• 検索結果がありません。

On Seifert fibered surgeries on knots

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "On Seifert fibered surgeries on knots"

Copied!
19
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

On Seifert fibered surgeries on knots

In Dae Jong

Osaka Prefecture University

joint work with Kazuhiro Ichihara E-KOOK Seminar

@Osaka City University 2013/2/14 15:00–15:20

(2)

Dehn surgery on a knot

K : a knot in S3

E(K) : the exterior ofK (i.e., S3\N(K))

Dehn surgery: Gluing a solid torus to E(K)

γ = [f(m) ]: surgery slope, identified with r ∈Q∪ {1/0}.

K(r): the manifold obtained by Dehn surgery on K along γ =r.

2 / 8

(3)

Dehn surgery on a knot

K : a knot in S3

E(K) : the exterior ofK (i.e., S3\N(K))

Dehn surgery: Gluing a solid torus to E(K)

γ = [f(m) ]: surgery slope, identified with r ∈Q∪ {1/0}.

K(r): the manifold obtained by Dehn surgery on K along γ =r.

(4)

Types of Dehn surgeries

By the Geometrization due to Perelman,

a Dehn surgery on a knot is one of the following:

Hyperbolicsurgery (yielding a hyperbolic mfd.)

Seifert surgery (yielding a Seifert mfd.)

Toroidalsurgery (yielding a mfd. containing an essentialT2)

Reducible surgery (yielding a mfd. containing an essentialS2)

Cabling Conjecture

[Gonz´alez-Acu˜na and Short]

Allreducible surgeries have already completely classified.

Remark

[Eudave-Mu˜noz] [Gordon and Luecke] The classification is not exclusive.

(∃ infinitely many hyperbolic knots

each of which admits a toroidalSeifert surgery. )

3 / 8

(5)

Types of Dehn surgeries

By the Geometrization due to Perelman,

a Dehn surgery on a knot is one of the following:

Hyperbolicsurgery (yielding a hyperbolic mfd.)

Seifert surgery (yielding a Seifert mfd.)

Toroidalsurgery (yielding a mfd. containing an essentialT2)

Reducible surgery (yielding a mfd. containing an essentialS2)

Cabling Conjecture

[Gonz´alez-Acu˜na and Short]

Allreducible surgeries have already completely classified.

Remark

[Eudave-Mu˜noz] [Gordon and Luecke]

The classification is not exclusive.

(∃ infinitely many hyperbolic knots

each of which admits a toroidalSeifert surgery. )

(6)

Toroidal Seifert surgery

Theorem

[Motegi ’02]

K : 2-bridge knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,3) and r= 0.

Theorem 1

[Ichihara-J. ’10]

K : Montesinos knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K is the trefoil knot and r = 0.

Theorem 2

[Ichihara-J. ’13(’09)]

K : alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒ •K =T(2,±3) and r= 0, or

• K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r= 2(p+q) with |p|,|q| ≥3.

4 / 8

(7)

Toroidal Seifert surgery

Theorem

[Motegi ’02]

K : 2-bridge knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,3) and r= 0.

Theorem 1

[Ichihara-J. ’10]

K : Montesinos knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K is the trefoil knot and r = 0.

Theorem 2

[Ichihara-J. ’13(’09)]

K : alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒ •K =T(2,±3) and r= 0, or

• K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r= 2(p+q) with |p|,|q| ≥3.

(8)

(small) Seifert surgery

Theorem

[Brittenham-Wu ’01]

AllSeifert surgeries on 2-bridge knots are completely classified.

Theorem 3

[Ichihara-J. ’09]

AllSeifert surgeries on Montesinos knots with |π1K(r)|<∞ are completely classified.

Theorem

[Meier ’12]

AllSeifert surgeries on pretzel knots are completely classified.

“Theorem”

[Ichihara-Masai ’13]

AllSeifert surgeries on alternating knots are completely classified.

5 / 8

(9)

(small) Seifert surgery

Theorem

[Brittenham-Wu ’01]

AllSeifert surgeries on 2-bridge knots are completely classified.

Theorem 3

[Ichihara-J. ’09]

AllSeifert surgeries on Montesinos knots with |π1K(r)|<∞ are completely classified.

Theorem

[Meier ’12]

AllSeifert surgeries on pretzel knots are completely classified.

“Theorem”

[Ichihara-Masai ’13]

AllSeifert surgeries on alternating knots are completely classified.

