• 検索結果がありません。

NancyGuelman OntheapproximationoftimeonemapsofAnosovflowsbyAxiomAdiffeomorphisms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "NancyGuelman OntheapproximationoftimeonemapsofAnosovflowsbyAxiomAdiffeomorphisms"

Copied!
23
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

MATHEMATICAL

SOCIETY Bull Braz Math Soc, New Series 33(1), 75-97

© 2002, Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática

On the approximation of time one maps of Anosov flows by Axiom A diffeomorphisms

Nancy Guelman

Abstract. We prove that iff1is the time one map of a transitive and codimension one Anosov flowφand it isC1-approximated by Axiom A diffeomorphisms satisfying a property calledP, then the flow is topologically conjugated to the suspension of a codimension one Anosov diffeomorphism.

A diffeomorphismf satisfies propertyPif for every periodic point inMthe number of periodic points in a fundamental domain of its central manifold is constant.

Keywords: Anosov flow, suspension of Anosov diffeomorphisms, time one map, Axiom A.

Mathematical subject classification: 37D20, 37D30, 37D05.

Introduction

Throughout this paperMdenotes a smooth compact Riemannian manifold with- out boundary, andφ :M×R→MaCr flow, withr ≥1.

Recall that the suspension of an Anosov diffeomorphism is an Anosov flow in the corresponding manifold. Let us consider a transitive Anosov vector field Xand letfτ = Xτ be the flow of X at timeτ. Althoughfτ is not an Anosov diffeomorphism, there exists aDfτ-invariant splitting ofT M

T M=EsEcEu,

such thatDfτ|Esis uniformly contracting,Dfτ|Euis uniformly expanding, and Ecis a nonhyperbolic central direction.

The object of our study are transitive Anosov flows ( i.e. the case when the non-wandering set is the whole manifold).

A codimension one Anosov flow defined on ann-manifoldMis an Anosov flow

Received 15 March 2001.

(2)

such that for allxM,dimEs(x)=1 anddimEu(x)=n−2 ordimEs(x)= n−2 anddimEu(x)=1.

An interesting question is what kind of dynamical system can appear under perturbations of a time one map of a transitive Anosov flow.

Palis and Pugh (see [9]) wondered whether the time one map of a transitive Anosov flow could be approximated by hyperbolic or Axiom A diffeomorphisms.

It is a well known fact that in the case when the flow arises from the suspension of an Anosov diffeomorphismg:NNsuch an approximation can be carried out with Axiom A diffeomorphisms.

The suspension manifoldNg is obtained from the direct productN × [0,1] by identifying pairs of points of the form(x,0)and(g(x),1)forxN. The suspension flowϕ(x, t )is determined by the vector field ∂t. The manifoldNg

is fibered over S1 and the projection of ϕ(x,1) onto S1 is the identity map.

Letf be a diffeomorphism preserving fibers,C1- close toϕ(x,1)such that the projection off overS1is a Morse-Smale map. We have thatf is an Axiom A diffeomorphism.

In this spirit, Bonatti and Díaz ( see [2]) proved that ifτ is a period of a periodic orbit of a transitive Anosov flow, then there exist an open set U of nonhyperbolic and transitive diffeomorphisms, and a sequence(gn)n∈N,gnU such thatgnfτ in theC1- topology.

Throughout this paperτ will be 1.

Our aim is to give a partial answer to the Palis-Pugh question. We will say that a diffeomorphismf satisfies propertyPif for any periodic pointx the number of periodic points betweenxandf (x)in the connected component of its central manifold is constant (see Section 1).

This property is not so strange. It is, for instance, verified in the case whenf is a convenientC1-perturbation of the time one map of a transitive Anosov flow arising from the suspension of an Anosov diffeomorphism. In fact, the above example verifies that the number of periodic points betweenx andf (x)in the connected component of its central manifold is constant, ifx is a periodic point off.

We will show that, in the general case there is an open dense setVMsuch that the number of periodic points betweenxandf (x)is constant for all thef- periodic points inV. Here, as before,f is aC1-perturbation of the time one map of a transitive Anosov flow.

