SOME MEAN VALUE THEOREMS FOR THE SQUARE OF CLASS
NUMBERS TIMES REGULATOR OF QUADRATIC EXTENSIONS
TAKASHI TANIGUCHI
ABSTRACT. Inthis articlewegiveasurvey of [T1] and [T2] and discuss related topics.
Let$k$beanumberfield,and$\Delta_{k},$ $h_{k}$and$R_{k}$the absolutediscriminant,the classnumber
and the regulator, respectively. In [T2]wefoundthe asymptoticbehavior of themean
valuesof$h_{F}^{2}R_{F}^{2}$ withrespectto $|\Delta_{F}|$ for certain families ofquadratic extensions$F$ of
a fixed number field$k$.
1. INTRODUCTION
This article is
a
survey of [T1] and [T2]. We start withour
main result. We fixan
algebraic number field $k$. Let $\mathfrak{M},$ $\mathfrak{M}_{\infty},$ $\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{f}},$ $\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{R}}$ and $\mathfrak{M}_{\mathbb{C}}$ denote respectively the set of all places of$k$, all infinite places, all finite places, all realplaces and all complexplaces.
For $v\in \mathfrak{M}$ let $k_{v}$ denotes the completion of $k$ at $v$ and if$v\in \mathfrak{M}$ thenlet $q_{v}$ denote the
order of the residue field of$k_{v}$. We let $r_{1},$ $r_{2}$, and$e_{k}$ be respectively thenumber ofreal
places, thenumber of complex places, and the number of roots of unity contained in $k$.
We denote by $\zeta_{k}(s)$ the Dedekind zeta function of$k$.
To state
our
result,we
classify quadratic extensions of $k$ via the splitting type atplaces of $\mathfrak{M}_{\infty}$. Note that if $[F : k]=2$, then $F\otimes k_{v}$ is isomorphic to either $\mathbb{R}\cross \mathbb{R}$
or
$\mathbb{C}$ for $v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{R}}$ and is $\mathbb{C}\cross \mathbb{C}$ for $v\in \mathfrak{W}$
.
We fixan $\mathfrak{U}t_{\infty}$-tuples $L_{\infty}=(L_{v})_{v\in\varpi\iota_{\infty}}$ where$L_{v}\in\{\mathbb{R}\cross \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}\}$ for $v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{R}}$ and $L_{v}=\mathbb{C}\cross \mathbb{C}$ for $v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathbb{C}}$. We define
$0(L_{\infty})=$
{
$F|[F$ : $k]=2,$$F\otimes k_{v}\cong L_{v}$ for all $v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\infty}$}.
Let $r_{1}(L_{\infty})$ and$r_{2}(L_{\infty})$ be the number of real places and complex places of$F\in\Omega(L_{\infty})$,
respectively. (This does not depend
on
the choice of$F.$) For $v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{f}}$we
put$E_{v}=1-3q_{v}^{-3}+2q_{v}^{-4}+q_{v}^{-5}-q_{v}^{-6}$, $E_{v}’=2^{-1}(1-q_{v}^{-1})^{3}(1+2q_{v}^{-1}+4q_{v}^{-2}+2q_{v}^{-\mathrm{S}})$
.
The following theorem is aspecial
case
of [T2, Theorem 10.12].Theorem 1.1. We
fix
an $L_{\infty}$ and $v_{1},$$\ldots,$
$v_{n}\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{f}}$ satisfying $\mathrm{r}_{2}(L_{\infty})-2r_{2}+n\geq 2$
.
Then the limit
$\lim_{Xarrow\infty}\frac{1}{X^{2}}$
F.not
$F. \in\Omega(L)|\Delta_{F/\mathrm{k}}|\leq X\mathrm{p}1\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}v_{1,\ldots\prime}v_{n}\sum_{\infty}h_{F}^{2}R_{F}^{2}$
enis$ts$, and the value is equal to
$\frac{({\rm Res}_{\epsilon=1}\zeta_{k}(s))^{3}\Delta_{k}^{2}e_{k}^{2}\zeta_{k}(2)^{2}}{2^{r_{1}+r_{2+1}}2^{2r_{1}(L_{\infty})}(2\pi)^{2r_{2}(L_{\infty})}}\cdot\prod_{1\leq i\leq n}E_{v:}’\prod_{v\in \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{f}}}.E_{v}v\neq v_{1},..,v_{\hslash}$
.
