金沢大 学 十 全 医 学会 雑 誌 第9 2巻 第6号 85 1‑8 61 (1 9 8 3) 8 5 1
E f fe cts of R ib o s o m al R N A P r o m ote r s o n
P la s mid R eplic atio n
M a ria del P ila r A guin aga
D i vi sio n of B iophysic s, Ca n c e r Re s e a r ch In stitute,K a n a z a wa Univ e r sit y
A bstraet
T he efT tcts of pr o m o te r s ofri bosom al R N A operonsin the rep lic a tio n orlgl n r eg10n Of
the B a cillu s s ubti揖 chrom o s o m e hav e be en s t ud ied on the rep lic a tion of pla smids in Esche richia c oli as a ho s t c ell. It ha s be en alre ad y fb und t hat p la smids c a r ryl ngthes e PrOm O te rS C a n nO t be rep lica ted in B ・ Subt肋・,ther efbre the m e chanism of inhibition of
r ep lic a tion c an no tbe e x a min edin th is ba c te riu m . In th is s tud y w efbu nd tha t eve n in E . C Oli the re ar e inhibito ry e鮎ct s on plasmid r ep lic a tion depe nding on sit e a nd dire c tio n of inse rtion ofthe prom o t ers. In p B R v e ct ors(E . coli p las mi ds),thepr o m o te rs c an bein sert ed
eitherin one dire c tion orin bo th dir e ctionsdepe nding o n gene cons tit u tions ar oundthesite Of in sertion . St ab ility of the p la smi d is als o afr tc t ed b y the site an d dir ec tion of the ins ertio n . In a c o m po sit e ve c t or betw e e n p B R a nd p U B (Stq pわ′わc oc c u s a u r e us p las mid),
theins ertion ofthe prom o t ers alone do e s no ttake p la ce bu t o c cu rs with an ac c o m panyl ng D N A 丘agment, alw ayslo c ated do w ns tre am from the pr o m o t ers. T h isfiagm entis de riv ed f
ro m the E . coli chrom o s om e and can be rep la ced by D N A 丘ag ment s cont ain l ng kno w n te r mina t ors oftrans cr lPt10n . Subs equ e ntl y we have newl y cons tru c t ed a ve c to rtha t m aybe usefu1 a s a te r min at or sear ch ing plas mid. T he m e chanis m of inhibition c aused b y the s e PrOm O te rS On P la smid r ep lic ation w as d iscu ssed.
Key w o rds clo n lng, rR N A pr o m oters, pla smid r eplic atio n
Introduetiom
D u ring the s tud y of the str u ctu r e and f
u nc tion ofthe orlgl n r eg1 0 n Of rep lic ation of BaciHus subtHね in ou r labora to ry, a D N A f
ragm ent(B 7), Wh ich e xh ibited s o m einh i b it o‑
ry fu nc tion s on D N A r ep lic atio n w as fb u nd With in th is r egio n (l). B y sequ e n cing a part Ofthis D N A ftagm ent a set of tw o t ande m
pr o m o te rs w a s d is c o v e red(2). T he s e prom ot‑
e r s a r e the m ain loci re spon si b le fbr the S uP pr eS Sion of aut onom ous r ep lica tion of p las mids c a r ryl ng this 丘agm entin B . s ubtilLs.
T hey e x e r cis ed str o ng inhibitio n o n p las mid
r ep lic a tion in Esche rich ia c oliand c aus ed r ap i d
S egr egation ofc ells w hich had alre ady lo st the
Pla s mi d(3).
It w a s fbund that B 7 c ontains a pa rt of a ri bos om al R N A ope ron (r r nO) a nd that the
tw o t andem prom o t ers in th is 丘agment w e re pr o m o te r s ofrR N A ope ron(r rnprom o te rs) (4,
5). W e w anted t o kn ow i f the inhi b it ory
e晩ct s caused b y r r nO prom o te r s woul d be C O m m O n f br oth e r r r n prom o t er s and t o u nde rs t andthe m echanis m of inh ibition du eto thes e pr o m o te rs・
In ge n e ral, r r n PrOm O te rS are C OnSidered
S trOng PrOm O t er S Sinc e they ar e fiequ entl y リ ボゾ ー ム R N A プロモ ー タ ー のプ ラス ミ ド複 製に対 する作 用: 金 沢 大 学が ん研 究 所 生物物 理 部
マリア デル ピ ラー ル アギナ ガ ( 指 導 教 官 吉 川 寛)
tr a n s cri bed b y th e R N A pol y m er ase・ Until now rn ore than l O O d i飴rentprom o te r seque n‑ ces hav e bee n i den tified. Prom o te rs ftom S e V er al bacte rial and vir al ge nom e s hav e be e n e a sily clo n ed in E・ C Oli and their s tr e ngth has been s tud ied (6, 7). H o w ev e r cloning of
D N A f h gm e n t s con t ain l ng StrOng prOm O te rS alon e,SuCh as bacte riophage T 5 prom o te rs(8)
Or r r n prOm Ot erS Of E . coli(9),ha v e failed・ T he m echanism ofth is u nclo nab ility of t he S trOng Pr O m O t er ha s no t been eluci dat ed yet・
In th is pape r w e des cri be the ins e rtion of r r n
pro m o t ers in vario us plas mids and it s e 飴c t s On P la s mi d r ep lic ation in E ・ C Oli・ Som e ve ctor s c o n s tru c ted in this s tudy m ay ha ve the
POtentialto be u sed a s pla s mi ds s e arch ing fbr
tra n s crip tio nal ter min a t ors. T he m e chanis m Ofinhibition ca us ed b y s tr o ng prom ote r s is
also d isc u s s ed.
