• 検索結果がありません。

2 Fekete-Szeg o ¨ problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "2 Fekete-Szeg o ¨ problem"

Copied!
9
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

On the Fekete-Szeg¨ o inequality for a class of analytic functions defined by using the

generalized S˘ al˘ agean operator

1

Dorina R˘aducanu

Abstract

In this paper we obtain the Fekete-Szeg¨o inequality for a class of analytic functions f(z) defined in the open unit disk for which Dλn+1f

Dλnf

α

Dλn+2f Dλn+1f

β

(α , β , λ ≥ 0) lies in a region starlike with respect to 1 and which is symmetric with respect to the real axis.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45 Key words:Analytic functions,generalized S˘al˘agean operator,

Fekete-Szeg¨o inequality

1 Introduction

Let Adenote the class of functions f(z) of the form

(1.1) f(z) =z+

X

k=2

akzk

which are analytic in the open unit disk U ={z ∈C:|z|<1}and let S be the subclass of Aconsisting of univalent functions.

1Received 28 December, 2007

Accepted for publication (in revised form) 3 January, 2008

19

(2)

The generalized S˘al˘agean differential operator is defined in [2] by Dλ0f(z) =f(z) , D1λf(z) = (1−λ)f(z) +λzf(z)

Dnλf(z) = Dλ1(Dnλ1f(z)), λ≥0.

If f is given by (1) we see that (1.2) Dnλf(z) = z+

X

k=2

[1 + (k−1)λ]nakzk.

When λ= 1 we get the classic S˘al˘agean differential operator [6].

Let Φ(z) be an analytic function with positive real part onU with Φ(0) = 1, Φ(0)>0 which maps the unit diskU onto a region starlike with respect to 1 which is symmetric with respect to the real axis.

Denote byS(Φ) the class of functions f ∈S for which zf(z)

f(z) ≺Φ(z), z ∈U

and denote by C(Φ) the class of functions f ∈S for which 1 + zf′′(z)

f(z) ≺Φ(z), z∈U

where ”≺” stands for the usual subordination.The classesS(Φ) andC(Φ) where defined and studied by Ma and Minda [1]. They obtained the Fekete- Szeg¨o inequality for functions in the class S(Φ) and also for functions in the class C(Φ).

By using the generalized S˘al˘agean differential operator we define the following class of functions:

Definition 1.1. Let Φ(z) be a univalent stralike function with respect to 1 which maps the unit disk onto a region in the right halfplane symmetric with respect to the real axis, Φ(0) = 1andΦ(0) >0.A function f ∈A is in the class Mα,βn,λ(Φ) if

(1.3)

Dλn+1f(z) Dλnf(z)

α

Dλn+2f(z) Dλn+1f(z)

β

≺Φ(z), 0≤α≤1,0≤β ≤1, λ >0.

(3)

It follows that

M0,10,1(Φ)≡C(Φ) and M1,00,1(Φ) ≡S(Φ).

Whenn = 0 andλ= 1 we obtain the classMα,β(Φ) studied by Ravichadran et.al. [3].

In this paper we obtain the Fekete-Szeg¨o inequality for functions in the class Mα,βn,λ(Φ).

To prove oue results we shall need the following lemmas.

Lemma 1.1. [1] Ifp1(z) = 1 +c1z+c2z2+. . . is an analytic function with positive real part in U , then

c2 −vc21





−4v+ 2, if v ≤0 2, if 0≤v ≤1 4v−2, if v ≥1.

When v <0orv >1, the equality holds if and only ifp1(z)is(1+z)/(1−z) or one of its rotations.If 0 < v < 1,then the equality holds if and only if p1(z) is (1 +z2)/(1−z2) or one of its rotations.If v = 0,the equality holds if and only if

p1(z) =

1 +a 2

1 +z 1−z +

1−a 2

1−z

1 +z , 0≤a ≤1

or one of its rotations.If v = 1,the equality holds if and only if p1 is the reciprocal of one of the functions such that the equality holds in the case of v = 0.

Also the above upper bound is sharp and it can be improved as follows when 0< v <1 :

|c2−vc21|+v|c21| ≤2, 0< v ≤ 1 2 and

|c2−vc21|+ (1−v)|c21| ≤2, 1

2 < v≤1.

(4)

Lemma 1.2. [4] If p1(z) = 1 +c1z+c2z2+. . . is an analytic function with positive real part in U , then

|c2−vc21| ≤2 max{1;|2v−1|}. The result is sharp for the function

p1(z) = 1 +z2

1−z2 or p1(z) = 1 +z 1−z.

