• 検索結果がありません。

Generating Functions for the Mean Value of a Function on a Sphere and Its Associated Ball in R

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Generating Functions for the Mean Value of a Function on a Sphere and Its Associated Ball in R"

Copied!
14
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Volume 2008, Article ID 656329,14pages doi:10.1155/2008/656329

Research Article

Generating Functions for the Mean Value of a Function on a Sphere and Its Associated Ball in R

n

Antonela Toma

Department of Mathematics II, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Splaiul Independent¸ei 313, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Correspondence should be addressed to Antonela Toma,[email protected] Received 20 April 2008; Accepted 22 May 2008

Recommended by Patricia Wong

We define two functions which determine the properties and the representation of the mean value of a function on a ball and on its associated sphere. Using these two functions, we obtain Pizzetti’s formula inRnas well as a similar formula for the mean value of a function on the ball associated to the sphere. We also give the expressions of the remainders in these two formulas, using the surface integral on a sphere.

Copyrightq2008 Antonela Toma. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

The mean function over values of a sphere and over its associated ball are very important in the study of some mathematical-physics problems as well as in the theory of a potential and in partial differential equations.

A representation for the mean values of a function over a sphere inRn was given by Pizzetti1using polyharmonic operators.

In2, volume II chapter IV, Section 3, page 258, using the second Green’s formula, it is given the proof for Pizzetti’s formula and then its generalization inRn.

In this paper, we define two functions which determine the properties and the representations of the mean values of a function over a sphere and over its associated ball.

These functions are called generating functions of these two averages and using these functions we obtain Pizzetti’s formula inRnas well as a new formula for the mean values of a function over a ball.

There are given the expression of the remainders using an integral over a sphere.

The properties of the generating functions are established using the formality concerning the calculus for higher order derivatives for functions of several variables.

(2)

For this purpose we use two formulas of N. Ya. Sonin and of Dirichlet3, page 365,4, page 671, respectively.

There are defined the corresponding quantities of some scalar quantities using the differential operators∇,Δ,Δh.

This fact allows us to prove two new formulas which determine the properties of the generating functions.

It is very important to mention that in this paper the way of deducting Pizzetti’s formula is totally different from the way used in3, page 73as well as in5, page 104.

2. General results

LetΩ⊂Rnbe a bounded set andf:Ω→R,fC2m 1Ω.

We denote bySra {x, x ∈ Rn,|x−a| r}the sphere of radiusr, centered ina a1, a2, . . . , an,Bra {x, x∈Rn,|x−a| ≤r}the ball of radiusr and centered inawhich is associated toSra.

We will also denote by R,R max{r |x−a|n} for thatBra ⊂ Ω. We define the functions

φ:−R, R−→R, φr

B1af

a rxa

dx, 2.1

ψ:−R, R−→R, ψr

S1af

a rxa

dS1, 2.2

wheredx,dS1 represent the volume element and area element for the unit ballB1aand for the unit sphere, respectively.

The mean valuesMsrfandMbrfforf :Ω→R overSra⊂Ωand overBra⊂Ω, respectively, are given by the following expressions:

Msrf 1 Sra

SrafxdS, 0≤rR, 2.3

Mrbf 1 Bra

Brafxdx, 0≤rR, 2.4

wheresee6, page 22|Sra| 2πn/2/Γn/2rn−1represents the area of the sphereSra and |Bra| 2πn/2/Γn/2rn/n represents the volume of the ballBra, Γ being beta- function.

Between the cartesian coordinates x x1, x2, . . . , xn and spherical coordinates y ρ, θ1, . . . , θn−1centered ina a1, a2, . . . , anthere are the relations

x1a1 ρsinθ1sinθ2· · ·sinθn−2sinθn−1a1 ρh1, x2a2 ρsinθ1sinθ2· · ·sinθn−2cosθn−1a1 ρh2, x3a3 ρsinθ1sinθ2· · ·sinθn−3cosθn−2a3 ρh3,

...