We will prove the following:

(3)

Theorem 1. LetMa smooth compact riemannian manifold without boundary, dim(M)3. If the time one map of a transitive codimension one Anosov flow isC1-approximated by Axiom A diffeomorphisms satisfying propertyP, then the flow is topologically conjugated to a suspension of a codimension one Anosov diffeomorphism.

Perhaps it is worthwhile to note that Verjovsky ( see [10]) proved that ifn >3 any codimension one Anosov flow is transitive (see [5] for a counterexample in dimension 3). Then the hypothesis of transitivity can be omitted if the dimension is higher than 3.

From Theorem 1 follows the next corollary.

Corollary 1. LetMbe a negative curvature closed surface. The time one map of the geodesic flow can not beC1-approximated by Axiom A diffeomorphisms verifying propertyP.

In Section 1 we prove that PropertyPis a “reasonable property” and we study some properties of attractors of Axiom A diffeomorphism close to the time one map of a transitive Anosov flow. In Section 2 we introduce maps which will play an important role in the proofs of the theorems and we examine some basic facts about them. Section 3 deals with the continuity of the above mentioned maps.

In Section 4 we prove that there is a repeller basic set which is a hypersurface and we complete the proofs of the Theorem in Section 5.

1 Properties of basic sets

We begin recalling some basic definitions about flows and diffeomorphisms.

Definition 1. A compactφtinvariant set,M, is called a hyperbolic set for the flowφ if there exist a Riemannian metric on an open neighborhoodU of, andλ <1< µsuch that for allxthere is a decomposition

Tx(M)=EsxExuEx0

such that∂tφ (x, t )|t=0E0x− {0},dim(E0(x)) =1,Dxφt(x)(Exi)Eφ (x,t )i , withi=s, u, and

Dxφ (x, t )|Es(x)λt witht ≥0 Dxφ (x, t )|Eu(x)µt witht≤0.

ACr flowφ :M×R→M, is called an Anosov flow ifMis a hyperbolic set forφ.

Letf :MMbe aCr diffeomorphism .

(4)

Definition 2. Anf-invariant setis called hyperbolic if there exists aDf- invariant decomposition ofTMsuch that

TM =EsEu

andDf|Es is uniformly contracting andDf|Euis uniformly expanding. More precisely, there arec >0 ,λ, with 0< λ <1 such that for allx

Dxfn|Es(x)< cλn and

Dxfn|Eu(x)< cλn.

A diffeomorphismf :MMis called an Anosov diffeomorphism ifMis a hyperbolic set forf.

Letf1:MM,the time one diffeomorphism ofφdefined as f1(x)=φ (x,1),∀xM,

whereφ :M×R→Mis a codimension one Anosov flow ifdim(M) >3 (In the case thatdim(M)=3, codimension one property is replaced by transitivity.) Without loss of generality we may assumedimEs(x)=n−2 anddimEu(x)= 1 for allxM.

Sinceφ has no singularities, it follows that there existf1-invariant foliations Fcs,Fcu,Fss,FuuandFc. Notice that the leaf ofFcthroughxis the same as theφ-orbit ofx, and we denote it byFc(x)orWφc(x).

By well known properties of transitive Anosov flows, we have that {Fc(x)|Fc(x)is a closed set}is dense inM.

{Fc(x)|Fc(x)is dense inM}is a residual set.

IfOis a periodic orbit of φ, thenWs(O)consists of all points whose foward φorbits never stay far fromOandWu(O)of all points whose reverseφ orbits never stay far fromO. Both of them are dense in M, and so areFcs(x) and Fcu(x)xO.

Since f1 is Cr, we have that the leaves of Fcs, Fcu and Fc are Cr. Let f : MM be a diffeomorphism C1-close to f1. The map f is plaque expansive (see [7] ), there existFfcs,FfcuandFfc and there is a homeomorphism h:MMclose to the identity such that ifh(x)=x, thenFfc(x´)isC1-close

(5)

toFfc

1(x)in compact sets and the manifoldsFfcs(x)andFfcs

1(x)areC1-close in compact sets. In addition,

hof1(Ffc1(x))=f oh(Ffc1(x)).

The mapf is normally hyperbolic atFfc, therefore every leaf ofFfc is invariant and every periodic point off is in a closed leaf ofFfc.

According to what was mentioned above we have that {Ffc(x)|Ffc(x)is a closed set}is dense inM and

{Ffc(x)|Ffc(x)is dense inM}is a residual set.

