注意の瞬き：資源剥奪理論 vs. 選択理論

全文

(1). The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science 2011, Vol. 29, No. 2, 159ῌ163. vs.

(2) . . . . Attentional Blink: Resource depletion vs. selection Jun-ichiro K6L6=6G6 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. Cognitive psychologists have likened attention to a limited resource or capacity to account for recognition performances under dual task circumstances. Some theorists use this analogy of limited resource to account for the attentional blink phenomenon, in which perception of the second of two targets embedded in a rapid stream of nontargets is impaired; they argue that the attentional blink reflects scarcity of available resource for the first target due to the resource depletion by the first target processing. Some other theorists propose an alternative explanation in which the attentional blink results from on-line selection mechanisms that act in response to distracting input, rather than being the result of first-target-induced cognitive resource depletion. The present article reviews recent arguments between these theories and introduces some new findings suggesting that selection mechanisms involved in filtering for targets provide a strong and coherent explanation of the attentional blink. Key words : attentional blink, resource, attention. ! w. . . . 1J! x$%y. zmn{#

(3) |}~H$%'6*%

(4) . ! Kahneman (1973) "! #$. #8F%+b$-! ,X)X%= . !. %& '()*%+,$-! ./0/123#. N9n+# (1,nW#gF%''. 4()56*. bH!

(5) #F%(X#F%=. 78.9): ;e.g., Norman &. Bobrow, 1975; Lavie, 1995<= >?@A. #B.

(6) . 'C%+#DEF%:GHIJKL9%M $%= NM . 2 O@A#@(! @APQRS. pq. ! xHOX)F%'. #TUF%= H! @ASRSSV,WX'YZ. HN%= H! H 1 SH 10 . @A[\,]^F%= N_`. {#PQ(! NzH 2 O{#. ! @A,. #a

(7) (OJ(::G! bc@AHdJ ,. )J= ¡s. N9n 2 {#D¢/:. e ()X%N'#fF%'gh.9)X%=. '! {SV, 500 ms I-£X'. BF%. ! ¤ 1 {. Wi! 5jklmn#oG)X%. ¥¦%,! ¤ 2 {#(§FX= N'(. (attentional blink; Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992). #'¨|= ! ¤ 1 {#©()¤ 2 . pq. {C#BF%ª«¬. &>?@A$%:G! rJs. ! . e ,Npqtuv$%'6*)X%=. X= (:,®)! Npq. ! '(. Nn1. Z¯#°F%m. 'Xc,±L%b$-! ]²³´µ¶·¸ ῍ Human Technology Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Sciene and Technology 305ῌ8566 1ῌ1ῌ1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Japan. . 1X= b(µ¶·¸HvF%¹`$. 9º! ¬. PQ.9%. G! Z¼nb_`H1®:. »J$%:. ½$%= rJ. Copyright 2011. The Japanese Psychonomic Society. All rights reserved..

(8) ¦kº»¼. 160. 29 ½. 2.

(9) . %3!A (Potter, Staub, & O’Conner,. 2

(10) . 2002) Au *. . ! "#$%& Dux & Marois, 2009; '(. . 2004)* 9:. . 1 \I . 0 K1+, L,M=0 . +, -. . N. X ,j+u * \ , 2 M=. /0 !1 23 * 1 . 41 . 41!5,67 !8 9:. 1 5?O (Lag-1 sparing; Pot-. ;

(11) 1 * <=>,?0. ter, Chun, Banks, & Muckenhoupt, 1998) ,. + =@. A

(12) +. , 2 ,0. * BC. , 2 8m. ,P0 :+u]!* 5Qs+,u . D. ,?O

(13) 0 !8 9. EF (Shapiro, Raymond, & Arnell, 1994) GHI. &. * &, 1 4. * DEF, 9:. ,JK!LMN (VSTM). AR m!8 5OP, 1 A. $R0 S%0 * 1 . &S¡ `__B¢£VTn1. "+OPQ#=C. JKTU&VW!X. "&Y4Z'([. (Wyble, Bowman, & Nieuwenstein, 2009)* ]. )) 1 5Q#4X\]!. 2 OP,BU?x1 * 2 M=. 9:. ^!* _! Ì5Q. ¤¥IAV1 !8 ?O1. #,abc3Id0\]!* DEF+,*. * =@dd[mdm&W_ . <=e+!Q# f!Q#-. + `41 2 ,/1X* . gh,- VSTM ./0 23 * gh. 23¦§s ?O,=<==@¨. ,-X+ =@!. X0 23I *. , 2 i-X. gh03Ij VSTM \Ikl1mmX ! 89:. ; * `5Q#,gh. m+ VSTM \Ikl<abc3; * _.

(14) BE ,9:. Y©,+,X. ! [) 1 1n,5Q# f2X. m Zu ª[(\I 1 0 «¬~. +C. u 23 K1+u * ¦§s . ;Ij op9:. X.

