• 検索結果がありません。

The ith individual has m + 1 choices, i.e., j = 0 , 1 , · · · , m.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "The ith individual has m + 1 choices, i.e., j = 0 , 1 , · · · , m."

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Example 5: Multinomial logit model:

The ith individual has m + 1 choices, i.e., j = 0 , 1 , · · · , m.

P(y

i

= j) = exp(X

i

β

j

)

m

j=0

exp(X

i

β

j

) ≡ P

i j

,

for β

0

= 0. The case of m = 1 corresponds to the bivariate logit model (binary choice).

Note that

log P

i j

P

i0

= X

i

β

j

The log-likelihood function is:

log L( β

1

, · · · , β

m

) =

n i=1

m j=0

d

i j

ln P

i j

,

where d

i j

= 1 when the ith individual chooses jth choice, and d

i j

= 0 otherwise.

(2)

Example 6: Nested logit model:

(i) In the 1st step, choose YES or NO. Each probability is P

Y

and P

N

= 1 − P

Y

. (ii) Stop if NO is chosen in the 1st step. Go to the next if YES is chosen in the 1st step.

(iii) In the 2nd step, choose A or B if YES is chosen in the 1st step. Each probability is P

A|Y

and P

B|Y

.

For simplicity, usually we assume the logistic distribution.

So, we call the nested logit model.

The probability that the ith individual chooses NO is:

P

N,i

= 1 1 + exp(X

i

β ) .

The probability that the ith individual chooses YES and A is:

P

A|Y,i

P

Y,i

= P

A|Y,i

(1 − P

N,i

) = exp(Z

i

α ) 1 + exp(Z

i

α )

exp(X

i

β )

1 + exp(X

i

β ) .

(3)

The probability that the ith individual chooses YES and B is:

P

B|Y,i

P

Y,i

= (1 − P

A|Y,i

)(1 − P

N,i

) = 1 1 + exp(Z

i

α )

exp(X

i

β ) 1 + exp(X

i

β ) . In the 1st step, decide if the ith individual buys a car or not.

In the 2nd step, choose A or B.

X

i

includes annual income, distance from the nearest station, and so on.

Z

i

are speed, fuel-e ffi ciency, car company, color, and so on.

The likelihood function is:

L( α, β ) =

n i=1

P

IN1i,i

(

((1 − P

N,i

)P

A|Y,i

)

I2i

((1 − P

N,i

)(1 − P

A|Y,i

))

1I2i

)

1−I1i

=

n i=1

P

IN1i,i

(1 − P

N,i

)

1I1i

(

P

IA2i|Y,i

(1 − P

A|Y,i

)

1I2i

)

1−I1i

,

(4)

where

I

1i

=  

 1 , if the ith individual decides not to buy a car in the 1st step, 0 , if the ith individual decides to buy a car in the 1st step, I

2i

=  

 1 , if the ith individual chooses A in the 2nd step,

0 , if the ith individual chooses B in the 2nd step,

(5)

Remember that E(y

i

) = F(X

i

β

), where β

= β σ . Therefore, size of β

does not mean anything.

The marginal e ff ect is given by:

∂ E(y

i

)

X

i

= f (X

i

β

) β

.

Thus, the marginal e ff ect depends on the height of the density function f (X

i

β

).

(6)

2.2 Limited Dependent Variable Model (

制限従属変数モデル

)

Truncated Regression Model: Consider the following model:

y

i

= X

i

β + u

i

, u

i

N(0 , σ

2

) when y

i

> a, where a is a constant, for i = 1 , 2 , · · · , n.

Consider the case of y

i

> a (i.e., in the case of y

i

a, y

i

is not observed).

E(u

i

| X

i

β + u

i

> a) =

aXiβ

u

i

f (u

i

)

1 − F(aX

i

β ) du

i

. Suppose that u

i

N(0 , σ

2

), i.e., u

i

σ ∼ N(0 , 1).

Using the following standard normal density and distribution functions:

φ (x) = (2 π )

1/2

exp( − 1 2 x

2

) , Φ (x) =

x

−∞

(2 π )

1/2

exp( − 1

2 z

2

)dz =

x

−∞

φ (z)dz ,

参照

関連したドキュメント

The m-step solvable Grothendieck conjecture for genus 0 curves over finitely generated fields.. 2nd Kyoto-Hefei Workshop on

Kirchheim in [14] pointed out that using a classical result in function theory (Theorem 17) then the proof of Dacorogna–Marcellini was still valid without the extra hypothesis on E..

By contrast with the well known Chatterji result dealing with strong convergence of relatively weakly compact L 1 Y (Ω, F, P )-bounded martingales, where Y is a Banach space, the

     ー コネクテッド・ドライブ・サービス      ー Apple CarPlay プレパレーション * 2 BMW サービス・インクルーシブ・プラス(

The construction of homogeneous statistical solutions in [VF1], [VF2] is based on Galerkin approximations of measures that are supported by divergence free periodic vector fields

The nested branching process is supercritical. We need a standard large deviation estimate. If m was chosen large enough, we have that M > 1 and hence that the branching process

The configurations of points according to the lattice points method has more symmetry than that of the polar coordinates method, however, the latter generally yields lower values for

iv Relation 2.13 shows that to lowest order in the perturbation, the group of energy basis matrix elements of any observable A corresponding to a fixed energy difference E m − E n