Let us denote byFfc(x)or byWc(x)the leaf of the central foliation through the pointx.

We recall that a diffeomorphismf :MM satisfies Axiom A if the non- wandering set(f )is hyperbolic and the set of periodic points is dense in(f ).

From now on we will assume that f is an Axiom A diffeomorphism C1− close tof1. Moreover, we will make the following assumption: the number of periodic points in the connected component ofWc(x), betweenx andf (x)is constant, for allf-periodic point inM. We will consider the number of periodic points inWc(x), betweenxandf (x), in such a way that the length of this curve is almost of the same length of the trajectoryφ (x, t )ˆ of the Anosov flow, witht varying between 0 and 1, andxˆ being af1periodic point nearx. Sometimes we have to consider the number of periodic points when the segment of the curve betweenx andf (x)winds around itself more than once. The last property will be called propertyP. We will prove that this property is verified in an open and dense set of the manifold.

LetO=Ffc(x)whereFfc(x)is a closed curve.

The rotation number off must be rational, because if it were irrational, there would be an hyperbolic minimal setIOand it would be included in a basic set.

IfO(f )thenOwould be in a basic set andf|Owould be expansive which leads to a contradiction with the nonexistence of one dimensional expansive diffeomorphism. LetyOthenα(y)=ω(y)=I, hence

yWs(I )Wu(I )Ws()Wu(), thereforey(f )which is a contradiction.

(6)

Then, there exist at least two periodic points inObecausef is an Axiom A diffeomorphism. All the points in(f )Omust be periodic because if there were a nonperiodic point,x(f )Othen the invariance of(f )Oimplies thatα(x)andω(x)would be periodic points of different indices so they would be in different basic sets.

From now on, we choose an orientation forFc, and denote Cba the curve included in a central foliation leaf, between a and b. We will consider the connected component ofFc(a)betweena andbin the positive direction from a, in the case thatFc(a)is a closed curve.

Proposition 1.1. There exists an open and dense setVMsuch that property P is verified for f|V i.e. all periodic points in V have the same number of periodic points in the connected component ofWc(x), betweenxandf (x).

Proof. The metric induced by the Riemannian metric on the leaves ofFcwill be denoteddc.

The lengths of the curvesCf (x)x are bounded away from 0, and asf is Axiom A there existsκ such thatdc(p, q) > κ, ifpandq are periodic points in the same leaf ofFc. Then, there existsm∈Nsuch that

m=min{n∈N:Wc(x)has exactlynperiodic points inCf (x)x }. Letpa periodic point verifying that the number of periodic points inCf (p)p ism.

We claim that there is an open neighborhood U of Cf (p)p such that for all periodic pointxinU the number of periodic points inCf (x)x ism.

If not, there exists a sequence of periodic pointspnpsuch that the number of periodic points inCf (ppn

n) is greater thanm, so there exist more thanmlimit points inCf (p)p . Since these limit points must be periodic, this contradicts our assumption.

Therefore, there exists a curve included in a dense leaf of central foliation in U. So, if we saturateUby the central foliation we have an open and dense set such that any periodic pointq in it has exactlymperiodic points inCf (q)q . Let us recall that there exists a finite number of attractors (repellers) whose basin of attraction (repulsion) are open sincef is Axiom A.

Here are some elementary properties of attractor basic sets.

LetAdenote an attractor basic set of the spectral decomposition off. Notice thatA=Mbecausef can not be an Anosov diffeomorphism. There is no loss of generality if we consider thatAis connected.

(7)

Lemma 1.1. Dim(Ws(x))=n−1,∀xA.

Proof. We have assumed thatdim(Eφs) =n−2, then asf isC1-close tof1

we have thatdim(Ws(x))=n−1 ordim(Ws(x))=n−2 for allx(f ).

LetxAper(f ), whereper(f )is the set off-periodic points.

Suppose thatdim(Ws(x))=n−2.

SinceAis an attractor,Wu(x)A; henceFlocc (x)Wu(x)A. The set Ais closed andf-invariant so there existsxFc(x)Aper(f ).

Butdim(Ws(x))=n−1 sincedim(Ws(x))=n−2. It follows that there exist two periodic points of different indices inA, which is impossible.