Density theorems with local conditions at finite places
are
obtained simultaneously.For details,
see
[T2, Theorem 10.12].Combined with the result of Kable-Yukie [KY2], we also obtain the limit ofcertain correlation coefficients. For simplicity we state in the
case
$k=\mathbb{Q}$. We state the fullversion of this theorem in Section 5.
$T$heorem 1.2. We
fix
aprime$l$ satisfying$l\equiv 1(4)$. Forany quadraticfield
$F=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{m})$other than$\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{l})$,
we
put $F^{*}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{ml})$. For apositive number$X$, weput$A_{l}(X)=\{F|_{F\otimes \mathbb{Q}_{l}isthequadraticunramified}^{[F:\mathbb{Q}]=2,-X<D_{F}<0}$’
extension
of
$\mathbb{Q}_{l}$.$\}$.
Then we have
$\lim_{Xarrow\infty}\frac{\sum_{F\in A_{l}(X)}h_{F}h_{F}}{(\sum_{F\in A_{l}(X)}h_{F}^{2})^{1/2}(\sum_{F\in A_{l}(X)}h_{F^{*)^{1/2}}}^{2}}.=\prod_{(\mathrm{f})=-1}(1-\frac{2p^{-2}}{1+p^{-1}+p^{-2}-2p^{-3}+p^{-5}})$
where $( \frac{\mathrm{p}}{l})$ is the Legendre symbol and$p$ runs through all theprimes satisfying $(_{l}^{\mathrm{g}})=-1$
.
From this theorem, for example, we can observe that if
we
choose $l$so
that $(_{l}^{\mathrm{g}})=1$for all smallprimes$p$ then $h_{F}$ and $h_{F}$
.
have strong relation, and ifwe choose $l$ so that$( \frac{p}{\iota})=-1$ for all small primes$p$then the relations between $h_{F}$ and $h_{F^{*}}$ become weak.
2. TAUBERIAN THEOREM
Our approach to prove the theorems above are the
use
of global zeta functions ofprehomogeneous vector spaces. Beforegiving a sketch oftheproof, we brieflyrecall the
Tauberian theorem to clarify the relation between Dirichlet series
we
consider and the asymptotic formulae in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. Let $\{a_{n}\}_{n\geq 1}$ be a sequence of positivenumbers. We put
$a(s)= \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{a_{n}}{n^{s}}$
$(s\in \mathbb{C})$,
$A(X)= \sum_{n\leq X}a_{n}$ $(X>0)$.
Then, roughlyspeaking,theTauberiantheoremsays thatwecanfind
some
informationsofasymptotic behavior of $A(X)$ as $Xarrow\infty$ from the analytic properties of $a(s)$. The
following is a basic type ofthe Tauberian theorem.
Theorem 2.1. Assume $a(s)$ is holomorphic
for
$\Re(s)>a$ exceptfor
apole at $s=a$of
order$b$. Let$\mathrm{c}/(s-a)^{b}$ be the leading
coefficient of
the Laurent $e\varphi ansion$ at $s=a$. Then$\lim_{Xarrow\infty}\frac{A(X)}{X^{a}(\log X)^{b}}=\frac{\mathrm{c}}{ab!}$.
Hence to prove Theorem 1.1 it is enough to investigate the function
$h_{F}^{2}R_{F}^{2}$
$F: \mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\epsilon \mathrm{p}11\mathrm{t}\cdot \mathrm{t}v_{1},\ldots,v_{n}\sum_{F\in 0(L_{\infty}\rangle}\overline{|\Delta_{F/k}|^{s}}$ .
