諏訪之瀬火山の地磁気異常と3次元磁気構造
全文
(2) -
(3) . . ,**0 +, +. ,**1 1 . . Aeromagnetic Anomalies and a -D magnetic structure of Suwanose-jima Island Yoshio UEDA῍, Ken-ei ONODERA῍῍, Kouiti KUMAGAWA῍῍ and Kaoru KOYAMA῍῍ Airborne magnetic surveys of Suwanose-jima Island were conducted on August, ,. and ,/, +333 at the altitude of +*00 m by a proton magnetometer installed on a craft of YS-++. Magnetic anomalies of total force are calculated by subtracting IGRF-+*. The negative peak (-,0 nT) is observed over the north to northeastern coastal zone and a positive peak (,., nT) is over the southeastern slope. Another positive peak is also recognized over the southern tip of Island. The volcanic edifice is approximated by the assemblage of the prismatic bodies for the -D magnetic analyses. A -D model analysis based on an uniform magnetization assumption shows the magnetization intensity of -.+. A/m corresponding to a magnetization direction polarized in the direction defined by declination of * and inclination of .,./. A -D non-uniform magnetization analysis, where each block is magnetized in the same direction as in the uniform model with a variable magnetization intensity, is conducted to derive an internal magnetic structure of the edifice. This result makes it apparent that the volume weighted mean magnetization intensity is ranging from ,.21 to -.+, A/m, and a non-uniformity of magnetization from .*ῌ to +.ῌ, by taking into consideration of the base layer underlain by the volcanic edifice. Besides, the following features are also made apparent. (+) Relatively low magnetization zones (*./ +./ A/m) are recognized in the southwest of Mt Ontake. This low magnetization zone extends to the base layer between *m and 1**m below sea level. This zone is thought to be linked with the conduit of Suwanose-jima Volcano. (,) Relatively strong magnetization zones (*./+./ A/m) are recognized in the southeast of the summit area and they further extend northeastward to the east o$ng of Suwanose-jima Island. (-) The base layer between * m and 1** m b.s.l. is generally small in magnetization intensity (*./+./ A/m) except the high magnetization zone denoted in ,). The above features may imply that the base layer is composed of more siliceous rocks than pyroxene andesites forming the present volcanic edifice. Key words : Suwanose-jima, magnetic anomalies, -D magnetic analysis, active volcano, Ryukyu-Islands (NanseiShoto), airborne geophysics. +ῌ ῐ ῎ ῑ ῏. . !". &HDC#drs&tBMuv! w #$% ,** km &'()*+,. -#drsxyz{R|#}~z{I (+3/.) &. - (Fig. +) ./-0123456789,:;<=. AYZCD*E |Z&Z F# r 1. >9,?@A BCD*E F!G& . H#,IJ. RBC 2.* Aῌm #IYZCD*E BUB #. KBC-LM N,- OPQ# PR,ST
(4). z{!w-#VZMxyz{&*-k*M. UVWXYZCD* [ \ +32- ; \ +30. ;. r 1##M&!b?M,. Tiba, +323E F#]^!_`#$- 133 m #^. dW?=)*rsyI-k*E. ?)*E a#bcdW?ef)*R #g. &rs#R*r
(5) ! ¡8¢. c!hi 1** m j&kA ^ * m j!bl#d. £1¤w&¥)*Rr?¦§I #§. W?m)*R no / N&pq)*E. OPQ-¨XYZ*,-0r
(6) I©ZCª. «//2῍***. ¬®¯°±²³´ ,῍+0῍/῍/*0 hµ¶ «+*.῍***. ´·¸¹º±»d /῍-῍+ b¼. Correspnding author : Ueda Yoshio e-mail : yueda+*@hotmail.com.
(7) ,¶\²]·¸¹²º^»«² ¼. 212. Fig. +.. Location of Suwanose-jima island. -
(8) . Fig. ,. Topography of Suwanose-jima island and its adjacent sea areas. Contour interval is +** m. T : Mt.Tondati-dake, O : Mt.On-take, N : Mt. Negami-dake ; M : Makodai plateau..