xn−2an−2 ρsinθ1sinθ2cosθ3an−2 ρhn−2, xn−1an−1 ρsinθ1cosθ2an−1 ρhn−1,

xnan ρcosθ1an ρhn,

2.5

(3)

where

ρ≥0, θi∈0, π, i1, n−2, θn−1∈0,2π. 2.6 The Jacobian of this punctual transform is

J

ρ, θ1, . . . , θn−1 ∂x

∂y ρn−1sinn−2θ1sinn−3θ2sinn−4θ3· · ·sinθn−2. 2.7 The volume elementdywritten in spherical coordinates has the expression

dyJ

ρ, θ1, . . . , θn−1

dρ dθ1· · ·n−1 2.8

and the area element forSρais dSρρn−1y

θ1, . . . , θn−2

12· · ·n−1, 2.9 where

J

θ1, . . . , θn−2 J

ρ, θ1, . . . , θn−1

ρn−1 sinn−2θ1sinn−3θ2· · ·sin2θn−3sinθn−2. 2.10 From2.8and2.9we have

dy dρ dSρρn−1dρ dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1

, 2.11

where dS1θ1, . . . , θn−1 represents the area element of the unit sphere S1a in spherical coordinates.

Proposition 2.1. Between the functionsφ, ψ :−R, R → R defined in2.1and2.2, there is the relation

φr 1

0un−1ψrudu, |r| ≤R. 2.12

Proof. Using the spherical coordinates and the relations 2.9 and 2.11 we obtain the following:

ψr

Δf

. . . , ai rhi, . . . J

θ1, . . . , θn−2

1· · ·n−1

Δf

. . . , ai rhi, . . . dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 ,

2.13

φr 1

0

Δf

. . . , ai ruhi, . . .

un−1du dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1

1

0

un−1

Δf

. . . , ai ruhi, . . . dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 du,

2.14

whereΔ 0, π × · · · ×0, π×0,2π

n−2 times

. From2.13we note that

ψru

Δf

. . . , ai ruhi, . . . dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1

2.15 and taking into account2.14, the relation2.12is proved.

(4)

Concerning the dependence between the functionsφ, ψ and the mean valuesMrsf, Mrbfof a functionfover a sphere and over the associated ball, respectively, we can state the following.

Proposition 2.2. Between the functionsφ, ψ defined by2.1and2.2, respectively, and the mean valuesMfrf,Mbrfdefined by2.3and2.4, there are the following relations:

Mbrf rn

Braφr nΓn/2

n/2 φr, 0≤rR, 2.16

Msrf rn−1

Sraψr nΓn/2

n/2 ψr, 0≤rR. 2.17

Proof. For 0rR, from2.14makingthe substitutionur ρand taking into account2.4 we obtain

φr 1

rn r

0

ρn−1

Δf

. . . , ai ρhi, . . . dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1

1 rn

Brafxdxn/2

nΓn/2Mbrf

2.18

and so,2.16is proved.

Using the spherical coordinates, we have Msrf 1

Sra

Srx0fxdx 1

Sra

Δf

. . . , ai rhi, . . . dSr

θ1, . . . , θn−1 rn−1

Sra

Δf

. . . , ai rhi, . . . dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 .

2.19

Taking into account2.13we have

Msrf rn−1

Sraψr Γn/2

n/2 ψr 2.20

which is2.17.

The relations2.16and2.17show that for 0≤rR, the functionsφ, ψ:−R, R→R, determine the properties of the mean valuesMbrfandMsrfand permit the calculus of these two quantities.

These relations justify the introduction of the following.

Definition 2.3. The functionsφ, ψ:−R, R→R defined by2.1and2.2are called generating functions for the mean valuesMrbfandMsrfof a functionf:Ω→R over the ballBra⊂Ω and over the sphereSra⊂Ω, respectively. Particularly, iff≥0 onΩ⊂Rn, then this function can be considered as the mass density onSraand onBra, respectively.

(5)

Consequently, taking into account2.3and2.17, the total massmsrof the sphereSra is given by the expression

msr

SrafxdSSraMsrf rn−1ψr, 0≤rR. 2.21 In this case,Msrfrepresents the mean value of the mass density onSra. Similarly, from 2.4and2.16we have the following expression for the total mass onBra:

mbr

BrafxdxBraMbrf rnφr, 0≤rR. 2.22 The expressions2.21and 2.22 prove that the generating functionsφ andψ, when f ≥0 and 0≤rR, have a mechanical meaning, allowing the calculus of the mass forSra and forBrawith the densityρx fx,x∈Ω⊂Rn.