Lemma 1.2. For every closed curve O in Fc there exists a periodic point pAO.

Proof. SinceO is closed, Ws(O)is dense inM andWs(A)is an open set, there existyinWs(O)Ws(A)andyWss(y)Osuch thatyWs(A).

AsyO,yWs(p)for a periodic pointpO. ThenpAO. LetK = maxxMlengt h(Cf (x)x ). K is finite becauseM is compact and the mapg: M →Rsuch that everyxM is mapped into the length ofCf (x)x is continuous.

The previous lemma asserts that in every segmentγ of central closed curve withlengt h(γ )K, there exists a periodic pointpγA.

Corollary 1.1. Every leaf ofFcintersectsA.

Proof. LetγFcwithlengt h(γ )K. Since

{Ffc(x)|Ffc(x)is a closed set}is dense inM,

we can choose arcsγnsuch thatγnare included in closed leaves ofFc,γnγ, andlengt h(γn)K. Then, there exists a sequence(pn)such thatpnAγn,

and any of its limit pointspγA.

Lemma 1.3. In every leaf ofFfcthere exists at least one point outside ofWs(A).

(8)

Proof. IfFfc(x)is closed, by Lemma 1.2 we have that there exists a periodic pointpA∩Ffc(x)and by Lemma 1.1dim(Ws(p))=n−1. The hyperbolicity offimplies that there exists a periodic pointqFfc(x)such thatdim(Ws(q))= n−2, henceq where is a basic set off, = A. So we proved the claim in the case thatFfc(x)is closed.

In the case thatC0 = Ffc(x) is a future-dense curve, this is, iff (x) > x in the chosen orientation, thenWc+(x) = {yWc(x)/yx} is dense, and if f (x) < xthenWc(x), with the obvious definition, is dense.

Clearly we have thatC0Ws(A)= ∅.

We only need to show thatC0is not included inWs(A), i.e.C0∂(Ws(A))=

∅.

Suppose that for everyy inCf (x)x , we have thatyWs(A). There exists an open and nondense setU, such thatAU,f (U )U andCf (x)xU; then ifC0intersectsU,C0would be included inUin the future. This contradicts the nondensity ofU, so there existsyCf (x)x such thaty /Ws(A).

It still remains to prove the claim in the case thatC =Ffc(x)is any curve.

Recall thatK =maxx∈Mlengt h(Cf (x)x ).

Suppose that there exists a curve γFfc(x) such that γWs(A) and lengt h(γ )K+1.

Then there exists an open setV,VWs(A)andγV. There existsyV such thatWc(y)is dense inM, andWc(y)V has length greater or equal than K. This gives the existence of a fundamental domain inWc(y)V, and then in Ws(A). This contradicts the previous case.

Note that we have proved that every leaf of the central foliation “goes away”

from the basin of attraction of any attractor.

Lemma 1.4. No curveγ,γ included inFfc(x)for anyx, satisfiesγA.

Proof. Suppose the statement is false, i.e. there existsγWlocc (x)such that γA. SinceγAWs(A), then the negative iterates ofγ are included inAand the length of them grow exponentially.

Letzα(x)thenzAand by the proof of Lemma 1.3Wc(z)has to intersect

∂(Ws(A)), butWc(z)AWs(A), which yields a contradiction.

All the above lemmas admit versions for repeller basic sets and the proofs are analogous. In fact, ifis a repeller basic set, then forx,Dim(Ws(x)) = n−2, every leaf of Ffc intersects, in every leaf of Ffc there exists a point outside ofWu(), and noγ included inFfc(x)satisfiesγ.

(9)

2 Properties of the projection along the central foliation

In this section, we will introduce some maps which are important from the technical point of view.

Definition 2.1. LetSA :Ws(A)∂Ws(A)be a map such that, for everyx in the basin of the attractorA,SA(x)is the nearest point in its central leaf in the positive direction verifying that it is not in the basin of attraction ofA.

Definition 2.2. LetS˜A:Ws(A)∂Ws(A)be the map analogous toSA, but in the negative direction of the central foliation .

Definition 2.3. Let S : A∂Ws(A) be the restriction of SA to A and S˜ :A∂Ws(A)the restriction ofS˜AtoA.