(9) !" # $%& ' ( . ~=5 ,/ +/>5 . )*'+ ,. + ? / }#`3@=?. & -%./0123(. N IJ]6/ GPS '= R#. 4/05678 . / +** m yzA=
(10) .% C, ,**0F. ' (9:;<= 0. }#i/B<B. 12/>(?5. ? (Wessel, +323) ? j (. @AB@ CDE F /G!"H. B/ 2.* nT 5. IJ #$ +333 %K +*00 m LMN. 1.@
(11) !"fC6. / OP'Q<
(12) &. lN./ IGRF-+*th model (Macmillan and Maus, ,**/). !"R
(13) ST - 3%. U. D% !"E/7FG F oilieZN HI G. . 4/8J878¡¢rE , . (.% G£@/¤-,0 nT ¥¦§
(14) K /. Fig. , /G!"HRV'WX Fig. - . km 7787F¨©ILªN «9 £. /#$OP()*YN#$K +*00 m . @/ ,., nT ¥¦8 , km IM<
(15) . !"XZN G!"HIJ #$/ +333 % 2. G£@vw/7K 0 km 5. [ ,. + ,/ + , + \.K +*00 m LMT. G!"HN*O/78_PWO. IJ]/^,IJ_`- YS++ a] bcd. N.%¬QR¦N*O=¬%ST.%. e.fgehi]jkilm/N. RST%U/Q<
(16) .%(% G!"H. ] nop0\.1. , 23f#N. ®%U#¯P/V°sWB®. #456/ Fig. - Z'. 7q'r89s. *.0. Ma %UZN.q CX±²Y +321F Brunhes. tu +2** m vw5 :x/7#4v. £0Z³N.% !". w/ /** m yz;(#4{|iN.%. E/ EZN.q Brunhes £. }#+ / ,. +/1. ,* nT <. y´$Z0/5N.=µ[(=.
(17)
(18) WXYZ - yzWX»¼. 213. Fig. -. Track lines and total intensity magnetic anomalies at the altitude of +*00 m. Left : Track lines. Right : Magnetic anomalies of total force. Contour interval is /* nT. Positive and negative anomalies are shown by solid and dotted lines, respectively.. . m! IJK58)& .
(19) . ,/** aIJK.ob $! "#g*. ! "#$%&'()*. (,**+) IJK$g&
(20) A. ! "+, 1** m -./ 012. BOPIJK$ XY a : ,3 s! +,3. 3!
(21) 45678. s? b ) Smith and Wessel (+33*) . &9:;< ./3! =>. $g* ,/* m, /** m, AB + km EFGHIJK$. ? @ +/ km, +, km, AB ++ km A. 8)& mEFGHIJK$tI$,. B! '@3"#"/ 9C. l8)&. &D 23 EFGHIJK? L&
(22) MN 0.1 km- ! OP 1** m QR3SMMN +,, km- ! . + p : -** m Q7 ,/* m EFGH , p : * m ? -** m /** m EFGH - p : * m ? "+, 1** m /** m EFGH. 4 TU ,* V& WXYZ[\. . p : OP 1** m ? "+, +,** m + km EFGH.
(23) M
(24) [\)&WXYZ.
(25) "#$ ;_!. ! "#]^_R` a
(26) .
(27) -¡Npp¢£¤t /** m ¥s. =>? +* km, 2 km AB! 0. m? !
(28) .o"+, 1** m ?. km -b [\)&WXYZc de! f. +,** m ¦§)! 4.op$ . p)*I¨. [\&g. |©ªg WXYZIJKg*w X Y $«g! 4IJK$EFGHqn¬®. - . YZ )*hi)&. g&hi. jk (,**0) l. ¯°±F²!
(29) :MTU³^W. ! mm! 9:M$n.opWqr. q´¯Wq)*g¦§)*Wq$1. s
(30) tuvEJKJ)*4 $wxLm. .,./ s! 1 *.* s)*! :MWqrs$L. )&. t! ®WXYZ? ´¯WqIlµ¶W. -ῌ+
(31) . 9:M2$ - yz{MN|}~-_. XYZ$·)¸g&¹·YZ$¶º)&.