Next, for the study of the properties of the generating functionsψandφ, we will use M.

Ya. Sonin Formula.

LetmiR,i 1, nbe real numbers andkN0. Thensee3, page 365,4, page 671 we have Sonin formula

S

B10

m1x1 · · · mnxn2k

dx1· · ·dxn

πn−1/2 Γk 1/2 Γn/2 k 1

m21 · · · mrnk

.

2.23

Denotingm m1, m2, . . . , mnRnand “ ” the scalar product,2.23becomes

S

B10 m, x2kπn−1/2 Γk 1/2

Γn/2 k 1 m, mk. 2.24

We mention that this result can be justifiedsee3, page 365on the basis of Dirichlet formula

D

B10x2u1 1· · ·x2un ndx1· · ·dxnΓ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2

Γn/2 k 1 , 2.25

whereμiN0,i1, nand1 · · · μn.

Usingμ μ1 · · · μnNn0, where|μ|μ1 · · · μnk, Dirichlet formula becomes

D

B10xdx Γ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2

Γn/2 k 1 . 2.26

Making the substitutionsui xiai,i 1, nand using Ju1, . . . , um ∂x/∂u 1 the

(6)

Jacobian of the transform, we have S

B1a m, x−a2kdx

B10 m, x2kdxπn−1/2 Γk 1/2

Γn/2 k 1 m, mk, 2.27

D

B1ax−adx

B10xdxΓ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2

Γn/2 k 1 , 2.28 whereB1arepresents the unit ball centered inaRn.

Let us consider the integrals S

S1a m, x−a2kdS1, D

S1ax−adS1, 2.29 whereS1ais the unit sphere, centered inaRn.

Proposition 2.4. Between the pairs of integralsS, SandD, D, there are the following relations:

S 2k nSn−1/2Γk 1/2

Γk n/2 m, mk, 2.30

D 2k nD

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2

Γk n/2 . 2.31 Proof. Using the spherical coordinates2.5, we have

xah

h1, h2, . . . , hn

. 2.32

Taking into account2.11, Sonin’s integral2.27becomes S

B1a m, x−a2kdx

1

0

Δ m, ρh2kρn−1dρ dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 1

2k n

Δ m, h2kdS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 1

2k n

S1a m, x−a2kdS1,

2.33

whereΔ 0, π × · · · ×0, π

n−2

×0,2π. We obtain

S

S1a m, x−a2kdS1

2k nS

2k n Γk 1/2

Γn/2 k 1πn−1/2 m, mk 2Γk 1/2

Γn/2 n−1/2 m, mk.

2.34

(7)

Using the same procedure, Dirichlet’s integral2.28becomes

D

B1ax−adx

1

0

Δ m, ρhρn−1dρ dS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 1

2k n

ΔhdS1

θ1, . . . , θn−1 1

2k n

S1ax−adS1.

2.35

Hence

D

S1ax−adS1

2k nD 2k nΓ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2 Γk n/2 1 2Γ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2 Γn/2 k .

2.36

So the proposition is proved.

Next, using the formulas concerning the calculus of the higher order differential for functions of several variables, we will define the correspondings for some scalar quantities which appear in the expressions ofSandS, respectively2.27and2.29.

The corresponding scalar quantities are defined using some differential operators, this fact leads us to new expressions similar to2.24and2.30.

On the basis of these formulas, we will establish the properties of the generating functionsψandφand of the mean valuesMsrfandMrbf.

LetfCpΩwithB1a⊂Ωand 2k≤p. We will define the following correspondings:

1

m

m1, . . . , mn

−→ ∇fa

∂x1, . . . ,

∂xn

fa, 2.37

where∇ ∂/∂x1, . . . , ∂/∂xnrepresents the operator “nabla”;

2

|m|2 m, m −→ ∇,∇fa Δfa, 2.38

where| · |represents the norm of a vector andΔ ∇,∇2/∂x21 · · · 2/∂x2nthe Laplace operator inRn;

(8)

3

|m|2k m, mk−→ ∇,∇kfa Δkfa, 2.39

where Δk Δ ·Δ· · ·Δ

k

2/∂x21 · · · 2/∂xn2k represents the polyharmonic operator of orderk;

4

m, x−a −→ ∇, xafa

∂x1

x1a1

· · ·

∂xn

xnan

fa dfa, 2.40 whered ∂/∂x1x1a1 · · · ∂/∂xnxn−anrepresents the differential operator;

5

m, x−a2k−→ ∇, x−a2kfa d2nfa, 2.41

where d2k ∂/∂x1x1a1 · · · ∂/∂xnxnan2krepresents the differential operator of order 2k.