Lemma (1.3) makes the preceding definitions possible.

LetWc(x)denote the connected component ofWc(x)Ws(A)which contains x.

Letl:A→R,l(x)=lengt h(CS(x)x ).

Lemma 2.1. lis lower semicontinuous.

Proof. SinceCS(x)x − {S(x)} ⊂Ws(A)andWs(A)is an open set, there exists a neighborhoodV such thatCS(x)x − {S(x)} ⊂VWs(A).

The central foliation is aC1- lamination becausefisC1-close to the time one map of an Anosov flow (see [7]), hence for all >0 there exists a neighborhoodUx

ofxsuch that ifyUxthen the curveCyy included inFc(y)withlengt h(Cyy)= l(x) is included inV, and hence inWs(A). Thenl(y)l(x) which

proves thatlis a semicontinuous map.

Sincel:A→Ris semicontinuous, the setRof points of continuity oflis a residual set. Let:M×R0M such that(x, l)=z, ifzWc(x),zis in the positive direction ofWc(x)andlengt h(Czx) =l. is a continuous map then

S(x)=(x, l(x)) is continuous overR.

Without loss of generality we can assume thatRis a residual set of continuity for bothSandS.˜

(10)

Analogously there exists a residual set Q in Ws(A) such that Q is a set of continuity forSAandS˜A.

Following, we prove some properties of the mapS. They are verified byS˜and the proofs are analogous.

Lemma 2.2. S(R)isf-invariant.

Proof. LetxR,y =S(x). For allzCyx− {y}, we have thatzWs(A), f (z)Wc(f (x))andf (z)Ws(A). Fromf (y)∂Ws(A)it follows that f (y)=S(f (x)). Replacingf byf1we conclude that

f (S(R))=S(R).

Lemma 2.3. For allyS(R),dim(Ws(y))=n2.

Proof. Let y = S(x) with xA; since dim(Wss(y)) = n − 2 and dim(Wuu(y)) = 1, dim(Ws(y)) = n−1 or n−2, but by Lemma (1.1) if zCyx− {y}thenzWs(x). Then

Wc(y)= {zWc(y)such thatdc(z, y) < }

can not be included inWs(y)and we can assert thatdim(Ws(y))=n−2.

Lemma 2.4. The set of periodic points inA\Ris nowhere dense inA.

Proof. In order to prove the lemma it is enough to prove:

Let(pn)n∈Nbe a sequence of periodic points such thatSis not continuous at pnandpnx. ThenSis not continuous atx.

Letqn=S(pn).

Sincepnis a point of discontinuity, there existα >0 and(rnk)Asuch that limk→∞rnk =pnand

lengt h(CS(rrnk

nk)) > lengt h(CS(ppnn))+α

and for any with 0< < α2 there exist(snk)R such that limk→∞snk =pn

and

lengt h(CS(ssnk

nk))lengt h(CS(rrnk

nk)) > lengt h(CS(ppn

n)).

(11)

It follows that there exists a periodic limit point ofS(snk),qn, inWc(pn).

Bothqnandqnare inWc(pn)S(R), are periodic and dim(Ws(qn))=dim(Ws(qn))=n−2.

Sinceqnandqnare in the same closed leaf ofFc, it follows that there exists a periodic pointpn, such thatpnCqqn

n anddim(Ws(pn))=n−1.

Suppose, contrary to our claim, thatSis continuous atx.

Frompnxwe conclude thatqnS(x)by the continuity ofSatx.

BesidesqnS(x)because there exist(snk)R such that limk→∞snk =pn

and limk→∞S(snk)=qn. Letting a convenient subsequencek(n), we can assert that

nlim→∞snk(n) =x and lim

n→∞S(snk(n))=S(x) by the continuity ofSatx. This givesqnS(x).

Thendist (qn, qn)→0 whenn→ ∞anddc(qn, qn)→0 whenn→ ∞. Butdc(qn, qn) > min{dc(pn, qn), dc(pn, qn)}and this leads to a contradiction becausepn andqn (orpn andqn ) are in different basic sets because they have different indices.

We have proved thatSis not continuous atx. p

q

p’

q’

n

n

n

n

x

S(x)

Figure 1

(12)

Observe that as a consequence we have that for allxA there exists a sequence of periodic points(pn)n∈NRsuch thatpnx.