(32) z.´µ/¶·¸´¹º»2´µ. ¼. 214. -ῌ,
(33) : . . 1'( E]9 Fig. 2 V'", (.) D'} 6V'(.
(34) - . -ῌ. "# $%&'()*+,. + . !"#. /6,!"#$%. $%& '( )"* +#$%, +. +') h6'( 2 9 !"/,. - "-./01 ,23456+. Z[6'"69 %E86"/. 72"#$%"8 9 . ". &7"#$%+') h6'( -./"!.
(35) : ,;<=#$%" 8>'(. "#$% b"/""y,b"-./h. ?9 @ i 6" fi 9 ! k 6". #>'y#LT (bulk magnetization) ;' 9. #$%AJk >' 9 B@ CD,D E'(. !"#$% b"/""x<c"y. fiFῌAik · AJkGb. (+). k. ,-./"72#$"1>c69 )) 6,b|# (total norm of residual magneti-. Aik ,HIJKLM
(36) 69 +***N+*** OP"QRS. zation) az>'( b #"y#. T U 3 6 V '( ) ) 6 , W X (CG) . LT<>',-./"#"72. (Bjorck and Elfving, +313) 'Y Z["\C. >u6V. 9 ))6,#=(72 (magnetic. ]1 !"#$%"^_`a 9 b". non- uniformity) ( ))az c,)" -. _]1 B@c Z[c "d"e (s) ". #"ls\C6Z[{| 1'h9 b"w". fghij k 6"lmnl 1'(. -./01 , - #hE{| 1E1. E]9 ^_"`a,72l6"#$%"c. /=E*,)|" ¡6V'( 9 -./. op'*E"#$%q'6V'( r9. "#=¢>u ?£"ls\C6". lst>uv 9 c Z[c". "¤h¥¦{|'(. "e s "w9 c"x<c"y "x<c"y"6az{|' Goodness-fitting-ratio (GFR)(Uyeda and Richards, +300) Z[ (. .- . / .ῌ+
(37) . -ῌ- !. §+,¨)"#& 9 -./h2-E#$. l"}~a>' ,
(38) =, (,**0) . #>' ©a +-./"#$%Eª#. 69 b"20,D (Menke, +323) . $ « Table + r ( Case-+ ,#$ «¬. |'(. "#® «2¯>' ©a +°±9 Case-, , ,. #$ «&!v +°±6V'( r9 Fig. .. +. E ῎ ῌ+ ῍, AJk,῏. covAJkFs,d ·. (,). , Case-+ 6"#²9 Z[#²³ª. ))6,#$%AJ "9 sd ,B@ "69 E , , 6V'( ,HIJKLM
(39) "!" , D6{|'( E ῎ ῌ+ FῌA , ῍, AJk,῏ i j9k. Table +. Results of uniform magnetization analyses of Suwanose-jima volcano.. ,. (-). &*20" ,B@ CD~a>' 69 (+) D]1 !"#$%"} *Z[c"} dfi " , ,!"#$%" }" , ,D6{|'( dfi,FῌA,ik · dAJk,. (.). k. (.) DlY) . !"#$%"}. d (AJk) +') h6'( ))6,)|"} Z[ 9 #$%"!"h#8*"$. Dr : degree from North to East, Ir : degree from horizontal to downward. Target area of analysis is restricted near Suwanose-jima island enclosed by the rectangular zone whose coordinates of left-down and righ-up corners are (0., 0/) (1., 11), respectively. The coordinate values are shown in Fig. ...
(40) ºb - »¼b2u. 215. Fig. .. Observed data, calculated data and residuals in the uniform magnetization analysis. Contour interval is ,* nT. Positive and negative anomalies are shown by solid and dotted lines, respectively. Thick lines are shown every +** nT..
