• 検索結果がありません。

Integral means of holomorphic mappings in $C^n$ (Inequalities in Univalent Function Theory and Its Applications)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Integral means of holomorphic mappings in $C^n$ (Inequalities in Univalent Function Theory and Its Applications)"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Integral

means

of

holomorphic mappings

in

$C^{n}$

Kazuyuki

Tsurumi

(東京電機大工

鶴見和之

)

Tadayuki

Sekine

(日本大学薬

関根忠行

)

Let

$f(*‘)$

and

$g(\dot{4})$

be

holomorphic

functions in the unit

disk

$\mathrm{U}$

with

$f(0)=g(0)=0$

.

The

function

$g(z)$

is said to

be

subordinate to the function

$f(z)$

if there exists afunction

$\psi(z)$

holomorphic in

$\mathrm{U}$

such

that

$|\psi(_{\sim}7)|\leq$

$|\sim 7$$|$

for

$\mathrm{z}\in\cup$

and

$g(_{4}’.)=f(\psi(z))$

.

Let

$g(_{<}’.)$

be

aholomorphic

function

in

U. For

$0<\mathrm{p}<\infty$

and

$0\leq$

$\mathrm{r}<1$

,

let

us

put

$M_{p}(r, \varphi):=\{\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{u\iota}|qxe^{i\Theta})|^{\mathrm{p}}d\Theta\}^{\#}$

Then

we

have the theorem

Theorem

A(The

subordination

theorem of

Littlewood

[2],

$\mathrm{p}.191$

)

Suppose

that

$f$

and

$g$

are

holomorphic

in

$\mathrm{U}$

and

$f(0)=g(0)=0$

and that

$g$

is

subordinate

to

$f$

,

then

we

have

$M_{p}(r, g)\leq M_{p}(r, f)$

$(0<\mathrm{p}<\infty, 0\leq \mathrm{r}<]$

$)$

The

purpose

of

this note is to extend this theorem

to

the

case

of

$C^{n}$

61.

$\mathrm{P}$

relimina

ies

Let

us

denote

apoint

2

of the

sace

$C^{n}$

by

the

column

vecto

数理解析研究所講究録 1276 巻 2002 年 103-108

(2)

$\mathrm{z}:=(\begin{array}{l}\overline{‘}1\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}_{2}\end{array})$

and

$\mathrm{z}^{*}$

denotes the conjugate transposed vector

of

$\mathrm{z}$

.The

norm

of

$\mathrm{z}$

is denoted

by

$|\mathrm{z}$

$|:=\sqrt{\mathrm{z}^{*}’}$

.

Denoted

by

$B_{n}(\mathrm{r}\mathrm{g}_{0})$

the

ball in

$C^{n}$

with radius

$\mathrm{r}$

and center

$z_{0},\mathrm{i}.\mathrm{e}$

,

$B_{n}(\mathrm{r},z_{0})$

$:=\{\mathrm{Z}$

$\in C^{n}$

I

$|z$

$-z_{0}|<\mathrm{r}\mathrm{f}$

,

and

Iet

$B$

$:=B_{n}(1,0)$

,

$S(r):=\partial B_{n}(r, 0)$

(the

boudary

of

$Bn$

(

$r$

, 0))

and

$S:=S(\mathrm{r})$

.

For

$\mathrm{z}\in C^{n}$

,

we

will

use

the

following

differential

forms and

operators

for the proof

of

our

theorem;

$d\mathrm{z}$ $=(\begin{array}{l}d\mathrm{z}_{1}\dot{}d\mathrm{z}_{n}\end{array})$

,

$dt$

$=(\begin{array}{l}d\overline{\mathrm{z}_{1}}\dot{}dT_{n}\end{array})$

.

$0\mathrm{J}$

$(\tilde{‘}):=d\mathrm{z}_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge d\mathrm{z}_{n}$

(n-times)

$\eta(\mathrm{z})$

$:= \sum_{j=1}(-1)_{\overline{4}}^{/+1}\beta \mathrm{z}_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge d\mathrm{z}_{j-1}\wedge d\mathrm{z}_{\mathit{1}+1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dzn$

(Leray

form)

$d\mathrm{o}(\mathrm{z})$

$:= \frac{1}{(2i)^{n}}\{\eta(t)\wedge$

$\{\mathrm{o}(\mathrm{z})+(-1)^{q(n)}\iota \mathrm{o}(f)\wedge\eta(_{\overline{4}})\}$

.