Lemma 2.5. S(R)is transitive andS(R)(f ).

Proof. Since Fc is continuous, the set of periodic points is dense in R and S(p)is periodic ifpis periodic, then the set of periodic points is dense inS(R), hence

S(R)(f ).

Analogously the image of a dense orbit is dense inS(R).

Corollary 2.1. From the above properties we conclude thatS(R)is included in, a basic set of the spectral decomposition off.

Lemma 2.6. S(Ws(x))Ws(S(x)).

Proof. Let xA, yWs(x)A. Suppose that S(y) /Ws(S(x)).

Since S(y)Fcs(x) there exists z = Ws(S(y))Wc(x). We have that

∀w∈∂(Ws(A)),Ws(w)∂(Ws(A)), thenWs(S(x))∂(Ws(A))∀x ∈A, andz∂(Ws(A)), but this contradicts the definition ofS.

Lemma 2.7. Ifxis a point of continuity ofS, then all the points inWs(x)A are continuity points ofS.

Proof. Letx be a point of continuity ofS,yWlocs (x)A. We first prove thatyis a continuity point ofS.

Let{yn}n∈NA, such that limn→∞yn=y. There existsxn=Wlocs (yn)Wu(x) andynWs(xn). By continuity of the stable foliation, we have limn→∞xn =x, and by continuity ofSatxwe conclude that limn→∞S(xn)=S(x).

FromynWs(xn), and the above lemma, it follows thatS(yn)Ws(S(xn)), henceS(yn)=Wlocs (S(xn))Wc(yn).

By the continuity ofWs andWcwe have that:

nlim→∞Wlocs S(xn)=Wlocs S(x)and lim

n→∞Wc(yn)=Wc(y); hence

nlim→∞S(yn)=Wlocs S(x)Wc(y)=S(y).

(13)

We have proved that∀yWlocs (x)A,Sis continuous aty i.e. S|Wlocs (y)Ais continuous.

Now, ifzWs(x)Athere isN > 0 such thatfN(z)Wlocs (fN(x))A

and the previous argument still applies.

Remark. Note that Lemmas (2.6) and (2.7) are verified not only by SandS˜ but also bySAandS˜A. The proofs are analogous.

Lemma 2.8. IfxA, thenxis a point of continuity ofSif and only ifxis a point of continuity ofSA.

Proof. We only have to prove that ifxAis a point of continuity ofSthen it is a continuity point ofSA.

Letybe a point close tox, theny =Wlocu (x)Wlocs (y)is a point inAsuch that S(y)is close toS(x)and

SA(y)=Ws(S(y))Wc(y)is close toSA(y)=S(y).

HenceSA(y)is close toSA(x)=S(x).

Proposition 2.1. Iff satisfies propertyPthen for every periodic pointp,Sis continuous atp.

Proof. Letk denote the number of periodic points in Cf (x)x , for all periodic pointxA. Supposex is a periodic discontinuity point ofS, then we have a sequence(xn)n∈Nof periodic points of continuity such that limn→∞xn=x and lengt h(CS(xxn

n)) > lengt h(CS(x)x )+α, withα >0.

For everyxn, there existkperiodic pointsxn1 < . . . < xnk inCf (xxn

n), ordered by the chosen orientation.

Since limn→∞Wc(xn) = Wc(x)in compact sets, there existxi, limit point of xni inWc(x), andxi must be periodic. Since the number of periodic points in Cf (xxn n) and inCf (x)x is the same, then there exists only a limit point ofxni, i.e.

limn→∞xni =xi.

In particular limn→∞xn1 = x1, and this gives limn→∞S(xn) = S(x); so lengt h(CS(xxn

n)) < lengt h(CS(x)x )+α ifnis big enough, which is absurd.

We have proved thatSis continuous at every periodic point.

(14)

Lemma 2.9. Letbe a basic set andx.

1. Ifdim(Ws(x))=n1 then there is a finite number of points ofin the connected component ofWc(x)Ws()that containsx.

2. Ifdim(Ws(x))=n2 then there is a finite number of points ofin the connected component ofWc(x)Wu()that containsx.

Proof. We will prove just the first statement.