On the other side this function is more or less the global zeta function of
one
specificprehomogeneousvector space, andwe canstudy analytic propertiesofthe zetafunctions
3. PREHOMOGENEOUS VECTOR SPACES AND GLOBAL ZETA FUNCTIONS Webrieflyrecallthe definition of prehomogeneous vectorspacesandtheirapplications to numbertheory. For details,
see
[SS] or [Yl, Introduction]. For simplicitywe here give adefinition ofa
certain restricted class instead of the general. Let $k$ bea
field.Definition 3.1. An irreducible representationofaconnected reductive algebraic group
$(G, V)$
over
$k$ is calleda
prehomogeneous vector space if(1) there exists
a
Zariski open$G$-orbit in $V$ and(2) there exists a non-constant polynomial $P\in k[V]$ and a rational character $\chi$ of $G$
such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$ for all$g\in G$ and $x\in V$.
The space of quadratic forms ($\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(n)$
,
Sym2
$k^{n}$) is a classical example. Irreducibleprehomogeneous vector spaces over an arbitrary characteristic $0$ algebraically closed
field
were
classified by Sato and Kimura in [SK]. Sato and Shintani [SS] defined global zetafunctions forprehomogeneous vectorspacesif$(G, V)$ isdefinedover
anumber field.Letus recallthedefinition. Let $k$be
a
number field and A thering of adeles. We denoteby $|\cdot|_{\mathrm{A}}$ the idele
norm.
Let $(G, V)$ bea
prehomogeneous vector space defined over $k$.Let $P\in k[V]$ be of minimum degree satisfying (2) in Definition 3.1 (whichis uniqueup
to constant), and$\chi$ be the corresponding character. We put
$T:=\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(Garrow \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(V))$, $\tilde{G}:=G/T$, $V^{\mathrm{S}8}:=\{x\in V|P(x)\neq 0\}$.
Let$\ovalbox{\tt\small REJECT}(V(\mathrm{A}))$ be thespace ofSchwartz-Bruhatfunctionson$V(\mathrm{A})$. We fixaHaar
measure
$dg$on
$\tilde{G}(\mathrm{A})$.Definition 3.2. For $\Phi\in\ovalbox{\tt\small REJECT}(V(\mathrm{A}))$ and $s\in \mathbb{C}$ wedefine
$Z( \Phi, s):=\int_{\overline{G}(\mathrm{A})/\tilde{G}(k)}|\chi(g)|_{\mathrm{A}}\sum_{x\in V(k)}..\Phi(gx)dg$
and call it the globalzeta
function.
Remark 3.3. For$x\in V^{86}(k)$ let$G_{x}=\{g\in\tilde{G}|gx=x\}$and$\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}$its identity component.
We denoteby $\tau(\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}})$ the unnormalized Tamagawa number of$\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}$. Roughly speaking the
global zeta function is a counting function of rational orbits $\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{\epsilon\epsilon}(k)$
with weight $\tau(\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}})$
.
We do not give the details here, but mention that bya
standardmodification we have
$Z( \Phi, s)=\sum_{x\in\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{\epsilon\epsilon}(k)}\frac{\tau(\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}})}{[\tilde{G}_{x}(k):\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}(k)]}\int_{\overline{G}(\mathrm{A})/\overline{G}_{[mathring]_{x}}(\mathrm{A}\rangle}|\chi(g_{x})|_{\mathrm{A}}^{s}\Phi(g_{x}x)dg_{x}$ ,
where$dg_{x}$ be
an
appropriate left $\tilde{G}(\mathrm{A})$-invariantmeasure.
The interpretation of $\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{88}(k)$ and $\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}$ in terms of field extensions for
preho-mogeneous
vector spaces is first established systematically in the celebrated work of Wright-Yukie [WY].The remarkabove implies thatifweknow theinformation ofpolestructuresof$Z(\Phi, s)$,
one
can obtain the density theorems of $\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k)$ with weight $\tau(\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}})$. On the otherside it is in general a very difficult problem to describe the principal parts of $Z(\Phi, s)$
explicitly and is
one
of the central problem in the theory of prehomogeneous vector4. THE SPACE OF PAIRS OF 2 $\cross 2$ MATRICES AND ITS INNER FORMS
Let $\mathfrak{B}$ be aquaternion algebra
over
$k$. We denote by$\mathfrak{B}^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}}$ the opposite algebra of B.