$(q(n)= \frac{n(n-1)}{2})$

Let

$z\approx$

$r\zeta$

,

$r:=|z$

$|and$

$|\zeta|=1$

.

Then

we

have

$\overline{\zeta_{1}}d\zeta_{1}+\cdots+\overline{\zeta_{n}}4_{n}+\zeta_{1}E_{1}+\cdots+\zeta_{n}d\zeta_{n}=0$

.

Thus

$d$

$\mathrm{o}(z)$

$=r^{\mathrm{h}-1}d\mathrm{o}$ $(\zeta)$

,

and the form

$dS( \zeta):=\frac{1}{v(S)}d\mathrm{o}(\zeta)$

is the normalized

rotation

invariant surface

measure on

$S$

,

where

$v(S)= \frac{2\pi^{n}}{(n-1)!}$

(the

area

of

$S$

).

$dv(\mathrm{z})$

$:= \frac{1}{(2_{l})^{n}}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}(t)$

$\wedge(\mathrm{o}(\mathrm{z})$

(the

volume elememt

of

$C^{n}$

).

Then

we

get

$dv( \backslash ’.):=\frac{1}{(2_{l})^{n}}\{\eta(\xi)$

$\wedge$

$\mathrm{C}0(\zeta)+(-1)^{q(n)_{(1)(\xi)\wedge\eta(\zeta)\}\wedge r^{2n-1}dr}}$

(3)

$=d\mathrm{o}(\zeta)\wedge r^{2n-1}dr$

Let

us

set

$\frac{\partial}{\partial z}$

$:=( \frac{\partial}{\partial_{\sim}^{-}1},\cdots, \frac{\partial}{\partial_{\sim_{n}}^{-}\prime})$

,

$\frac{\partial}{\partial’*}‘:=(\begin{array}{l}\frac{\partial}{\partial\overline{\mathrm{z}_{1}}}\dot{}\frac{\partial}{\partial_{4_{n}}^{\approx^{-}}}\end{array})$

$\Delta:=4\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial_{\overline{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{r}}}\partial z}=4\sum_{j=\mathrm{I}}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial_{\overline{4}_{j}}\partial_{\acute{\sim}_{j}}^{-}}$

.

H:

$= \frac{\partial^{\underline{\tau}}}{\partial_{\tilde{4}}^{*}\partial_{\overline{4}}}=(\begin{array}{lll}\frac{\partial\underline{’}}{\partial\sim_{1}\prime\partial_{\overline{4}1}\overline{\wedge\wedge}} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial_{\overline{\tilde{4}1}}\partial_{\tilde{4}_{n}}}\dot{} \dot{} \dot{}\dot{‘}\frac{\partial^{\sim}}{\partial_{\mathrm{l}}^{-}\partial_{\overline{4}1}},’ \frac{\partial^{\underline{\gamma}}}{\partial_{\overline{<}^{\partial}}^{-_{nn}}}.\dot{‘}\end{array})$

Let

$u(\mathrm{z})$

be areal function

in

adomain

$\mathrm{D}$

in

$C^{n}$

.

The function

$u(z)$

is

said to

be

subharmonic

in

$\mathrm{D}$

if

the following three conditions hold:

(t)

$-\infty\leq$

$u(_{\overline{4}})<$

$\infty$

(2)

$u(_{\wedge’}^{\sim})$

is

upper

semicontinuous in

$\mathrm{D}$

(3)

For

any

point

$\dot{‘}0\in \mathrm{D}$

,

we

can

take

an

$\mathrm{r}>0$

such

that

$B(r,z_{0})\subset \mathrm{D}$

and

$u(_{\overline{4}0})$

$\leq$

$\frac{1}{v(S)}\int_{S(\mathrm{r},z_{0})}u(\zeta)$

do(\mbox{\boldmath$\zeta$})

Suppose

that

$u(_{\backslash }^{-}.)$

is afunction

of the class

$C^{2}$

in D. Then

$u(_{\tilde{\mathrm{i}}})$

is

{

subharmonic

}

plurisubharmonic

00

{

$\mathrm{H}(u)=\Delta u=4\frac{\partial^{\underline{\eta}}u}{\frac{\partial z^{*}\partial z\partial^{\sim}u}{\partial’*\partial}}‘’\overline{‘}$

(

$\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\geq 0$

hessian)

is

positive

definite.

