• 検索結果がありません。

Theorem 2.1.[1].If f(z) =z+a2z2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Theorem 2.1.[1].If f(z) =z+a2z2"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

UNIVALENCE CRITERIA

Virgil Pescar

Abstract. In this paper we derive some criteria for univalence of analytic functions and of an integral operator in the open unit disk.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.

Key Words and Phrases: Univalence, Integral Operator.

1. Introduction

LetA be the class of the functions of the form f(z) =z+

X

n=2

anzn (1.1)

which are analytic in the open unit disk U = {z∈C:|z|<1}. Let S denote the subclass of Aconsisting of all univalent functions f inU.

2. Preliminary results

We need the following theorems.

Theorem 2.1.[1].If f(z) =z+a2z2+. . . is analytic in U and 1− |z|2

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (2.1)

for all z∈ U, then the function f(z) is univalent inU.

(2)

Theorem 2.2.[4]. Let α be a complex number,Re α >0 and f ∈ A. If 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (2.2)

for all z∈ U, then the function

Fα(z) =

α Z z

0

uα−1f0(u)du 1

α

(2.3) is in the class S.

Theorem 2.3.[5]Let α be a complex number, Re α >0 andf ∈ A. If 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1

for all z∈ U, then for any complex number β, Re β ≥Re α, the function

Fβ(z) =

β Z z

0

uβ−1f0(u)du 1

β

(2.4) is regular and univalent in U.

Theorem 2.4.(Schwarz)[2].Let f(z) the function regular in the disk UR={z∈C:|z|< R}

with |f(z)|< M, M fixed. Iff(z) has in z= 0 one zero with multiply≥m, then

|f(z)| ≤ M

Rm|z|m, z∈ UR (2.5)

the equality (in the inequality (2.5) for z6= 0) can hold only if f(z) =e M

Rmzm, where θ is constant.

Theorem 2.5.[3]If the function g(z) is regular in U and |g(z)|<1 in U, then for all ξ∈ U andz∈ U the following inequalities hold:

g(ξ)−g(z) 1−g(z)g(ξ)

ξ−z 1−zξ

(2.6)

(3)

and

|g0(z)| ≤ 1− |g(z)|2

1− |z|2 (2.7)

the equalities hold only in the case g(z) = E(z+u)1+uz , where |E|= 1 and |u|<1.

Remark.[3]For z= 0, from inequality (2.6) we have

g(ξ)−g(0) 1−g(0)g(ξ)

<|ξ| (2.8)

and, hence

|g(ξ)| ≤ |ξ|+|g(0)|

1 +|g(0)||ξ| (2.9)

Consideringg(0) =aand ξ=z,

|g(z)| ≤ |z|+|a|

1 +|a||z| (2.10)

for all z∈ U.

3. Main results

Theorem 3.1.Let the function f ∈ A. If

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ 3√ 3

2 (3.1)

for all z∈ U, then the function f is in the class S.

Proof. We consider the function g(z) = zff000(z)(z), z ∈ U. We have g(0) = 0 and from (3.1) by Theorem 2.4 (Schwarz) we obtain

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ 3√ 3

2 |z| (3.2)

for all z∈ U. From (3.2) we get (1− |z|2)

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ 3√ 3

2 (1− |z|2)|z| (3.3) for all z∈ U.

(4)

Because

max|z|<1[(1− |z|2)|z|] = 2 3√

3, from (3.3) we obtain

(1− |z|2)

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (3.4)

for all z∈ U and by Theorem 2.1 we obtain thatf is in the classS.

Theorem 3.2.Letα be a complex number,Re α >0 and the functionf ∈ A. If

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 (3.5)

for all z∈ U, then the function

Fα(z) =

α Z z

0

uα−1f0(u)du α1

(3.6) is regular and univalent in U.

Proof. Let’s consider the function p(z) = zff000(z)(z),z ∈ U. We have p(0) = 0 and from (3.5) by Theorem 2.4 (Schwarz) we get

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 |z| (3.7)

for all z∈ U. From (3.7) we obtain 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 ·1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z| (3.8)

for all z∈ U.

Since

max|z|<1

1− |z|2Re α Re α |z|

= 2

(2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α from (3.8) we have

1− |z|2Re α Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (3.9)

(5)

for all z∈ U and by Theorem 2.2 we obtain that the function Fα(z) is regular and univalent inU.

Remark 3.3.From Theorem 3.2 forα= 1 we obtain Theorem 3.1.

Theorem 3.4.Letα be a complex number,Re α >0 and the functionf ∈ A. If

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 (3.10)

for all z∈ U, then for any complex number β, Re β ≥Re α, the function

Fβ(z) =

β Z z

0

uβ−1f0(u)du β1

(3.11) is regular and univalent in U.