Let us consider the representation $(G, V)=(G, \rho, V)$ where
(4.1) $G=\mathfrak{B}^{\cross}\mathrm{x}(\mathfrak{B}^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}})^{\mathrm{x}}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)$, $V=\mathfrak{B}\otimes k^{2}=\mathfrak{B}\oplus \mathfrak{B}$,
and
$\rho(g)(a\otimes v)=(g_{1}ag_{2})\otimes(g_{3}v)$ for $g=(g_{1},g_{2},g_{3})\in G,a\in \mathfrak{B},$ $v\in k^{2}$
.
We regard this representation as arepresentation of the algebraic group $G$
over
$k$.
If $\mathfrak{B}=\mathrm{M}(2,2)$ then $V$ is the space ofpairs of $2\cross 2$ matrices, and in general $(G, V)$ is aninner form of this split form. This is
an
example ofprehomogeneous vector space, andthere is
an
interesting interpretationof $\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k)$ and $\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}$.
Proposition 4.2. (1) There $e$tists
a non-zero
polynomial $P$of
$V$ and a rationalchar-acter$\chi$
on
$G$ such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$.
(2) There exists the canonical bijection between$\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V\mathrm{a}\mathrm{e}(k)$ and the set
of
isomorphismclasses
of
separable quadratic algebrasof
$k$ those are embeddable into $\prime \mathfrak{B}$.
For$x\in$
$V^{8\mathrm{S}}(k)$, we denote by $k(x)$ the corresponding algebra.
(3) For$x\in V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k),\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}\cong(k(x)^{\mathrm{x}}/k^{\mathrm{x}})^{2}$ as an algebraic group
over
$k$.with
On the principal parts formula, weproved thefollowing in [T1].
$T$heorem 4.3. Let$\mathfrak{B}$ be a non-split quaternion algebra. Then
$Z(\Phi, s)=Z_{+}(\Phi, s)+Z_{+}(\hat{\Phi}, 2-s)$
$+ \tau(G/T)(\frac{\hat{\Phi}(0)}{s-2}-\frac{\Phi(0)}{s})+\frac{Z_{\mathfrak{B}}(R\hat{\Phi},1/2)}{s-3/2}-\frac{Z_{\mathfrak{B}}(R\Phi,1/2)}{s-1/2}$
.
Here $Z_{+}(\Phi, s)$ is an integral entire as a jfunction
of
$s,$ $\tau(G/T)$ is the Tamagawa numberof
$G/T,$ $R\Phi$ the suitable restrictionof
$\Phi$ to 3(A), $\hat{\Phi}$a
suitable $Fou$rier transform, and
$Z_{\mathrm{B}}$
.
the zetafunction
of
simple algebra associated to$\prime \mathfrak{B}$.
Thisis provedby usingthe Fourieranalysis. The globaltheoryincludes rather
case
bycaseexplicit computation. The$k$-rankofthegroup $\tilde{G}$
affectsseriously onthecomplexity
of this computation and if $\mathfrak{B}$ is non-split then the computation becomes quite mild.
This is thereasonwhy weconsidernon-splitforms. For details
on
thistopicsee
Yukie’s treatise [Y1]. We mention that H. Saito’s method [Sa2] isan
alternative strong tool to establish the global theory in somecases.
5. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS Since the split form of(4.1)
(5.1) $G=\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)$, $V=k^{2}\otimes k^{2}\otimes k^{2}$
has a high symmetry, there
are
many $k$-forms of this representation. One interesting $k$-forms is studied by Kable-Yukie in a series ofwork [KY1, Y2, $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Y}2,$ $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Y}3,$$\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Y}4$]. Wefixaseparable quadratic algebra $\tilde{k}$
. Wedenote by$H_{2}(\tilde{k})$ betheset ofbinary Hermitian
forms over $\tilde{k}$
.
$H_{2}(\tilde{k})=\{x\in \mathrm{M}(2,2;\tilde{k})|^{t}x^{\sigma}=x\}$. Thegroup $\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2_{7}\tilde{k})$ acts naturally
on
thisspace by $(g,x)\mapsto gx^{t}g^{\sigma}$. Now$G=\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2,\tilde{k})\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2, k)$, $V=H_{2}(\tilde{k})\otimes k^{2}$
is an outer form of (5.1). For this
case
the following proposition is proved in [KY1]. Proposition 5.2. (1) There exists a non-zero polynomial $P$of
$V$ and a rationalchar-acter$\chi$ on $G$ such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$.