2 Fekete-Szeg o ¨ problem

We prove our main result by making use of Lemma 1.1.

Theorem 2.1. Let Φ(z) = 1 +B1z+B2z2+. . ..If f(z) given by (1.1) is in the class Mα,βn,λ(Φ) , then

a3−µa22





1

4λ(1+2λ)n[α+β(1+2λ)]

h2B2λ(1+λ)2n[α+β(1+λ)]B12 2γi

, if µ≤σ1 B1

2λ(1+2λ)n[α+β(1+2λ)], if σ1 ≤µ≤σ2

1

4λ(1+2λ)n[α+β(1+2λ)]

h−2B2+λ(1+λ)2nB21

[α+β(1+λ)]2γi

, if µ≥σ2. Further,if σ1 < µ≤σ3 ,then

|a3−µa22|+

+ λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2 2(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B1

1− B2

B1

+ γB1

2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2

|a2|2

≤ B1

2λ(1 + 2λ)2n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]. If σ3 < µ≤σ2 ,then

|a3−µa22|+

+ λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2 2(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B1

1 + B2 B1

− γB1

2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2

|a2|2

(5)

≤ B1

2λ(1 + 2λ)2n[α+β(1 + 2λ)], where

σ1 := 2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2(B2−B1) 4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12

−B12(1 +λ)2n[λ[α+β(1 +λ)]2−(λ+ 2)[α+β(1 +λ)2]]

4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12 σ2 := 2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2(B2+B1)

4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12

−B12(1 +λ)2n[λ[α+β(1 +λ)]2−(λ+ 2)[α+β(1 +λ)2]]

4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12 σ3 := 2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2B2

4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12

−B12(1 +λ)2n[λ[α+β(1 +λ)]2−(λ+ 2)[α+β(1 +λ)2]]

4(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]B12 and

γ :=λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2

−(λ+ 2)(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)2] + 4µ(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)].

These results are sharp.

Proof. Letf ∈Mα,βn,λ(Φ) and let (2.1) p(z) :=

Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

α

Dn+2λ f(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

β

= 1 +b1z+b2z2+. . . Since the function Φ(z) = 1 +B1z+B2z2+. . .is univalent andp≺Φ then the function

p1(z) = 1 + Φ1(p(z))

1−Φ1(p(z)) = 1 +c1z+c2z2. . . is ananlytic and has positive real part in U.We also have

p(z) = Φ

p1(z)−1 p1(z) + 1

= 1 + 1

2B1c1z+ 1

2B1(c2− 1

2c21) + 1 4B2c21

z2+. . .

(6)

From (2.1) we obtain b1 = 1

2B1c1 and b2 = 1

2B1(c2−1

2c21) + 1 4B2c21. By making use of (1.1) and (1.2) we obtain

Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) = 1 +λ(1 +λ)na2z+ [2λ(1 + 2λ)na3−λ(1 +λ)2na22]z2+. . . and therefore we have

Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

α

=

= 1+αλ(1+λ)na2z+λ

2α(1 + 2λ)na3+ λα2−α(λ+ 2)

2 (1 +λ)2na22

z2+. . . Similarly we obtain

Dn+2λ f(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

β

= 1 +βλ(1 +λ)n+1a2z+

2β(1 + 2λ)n+1a3+λβ2−β(λ+ 2)

2 (1 +λ)2n+2a22

z2+. . . Thus we have

Dn+1λ f(z) Dλnf(z)

α

Dn+2λ f(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

β

= 1 +λ(1 +λ)n[α+β(1 +λ)]a2z+

+λ{2(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]a3+ +λ[α+β(1 +λ)]2−(λ+ 2)[α+β(1 +λ)2]

2 (1 +λ)2na22

z2+. . . In view of (2.1) it results

(2.2) b1 =λ(1 +λ)n[α+β(1 +λ)]a2

and

b2 = 2λ(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]a3 + +λ2[α+β(1 +λ)]2−λ(λ+ 2)[α+β(1 +λ)2]

2 (1 +λ)2na22.

(2.3)

(7)

Therefore we have

(2.4) a3−µa22 = B1

4λ(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)][c2−vc21] where

v := 1 2

1− B2

B1

+ γB1

2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2

.