(15) 1 *. ?O,9&X5Qs

(16) @A. (+A 3qmrs4I. X* Di Lollo, Kawahara, Ghorashi, & Enns (2005;. 2 5tDEF (Chun & Potter, 1995) +u * . Kawahara, Di Lollo, & Kumada, 2006) , 3 ®X. DEF, &Y41!OP, 1 5t. M=40 (TTT) \¯ =D 1. 6-Xv7!LMN"+8K9:w2x1y. 41 (TDT) \¯]s 5V^. 23 * 9:,!<=\;!X!8 z<. _`°!* TTT \¯, TDT \¯bAZa. 0 \ 5=OP{|}~1_* `!. !8 +,BbN. 8 m>0 !8, 2 5t+MN?. cd1 * \ cd$ . x x0 @Au * 2 5t,6-. , TTT \¯± TDT \¯bAj]²\]. ub BB 1 /\+. !* *\¯+, 1 \IV ³s<=. =@!. X* `!8 . , 2 ?x x/. 9:. e A\\Ij M=!. ;. E. ,C 5=D+}~1 * BE . ²\]! DEF+,. =@s 2 41 , 1 . I^_c

(17) +. X*. /] + 2 ,0 2 5t. !8f Di Lollo et al. (2005) , . +m?x1 * 2 5tDEF,. «¬~Gg´µ * . 1__X+F1b f!A. K1+, 1 5D¶ ]. GLDEF (Jolicoeur, 1998) dH,I. 8K4hB<(i0 \ u ,j61. J6-X1! 1 5t+An,;. 2 ·S%0 * ¸¹3.

(18) »¼½ . 161.

(19) . bL* b5rtu.

(20) . TLC / 2 56ZD["& 3 M. . !" . \N_;]!" ;*T2 4. #$%&'()'*+ #. s4tbc^:;!" <"!". ,-./012(

(21) !3. RS8""&_6M%'\%`. '45-678 !9:;<=>. ab

(22) !". ?"@=>#A$B:; ?"

(23).

(24). '"CD %EFGH&%' 'I J (K)L* 2 M*K + (K ,-

(25). RS6M7cQdN ef

(26). !*KN.%&:; @. :I;J#[g=>'`!2m. <O / 1 0"01727 . y&hi _< 6M7 cQj. P34Q)RS

(27) !TL'U;J'*'" . v*;k"jk"hi. RSVWEF7 5678. 7 ;*hi S%&). 78. XI*;<O / 1 ). I{op

(28) q:;!". !. Dell Acqua, Jolicoeur, Luria, & Pluchino (2009) . ^; <I*;!

(29) _& @<O 1!9. l!mN:;<n

(30) ! l!. :;</ 2 =

(31) `:;+ a>:; . =.

(32) <w NoY

(33) < \ Qp¡q. bc?C9Y Z&7. Within-Trial Contingency; WTC No] ¢L. TLC (Temporary Loss of Control) bcdJ;. rs/ 1 =.C/ 2 =.tGuv. 9Y Z" [L*!9:; \(K] :%. 2? Olivers, Van der Stigchel, & Hulleman. C'. !"< TLC bc Y7. (2007; Olivers & Meeter, 2008) 2efg5 7h. WTC No\:;!"'L. @*bc72 _+=>Ai'. et al. (2009) 3

(34) q:{ £

(35) <. j01BCk:; ?". ¤ / 3 =.t/ 1 / 2 2=.

(36) <Jw. =>56 DE

(37) ?"

(38) '"2 F9

(39) VWE. \WTC No

(40) <] &@%&'No +. F Gl / 1 DE:; VWEF. @__=.t ¥

(41) <%y2wL. *; / 1 #[=>7#HDEm. Dell’Acqua et al. (2009) opRSbc. . S¦§

(42) <. !"7 ?"

(43) '"2LL*. + :78. < @7 Dell’Acqua. <. !2n"DELL op

(44) !

(45). ? Olivers, Hulleman, Spalek, Kawahara, & Di. qI%:DE:;7 @[!9:;<. Lollo (in press) ¨©c £No

(46) <¤. =>VWEF Gl<O ?C'n"F9. 12/18 {7a*;!"< WTC ªp. m rstu7/ 2 !9:;2. x*;< 8/18 ¨«'L. 7'`' \] bc7 / 1 . WTC ªpVW

(47) <C78"&. < r. ! @*. #[2v727. 3. 9¬

(48) < :* cQ£Noop(. <JwF9m*'"7 2,-./. "!=>!9CD y®zV

(49) <¤ !9. K`xya>

(50) zLK` { Olivers et al.. CD{" (84 ms) n" WTC ªp|v }". (2007) / 4 _7a>

(51) zLK` \a>

(52) z. (100ῌ125 ms) WTC ªp¯"L _. L|}]

(53) q

(54) !" Nieuwenstein, Potter,. v'L. & Theeuwes (2009) 22?a>

(55) zL|}

(56). ~RS7'` {"!9CDD°7w1. q

(57) !Ty 6MNO

(58) &~bc (Wyble. ±w

(59) !"9¬:;<. et al., 2009) S

(60) !". <

(61) <. <`|. ! WTC ªp#. RS6M6M²G;Uj_. <

(62) PQ&+

(63) 2RS. *'" Visser (2007) ³´µ / 1 ¶·k. 6M"+;L,TNO:;U7'" '.