(2) There exists the canonical bijection between $\tilde{G}(k)\backslash V^{\epsilon \mathrm{s}}(k)$ and separable quadratic
algebras
of
$k$.
For$x\in V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k)$ we denote by$k(x)$ the coresponding algebra.(3) For$x\in V\mathrm{a}\mathrm{e}(k),\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}\cong(\tilde{k}\otimes k(x))^{\mathrm{x}}/\tilde{k}^{\mathrm{x}}$ as an algebraic group
over
$k$.
Let $\tilde{k}$
and $k(x)$ be different quadratic extensions of $k$. Then the biquadratic field
$\tilde{k}\otimes k(x)$ contains anotherquadratic extensionof$k$
.
We denotethis fieldby$k(x)^{*}$.
Thenby (3) the Tamagawanumber of$\tilde{G}_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}$is
more or
less the product $h_{k(x)}R_{k(x)}\cross h_{k(x)}\cdot R_{k(x)^{\mathrm{s}}}$.
We will state the full version of [T2, Section 11]. Let $S$denote a finiteset of places of $k$ containing $\mathfrak{M}_{\infty}$ and $L_{S}=(L_{v})_{v\in S}$
an
$S$-tuple of separable quadratic algebra $L_{v}$ of$k_{v}$.Let $F$ be a quadratic extension of $k$. We write $F\approx L_{S}$ to
mean
that $F\otimes k_{v}\cong L_{v}$ forall $v\in S$. Let $X$ be a positivenumber. For convenience, we introduce the abbreviation
$\mathfrak{Q}(L_{S,}.X)=\{F|[F : k]=2, F\approx L_{S},N(\Delta_{F/k})\leq X\}$
.
Here,$N(\Delta_{F/k})$ is the ideal norm ofthe relative discriminant $\Delta_{F/k}$ of$F/k$
.
Definition 5.3. We define
$\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}(L_{S})=\lim_{Xarrow\infty}\frac{\sum_{F\in \mathrm{O}(L_{\mathit{3}},X)}h_{F}R_{F}h_{F}*R_{F}}{(\sum_{F\in \mathfrak{Q}(L_{S},X)}h_{F}^{2}R_{F}^{2})^{1/2}(\sum_{F\in \mathrm{O}(L_{S},X)}h_{F^{*}}^{2}R_{F^{*)^{1/2}}}^{2}}$
.
ifthe limit of the right hand side exists and call it the comlation
coefficient.
The asymptotic behavior of the numerator in the right hand side as $Xarrow\infty$
was
investigated in [KY2, $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Y}3,$ $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{Y}4$], while the denominator is considered in [T2]. Hence
wecould find the correlation coefficients for certain types$\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}k\sim$
and$L_{S}$
.
Let$\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}},$ $\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{n}}$ and $\mathfrak{M}_{8}\mathrm{p}$ be the sets of finite places of $k$ whichare
respectively ramified, inert and spliton
extensionto$\overline{k}$
.
For $v\in \mathfrak{M}$andaseparable quadratic algebra$L_{v}$, we definethe separable
quadratic algebra$L_{v}^{*}$ as follows. Let$\sim\sim k_{v}=k\otimes k_{v}$.
$\mathrm{I}\mathrm{f}k_{v}\underline{\simeq}k_{v}\sim\cross k_{v}$thenwe define
$L_{v}^{*}=L_{v}$
for any $L_{v}$. In the
case
$\sim k_{v}$ isa field, if$L_{v}=k_{v}\cross k_{v}$ thenwe
let $L_{v}^{*}\cong k_{v}\sim$, and if $L_{v}\cong k_{v}\sim$then we let $L_{v}^{*}=k_{v}\cross k_{v}$
.
Finally in thecase
$\sim k_{v}$ and $L_{v}$are
distinct fields, we define$L_{v}^{*}$ the
same
way as
we defined
$F^{*}$ for number fields. Let $\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}}=\{v\in \mathfrak{M}_{i}|v|2\}$. Weproved the following in [T2, Section 11].
