Let bx and by be the equivalence classes of the pointsx and y. The following equality holds:

pbα(bx+y) =b pbα(x) +b pbα(y)b

(6)

By the condition,∃λα >0, such that yb=λαx. We have:b

pα(y−λαx) =pbα(y\−λαx) =pbα(yb−λdαx) = pbα(yb−λαbx) =pbα(b0) = 0.

Theorem 2.3 allows us to find some similar characteristics of being strictly convex in a semi-normed vector space (X,{pα}α∈A).

Theorem 2.4 The semi-normed vector space (X,{pα}α∈A) is strictly con- vex according to the indexα ∈ A if and only if for every two pointsx and y in X, such thatpα(x)6= 0, pα(y)6= 0 and [x, y]α =pα(x)·pα(y), there is a λα >0 such that pα(y−λαx) = 0.

Proof. Suppose that the semi-normed vector space (X,{pα}α∈A) is strictly convex according to the index α ∈ A. Theorem 2.3 implies that the normed vector spaceXα is strictly convex. Let xand y be two points in X such that:

pα(x)6= 0, pα(y)6= 0 and [x, y]α =pα(x)·pα(y).

We note that for the equivalence classesxband y,b hx,b yib α=pbα(bx)·pbα(by).

Theorem 1.3 implies that there exists a λα >0, such that by=λαbx⇔pα(y−λαx) = 0.

Conversely, suppose thatx and y are two points in X, such that:

pα(x+y) = pα(x) +pα(y).

Sincepbα(bx+by) =pbα(bx) +pbα(by) we conclude that:

hx,b bx+byiα+hy,b xb+yibα = hbx+y,b xb+byiα = [pbα(bx+by)]2 =

= pbα(xb+by)·pbα(xb+by) =

= pbα(xb+by) (pbα(x) +b pbα(y))b therefore,

(pbα(x)b ·pbα(bx+y)b − hx,b bx+byiα) + (pbα(y)b ·pbα(xb+by)− hby,bx+yibα) = 0.

From the condition (4)0 of the Definition 1.5, each of the brackets in the above equality is nonnegative and since their sum is zero, we have that:

pbα(bx)·pbα(xb+by) =hx,b xb+byiα and pbα(by)·pbα(xb+by) = hy,b bx+yibα (1)

(7)

Sincepbα(bx)·pbα(xb+y) =b hbx,bx+yibα, it derives that there exists some ηα >0, such that bx+by = ηαbx ⇔ by = (ηα−1)bx. Denoting by λα = ηα−1 we have that:

pbα(xb+y)b = pbα(x) +b pbα(y)b ⇔pbααbx) = pbα(x) +b pbα(y)b ⇔

⇔ ηα·pbα(x) =b pbα(bx) +pbα(y)b ⇔pbα(y) = (ηb α−1)pbα(bx) that imply ηα−1>0 (we used the fact that pα(x)6= 0 and pα(y)6= 0).

Therefore, there exists a λα >0, such that yb=λαxb⇔pα(y−λαx) = 0.

Theorem 2.5 The semi—normed vector space X,{pα}α∈A

is strictly con- vex according to the index α ∈ A if and only if for every two points x and y in X, such that pα(x) 6= 0, [x, y]α = 0 and pα(x+y) = pα(x), we have that pα(y) = 0.

Proof. Suppose that x and y are two points inX, such that:

pα(x)6= 0,[x, y]α= 0 and pα(x+y) = pα(x) For the equivalence classes of bx and by we have the followings:

pbα(bx)6= 0,hbx,byiα = 0 andpbα(bx+y) =b pbα(x).b

Theorem 2.3 implies that the space Xα is strictly convex. From Theorem 1.4/(iii) we conclude that:

pbα(y) = 0b ⇔pα(y) = 0.

Conversely, suppose thatx and y are two points in X, such that:

pα(x)6= 0, pα(y)6= 0 and pα(x+y) =pα(x) +pα(x).

We note that pbα(xb+y) =b pbα(x) +b pbα(y). Let’sb λα = pbα(y)b

pbα(bx).