Thus the

Plurisubharmonic

function

is subharmonic

(4)

The

mapping

function

$\mathrm{f}(\mathrm{z})$

from

adomain

in

$C^{n}$

to

$C^{n}$

is

denoted

by

the column

vector

$f(\mathrm{z})=(\begin{array}{l}f_{1}(_{\sim}’)\dot{}f_{n}(z)\end{array})$

.

The mapping

$\mathrm{f}\{\mathrm{z}$

)

is

said

to

be holomorphic if each

component

functions

$f_{j}(\mathrm{z})(j=1\cdots n)$

are

holomorphic. Let

$H_{n.m}$

be

the

family

of holomorphic mappings

from

$B_{n}$

to

$C_{m}$

and

suppose

that

$f(z)$

and

$g(\mathrm{z})$

are

belonging

to

$H_{n.m}$

and that

$f(0)=g(0)=0$

.

The

mapping

$g(z)$

is said

to

be

subordinate

to

$f(\mathrm{z})$

if

there

exists

aholomorphic

mapping

$\Psi(z)$

from

$B_{n}$

to

$B_{n}$

such that

$|\Psi(\mathrm{z})|\leq|‘.|(\mathrm{z} \in Bn)$

and

$g(\mathrm{z})=f(\Psi(z))($

For amapping

$f(‘’)\in H_{n.m}$

,

we

set

$M_{p}(r,f):= \{\frac{1}{v(S_{\mathrm{r}})}\int_{s_{\mathrm{r}}}|f(\mathrm{z})|^{\mathrm{p}}d\mathrm{o}(z)\}^{f}$

$(0<\mathrm{r}<1_{\backslash }0<\mathrm{p}<\infty)$

$S2$

.

Theorems for

subharmonic functions

For

the

ball

$B_{n}(z_{0}, r)\subset C^{n}$

,

let

us

put

$K(\xi, z)$

$:= \frac{1r^{2}-|\overline{4}-\mathrm{z}_{0}|^{2}}{v(S)r|z-\xi|^{2n}}$

Then the following theorems

hold

:

Theorem

$\mathrm{B}$

(

[3],

p.32, Theorem

1.16)

Let

$\varphi(‘’)$

be acontinuous function

on

$S(\mathrm{r},\mathrm{z}0)$

.

Let

us

put

$u( \mathrm{z}):=\int_{S(\prime,\triangleleft)}K(\xi, \mathrm{z})\propto\xi)d\mathrm{o}(\xi)$

$(\mathrm{z} \in B(r,\mathrm{z}_{0}))$

Then the function

$u(z)$

is the solution of the

problem

of

Dirichlet

for

$B(r,‘’)0$

with

the boundary valu

$\mathrm{e}$

$\propto z$

).

(5)

Theorem

$\mathrm{C}$

( [3],

p.52, Theorem

2.7)

Let

$\varphi(\mathrm{z})$

be

asubharmonic

function

on

adomain

$\mathrm{D}$

in

$C_{n}$

and

$u(z)$

is

not

equal

to

$-\infty$

.

Suppose

that

$B(\tilde{‘}0’ r)\subset \mathrm{D}$

.

Let

us

put

$V(‘’):= \chi_{B(P,t_{0})}(_{\overline{4}})\int_{S(r,z_{0})}K(\xi, \mathrm{z})\mu\xi)d\mathrm{o}(\xi)+\mathrm{x}_{D-\overline{B(r}},\triangleleft)(_{\overline{4}})u(_{\overline{4}})$

where

$\chi_{A}$

denotes

the

characteristic function

for

A.

Then

$V(x)$

is

subharmonic

in

$\mathrm{D}$

and

harmonic

in

$B(\gamma,\tilde{‘})0$

,

and

we

have

$\mathrm{u}\{\mathrm{x}$

)

$\leq$

$V(x)$

in

$B(r,z_{0})$

Main Theorem.