Theorem 5.4. Assume$\mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}}\cap \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}}=\emptyset$ and$S\supset \mathfrak{M}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{m}}$. Let$L_{S}=(L_{v})_{v\in S}$ is an S-tuple
of
separable quadratic algebras such that thereare
at leasttwoplaces$v$ with$L_{v}$ arefields.
$R47ther$
assume
that there are at least twoplaces $v$ with $L_{v}^{*}$ arefields.
Then we have6. FURTHER PROBLEMS
Inthe invaluable work [WY], Wright and Yukie found good interpretations of rational orbits for 8
cases
including ourcase
(5.1), and discussed the expected density theoremsfor those cases. On the other hand, in the process [T1] and [T2] to proveTheorem 1.1,
the technicalheartisto considertheinnerformtohandlethe global theory. The k-forms
ofirreducible reduced regular prehomogeneous vector spacesover local and global fields
are classified byH. Saito [Sal], and we could
see
thatsome
othercases
treated in [WY] have inner forms. In this section, we will discuss the rational orbit decomposition forsome
innerform representations. The proofmaybe appear in aforthcomingpaper. Let$k$be
an
arbitraryfield. Let $8_{i}$ be theset of isomorphism classes of separable algebras of$k$ of degree $i$
.
(I) The
case
$(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(3)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(3)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2), k^{3}\otimes k^{3}\otimes k^{2})$.Let $\mathcal{D}$ be asimple algebra ofdegree 3 over $k$
.
Then$G=\mathcal{D}^{\mathrm{x}}\mathrm{x}(\mathcal{D}^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}})^{\mathrm{x}}\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)$, $V=\mathcal{D}\otimes k^{2}$
isaninner form. Let
83
$(\mathcal{D})$ be theset ofisomorphism classes of separable cubicalgebrasof$k$ those
are
embeddable into D. Then the following propositionholds.Proposition 6.1. (1) There exists a
non-zero
polynomial $P$of
$V$ and a rationalchar-acter$\chi$ on $G$ such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$.
(2) Let $V^{99}=\{x\in V|P(x)\neq 0\}$
.
Then there exists the canonical bijection between$G(k)\backslash V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k)$ and $\mathcal{E}_{3}(\mathcal{D})$. $Forx\in V^{\mathrm{S}8}(k)$ we denote by $k(x)\in \mathcal{E}_{3}(\mathcal{D})$ be the
co7Ye-sponding algebra.
(3) For$x\in V^{8S}(k),$ $G_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}\cong k(x)^{\mathrm{x}}\cross k^{\mathrm{x}}$
as
an algebraic group over $k$.
Romthis proposition, we mayobtain the densityof$h_{F}R_{F}$ ofcubicextensions $F$of$k$.
In the
case
$\mathcal{D}$ is not split, the principal parts of the global zeta functionwere
describedin [T1]. It has possible simple pole at $s=0,1/6,4/3,3/2$ and holomorphic elsewhere.
The local theory and the filtering process necessary to obtain the density theorem
are
in progress.(II) The
case
$(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(4)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2), \wedge^{2}k^{4}\otimes k^{2})$.
Let$\mathfrak{B}$beaquaternionalgebraof$k$. Wedenoteby$H_{2}(\mathfrak{B})$be the set of binary Hermitian
forms
over
B. Then$G=\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2, \mathfrak{B})\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2)$, $V=H_{2}(\mathfrak{B})\otimes k^{2}$
is an inner form. For this casethe following proposition holds.
Proposition 6.2. (1) There exists a
non-zero
polynomial $P$of
$V$ and a rationalchar-acter$\chi$
on
$G$ such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$.
(2) Let $V^{8\mathrm{S}}=\{x\in V|P(x)\neq 0\}$. Then there exists the canonical bijection between
$G(k)\backslash V^{\mathrm{s}\epsilon}(k)$ and $\epsilon_{2}$
.
For $x\in V^{\mathfrak{B}}(k)$ we denote by $k(x)\in\epsilon_{2}$ be the correspondingalgebra.