Therefore,λα>0. Considering the pointsbu=λαbx−byandbv =xb+by, we have that:

pbα(bu+bv) = pbα(xb+λαx) =b pbα

xb+ pbα(by) pbα(x)b bx

=pbα

xb·(pbα(bx) +pbα(by)) pbα(x)b

=

= pbα(bx) +pbα(by)

pbα(bx) pbα(bx) =pbα(bx) +pbα(by) = pbα(xb+by) =pbα(bv),

(8)

furthermore, pbα(vb) 6= 0. Due to the equalities (1) in Theorem 2.4, we can conclude that:

hbu,bviα = hλαxb−y,b xb+byiααhbx,bx+yibα− hy,b xb+byiα =

= pbα(y)b

pbα(bx)·pbα(bx)·pbα(bx+by)−pbα(y)b ·pbα(bx+y) = 0.b Finally, for the points buand bv the following equalities hold:

pbα(bu+vb) =pbα(bv) and hbu,bviα = 0.

Letu1 ∈bu and v1 ∈vb. The following equalities are true:

pα(u1+v1) = pα(v1),[u1, v1]α = 0 and pα(v1) =pα(bv)6= 0.

From the assumption, it derives that:

pα(u1) = 0⇒pbα(u) = 0b ⇒pα(y−λαx) = 0.

Letp be a semi-norm in the space X and C a convex subspace of X.

Definition 2.6 A point x0 ∈C, is called an extreme point of C, according to the semi-norm p, if x0 = tu+ (1 −t)v with 0 < t < 1 and (u, v) ∈ C2, implies thatp(x0−u) = p(x0−v) = p(u−v) = 0.

If the semi-norm p is a norm, then the extreme point according to the semi- norm pis extreme point for C, since if p(x0−u) =p(x0−v) =p(u−v) = 0, we have thatx0 =u=v.

Theorem 2.7 The semi-normed vector space X,{pα}α∈A

is strictly con- vex according to the index α ∈ A if and only if every point x0 ∈ Sα(0,1) = {x∈X/pα(x) = 1}is an extreme point of the setBα(0,1) ={x∈X/pα(x)≤1}

according to the semi-norm pα. Proof. Let’s denote by

x0 =tu+ (1−t)v with 0< t <1, pα(u)≤1, pα(v)≤1 and pα(x0) = 1 From the definition of the sum and multiplication by scalars of the equivalence classes in Xα we have that xb0 = tbu+ (1−t)bv. Since Xα is strictly convex, from [2] we have thatxb0 =ub=vb. Therefore,xb0−ub=xb0−bv =bu−bv =b0⇒ pα(x0−u) =pα(x0−v) = pα(u−v).

Conversely, to prove that the semi--normed vector space X,{pα}α∈A is strictly convex according to the indexα∈ A its sufficient to prove that Xα is strictly convex.

(9)

Letxb0andyb0be two distinct points from zero, such thathxb0,yb0iα =pbα(xb0

pbα(yb0). The pointsxb1 = xb0

pbα(xb0) and yb1 = yb0

pbα(yb0) are in the the closed ball:

Bbα(0,1) = {bx∈Xα/pbα(x)b ≤1}.

Let’sub=txb1+(1−t)yb1,0< t <1. We havepbα(bu)≤tpbα(xb1)+(1−t)pbα(yb1)≤1.

Furthermore,

hbu,yb0iα = t· hxb1,yb0iα+ (1−t)· hyb1,yb0iα =

= t·pα(xb0)·pα(yb0)

pα(xb0) +(1−t)·pα(yb0)·pα(yb0) pbα(yb0) =

= pbα(yb0) [t+ (1−t)] = pbα(yb0).

So, pbα(yb0) =hu,b yb0iα =pbα(bu)·pbα(yb0)⇒pbα(u) = 1, which means that:b

ub∈Scα(0,1) ={xb∈Xα/pbα(x) = 1}b .

Let us take the points x1 ∈ xb1, y1 ∈ yb1 and u ∈ u. One can see that:b x1 ∈ Bα(0,1), y1 ∈Bα(0,1) and u∈Bα(0,1). From the assumption it derives that:

pα(x1−u) = pα(y1−u) =pα(x1−y1) = 0 ⇒bu=xb1 =yb1 ⇔yb0α·xb0

⇔ pbα(yb0−λα·xb0) = 0, where λα = pbα(yb0)

pbα(xb0) > 0. From Theorem 1.3, we conclude that Xα is strictly

convex.

Let us try to extend some results related to the strict convexity of a normed space. Firstly we give the following definition:

Definition 2.8 The operator T : X,{pα}α∈A

→ X,{pα}α∈A

belongs to the class L0 if for every α ∈ A there exists a constant cα such that pα(T x)≤ cαpα(x), for x∈X.