Let

$\mathrm{w}_{1}’$

)

be

asubharmonic function in

$B$

and let

$\psi(‘’)$

be

aholomorphic mapping from

$B$

to

$B$

such that

$|\Psi(_{\sim}’)|\leq$

$|‘.|$

.

Then

we

have

$\int_{s_{n^{(\prime}}0\}}\propto\psi(_{\tilde{\iota}}))d\mathrm{o}(_{\overline{4}})\leq$

$\int_{S_{n}(r.0)}\propto \mathrm{z})d\mathrm{o}(\mathrm{z})$

As the corollary

of

our

theorem

,

we

obtain

the Subordination Theorem of

Littlewood for

$c’\downarrow$

Corollary

1.

Let

$f$

and

$\mathrm{g}$

be

holomorphic mapppings of

$H_{n.m}$

such

that

$f(0)=g(0)=0$

.

Suppose that

$g$

is subordinate

to

$f$

,

then

we

have

$M_{p}(r, g)$

$\leq$

$M_{p}(r, f)$

$(0<\mathrm{p}<\infty, 0\leq \mathrm{r}<]$

$)$

From

Corollary

1,

we

get

the

following:

Corollary 2.

Let

the

functions

$f(z)$

and

$\mathrm{g}(\mathrm{z})$

be the

same

as

in

Corollary 1,

then

we

have

$\int_{B_{n}}||g(_{\overline{4}})|^{p}dv(_{\overline{4}})\leq$

$K \int_{B_{n}}|f(\mathrm{z})\#^{p}dv(\overline{‘})$

where

$\mathrm{K}$

is

aconstant

(6)

References

[1]

$\mathrm{L}$

A.Aizenberg

and

Sh.A.Dautov: Differential

Forms,

Orthoganal to Holomorphic

Functions

on

$\mathrm{F}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s},\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}$

their Properties,

Translations of Mathematical Monographs,

$\mathrm{v}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}.56$

A.M.S

(1983)

[2]

$\mathrm{P}.\mathrm{L}$

.Duren

:Univalent

Functions,

Grundlehren

der

mathematischen Wissenschaften

259.

Springer(l

983)

[3]

W.K.Hayman

and

P.B.Kennedy:Subharmonic

Functions,

vol.LAcadenic

Press(1976)

[4]

$\mathrm{W}.\mathrm{K}$

.Hayman

:Subharmonic

Functions,

$\mathrm{v}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}.2$

.

Academic

Press(l 989)

[5]

S.G.Krantz:Function

Theory

of

Several

Complex

Variables,

John

Wiley

and Sons

(1982)

[6]

W.Rudin:Function

Theory

in

the Unit Ball of

$C_{n}$

,

G.M.W.241

.Springer Verlag

(1980)

[7]

P.Lelong

:Plurisubharmonic

functions and

positive

differential

forms,

Gordon and

Breach

Scientific

Publishers,

New

York

(1968)

参照

関連したドキュメント

Key words: Analytic function; Multivalent function; Linear operator; Convex univalent func- tion; Hadamard product (or convolution); Subordination; Integral operator.... Analytic

Once bulk deformation b is chosen (so that there is a torus fiber L whose Floer cohomology is non-vanishing), then we consider the Floer chain complex of L with a generic torus fiber

A lemma of considerable generality is proved from which one can obtain inequali- ties of Popoviciu’s type involving norms in a Banach space and Gram determinants.. Key words

ROUMELIOTIS, A new general- ization of Ostrowski integral inequality for mappings whose derivatives are bounded and applications in numerical integration and for special means,

This class of starlike meromorphic functions is developed from Robertson’s concept of star center points [11].. Ma and Minda [7] gave a unified presentation of various subclasses

de la CAL, Using stochastic processes for studying Bernstein-type operators, Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Functional Analysis and Approximation The-

[3] JI-CHANG KUANG, Applied Inequalities, 2nd edition, Hunan Education Press, Changsha, China, 1993J. FINK, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic

Key words and phrases: Cebyšev type inequalities, Absolutely continuous functions, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for double integrals, L p spaces, Hölder’s integral inequality..