Suppose that it is false. Then we can choose{xi}inWs()Wc(x), such thatx1< x2< . . . < xl < . . . in the given orientation ofWc(x). There exists k > 0 such that f1|Wkc(x) "expands", ∀xA. Then there exists n1 ∈ N verifying thatlengt h(fn1(Cxx1)) > k, for allnn1. There existsn2∈Nsuch thatlengt h(fn2(Cxx21)) > k, for allnn2. Letl0such thatkl0> K+1, where K = maxxMlengt h(Cf (x)x ). We continue in this way obtainingn3, . . . , nl0. LetN =max{n1, . . . , nl0}, then

lengt h(fN(Cxxl

0)) > kl0 > K+1

Hence, as in the proof of Lemma 1.3 we conclude that there existspfN(Cxx

l0) such thatp∂Ws() and thereforefN(p)∂Ws()andfN(p)Cxxl

0

Ws(); which is a contradiction.

We have actually proved that there are no more than[K+k1]points ofin the

connected component ofWs()Wc(x).

3 Continuity of the map S.

Let us first prove the next lemma.

Lemma 3.1. Letxbe a continuity point ofSAandS˜A, (i.e. xQ) then for all yWs(x),Wc(y)A= ∅.

Proof. Let >0 be such that∪xAWs(x)Ws(A).

LetxQandUx be a neighborhood of x such that for all yUx we have thatlengt h(Wc(y))is close enough tolengt h(Wc(x)), and letyUxWs(x).

Since Wc(y)Ws(A) and Ws(A) is open, there exists a neighborhood of Wc(y),V, such thatVWs(A)andV ⊂ ∪zUx(Wc(z)), in such a way that ifzVAthenlengt h(Wc(z))is close enough tolengt h(Wc(y)).

(15)

By the density of the closed leaves in the central foliation, there exists a curveζin V, included in a closed leaf of the central foliation,Osuch thatζ =O∩Ws(A).

There exists a periodic pointpsuch thatpζA,ζ =Wc(p)and sinceSA

andS˜Aare continuous atyby the remark of Lemma 2.7, the lengths ofWc(y) andζ are close; and the lengths of the curvesCSp

A(p), andCpS˜A(p)are greater than thepreviously defined.

Then, considering open setsVn such thatVnWc(y), we can assert that there exist curvesζnVnand periodic pointspnζnAsuch that the lengths ofWc(y)andζnare close; and the lengths of the curvesCSpn

A(pn), andCpS˜An(pn)are greater than.

Sinceζnconverges toWc(y)and the distance ofpnto∂(Ws(A))is bounded away from 0, there exists a limit pointpofpnsuch thatpAWc(y).

We have proved that ifxQthen

∀y ∈Wlocs (x),∃p∈Wc(y)A.

Successive applications of this proceeding enables us to conclude that ifxQ

yWs(x),pWc(y)A.

Corollary 3.1. =S(R)is a repeller set.

Proof. LetxQA, zWs(S(x)) and z = Wc(z)Wss(x). Since zWs(x)withxQ, then by Lemma 3.1 there existsqWc(z)A; hence S(q)=zandzS(R). Then

∀x ∈QA, Ws(S(x))S(R).

We have proved thatS(R)is included in a basic set. Now, ify =S(x)with xAQthen

Ws(y)S(R)S(R)Ws(y).

It follows thatS(R)is a basic set, and since it contains a stable manifold we have

that=S(R)is a repeller set.

Let us consider the following maps.

(16)

Definition 3.1. Let:Wu()∂Wu()be a map such that, for everyx in the basin of repulsion of,(x)is the nearest point in its central leaf in the positive direction verifying that it is not in the basin of repulsion of.

Definition 3.2. Let˜ : Wu()∂Wu() be the map analogous to, but in the negative direction of the central foliation.

Definition 3.3. Let : ∂Wu() be the restriction of to and ˜ :∂Wu()the restriction of˜to.

The version of Lemma (1.3) for repeller sets makes the preceding definitions possible.

As done after Definition 2.3 we defineWc(x)as the connected component of Wc(x)Wu()which containsx, ifxWu().