Our result follows now by an application of Lemma 1.1.To show that the bounds are sharp,we consider the functions KΦ,m(m= 2,3, . . .) defined by

Dn+1λ KΦ,m(z) DnλKΦ,m(z)

α

Dλn+2KΦ,m(z) Dλn+1KΦ,m(z)

β

= Φ(zm1), KΦ,m(0) = [KΦ,m](0)−1 = 0

and the functions Fδ, Gδ (0≤δ ≤1) defined by Dn+1λ Fδ(z)

DnλFδ(z) α

Dλn+2Fδ(z) Dλn+1Fδ(z)

β

= Φ

z(z+δ) 1 +δz

, Fδ(0) =Fδ(0)−1 = 0 and

Dn+1λ Gδ(z) DnλGδ(z)

α

Dn+2λ Gδ(z) Dn+1λ Gδ(z)

β

= Φ

−z(z+δ) 1 +δz

, Gδ(0) =Gδ(0)−1 = 0.

It is clear that the functionsKΦ,m, Fδ andGδ belong to the class Mα,βn,λ(Φ).

If µ < σ1 orµ > σ2 , then the equality holds if and only if f is KΦ,2 or one of its rotations.When σ1 < µ < σ2 , the equality holds if and only if f is KΦ,3 or one of its rotations.If µ=σ1 , then the equality holds if and only if f isFδ or one of its rotations.If µ=σ2 ,then the equality holds if and only if f isGδ or one of its rotations.

By making use of Lemma 1.2. we easely obtain the next theorem.

Theorem 2.2. Let Φ(z) = 1 +B1z+B2z2+. . .and let f(z) be in the class Mα,βn,λ(Φ) .For a complex number µ we have:

|a3 −µa22| ≤

(8)

≤ B1

2λ(1 + 2λ)n[α+β(1 + 2λ)]max

1,

−B2

B1

+ γB1

2λ(1 +λ)2n[α+β(1 +λ)]2

. The result is sharp.

References

[1] W.Ma,D.Minda,A unified treatment of some special classes of uni- valent functions,Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analy- sis,Z.Li,F.Ren,L.Yang and S.Zhang(Eds.),Int.Press(1994),157-169.

[2] F.M.Al-Oboudi,On univalent functions defined by a generalized S˘al˘agean operator,Internat.J.Math.Math.Sci.,27(2004),1429-1436.

[3] V.Ravichandran,M.Darus, M.Hussain Khan,K.G.Subramanian, Fekete-Szeg¨o inequality for certain class of analytic functions, Aust.J.Math.Anal.Appl.,1,2(2004)art.4.

[4] V.Ravichadran,Y.Polotoglu,M.Bolcal,A.Sen,Certain subclasses of star- like and convex functions of complex order,preprint

[5] H.M.Srivastava,A.K.Mishra,M.K.Das,The Fekete-Szeg¨o problem for a subclass of close-to-convex functions,Complex Variables,Theory Appl.,44,(2001),145-163.

(9)

[6] G.S.S˘al˘agean,Subclasses of univalent functions,Lect.Notes in Math.,1013,(1983),362-372.

[7] D.R˘aducanu,The Fekete-Szego¨problem for a class of multivalent func- tions,(to appear).

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

”Transilvania” University of Bra¸sov 50091,Iuliu Maniu,50,Bra¸sov

Romania

E-mail: [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Gochhayat, The Fekete-Szeg¨ o problem for k-uniformly convex functions and for a class defined by the Owa-Srivastava operator, J.. Gochhayat, Fekete-Szeg¨ o problem for a class

Fekete-Szeg¨ o problem, close-to-convex functions, close- to-convex functions with respect to a starlike function, close-to-convex functions with argument

In this paper we define a subclass of α -uniform convex functions by using the S’al’agean differential operator and we obtain some properties of this class.. this operator

For a brief history of the Fekete-Szegö problem for the class of starlike, convex and close-to-convex functions, see the recent paper by Srivastava et

For a brief history of the Fekete-Szegö prob- lem for the class of starlike, convex and close-to-convex functions, see the recent paper by Srivastava et

We then present a proof of Theorem 1, followed by independent proofs that there are no nice vectors for the cases n = 4 and n = 6, which are the two smallest cases not covered

In the development of the prediction theory, at the same time with factorization theorems by analytic functions (for example, using the Szeg¨o [12] factorization of a positive

S˘al˘agean and the results given in [2] and [3] on the several types of close-to- convex functions, in this paper I define new sets of univalent func- tions called