(10)

(small) Seifert surgery

Theorem

[Brittenham-Wu ’01]

AllSeifert surgeries on 2-bridge knots are completely classified.

Theorem 3

[Ichihara-J. ’09]

AllSeifert surgeries on Montesinos knots with |π1K(r)|<∞ are completely classified.

Theorem

[Meier ’12]

AllSeifert surgeries on pretzel knots are completely classified.

“Theorem”

[Ichihara-Masai ’13]

AllSeifert surgeries on alternating knots are completely classified.

5 / 8

(11)

Proof of Theorem 2

Theorem 2

[Ichihara-J. ’13(’09)]

K : alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒ •K =T(2,±3) and r= 0, or

• K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r= 2(p+q) with |p|,|q| ≥3.

Claim 1

K : composite alternatingknot, K(r) : toroidalSeifert manifold

⇒K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r = 2(p+q) with|p|,|q| ≥3.

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

(12)

Proof of Claims

Claim 1

K : composite alternatingknot, K(r) : toroidalSeifert manifold

⇒K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r = 2(p+q) with|p|,|q| ≥3.

This follows from the classification of non-simpleSeifert surgeries on non-hyperbolic knots by Miyazaki-Motegi.

Lemma 1

[Boyer-Zhang, Patton]

Toroidalsurgeries on alternating knots are completely classified.

Lemma 2

[Ichihara-Motegi-Song]

K : small hyperbolic knot r : ∂-slope of K IfK(r) is a Seifert manifold with|π1K(r)|=∞,

then K is fibered and r= 0.

7 / 8

(13)

Proof of Claims

Claim 1

K : composite alternatingknot, K(r) : toroidalSeifert manifold

⇒K =T(2, p)#T(2, q) and r = 2(p+q) with|p|,|q| ≥3.

This follows from the classification of non-simpleSeifert surgeries on non-hyperbolic knots by Miyazaki-Motegi.

Lemma 1

[Boyer-Zhang, Patton]

Toroidalsurgeries on alternating knots are completely classified.

Lemma 2

[Ichihara-Motegi-Song]

K : small hyperbolic knot r : ∂-slope of K IfK(r) is a Seifert manifold with|π1K(r)|=∞,

then K is fibered and r= 0.

(14)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3. IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small. ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness. Ifa is even and b, c are odd, then r is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

8 / 8

(15)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3.

IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small. ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness. Ifa is even and b, c are odd, then r is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

(16)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3.

IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small. ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness. Ifa is even and b, c are odd, then r is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

8 / 8

(17)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3.

IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small.

ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness. Ifa is even and b, c are odd, then r is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

(18)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3.

IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small.

ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness.

Ifa is even and b, c are odd, then r is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

8 / 8

(19)

Proof of Claims

Claim 2

K : prime alternating knot, K(r) : toroidal Seifert manifold

⇒K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

By Lemma 1,K is either 2-bridge or pretzelwith length 3.

IfK is 2-bridge, then K =T(2,±3) and r= 0.

IfK =P(a, b, c)which is not a two-bridge knot, then K is small.

ThereforeK is fibered and r= 0 by Lemma 2.

Ifa, b, c are odd, then g(P(a, b, c)) = 1, contradicts to fiberedness.

Ifa is even and b, c are odd, thenr is a ∂-slope of a 1-punctured Klein bottle. Thenr = 2(b+c), contradicts to r= 0.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Finally we turn our attention to the tongue move. As we will see this corresponds to a band sum operation in D. In certain cases, it can be described precisely what the band sum

Altering one knot value, curve points move on well-defined paths, the limit of which can be computed if the knot value tends to infinity.. Symmetric alteration of two knot values

[1] Feireisl E., Petzeltov´ a H., Convergence to a ground state as a threshold phenomenon in nonlinear parabolic equations, Differential Integral Equations 10 (1997), 181–196..

The first known examples of small Seifert manifolds arising from Dehn surgery on hyperbolic knots were given by [13]. Berge has a construction which produces families of knots with

Uses Ni’s result and the invariant fibration

It is worth noting that the above proof shows also that the only non-simple Seifert bred manifolds with non-unique Seifert bration are those with trivial W{decomposition mentioned

This reflects the fact that T (2) with the exceptional tight contact structure contains two non Legendrian isotopic vertical Legendrian curves with twisting number 0, and negative

In order to do so, we prove a structure theorem for covers between Seifert fiber spaces (see Proposition 4.4), which reduces the question to classifying all covers between