All the properties verified byS,S,˜ SA andS˜A are verified by,,˜ and ˜ with the obvious modifications. In particular, there exists a residual set Wu()such thatand˜are continuous in. Besides, ifxthen for allyWu(x)we have thatWc(y) = ∅. Once again, if propertyPis verified, all the periodic points ofare continuity points for all these maps.

Lemma 3.2. Letx. Suppose thatyWu(x). Then Wc(y)= ∅.

Proof. By the version of Lemma 3.1 for repeller sets and the continuity of

and˜restricted to, we have that for all pointxthere is a neighborhood Uxsuch that ifyUx andzWlocu (y)thenWc(z)= ∅.

Let

U= ∪xUx. Uis an open and dense set inWu().

Letxand suppose by contradiction that there existsy0Wu(x)such that Wc(y0)= ∅. In addition, there exists a neighborhoodVy0 ofy0such that if zVy0Wu(y0)thenWc(z)= ∅.

Since Wu(x) is dense in , there exists vWu(x)U, hence there exists

˜

vWuu(x)U.

Let CWuu(x) an arc such that is maximal with respect to the following property: ifyC,Wc(y)= ∅.

(17)

Letr˜be an extreme of C andr =Wc(r)˜ ∩.

IfwCWlocuu(˜r)thenw=Wc(w)Wlocuu(r)exists and verifies thatWc(w)= ∅; so we can define

Wu+(r)= connected component of{y ∈Wu(r)|Wc(y)= ∅}

such thatWu+(r)Wu(r)= ∅for any >0.

For alln∈N,fn(r)andWu+(fn(r))contains an arcDnWuu(fn(r)) whose length grows exponentially and it has an extreme infn(r).

Letqω(r), then Wu+(q)contains a “half plane” of Wu(q), i.e. with an adequate orientationonWuu(q), we have

Wu+(q)= { vWu(q)|Wc(v)Wuu(q)q}

We may also assume thatfn(r)q. Takingnandmbig enough we obtain thatfn(r)andfm(r)are as close as we wish, then there is no possibility that Ws(fn(r))intersectsWu(fm(r))inWu+(fm(r))because this point would be inWu+(fm(r)).

In the same way there is no possibility thatWs(fm(r))intersectsWu(fn(r))in Wu+(fn(r)).

It follows that ifnandmare big enough thenWs(fn(r))intersectsWu(fm(r)) inWc(fm(r))because the central-stable foliation locally separatesM.

Then there are two possibilities:

1. There exist infinite many stable manifolds offj(r), withj ∈ N. In this case, there exist infinite many points inWc(fm(r)), but this contradicts Lemma 2.9.

2. There exists a finite number of different stable manifolds offj(r), with j ∈N.

We can suppose thatWs(fn(r))is the same for alln∈N. Sincefn(r)q, we have thatq is periodic point; and sinceWu+(q) = ∅,q is not a continuity point ofand˜, because it would contradict the version of Lemma 3.1 for repeller sets.

On the other hand, the version of proposition 2.1 for repeller sets asserts that all periodic points inare continuity points of, and, and hence˜ of, and˜, which yields a contradiction.

We notice that it is at this point where PropertyPis used.

We have proved that for allx, and for allyWu(x)

Wc(y)= ∅.

参照

関連したドキュメント

A condition number estimate for the third coarse space applied to scalar diffusion problems can be found in [23] for constant ρ-scaling and in Section 6 for extension scaling...

As an application of our convergence result, a local-in-time solution of 1- harmonic map flow equation is constructed as a limit of the solutions of p-harmonic (p &gt; 1) map

In section 2 we present the model in its original form and establish an equivalent formulation using boundary integrals. This is then used to devise a semi-implicit algorithm

One problem with extending the definitions comes from choosing base points in the fibers, that is, a section s of p, and the fact that f is not necessarily fiber homotopic to a

In Section 3 we generalize to several complex variables a result which is due to Schi¤er in the one-dimensional case: the degree of a holomorphic map between two annuli is bounded by

Maria Cecilia Zanardi, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, 12516-410 São Paulo,

Going back to the packing property or more gener- ally to the λ-packing property, it is of interest to answer the following question: Given a graph embedding G and a positive number

We show that the C ∗ -algebra of a locally compact, Hausdorff and principal groupoid is a Fell algebra if and only if the groupoid is one of these relations, extend- ing a theorem