Using these correspondences and taking into account2.23,2.27,2.29, and2.30, we obtain

B1ad2kfadxπn−1/2 Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kkfa, 2.42

S1ad2kfadS1n−1/2Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kΔkfa. 2.43 We note that the expressions2.42and2.43represent the correspondings for2.27 and2.30. We will prove the availability of these relations.

Proposition 2.5. ForfCpΩwithB1a⊂Ωand 2kpthe relations2.42and2.43held.

Proof. We have

B1ad2kfadx

B1a

∂x1

x1a1

· · ·

∂xn

xnan

2k

fadx1· · ·dxn

1 ··· 2μn2k

2k!

1

!· · · 2μn

! 2

∂x21 μ1

· · · 2

∂x2n

μn fa·

B1ax−adx.

2.44 On the basis of2k!2kk!2k−1!!22kk!Γk 1/2/√π, we obtain

2k!

1

!· · · 2μn

! k!

μ1!· · ·μn!

πn−1/2Γk 1/2 Γ

μ1 1/2

· · ·Γ

μn 1/2. 2.45

(9)

Taking into account2.45and Dirichlet Formulas2.43, the expression2.44becomes

B1ad2kfadxπn−1/2 Γk 1/2 Γn/2 k 1

μ1 μ2 ··· μnk

k!

μ1!· · ·μn! 2

∂x21 μ1

· · ·

2

∂x2n

μn

fa, 2.46

so that

B1ad2kfadxπn−1/2 Γk 1/2 Γn/2 k 1

2

∂x21 · · · 2

∂xn2

k

fa πn−1/2 Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kkfa.

2.47

Using the same method, we obtain

S1ad2kfadx

S1a

∂x1

x1a1

· · ·

∂xn

xnan

2k

fadS1

1 ··· 2μn2k

2k!

1

!· · · 2μn

! 2

∂x21 μ1

· · · 2

∂x2n

μn fa·

S1ax−adS1.

2.48

On the basis of2.45and2.31, we have

S1ad2kfadS1

n−1/2Γk 1/2 Γn/2 k

μ1 ··· μnk

k!

μ1!· · ·μn! 2

∂x21 μ1

· · · 2

∂x2n

μn fan−1/2Γk 1/2

Γn/2 k 2

∂x21 · · · 2

∂xn2

k fan−1/2Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kΔkfa

2.49

and so the proposition is proved.

For the generating functionsφandψwe can state the following.

(10)

Proposition 2.6. LetΩ ∈Rnbe a bounded set andf : Ω→ R,fC2m 1Ω. Then the functions φ, ψ:−R, R→R defined by2.1and2.2, whereRmax|x−a|such thatBra⊂Ω, have the following properties:

1φ,ψare even functions andφ, ψC2m 1−R, R, 2φk0 ψk0 0 forkodd,k≤2m 1, 3ψ2k0

S1ad2kadS1n−1/2Γk 1/2/Γn/2 kfa, km, 4φ2k0 1/n 2kψ2k0 πn−1/2Γk 1/2/Γn/2 kkfa, km, 5φpr 1

0un p−1ψprudu, p≤2m 1, 6ψpr

S1adpfa rxadS1, p≤2m 1, 7ψr n/2m

k01/k!Γn/2 kr/22kΔkfa R2m 1r, where

R2m 1r ψ2m 1θr

2m 1! r2m 1 r2m 1 2m 1!

S1ad2m 1f

a θrxa

dS1, 0< θ <1, 2.50

8φr πn/2m

k01/k!Γn/2 k 1r/22kΔkfa R2m 1r, where

R2m 1r φ2m 1θr

2m 1!r2m 1 r2m 1 2m 1!

1

0

S1aun 2md2m 1f

a θruxa

du dS1, 0< θ <1.