(41) . !" -.+.#-.-* Aῌ. m $ %&'()*+," +* Aῌm -./.. !01 23. *04*+*,536789:;7 < !$"1 =>,? @A BCD1 +32-E F'G1 H,IJ6 7
(42) *K !"LM NOPQ * , +#. Aῌm, RST U
(43) *, -# 1 Aῌm, 7VW XYZ *, +.0#,.0 Aῌ m $ 1 [\]^0_`9ab cde. f
(44) ' !gghi>,? @Sj 1 ,**-E. Fig. /. Standard deviations (s) and GFR (goodnessof-fitting ratio) between the observed and calculated anomalies againt iteration numbers in CG solution.. Fig. . kd7lmn. ," +/* nT op 0qfd7 . d - 98"77. l' rs"0t'b2ucdv7. !cd1 . 98" !
(45) . 89
(46) fwxa:;d7 l'y. 77ef
(47) . t'b2urs 8"1 23+. Fig. / " $ $cdef
(48) . !z9{|}~,'(0:;. (s) CG V ¡¢. d7 ;<1 |b2uyt.
(49) s "£¤¥¦,"§¨©W01. N,`7<1 l'|2u . ? cd" s "ª«t$' ,"1 s. 0'. 0ª«t¬
(50) ®,¯ @V 0. .ῌ, ΐῑ῏ῒῐ῍ῌ῎. +*E £°¯
(51) l 8ef
(52) yt. ,"1 Fig. .
(53) $.. ±²¯³ Table , ´f
(54) 'g1 ¯³. 1 Gi,U 1 + c. ;µ¶ @ . E ·¸¹
(55) f1 µ.
(56) TUVWXYZ[\]X^_`7XYa b. 216. Fig. 0. Observed, calculated and residuals in the non-uniform multi-block model. Contour interval is ,* nT. Positive and negative anomalies are shown by solid and dotted lines, respectively. Thick lines are shown every +** nT.. Table ,.. Results of analyses by multi-block models for the residuals in case +.. Target area of analysis is the same zone in Table +. *+ : total summation of the product of magnetization intensity (J) and volume of each block. *, : a percent value of the total summation of the absolute value of the product of magnetization deviation and volume of each block against a bulk magnetization..
(57) . :;0 +.ῌ < =>
(58) ? @. ! "#$%&'()*)*. ABCD0E
(59) @! 0 GFR F@GH
(60) 8. +,-./0 ,.211-.+, Aῌm 2)*0 -.** Aῌm3 4. IJKLMN 8I. ,5+6*7/089
(61) :;0 .*ῌ! 8. O
(62) 0! 8P+0! Q . ,-./RS@.
(63) EFGHI)* - )*QR. 217. Fig. 1. A -D magnetic structure of Suwanose-jima volcano derived from aeromagnetic anomalies. The upper left is the first layer (h-** m a.s.l.), the upper right is the second layer (-** mh* m), the lower left is the third layer (* mh1** m), and the lower right is the fouth layer (1** mh+,** m b.s.l.), respectively. Magnetization devations from mean value (-.+. A/m) are shown in contour lines with interval of *./ A/m for the first to third layers. For the fouth layer, the magnetization contrast in the layer is shown in the same contour intervals. The analyzed region is the rectangular zone whose left-down and right-up corners are (0,, 0-) (10, 13), respectively.. -
(64) Fig. 0 . !"#
(65) $%&'(. Fig. 1 + 1 , XYZ)KLM4. 5 !"#V[\
(66) ]^Z_`C&ab`cd ef3 + Aῌm gM)KLMhiYAjk&'
(67). )* +,-./'012 3 45. h)KLMZ4 Fig. 2 ST$[Vl&C. 6789:;<=> 45 ?0@ A. (EFGHImYZ - Vn[@
(68) . BC
(69) D# Fig. 1 EFGHIJ)KLM. ( ef3 )KLMhiYo@0 ῌ '. 45$ Fig. 2 EFGHI NOP)*QR. &Z4 Qpq]rstu@ ῍ vMw xy. ST U. VW!"#
(70). "#z{)QR xy"#V @( , o|}~A.