Theorem 2.9 Let X,{pα}α∈A

be a semi–normed vector space. For every α ∈ A the proposition 1. implies the proposition 2., where 1. and 2. are the following propositions:

1. If the operator T ∈ L0 satisfies the conditions:

pα(I+T)≤1 and [T x, x]α = 0,

where pα(I+T) = sup{pα(x+T x)/pα(x)≤1}, then pα(T x) = 0;

(10)

2. If z and y (pα(y)6= 0) satisfy the conditions:

[z, y]α = 0 and pα(z+y) = pα(y) then pα(z) = 0.

Proof. On the contrary, let us suppose that the points z and y are such that:

[z, y]α = 0, pα(z+y) = pα(y) and pα(z)6= 0 Let us consider the operator T :X →X, defined by:

T x= 1

(pα(y))2 ·[x, y]α·(z+y)−x, forx∈X.

This operator is inL0, since:

pα(T x) ≤ 1

(pα(y))2 · |[x, y]α| ·pα(y+z) +pα(x) = |[x, y]α|

pα(y) +pα(x)≤

≤ pα(x)pα(y)

pα(y) +pα(x) = (1 + 1)pα(x) = cαpα(x), for x∈X.

We note that:

pα(I+T) = sup{pα(x+T x/pα(x)≤1}=

= sup

pα

1

(pα(y))2 ·[x, y]α·(z+y)

/pα(x)≤1

=

= sup

[x, y]α

pα(y)/pα(x)≤1

≤sup

pα(x)pα(y)

pα(y) /pα(x)≤1

=

= sup{pα(x)/pα(x)≤1}= 1.

On the other hand [T y, y]α =

[y, y]α

p2α(y)(y+z)−y, y

α

= [z, y]α = 0,

while T y =z and pα(T y) = pα(z)6= 0. This fact contradicts the proposition (1) of the theorem, since although pα(I +T) ≤ 1 and [T y, y]α = 0, we have

that pα(T y)6= 0.

Theorem 2.10 Let us suppose that the semi–normed vector space X,{pα}α∈A is strictly convex according to the α ∈ A. Then, if z and y are two points in X such that:

pα(y)6= 0,[z, y]α = 0 and pα(z+y)≤pα(y) then pα(z) = 0.

(11)

Proof. Let us construct the corresponding classes of equivalence bz and by of the points z and y. Since pbα(zb+y) =b pα(z +y) ≤ pα(y) = pbα(by) and hz,b yibα = [z, y]α = 0, then from Theorem 1.4/(iii), we conclude that zb= b0,

thereforepα(z) =pbα(bz) = 0.

Theorem 2.11 Let X,{pα}α∈A

be a semi–normed vector space. For all α∈ A the following propositions are equivalent:

1. If y and z are two points in X that satisfying the conditions: , pα(y)6= 0,[z, y]α = 0 and pα(y+z)≤pα(y), then, pα(z) = 0;

2. If the operator T ∈ L0 satisfies the conditions:

pα(I+T)≤1 and [T x, x]α = 0 then pα(T x) = 0.

Proof. Since pα(I +T) = sup{pα(x+T x)/pα(x)≤1} ≤ 1, it derives that the following is true:

pα(x+T x)≤pα(I+T)·pα(x), for x∈X

Ifx∈X and pα(x) = 0, then equality holds. If x∈X and pα(x)6= 0, we note that:

pα(x+T x) pα(x) =pα

x pα(x)+T

x pα(x)

=pα(x1+T x1), where x1 = x pα(x). Since pα(x1) = 1, pα(x1 + T x1) ≤ pα(I +T), which gives pα(x+T x)

pα(x) ≤ pα(I+T), so we conclude thatpα(x+T x)≤pα(I+T)·pα(x) forx∈X. From the condition we have thatpα(I+T)≤1, therefore we havepα(x+T x)≤pα(x), forx∈X.Finally, pα(x+T x)≤pα(x), for x∈X and [T x, x]α = 0, forx∈X

imply that pα(T x) = 0.

As a corollary of Theorems 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11 we conclude the following, which is a generalization of Theorem 1.4.

Theorem 2.12 Let X,{pα}α∈A

be a semi–normed vector space. The fo- llowing propositions are equivalent:

1. The space X,{pα}α∈A

is strictly convex according to the α∈ A;

(12)

2. If y and z are two points in X that satisfying the conditions : pα(y)6= 0,[z, y]α = 0 and pα(y+z)≤pα(y), then pα(z) = 0;

3. If the operator T from L0 , satisfies the conditions:

pα(I +T)≤1 and [T x, x]α = 0 then pα(T x) = 0.