(3) For $x\in V^{8S}(k)_{f}G_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}\cong(\mathfrak{B}\otimes k(x))^{\mathrm{x}}$ as an algebraic group
over
$k$.(III) The
case
$(\mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(6)\cross \mathrm{G}\mathrm{L}(2), \wedge^{2}k^{6}\otimes k^{2})$.Let $H_{3}(\mathfrak{B})$ be the set of ternary Hermitian forms over B. Then just the same as the
above case,
is
an
inner form. For thiscase
$\mathrm{t}$he following proposition holds.Proposition 6.3. (1) There exists a
non-zero
polynomial $P$of
$V$ and a rationalchar-acter
$\chi$ on$G$ such that $P(gx)=\chi(g)P(x)$.
(2) Let $V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}}=\{x\in V|P(x)\neq 0\}$. Then there exists the canonical bijection between
$G(k)\backslash V^{8\mathrm{S}}(k)$ and $\epsilon_{3}$
.
For$x\in V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k)$ we denote by $k(x)\in\epsilon_{3}$ be the correspondingalgebra.
(3) For $x\in V^{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}(k),$ $G_{x}^{\mathrm{o}}\cong\{g\in(\mathfrak{B}\otimes k(x))^{\mathrm{x}}|\mathrm{N}(g)\in k^{\cross}\}$ as an algebraic group
over
$k$.
The principalparts ofthe global zeta function for (II) and (III)
are
not known. REFERENCES[D] B. Datskovsky. Ameanvalue theoremforclass numbers ofquadraticextensions. Contemporafy
Mathematics, 143:179-242,1993.
[DW] B. Datskovsky and D.J. Wright. Density of discriminantsof cubic extensions. J. ReineAngew. Math., 386:116-138, 1988.
[KY1] A.C. Kable and A.Yukie.Prehomogeneous vectorspacesandfield extensionsII. Invent. Math.,
130:315-344, 1997.
[KY2] A.C. Kableand A. Yukie. Themean value of theproductofclass numbers ofpairedquadratic
fields, I. Tohoku Math. J., 54:513-565, 2002.
[KY3] A.C. Kable and A.Yukie. The meanvalue of the productofclass numbers ofpairedquadratic
fields,II. J. Math. Soc. Japan, 55:739-764,2003.
[KY4] A.C. Kableand A. Yukie. Themean valueof the productof classnumbers ofpaired quadratic fields,III. J. Number Theory, 99:185-218,2003.
[Sal] H.Saito. Onaclassificationof prehomogeneousvector spacesoverlocal and global fields. Joumal ofAlgebra, 187:510-536, 1997.
[Sa2] H. Saito. Explicit form of the zeta functions of prehomogeneous vecotr spaces. Math. Ann., 315:587-615, 1999.
[SK] M. Satoand T. Kimura. A classification ofirreducibleprehomogeneousvectorspacesandtheir
relative invariants. Nagoya Math. J., 65:1-155, 1977.
[SS] M.Sato andT.Shintani. On zetafunctionsassociatedwith prehomogeneous vector spaces. Ann.
ofMath., 100:131-170, 1974.
[Sh] T. Shintani. On Dirichlet series whose coefficients are class-numbers of integral binary cubic forms. J. Math. Soc. Japan, 24:132-188, 1972.
[T1] T.Taniguchi.Onthe zeta functionsofprehomogeneousvectorspacesforpairof simple algebras.
Preprint 2004, math.$\mathrm{N}\mathrm{T}/0403253$.
[T2] T. Taniguchi.Ameanvalue theorem for thesquareofclassnumber timesregulatorofquadratic
extensions. Preprint2004.
$[\backslash \mathrm{V}\mathrm{Y}]$ D.j. Wright and A. Yukie. Prehomogeneous vector spaces and field extensions. Invent. Math.,
110:283-314,1992.
[Y1] A.Yukie. Shintani ZetaFunctions, volume183ofLondon Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series. Cam-bridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, 1993.
[Y2] A. Yukie. On the Shintanizeta function for the space of pairs of binary Hermitian forms. J. Number Theory, 92:205-256,2002.
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO, 3-8-1 KOMABA
MEGURO-KU, TOKYO 153-0041, JAPAN