(71) 218. ´(µ&)'¶·¸)¹º»)n ¼ Table -. Results of analyses by multi-block models for the zone including the base floor of Suwanosejima island.. Fig. 2. A EW cross sectional view of -D magnetic structure in Fig. 1. The cross section from west to east at the N-S coordinate of 1+.* is shown. The estimated error bars of magnetizations along the profile are shown in the upper part, from the first to the third layers, respectively.. Target area of analysis is the zone enclosed by the rectangular whose coordinates of left-down and righup corners are (0+, 0-) (2,, 2*), respectively. The coordinate values are shown in Fig. .. *+ : total summation of the product of magnetization intensity (J) and volume of each block. *, : a percent value of the total summation of the absolute value of the product of magnetization deviation and volume of each block against a bulk magnetization.. "!#rO opV-\] %="= rrOE Fig. 3 -\]
(72) Z - [^ _b"hiVc-\]. .
(73) 5 }!/.
(74) . g%e:FE }*M.-\]. !"#$. hiV-\] d6{5%$> .. % &'()* +333+ ,-./012. " +.*+.* Aῌm -\] !# $. 345$%67 8 9#:;<=. :Feg%Z . [O. >? @:,-ABCD% E. M.$:Fe6:;KV{5rO M. >F GHHI JKLM 1NO. L 1** m 6gU %= } 6a. "P; &QR)* ,**.+ ,-/0SST. /** m np61=. "#U VWX,-.
(75) %YV. -\] 6K CG !NOryz6 Fig.. E Z - [-\]
(76) ^_`. +* {=r $~ M. +, Aῌm . ab"c-\] d.O. -\] E; ^_.. $:FefagZ . [O"P. &M. <+ . Aῌm ¡-\] 6{5$%. ; ^_$
(77) hiVjgklm. ¢. <n8 Am!"#% ! ^_M.opVe-qVAB6NOr. ¡£r:F ^_M.6Am5 Z - [P#"^_.¤"!¥n. O stiuv6wx="st=ryz6 Table - . ¦§n8 :;SS¨©§<n §A. {=r |r Fig. 3 }yz:-\]
(78) ~. m!"#ª#k ! $«#"W. E p-\] ,.12 Aῌm %e; Table. ¬¦®¯:KV°±:²³$%E. , styz%"! e"# $C. >F. DM.Z - [-\] ^_..
(79) +4 - 4. 219. Fig. 3. A -D magnetic structure of Suwanose-jima volcano derived from aeromagnetic anomalies. The captions of figures are the same as described in Fig. 1. The analyzed region is the rectangular zone whose left-down and right-up corners ore (/3, 0+) and (2., 2,), respectively.. /ῌ ῍. ῎.
(80) . H][D" ^_`8a:bc<defHgh @ij. -.+. Aῌm !" #. IJ k#J 1** m lm<@n" #J. $%&'(" # )*. $%01
(81)
(82) . +,, km- #J . +,-
(83)
(84) ./ -.** A ῌ m . op # qrs +.*t,.* Aῌ. " 01
(85) 234567489:;<=%. m u" vw (-.*t/.* A ῌ m) xyz. >?@4A& (non-uniformity of magnet-. H{[ TT DE" ,|. ization) B + CDEB - C!F
(86) G. }~01dn <01
(87) . '( .*ῌ @H" IJ@IKC LB .. 01@T HvS _" . CM NOP +.ῌ IKC '(<QGRS. 01op# <dnI. T '(UVWXYZH" [\S. <01H" op#A<.
(88) ¨©-iPl¯°iºp»:iP ¼. 220. ῌ ῑ ῐ ῍. Fig. +*. Horizontal distribution of magnetization intensities of Suwanose-jima volcano. Block models with horizontal length of /** m in north and east directions above the depth of 1** m are assumed to be magnetized in the present fild direction. A calculated GFR is +*.2 and the standard deviation of misfits is +1., nT, respectively. Contour interval is + A/m..
(89) . !"#" .