(64) <8 / 2 \*K] 2 ¸O<. IJ Kawahara & Enns (2009) U?. ¤ D°{"j*K2\w¹

(65) < . C7'` 8(VW

(66) < ,6X)w. {7/ 1 #[º2!9:;'L. 7mY

(67) !" @*: ,-. 6M7/ 1 #[: <. < .

(68) 8cm¦pq. 162. 29 . 2_.

(69) 1 . Takeda, & Kawahara (2011)

(70) 6W. . !"#$. 3ijk (Olivers & Meeter, 2008) d . % $&'

(71) (!)*+

(72). U 3ijk'HI $ ". . W JK VJK.L"/E. , -./0 12"34 . *RW Olivers & Meeter (2008) y. !"!5 **6789 Dux,. z{) 1 9Js"M5. Asplund, & Marois (2008) 3 +:; . ,a < 2 "$. ; $ ! 2 3 <. !P, ON

(73) 0 . => ?@ $0<="AB. OP, 1 9jkL. CT1 T1-T2 T2-D-D-D-D-D-T3 T3; DD ED:FG . O*P Q#$>jk50. AB (T1 T1-T2 T2-T3 T3) 3 HI. /%W QR S X. 0JKLM $ <="!". Y- $¡ &'$6T . 3 12"N$ "OP, 0. ?@ . "FQ#$RST:"F C 1 . 200 ms ;'"u/. G %& U V* 3 . $' 2 "H! !£. 12"' W $ "OP, X. 1 Ujk;u/. YVOP+( <="3*" 3 . \ $&' 1 9. )*Z[")\ Dux et al. (2008) +,. $. . ]^ 3 "- 2 7-_`.. . $ 12"'UZ[" /\a bc. !"u/¢- 1 100ῌ. ! <9x¤¥"W $.

(74). 6O $00O

(75) .1d . V0m¦§ W ¨W©12 . )*e? \ Visser (2007) f,! 2. ª«¬®5¯X Y° "¤?. 7g2"h U 1 3ijk.

(76) 0 ±²R³ 7W . " g2l4

(77) "56g2. ( yz{ m12´Z\0$R. m7nopq\00\)* g2l4. b)* 12[\

(78) Js.

(79) <=rstu/ &' . "$ON R$µW

(80) 7. !. !. u/v8w"W " $&'9x. b( $0<¶",§.

(81) yz{.1d |: , Olivers,. ]a·^7 ,¸,XY V. Spalek, Kawahara, & Di Lollo (2009) Dux et al.. ¹ +0 0O"_º. (2008) XY;1d 1 }~. `³ 7 . <:; *=l>]^ 3. *a6Js7<1» . <='O05 $&. 5 S ¼½"b+B?u/ v8w (Ka-. ' Dux et al. (2008) <="]^ (T1 T1-T2 T2-D-. wahara & Enns, 2009) "W \. D-D-D-D-T3 T3) 3 C:G (D) ", ?6@W U %&& ' O\Z["A5$ ?@ Dux et al. (2008) B&'XY >EC\W - DE g2 7=la$ . Spq F h fG)

(82) 0 O " 0 Kihara, Yagi,. !12[\,

(83) . Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109ῌ127. Dell’Acqua, R., Jolicoueur, P., Luria, R., & Pluchino, P. (2009). Re-evaluating encoding-capacity limitation as a source of the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 338ῌ351. Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Gorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T..

(84) . (2005). The attentional blink: Resource limitation or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191ῌ200. Dux, P. E., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2008). An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: Evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 219ῌ 224. Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014ῌ1032. (2004).

(85) 46, 501ῌ 526. Kawahara, J. & Enns, J. T. (2009). Selection di$culty and inter-item competition are independent factors in rapid visual stream perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 146ῌ158. Kawahara, J., Kumada, T., & Di Lollo, V. (2006). The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 886ῌ 890. Kihara, K., Yagi, Y., Takeda, Y., & Kawahara, J. (2011). Distractor devaluation e#ect in the attentional blink: Direct evidence for distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 37, 168ῌ179. Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Hooge, I. T. C. (2005). Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1463ῌ1475. Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836ῌ863. Olivers, C. N. L., Hulleman, J., Spalek, T., Kawahara, J., & Di Lollo, V. (in press). The sparing is far from spurious: Reevaluating within-trial contingency e#ects in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perform-. 163. ance. Olivers, C. N. L., Spalek, T. M., Kawahara, J., & Di Lollo, V. (2009). The attentional blink: Increasing target salience provides no evidence for resource depletion. A commentary on Dux, Asplund, and Marois (2008). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 214ῌ218. Olivers, C. N. L., Van der Stigchel, S., & Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limitedcapacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 71, 126ῌ139. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979ῌ992. Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O’Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1149ῌ 1162. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849ῌ860. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357ῌ371. Visser, T. A. W. (2007). Masking T1 di$culty: Processing time and the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 285ῌ297. Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 787ῌ807..

(86)