2.51 Proof. Using the spherical coordinates given by 2.5 and denoting h h1, . . . , hn, the expression forψgiven by2.2becomes

ψr

S1af

a rxa dS1

ΔJ

θ1, . . . , θn−2

0

f

r, θ1, . . . , θn−1 n−1

1· · ·n−2,

2.52

whereΔ 0, π × · · · ×0, π

n−2

,fr, θ1, . . . , θn−1 fa rhandJθ1, . . . , θn−2is given by the formulas2.10.

Since fC2m 1Ω, using the differentiation rule for integrals depending on a parameter, it results inψC2m 1−R, R.

In order to prove thatψis an even function we will change the variablesθ1, . . . , θn−1→ u1, . . . , un−1by the relations

θiπui, i1, n−2, θn−1π un−1,

ui∈0, π, i1, n−2, un−1∈−π, π 2.53 in the expression2.52.

(11)

The Jacobian of this transform is defined by

J1

u1, . . . , un−1

θ1, . . . , θn−1

u1, . . . , un−1 −1n−2 2.54 Having this change of variables,2.52becomes

ψr

ΔJ

u1, . . . , un−2π

−πf

r, u1, . . . , un−1 dun−1

du1· · ·dun−2. 2.55

Sincef−r, u1, . . . , un−1is periodical, with the period 2πwith respect to the variableun−1, the expression2.55becomes

ψr

ΔJ

u1, . . . , un−2

0

f

r, u1, . . . , un−1 dun−1

du1· · ·dun−2. 2.56

Makingthe comparison between the expression from above and2.52we haveψr ψ−rsoψis an even function.

Consequently,ψ2k is an even function andψ2k 1 is odd, it means thatψ2k 10 0.

From 2.12 we have φ is even, φC2m 1−R, R, φ2k is even and φ2k 1 is odd, so φ2k 10 0.

So we proved the properties1and2.

Remark 2.7. In the case off:RnR,f∈ DRnwhereDRnis L. Schwartz space,fCRn and having a compact support, thenψ :RR,ψr

S1afa rxadS1,ψr ∈CR with compact support.

Iff∈ DRn, we can state that the formulas ψr

S1af

a rxa

dS1, 2.57

rR, define an integral transform which associatesf ∈ DRnto the even functionψ∈ DR.

According to 7, page 61, this integral transform is denoted by Tpn named polare transform. Thus we writeψTpnf. From2.2applying the differentiation rule for composite functions and denotingyarxa, we obtain

ψpr

S1a

∂p

∂rpf

a rxa dS1

S1a

∂yi

∂yi

∂r p

fydS1

S1a

∂y1

x1a1

· · ·

∂yn

xnan

p

fydS1

S1adpf

a rxa dS1.

2.58

(12)

Forp2k≤2mandr0 we have ψ2k0

S1a

∂x1

x1a1

· · ·

∂xn

xnan

2k

fadS1

S1ad2kfadS1. 2.59 Taking into account2.43, we have

ψ2k0

S1ad2kfadS1n−1/2Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kΔkfa. 2.60 On the other hand, from2.12and2.60we obtain

φpr 1

0

un p−1ψprudu, |r| ≤R, p≤2m 1,

φ2k0 1

n 2kψ2k0 2πn−1/2

n 2k

Γk 1/2 Γn/2 kΔkfa πn−1/2 Γk 1/2

Γn/2 kkfa.

2.61

The formulas2.60and2.61justify the properties3,4,5,6from the proposition.

In order to obtain the formula7we will apply Mac-Laurin formulas. Thus ψ being even andψC2m 1−R, R, on the basis of2.58, we can write

ψr m

0

ψ2k0

2k! r2k R2m 1r, 2.62 where

R2m 1r ψ2m 1θr

2m 1! r2m 1 r2m 1 2m 1!

S1ad2m 1f

a θrxa

dS1, 0< θ <1. 2.63

Since2k!22kk!Γk 1/2π−1/2and taking into account2.60, from2.62we obtain7.

Using the same method, we obtain8taking into account the results from4,5, and 6. So,Proposition 2.6is proved.

In particular, if fC−R, R andf is analytic, then the remainders R2m 1t → 0, R2m 1r→0 form→ ∞.