Proof. From Theorem 2.10 we have that (1)⇒(2).

From Theorem 2.3 and from the fact that the condition pα(y+z) =pα(y) is weaker than the following one pα(y+z) ≤ pα(y) we have that (2) ⇒ (1).

From Theorems 2.3 and 2.9 we have that (3)⇒(1).

From theorem 2.11 we have that (2) ⇒ (3). Finally, we have that (1) ⇔

(2)⇔(3).

Lel’s X,{pα}α∈A

a semi-normed vector space. We denote with:

S(0,1) = \

α∈A

Sα(0,1) and B(0,1) = \

α∈A

Bα(0,1).

Let us suppose that the family of the s.p.i. products, corresponding to the family of semi—norms, is separated, i.e.:

∀x∈X,∃α∈A, such that [x, x]α =p2α(x)6= 0.

Theorem 2.13 The Haussdorf vector space X,{pα}α∈A

is strictly convex if and only if every pointx0 ∈S(0,1) (S(0,1)6= Φ), is a extreme point for the set B(0,1).

Proof. Suppose thatx0 =tu+(1−t)v, wherex0 ∈S(0,1) andu, v ∈B(0,1).

Since X,{pα}α∈A

is a convex structure for all α ∈ A Theorem 2.7 implies that:

pα(x0−u) =pα(x0−v) =pα(u−v) = 0

Since the above equalities hold for all α ∈ A than x0 =u =v. Really, if we suppose the contrary, for instance x0 6= u then there exists an index α ∈ A such thatpα(x0−u)6= 0.

Conversely, let us consider an index α ∈ A. Since the point x0 ∈ S(0,1) is an extreme point of B(0,1), we conclude that the point x0 ∈ S(0,1) is a extreme point according to the semi—normpα. Using Theorem 2.7 on the set B(0,1) we have that the space X,{pα}α∈A

is strictly convex according to the index α. Since α ∈ A is an arbitrary index, the space X,{pα}α∈A

is

strictly convex.

(13)

References

[1] E. Berkson, Some types of Banach algebras, Hermitian and Bade func- tionals,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 116(1965), 376.

[2] E. Torrance, Stricly convex spaces via semi–inner–product spaces ortogo- nality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 26(1970), 108-110.

[3] G. Lumer, Semi–inner–product spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 100(1) (1961), 29–43.

[4] J.R. Gilles, Classes of semi–inner–product spaces, Trans. Amer. Math.

Soc., 129(3) (1967), 436–446.

[5] K.R. Unni and C. Puttamadaiah, Some remarks on strictly convex semi–

inner–product spaces,Bull. Calc. Math. Soc. India, 77(1980), 261-265.

[6] M.M. Pavle, Sur la transervalit dans des espaces norm´e, Mathematica Balcanica, 1(1971), 171–176.

[7] X.H. Teliti and A. Stringa, The semi–pre–inner–product functions, 3–rd International Conference On Algebra and Functional Analysis, Elbasan, Albania, 15–16 May, (2010).

参照

関連したドキュメント

It has been shown that if C is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uni- formly convex Banach space X, then every nonexpansive mapping T : C → C has a fixed point (see [2])..

Using definition (1.7), and according to the arguments given in [3], we obtain the following extreme points of the closed convex hulls of ᏴᏯᐂ (k,α) denoted by clco ᏴᏯᐂ

We will also prove that this projection is the only minimal projection if our operator norm is determinated by the l 2 norm in the space R n.. Let X be normed space over the field

mapping; Fixed points; Uniformly G\^ateaux differentiable norm; Uniformly smooth Banach space; Reflexive and Strictly convex Banach space; Variational inequality.... (shortly,

nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space $X$ , then.. every asymptotically nonexpanisve mapping $T:Carrow C$ has

logical vector space with a partial ordering defined by a solid pointed

be nonempty compact convex sets in two topological vector spaces, respectively,. and $Z$ an ordered topological vector space with an ordering defined

$log’i_{C}al$ vector space E.. $fo7^{\cdot}$ every lower semicontinuous function $\varphi$ : $\Omegaarrow[\mathrm{c}x, lJ]$ and $ever\cdot 1/upper$ semi-.