Proof. We consider the function ψ: (0,∞)→R, ψ(x) = 1−ax2x, 0< a <1. The function ψ(x) is the function decreasing for x ∈(0,1). If x1 =Re α ≤ x2 =Re β and a=|z|,z∈ U then

1− |z|2Re β

Re β ≤ 1− |z|2Re α

Re α (3.12)

for all z∈ U. From (3.12) we obtain 1− |z|2Re β

Re β

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Re α Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

(3.13) for all z∈ U.

From (3.10) and Theorem 2.4 (Schwarz) we get

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 |z|, z∈ U (3.14)

and, hence, we have 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ (2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

2 ·1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z| (3.15) for all z∈ U.

Because

max|z|<1

1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z|= 2

(2Re α+ 1)2Re α+1Re α

(3.16) by (3.15) and (3.13) we obtain

(6)

1− |z|2Re β Re β

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (3.17)

for all z∈ U.

From (3.17) and Theorem 2.2 we obtain that the function Fβ(z) is regular and univalent inU.

Theorem 3.5.Let α, β complex numbers Re β ≥ Re α > 0, the function f ∈ A, f(z) =z+a2z2+. . . If

f00(z) f0(z)

<1 (3.18)

for all z∈ U and

max|z|<1

1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z| |z|+ 2|a2| 1 + 2|a2||z|

≤1 (3.19)

then the function Fβ(z) define by (2.4) is regular and univalent in U.

Proof. Let’s consider the regular functionp(z) = ff000(z)(z), z∈ U. We have|p(0)|= 2|a2|and from (3.18) we obtain |p(z)|<1 for allz∈ U.

By Remark 2.6 we obtain

f00(z) f0(z)

≤ |z|+ 2|a2|

1 + 2|a2||z| (3.20)

for all z∈ U. From (3.20) we get 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z||z|+ 2|a2|

1 + 2|a2||z| (3.21) for all z∈ U.

We consider the functionQ: [0,1]→R Q(x) = 1−x2Re α

Re α x x+ 2|a2|

1 + 2|a2|x; x=|z|.

BecauseQ 12

>0 it results that

x∈(0,1)max Q(x)>0.

Using this result and from (3.21) we conclude 1− |z|2Re α

Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤max

|z|<1

1− |z|2Re α

Re α |z| |z|+ 2|a2| 1 + 2|a2||z|

(3.22)

(7)

and hence, by (3.19) we obtain

1− |z|2Re α Re α

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1 (3.23)

for all z∈ U. From (3.23) and by Theorem 2.3 we obtain that the functionFβ(z) is in the class S.

References

[1] Becker, J.,L¨ownersche Differentialgleichung und quasikonform fortsetzbare schlichte Functionen, J. Reine Angew. Math. 255 (1972), 23-43.

[2] Mayer, O.,The Functions Theory of One Variable Complex, Bucure¸sti, 1981.

[3] Nehari, Z.,Conformal Mapping, Mc Graw-Hill Book Comp., New York, 1952 (Dover. Publ. Inc., 1975).

[4] Pascu, N. N., On a univalence criterion II, Itinerant Seminar on Functional Equations, Approximation and Convexity (Cluj-Napoca, 1985), 153-154.

[5] Pascu, N. N.,An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Bra¸sov, (1987), 43-48.

[6] Pescar, V., New Univalence Criteria, ”Transilvania” University of Bra¸sov, 2002.

[7] Pescar, V., Breaz, D. V., The Univalence of Integral Operators, Academic Publishing House, Sofia, 2008.

Virgil Pescar

Department of Mathematics

”Transilvania” University of Bra¸sov 500091 Bra¸sov, Romania

e-mail: [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

YANG, Some further results on the zeros and growths of entire solutions of second order linear differential equations, Kodai Math.. WANG, The possible orders of solutions of linear

[8] Ozkan, O., Some subordination results on the classes starlike and convex func- tions of complex order, Appl.. , Some subordination results associated with certain subclasses

In this paper we derive subordination results for certain subclass of analytic functions defined by using Salagean operator.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

In this paper we derive several subordination results for certain new classes of analytic functions defined by using Salagean operator.. (1.2) Definition 1 (Hadamard Product

In this paper, we derive several interesting subordination results for certain class of analytic functions defined by the linear operator L(a, c)f (z) which in- troduced and studied

In this paper, we consider some sufficient conditions for two integral operators to be close-to-convex function defined in the open unit disk1. Keywords: Analytic

In this work, we introduce and investigate an interesting subclass X t (γ) of analytic and close-to-convex functions in the open unit disk

For p-valently starlike and convex functions f (z) in the open unit disk U, the upper bounds of the functional |a p+2 − µa 2 p+1 |, defined by using the second Hankel determinant H