M ateri als a nd M et hods
Bacte rial s tr ain s. E . c oli C 6 0 0 (thy, hT u,
血, わ乃」 , 加, ∫呼 ダ) and 丘■・ C O〟1 0 3 7(r e c.4 , dn aA‑t岳),W er e uSed as ho st sfb rthe cloning of P la s mi ds contain l ng r7・n Pr O m O t erS Of B.
subtihs. W hole chrom c som al D N A of B.
SubtilLs1 6 8 L T T(h? u, t7P C 2,thy) w a s u s ed fbr
SoutheTn h ybri d iza tion e xpe rim ent s・
P lasmi ds. Pla s mi ds used in th is s tud y a re su m m a riz ed in Table l. T he c ons tr u ctio n of P L A R l l l and p L A R 3 3 1 is illu stra ted in F i g. 5.
P hages. Lam bda ch B S O I c ont ain l ng r r nO Ope rOn a nd la mbda ch B S l l c ontain l ng r rnA OperOn(F i g.1) hav e be e n previou sl y desc ribed
(1 3).
Table l. Pr ope rtie s ofthe pla s mids u s ed in th is study
P la s mid S iz e
(k b) Co mpo sitio n
Ge n etic
m a rke r s So u r c e
pB R 3 2 2 4.3 6
pB R 3 22 + pU B l l O
A m pr, Tcr (1 0)
pB R 3 2 8 4.9 0 AmpてTcてCm r 四
pU B l lO 5.0 0 K m r (1 2)
pM S l O 2′ 7.7 0 A m r,Km r (3)
pN O l O l O 5.6 6 pB R 3 2 2 十 E 4′[1】 A mpr,Tcr pr ovi ded by Dr. Oga s a w a r a pM S l O 2′・B 6 王3.6 5 pM S l O 2′+ B 6【2] A m pr,K m r pr o vi ded by Dr. Oga s a w a r a
・pL Op・1 7.1 7 pB R 3 2 2 十 加Rl/to【31 Am pr pr o vi ded by Dr.M a sam u n e pL A R 9 6.20 pB R 3 2 2十E 1 9(b)【4】 Am pr,Tcr this c o m m u nic atio n pL A R 1 2 7.21 pB R 3 2 2+E 1 4(b) Am pr, Tcr this c o m m u nic atio n
pN O l O1 2 6.7 3 pB R 3 2 8 十E 1 9(a) Am pr, Tcr (1 3)
pN O l O1 3 6.73 pB R 3 2 8+E 1 9(b) Am pr, Tcr (13)
pN O 2 0 03 7.7 5 pB R 3 2 8十E 1 4(a) Am pr, Tcr (13)
pN O 2 0 04 7.7 5 pB R 3 2 8+E 1 4(b) Am pr, Tcr ( 13)
pB R 3 2 2・B 7 9.9 0 pB R 3 2 2+ B 7 A m pr pr o vided by Dr.Oga s a w a r a pL A R l O 1 1.3 6 pM S l O 2′+E 1 9+ Ⅹ(a) Am pr, K m r th is c o m m u nic atio n pL A R l l 1 3.4 0 pM S l O 2′+E 1 4+Y(a) Am pr, K m r this c o m m u nic atio n pL A R 3 3 13.4 0 pM S l O 2′+ E 14 + Y′(b) A mpr, K m r this c o m m u nic atio n pL A R 1 3 1 6.2 5 pM S lO 2′+2【E14〕+ Y(c) A m pr. K m r this c o m m u nic atio n pL A R l l l 1 3.4 0 pL A R l l【5】 A m pr, K m r this c o m m u nic atio n pL A R 3 3 1 1 3.4 0 pL A R 3 3[51 A m pr, K m r this c o m m u nic atio n
[1] :pN O l O l O ha s al.3 k b fr agm e nt(E 4′) c o ntaining r m Ote r min ato rintr odu c ed intot he m nd IIIsi te of pB R 3 2 2. [2]:PM S l O2′・B 6 ha s a 5.9 5 k b fr agm e nt(B 6) (1 3)intr odu c ed intothe Ba mH I site ofpM S l O2′・
B 6 c o ntain s E 3′ in which th e r r nA te r min ato rislo c ated.[3] :pL Op‑1c o ntaips te r min ato r s tR l a ndto als o ge n e s Oa nd P of la mb da phage. [4】: T hein s e rted fr agm e nts a r e at the EとOR I site of the v e ctpr・ (a) ・
D ir e ctio n of pr o m ote r sisto wa rds A mprge n e:m)‑:D ir e ctio n of pr o m ote r sis to wa rds T cr ge n e l n pB R 3 2 8
a nd pB R 3 2 2 0 rtO Wa rds pU Bll O o rigi nin pM S l O 2′. (c): T w o E 1 4 fr agm e nts s epa r ated bya D N A fr ag・ m e nt(Y) with th edir e ctio n ofpr o m ote r sfa cihg e a ch othe r. X,Y a nd Y′ a r e D N A fr agm?ntS deriv ed fr o m the E c olichr om o s o m e(S e ete Xt). [5】: T he 励oR Isite upstr e a m fr o m the pr o m ote r s I S m Od i丘ed・
(k b): M ole cula r siz e of D N A in kiloba s e pair s.