We obtain the following Mac-Laurin Series forψ, φ:−R, R→R:

ψr n/2

k0

1 k!Γn/2 k

r 2

2k

Δkfa, |r| ≤R, 2.64

φr πn/2

k0

1 k!Γn/2 k 1

r 2

2k

Δkfa, |r| ≤R, 2.65

(13)

The results established inProposition 2.6permit to give the corresponding representa- tions for the mean valuesMrsfandMbrfdefined in2.3and2.4, by using2.16and 2.17.

Thus, for 0≤rR, taking into account8,2.16, and2.64we can write Mbrf 1

Bra

Brafxdx n

n

2 m

k0

1 k!Γn/2 k 1

r 2

2k

Δkfa

nn/2Γ

n 2

r2m 1 2m 1!

1

0

S1aun 2md2m 1f

a θruxa

du dS1, 0< θ <1,

Mbrf n

n 2

k0

1 k!Γn/2 k 1

r 2

2k

Δkfa.

2.66 Similarly, from7,2.62, and2.17we have

Msrf 1 Sra

SrafxdS Γ

n 2

m k0

1 k!Γn/2 k

r 2

2k

Δkfa Γn/2

n/2 · r2m 1 2m 1!

S1ad2m 1f

a θrx−a

dS1, 0< θ <1,

2.67

Msrf Γ n 2

k0

1 k!Γn/2 k

r 2

2k

Δkfa. 2.68 We remark that the expression of the remainder forMsrfgiven in2.67

R∗∗2m 1r Γn/2 2πn/2

r2m 1 2m 1!

S1ad2m 1f

a θrx−a

dS1, 0< θ <1 2.69 may have other forms as in2, volume II, chapter IV, Section 3, page 261and8.

Forn 3, sinceΓ3/2 k 2k 1!/22k 1k!

π, from 2.68, we obtain Pizzetti’s Formula1:

Msrf

k0

r2k

2k 1!Δkfa. 2.70 Similarly, since

Γ3

2 k 1

3

2 k

Γ3 2 k

2k 32k 1!

22k 2k!

π, 2.71

we have

Mrbf 3

k0

r2k

2k 1!2k 3Δkfa. 2.72 This last formula constitutes the similarity of Pizzetti’s formula for the mean value Mrbfover the ballBra⊂R3.

(14)

References

1P. Pizzetti, “Sulla media dei valori che una funzione dei punti dello spazio assume alla superficie di una sfera,” Rendiconti Lincei (5), vol. 18, pp. 309–316, 1909.

2R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methoden der Mathematischen Physik, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1937.

3G. M. Fichtenholz, Differential-und Integralrechnung. III, vol. 63 of Hochschulb ¨ucher f ¨ur Mathematik, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany, 1977.

4I. S. Gradstein and I. M. Ryshik, Tables of Series, Products and Integrals. Vol. 1, 2, Harri Deutsch, Thun, Switzerland, 1981.

5G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions and Partial Differential Equations, vol. 7 of Mathematics and Its Applications, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA, 1968.

6S. G. Mihlin, Ecuat¸ii liniare cu derivate part¸iale, Editura S¸tiint¸ific˘a s¸i Enciclopedic˘a, Bucures¸ti, Romania, 1983.

7W. W. Kecs, Teoria distribit¸iilor s¸i aplicat¸ii, Editura Academiei Romˆane, Bucures¸ti, Romania, 2003.

8M. N. Olevski˘ı, “An explicit expression for the remainder in the Pizetti formula,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 331–333, 1989.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In [9], Wang and L¨ u have investigated the fixed points and hyper- order of solutions of second order linear differential equations with meromorphic coefficients and their

Using general ideas from Theorem 4 of [3] and the Schwarz symmetrization, we obtain the following theorem on radial symmetry in the case of p &gt; 1..

Also for the modulus metric, we have an explicit formula in the case of the unit ball, and here a similar proof as for the Ferrand metric can be carried out to show

In this short note we will obtain another type of Hardy inequality on the sphere and also give the corresponding sharp constant. Our main theorem is the following... Theorem 1.1.

In this paper, we propose a new and efficient method that is applicable for the computation of the Fourier transform of a function which may possess a singular point or slowly converge

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

We then present a proof of Theorem 1, followed by independent proofs that there are no nice vectors for the cases n = 4 and n = 6, which are the two smallest cases not covered

In [4], Dragomir and Agarwal have made use of the latter to derive bounds for the error term in the trapezoidal formula for the numerical integration of an integrable function f