The Decline of Taro and Taro Irrigation in Papua New Guinea
著者(英) R. Michael Bourke
journal or
publication title
Senri Ethnological Studies
volume 78
page range 255‑264
year 2012‑03‑30
URL http://doi.org/10.15021/00002520
255
S
ENRIE
THNOLOGICALS
TUDIES78: 255–264 ©2012 Irrigated Taro (Colocasia esculenta) in the Indo-Pacifi c
Edited by Matthew Spriggs, David Addison, and Peter J. Matthews
The Decline of Taro and Taro Irrigation in Papua New Guinea
R. M ICHAEL B OURKE The Australian National University
Taro is a very ancient food crop in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and was utilized in the high- lands as early as 10,000 years ago. It was the most important food crop in PNG until about 300 years ago when it was displaced in the highlands (above 1200 m altitude) by the recently introduced sweet potato. In the lowlands, it remained an important food crop until the early 1940s. Since then taro production has been greatly reduced by a combination of taro blight, taro beetle and declining soil fertility. It is now the most important staple food crop in a limited number of remote inland locations. Taro provides only 4% of the food energy from the staple food crops, compared with 63% from sweet potato. In the 20
thcentury, irrigation of taro was recorded as a generally minor practice at about 15 locations. There are indica- tions that there was signifi cant irrigation of taro in the seasonally dry Eastern Highlands prior to the adoption of sweet potato there. By the mid 1990s, taro irrigation was recorded as a signifi cant practice at one location only. The glory days of taro and taro irrigation in PNG are now over.
1. I NTRODUCTION
The mid-2011 population of Papua New Guinea (PNG) is estimated as 7.0 million. Most (81%) of the population are rural villagers who produce most of their own food, mainly from food ‘gardens’, but also from planted tree crops, self-sown trees, fi shing and hunting. The balance of the population live in urban locations (13%) or in rural non-village locations (6%) such as high schools, mining or logging camps. A little over half (57%) of the rural village population live in the lowlands (sea level to 1200 m altitude), while the remaining 43% live in the highlands (1200–2800 m altitude) (Allen and Bourke 2009: Table 1.1.1).
Over the six-year period 1990 to 1995, a national level survey known as Mapping Agricultural Systems of PNG (MASP) was conducted of village agriculture (Allen et al.
1995; Bourke et al. 1998). The MASP surveys produced, amongst other things, data on dis- tribution of staple food crops (Fig. 1). These surveys, combined with data from the 2000 national census, mean crop yields, food intake and other data, allow estimates to be made of the number of people growing the staple food crops and crop production (Tables 1 and 2).
Using historical data, as well as a previous 1961 survey of village agriculture, the author has
estimated the contribution to food energy of the most important staple food crops at six dif-
ferent periods (Fig. 2).
Table 1 Rural population growing staple food crops in 2000
Crop
Most important food An important food Grown for food
Population % Population % Population %
Sweet potato 2,785,005 66 633,791 15 4,142,532 99
Banana 385,748 9 1,341,922 32 4,035,383 96
Taro (Colocasia) 265,094 6 1,026,171 25 3,991,472 95
Greater yam (Dioscorea alata) – – 167,122 4 2,508,298 60
Cassava 42,847 1 515,140 12 2,318,528 55
Chinese taro (Xanthosoma) 129,061 3 779,783 19 2,244,173 54
Coconut 1,662 < 1 1,488,561 36 1,535,066 37
Sago 459,831 11 145,703 4 1,372,004 33
Lesser yam (D. esculenta) 271,968 7 237,093 6 1,369,959 33
Irish potato – – 120,881 3 668,769 16
Giant taro (Alocasia (( ) – – – – 315,154 8
Queensland arrowroot (Canna) – – – – 184,334 4
Elephant yam (Amorphophallus (( ) – – – – 139,707 3
Swamp taro (Cyrtosperma) 680 <1 3,466 < 1 31,598 < 1
Aerial yam (D. bulbifera) – – – – 21,538 < 1
Yam (D. nummularia) – – – – 7,391 < 1
Yam (D. pentaphylla) – – – – 3,436 < 1
Percentages represent the proportion of total rural population (4,192,561 in 2000) growing each crop in each class.
Column totals add up to more than 100% because people are counted more than once where they grow more than one crop in that class. Source: Mapping Agricultural Systems of PNG database; Bourke and Allen (2009: Table 3.1.1)
Table 2 Estimated production of 18 staple food crops in Papua New Guinea in 2000
Crop Weight
(tonnes)
Weight (%)
Energy (kJ × 109)
Energy (%)
Sweet potato
a)2,871,851 63.57 11,422.68 62.77
Banana 436,496 9.66 1,260.98 6.93
Cassava 271,894 6.02 1,115.61 6.13
Taro (Colocasia) 229,088 5.07 748.14 4.11
Chinese taro (Xanthosoma) 226,536 5.01 739.81 4.07
Lesser yam (Dioscorea esculenta) 180,370 3.99 656.99 3.61
Coconut 100,929 2.23 633.88 3.48
Greater yam (D. alata) 91,358 2.02 294.54 1.62
Sago 82,962 1.84 1,240.00 6.81
Irish potato 18,759 0.42 55.77 0.31
Giant taro (Alocasia (( ) 2,389 0.05 7.79 0.04
Queensland arrowroot (Canna) 1,431 0.03 4.69 0.03
Elephant yam (Amorphophallus (( ) 1,217 0.03 3.98 0.02
Swamp taro (Cyrtosperma) 823 0.02 2.68 0.01
Yam (D. nummularia) 478 0.01 1.55 0.01
Aerial yam (D. bulbifera) 467 0.01 1.51 0.01
Rice 407 0.01 5.82 0.03
Yam (D. pentaphylla) 37 0.00 0.13 0.00
Total 4,517,492 100.00 18,196.54 100.00
a)
Estimated sweet potato production includes that fed to pigs in the highlands. Source: Bourke and Vlassak (2004)
The Decline of Taro and Taro Irrigation in Papua New Guinea 257
50 0 100 200 300 400 k ilometr es
Mixed crops Banana Banana, cassava Banana, Chinese taro Banana, sago Banana, sweet potato Banana, yam CassavaCassava, Chinese taro Cassava, sweet potato Chinese taro Chinese taro, sweet potato Chinese taro, taro Coconut Coconut, sago Sago
Sago, sweet potato Sago, taro Sweet potato Sweet potato, taro Sweet potato, yam Taro Taro, yam Yam