(90) $ %&
(91) ῏. ῎. '()*+,+-./ 01 2'(3 LA1*+ 455678 9:;<=>?
(92) > '() @ABC !"D*E+,+0#F$ ' %GHIJKLE&MN
(93) '(O )*+& P,-Q R./SQTU70V*+ WX120VY9 3Z[ZK4\]^ _$=` ab+,+
(94) cE;<=> ?
(95) $T '(56d GMT (Wessel and Smith, +33+) e7>
(96). Bjorck, A. and Elfving, T. (+313) Accelerated projection methods for computing pseudo inverse solutions of systems of linear equations, BIT, +3, +./ῌ+0-. 8fghi9 1:ij;<- (+321) =k>lm? @nABoC@
(97) nDpEpqrst 2, -1*ῌ -2+. FGu:ivHI (+32-) wxyz{|> }
(98) ,2 +*+ῌ++/. 0#F$ (,**-) )C !$~
(99) J iKi8h (+333) T LM
(100) N8rOC$ ., B-+ ++ῌ+2. Macmillan, S. and Maus, S. (,**/) International geomagnetic reference field - the tenth generation. Earth, Planets and Space, /1, ++-/ῌ++.*. Menke, W. (+323) Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory, revised edition. International Geophysics Series, ./, Academic Press, Inc. vHI (+30.) wxyz{| +30* C+E
(101) 3 /1ῌ0,. PQRS (+3/.) kE!rT :$
(102) UV$ + +-ῌ,3. i12iW/[ (,**.) T+E ,**- C ++ X?YZ [
(103) N8rOC$ .1B, 11-ῌ112. Smith, W.H.F. and Wessel, P. (+33*) Gridding with continuous curvature splines in tension. Geophysics, //, ,3-ῌ -*/. \/ i] i ^ (,**+) _`@A B7+E a¡b¢c0d
(104) ,**+ C 0#eO£¤rs¥¦f§V
(105) Tiba, T. (+323) Petrochemistry of the volcanic rocks from Kuchino-shima, Nakano-shima and Suwanose-jima, Tokara Islands. Mem. Natn, Sci. Mus., Tokyo, ,,, 1ῌ+3. ¨©- (,**0) -g - ª«)¬h ,*** CY U i¡
(106) /+ +0+ῌ+1.. ¨©-ij®kiPl¯°i±²³mi8´: (+32-) '()µ ¶Lnf· )¸¹)¬h
(107) `o $~ +2 -1ῌ0.. Uyeda, S. and Richards, M. (+300) Magnetization of four Pacific seamounts near the Japanese Islands, Bull.Earthq. Res.Inst., .., +13ῌ,+-. Wessel, P. (+323) XOVER : a cross-over error detector for track data, Computers & Geosciences, +/, ---ῌ-.0. Wessel, P. and Smith, W.H.F. (+33+) Free software helps map and display data. EOS. Trans., AGU, 1,, ..+ῌ..0. 0V*+ WX12.
(108)
図
関連したドキュメント
In the second computation, we use a fine equidistant grid within the isotropic borehole region and an optimal grid coarsening in the x direction in the outer, anisotropic,
The dimension d will allow us in the next sections to consider two different solutions of an ordinary differential equation as a function on R 2 with a combined expansion.. The
Here we continue this line of research and study a quasistatic frictionless contact problem for an electro-viscoelastic material, in the framework of the MTCM, when the foundation
We present sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to Neu- mann and periodic boundary-value problems for some class of quasilinear ordinary differential equations.. We
Using the multi-scale convergence method, we derive a homogenization result whose limit problem is defined on a fixed domain and is of the same type as the problem with
It is known now, that any group which is quasi-isometric to a lattice in a semisimple Lie group is commensurable to a lattice in the same Lie group, while lattices in the same
An integral inequality is deduced from the negation of the geometrical condition in the bounded mountain pass theorem of Schechter, in a situation where this theorem does not
A further simplification is to observe that since the flow is uniform at infinity, we may assume that the flow is in an infinitely long channel with width 2L L r and the obstacle